I am dissapointed with Black Ops, Modern Warfare 2 was so much funner.

Black Ops is more balanced and everything, but the network problems that you get even on 3 or 4 bar is ridiculous, sometimes you get disconnected and other times the bullets don't register.

At least Modern Warfare 2 with all it's unbalanencedness and everything was playable, ( and very fun. )

Black Op's also dosen't really have that same charm that the infinity ward games have, the campaign was very lacking, and the only redeeming feature is the zombie mode, with JFK and Castro etc...

:( Son I am dissapoint.

I've heard the opposite from almost everyone that I know that has played it. As well as reviewers and other gaming media. To each their own though. I prefered CoD4 over all of them personally.

Black Op's also dosen't really have that same charm that the infinity ward games have, the campaign was very lacking, and the only redeeming feature is the zombie mode, with JFK and Castro etc...

Megaman5364

Can't even help contradicting your own blog?

Its the opposite for me personally. I hated MW2, but I love Black Ops

I agree.

Funner isn't a word :|

I haven't noticed anymore network issues in Black Ops than I did in MW2, and I also felt MW2 lacked the charm COD4 and everything previously had. The way the series handles it's matchmaking just..well..sucks.

Funner isn't a word :|

I haven't noticed anymore network issues in Black Ops than I did in MW2. The way the series handles it's matchmaking just..well..sucks.

Upparoom

You have the PS3 version...people who have that version complained about the connection.

While on PC, I don't have that problem.

I thought the campaign was well done too.

MW2 was balanced I could counter just about everythng in the game. MW2 had more options for gameplay. I ran around with just a riotshield and throwing knifefor 2 months.

Blops you have2 choices run with a assult riffle or a sub machinegun.

MW2 had FMJ which worked better thenblops. The maps inblops suck forusing bullet penitration.

MW2 RPGS were better so werenoobtoobs.

MW2 sniping was better.

MW2 had the rioshield class.

MW2 maps were better.

Blops is garbage. Next to socom confrontation it's the 2nd worst online game I've played.

MW2 was balanced

jdc6305

No.

[QUOTE="jdc6305"]

MW2 was balanced

Verge_6

No.

[QUOTE="Verge_6"]

[QUOTE="jdc6305"]

MW2 was balanced

jdc6305

No.

neither game is balanced, so let's leave it at that :P

I saw "funner" and laughed, so I decided to post about it. I thought Black Ops was better by the way, but neither game blew my socks off by any means.

MW2 was balanced I could counter just about everythng in the game. MW2 had more options for gameplay. I ran around with just a riotshield and throwing knifefor 2 months.

Blops you have2 choices run with a assult riffle or a sub machinegun.

MW2 had FMJ which worked better thenblops. The maps inblops suck forusing bullet penitration.

MW2 RPGS were better so werenoobtoobs.

MW2 sniping was better.

MW2 had the rioshield class.

MW2 maps were better.

Blops is garbage. Next to socom confrontation it's the 2nd worst online game I've played.

jdc6305

Bullet penetration is a joke and only exists in games. Yes you can shopot someone through a wall in real life but the chances of hitting them are slim to none. Being able to shoot through a 5 and a half inch black on concrete is complete BS.

[QUOTE="Verge_6"]

[QUOTE="jdc6305"]

MW2 was balanced

jdc6305

No.

[QUOTE="jdc6305"]

MW2 was balanced I could counter just about everythng in the game. MW2 had more options for gameplay. I ran around with just a riotshield and throwing knifefor 2 months.

Blops you have2 choices run with a assult riffle or a sub machinegun.

MW2 had FMJ which worked better thenblops. The maps inblops suck forusing bullet penitration.

MW2 RPGS were better so werenoobtoobs.

MW2 sniping was better.

MW2 had the rioshield class.

MW2 maps were better.

Blops is garbage. Next to socom confrontation it's the 2nd worst online game I've played.

Nick3306

[QUOTE="Nick3306"][QUOTE="jdc6305"]

MW2 was balanced I could counter just about everythng in the game. MW2 had more options for gameplay. I ran around with just a riotshield and throwing knifefor 2 months.

Blops you have2 choices run with a assult riffle or a sub machinegun.

MW2 had FMJ which worked better thenblops. The maps inblops suck forusing bullet penitration.

MW2 RPGS were better so werenoobtoobs.

MW2 sniping was better.

MW2 had the rioshield class.

MW2 maps were better.

Blops is garbage. Next to socom confrontation it's the 2nd worst online game I've played.

jdc6305

[QUOTE="jdc6305"]

[QUOTE="Verge_6"]

No.

Mordred19

neither game is balanced, so let's leave it at that :P

Agreed, the only thing that's particularly balanced well in Black Ops is the guns, otherwise the awful spawns ruin every game mode that isn't TDM or S&D. Also, the main problem with killstreaks still persists and probably will never go away thanks to MW2 decision to "upgrade" killstreaks: they circumvent the point of teamwork.

[QUOTE="Mordred19"]

[QUOTE="jdc6305"]Care to elaborate?

Upparoom

neither game is balanced, so let's leave it at that :P

Agreed, the only thing that's particularly balanced well in Black Ops is the guns, otherwise the awful spawns ruin every game mode that isn't TDM or S&D. Also, the main problem with killstreaks still persists and probably will never go away thanks to MW2 decision to "upgrade" killstreaks: they circumvent the point of teamwork

there was too much BS in MW2.... the game is all about who can get the most ***** up kills. And the game is not balanced at all, and it encourages you to camp. The game is just a big fail in my opinion. Both COD4 and Blackops are way better games.

