I maybe be a fan of Nintendo and the Wii, but I am not loyal to a fault. I play any and everything. Lately, the PS3 and 360 fans have been flaming each other via "Halo 3's graphicS Suxx!!!" or better yet "GeArs of WaRs has SUXAFUDF graPhiCs OmG!!!" Well, I must prostest against such stupidity:
Gears of War has the best graphics of any game, pc or not, currently. It maybe short, but it still holds this title.It may not look, to some of you, "prettyfull," but that is because it is trying to convey the feeling of war, not of pretty flowers in the summer breeze.
Secondly, Halo 3. Tell me, how does a game's graphic's suck, IF IT IS NOT EVEN NEAR TO BEINGÂ RELEASED? Don't have such lofty expectations. With Zelda: Twilight Princess, everyone gotso worked up, thinking of things like an ending were Link dies, or evironments that would take up to 45 hrs to explore, etc. What did they get? One of the best games of 2006. Not their lofty goals:best game ever made. Even Halo 3 should not be hyped to this level. How will you ever have fun playing the game, if you are too concerned with the little graphical problems. I loved Zelda :TP (never played Oot) and managed to bring myself back to reality, not the hype. Can one do that with Halo 3? If you can, hype it all you want, just remember this is a formula being reused for a third time, and has a chance of floping. Don't overhype.
Log in to comment