[QUOTE="jdc6305"]

[QUOTE="Verge_6"]

No.

Verge_6

[QUOTE="Verge_6"]

[QUOTE="jdc6305"]Care to elaborate instead of taking what I said out of context?

jdc6305

[QUOTE="Verge_6"]

[QUOTE="jdc6305"]Care to elaborate instead of taking what I said out of context?

jdc6305

I had fun with MW2, but balanced it was not. In Black Ops, I can actually step outside without getting instakilled by a Harrier, chopper, or Pave-low. Imagine that!

You mean it's not unbalanced enough like MW2.SaltyMeatballs

Your sig is perfect, and true. :D

[QUOTE="jdc6305"]

[QUOTE="Verge_6"] What context? What difference does it make whether that statement was with the rest of your statement or not? It's blatantly standalone. As for elaboration, I can't believe I have to even bring this up;

Verge_6

The shot gun attachment for the FAL has twice the range the moddels do.

I have every title except 8 not including the gun tittles. I've played every COD since the first. I have over 120 days played in all the COD's.

It's Call of Duty. They aren't exactly all that different :]jg4xchamp

MW2's multiplayer is very unbalanced. If you're just starting out and you're a level one you don't get all the equipment and weapons the other people you get matched up will have. And any game that pairs up level 40's with single digits is not balanced. Not to mention the extra help you get if you get a killing streak. How is that balanced?

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"]It's Call of Duty. They aren't exactly all that different :]psn8214

MW2's multiplayer is very unbalanced. If you're just starting out and you're a level one you don't get all the equipment and weapons the other people you get matched up will have. And any game that pairs up level 40's with single digits is not balanced. Not to mention the extra help you get if you get a killing streak. How is that balanced?

randomguy15

i agree with you TC.. i found black ops to be quite bland. i have hardly touched the online multiplayer, yet i enjoyed mw2. the single player was also very dissapointing which i felt let the game down a lot more than whether the online multiplayer was a more balanced experience.

Based on what? multiplayer didn't exactly become balanced. It just has less of the game breakers(ala commando), and the campaign itself is still typical Call of Duty. Go forward, bunch of dudes(dumb AI to boot), unsatisfying gunplay=rinse and repeat. I'm sure plenty of people are finding it to be more fun, but reality is either way you spin it Black Ops is once again Call of Duty. No different from what we've been getting the past few years from the series. Just maybe a bit of a paint job. jg4xchamp

I play a lot of CoD: Black Ops is more balanced. Guns sound a bit better. Recoil in general has returned. PC version is much much better. Graphically, on PC its stunning at times. It's mostly things a fan of the series would notice. If you don't like the core game, then ... you don't like the core game. Similar to how Reach probably won't convert someone who didn't like Halo 3.

[QUOTE="randomguy15"]

MW2's multiplayer is very unbalanced. If you're just starting out and you're a level one you don't get all the equipment and weapons the other people you get matched up will have. And any game that pairs up level 40's with single digits is not balanced. Not to mention the extra help you get if you get a killing streak. How is that balanced?

jdc6305

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"]Based on what? multiplayer didn't exactly become balanced. It just has less of the game breakers(ala commando), and the campaign itself is still typical Call of Duty. Go forward, bunch of dudes(dumb AI to boot), unsatisfying gunplay=rinse and repeat. I'm sure plenty of people are finding it to be more fun, but reality is either way you spin it Black Ops is once again Call of Duty. No different from what we've been getting the past few years from the series. Just maybe a bit of a paint job. psn8214

I play a lot of CoD: Black Ops is more balanced. Guns sound a bit better. Recoil in general has returned. PC version is much much better. Graphically, on PC its stunning at times. It's mostly things a fan of the series would notice. If you don't like the core game, then ... you don't like the core game. Similar to how Reach probably won't convert someone who didn't like Halo 3.

Captain obvious much? :P

jg4xchamp

Well, you don't like the core game then. :P I find it fun, but meh, I see why people wouldn't like it.

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"]You mean it's not unbalanced enough like MW2.psn8214

Your sig is perfect, and true. :D

As for the topic on hand, I find it hard to believe Black Ops could be any worse than Modern Warfare 2, the latter being a horrible, unbalanced mess.

You have the PS3 version...people who have that version complained about the connection.

While on PC, I don't have that problem.

I thought the campaign was well done too.

mitu123

[QUOTE="jdc6305"]

[QUOTE="randomguy15"]

MW2's multiplayer is very unbalanced. If you're just starting out and you're a level one you don't get all the equipment and weapons the other people you get matched up will have. And any game that pairs up level 40's with single digits is not balanced. Not to mention the extra help you get if you get a killing streak. How is that balanced?

randomguy15

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

You have the PS3 version...people who have that version complained about the connection.

While on PC, I don't have that problem.

I thought the campaign was well done too.

Dogswithguns

I agree. The multiplayer of Black Ops felt so bland and boring to me, and it feels as though Treyarch didn't really think about how their maps could be tailored towards different play styles, because the Black Ops maps are awful imo. I preferred the campaign over Modern Warfare 2's though.

I agree with the majority that Blops >>>MW2.

I'm not in the OMA abuser now crying minority.

I felt MW2 was more unbalanced and that BO is the better game. Especially that awful commando perk in mw2where you could fly across the screen to stab someone. I even enjoy MOH more then MW2.

I am dissapointed with mw2. WAW was so much funner.

It's a shame they can't make it as good as Cod4....