I am starting to agree with my friends

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for quickposter
quickposter

1735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 quickposter
Member since 2010 • 1735 Posts

First off, I apologise for the huge rant I am about to enter. It just I need to vent my frustration towards Microsoft and the big mistake they are making with kinect.

I originally bought a 360 for Rare's games. I loved Kameo and Perfect Dark Zero despite what haters thought of them. But I am becoming increasingly worried about Rare and how MS are managing them. MS, please tell me you were joking? That you didn't cancel Kameo 2, Perfect Dark Core, Banjo Karts and Conkers other bad fur day in favour of Kinect shovelware. Tell me its all untrue.

I do not play my PS3 much because most of the games I want are also on 360 but there is no denying it. I might not like many of Sony's games but it has a lot more on offer than the 360 currently does. I do not want to constantly play Halo and Gears after Halo and gears with a side of Fable and Forza. I am not trying to come off as offensive here or start and argument. I just need to get this off my chest.

After an extremely disappointing E3 last year I now have an ultimatum for you MS. Show me one of Rare's real games or this time next year my 360 will be gone and Nintendo's next console will be sitting in it's place.

Thanks for listening guys. I feel a lot better now.

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
Hate to break it to you but Rare was never a very good developer. They were like the one hit wonder bands in the 80s.
Avatar image for quickposter
quickposter

1735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 quickposter
Member since 2010 • 1735 Posts

Hate to break it to you but Rare was never a very good developer. They were like the one hit wonder bands in the 80s. KC_Hokie

They created some of the best games on N64. And while it is true their quality plummeted after MS bought them I still think they made good games. But you are entitled to your opinion.

Avatar image for sethman410
sethman410

2967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 sethman410
Member since 2008 • 2967 Posts
Unfortanetly it's true that they cancelled those games. Kinect is a joke, you should start playing your ps3 more often. You're missing out the exclusives. Do you play high quality exclusives for ps3?
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Hate to break it to you but Rare was never a very good developer. They were like the one hit wonder bands in the 80s. quickposter

They created some of the best games on N64. And while it is true their quality plummeted after MS bought them I still think they made good games. But you are entitled to your opinion.

Let's just say for sake of argument I agree with you that they were a good developer. Since when is it a good idea to buy a console because a single developer? That's never been a good strategy for buying a console.
Avatar image for quickposter
quickposter

1735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 quickposter
Member since 2010 • 1735 Posts

Unfortanetly it's true that they cancelled those games. Kinect is a joke, you should start playing your ps3 more often. You're missing out the exclusives. Do you play high quality exclusives for ps3?sethman410

I like the LBP and Uncharted series. I also like God of War 3 and Killzone 3 met the expectations I had for KZ2. I think its much smoother now.

KC_Hokie I also bought a 360 for Team Ninja's games. But they are multiplatform now. I love DOA and NG. Can't say the same for DOAX. But Itagaki was a big supporter of Xbox and having his own studio for MS with other veterans of TN would have been a huge coup. But Devils Third is also multiplatform.

Avatar image for MattDistillery
MattDistillery

969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 MattDistillery
Member since 2010 • 969 Posts

Hate to break it to you but Rare was never a very good developer. They were like the one hit wonder bands in the 80s. KC_Hokie

They carried the N64 and made it my favourite ever console.

Avatar image for Vesica_Prime
Vesica_Prime

7062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 Vesica_Prime
Member since 2009 • 7062 Posts

[QUOTE="quickposter"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Hate to break it to you but Rare was never a very good developer. They were like the one hit wonder bands in the 80s. KC_Hokie

They created some of the best games on N64. And while it is true their quality plummeted after MS bought them I still think they made good games. But you are entitled to your opinion.

Let's just say for sake of argument I agree with you that they were a good developer. Since when is it a good idea to buy a console because a single developer? That's never been a good strategy for buying a console.

Really? People bought the Xbox Original just for Halo.

Avatar image for sethman410
sethman410

2967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 sethman410
Member since 2008 • 2967 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="quickposter"]

They created some of the best games on N64. And while it is true their quality plummeted after MS bought them I still think they made good games. But you are entitled to your opinion.

Vesica_Prime

Let's just say for sake of argument I agree with you that they were a good developer. Since when is it a good idea to buy a console because a single developer? That's never been a good strategy for buying a console.

Really? People bought the Xbox Original just for Halo.

And people bought ps3 just for MGS4. It boosted the ps3 sales when it came out by a large margin.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="quickposter"]

They created some of the best games on N64. And while it is true their quality plummeted after MS bought them I still think they made good games. But you are entitled to your opinion.

Vesica_Prime

Let's just say for sake of argument I agree with you that they were a good developer. Since when is it a good idea to buy a console because a single developer? That's never been a good strategy for buying a console.

Really? People bought the Xbox just for Halo.

Halo plus many other games. I doubt many people bought an Xbox simply because Bungie made games just for the Xbox.
Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#11 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

Halo plus many other games. I doubt many people bought an Xbox simply because Bungie made games just for the Xbox.KC_Hokie

Many people bought 360s for halo 3..

Avatar image for hypoty
hypoty

2825

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 hypoty
Member since 2009 • 2825 Posts

Even Rare's most dedicated and oldest fansites have abandoned them, if that doesn't start the alarm bells then nothing will. I'd say Rare is closer to being shut down than creating a new game game worthy of their legacy.

Avatar image for quickposter
quickposter

1735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 quickposter
Member since 2010 • 1735 Posts

There were a lot of reasons to own an original Xbox. I knew Kinect wasn't going to be for me. But I also thought MS had more sense then such a lack of core games. If they think making an FPS on Kinect is going to make me buy it they are sadly mistaken. I will take the controller any day and thats all I want to play with.

I much prefer Nintendo's games anyway so if MS do blow it its no contest. But I also preferred MS games to Sony so this is a very sad thing to see. Nintendo and Sony definitely have a lot more on offer for their core audiences atm. MS aint fooling me. I'm not buying kinect and if they are going this way then I'm out. I'm no lemming.

Avatar image for trugs26
trugs26

7541

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 trugs26
Member since 2004 • 7541 Posts

Hate to break it to you but Rare was never a very good developer. They were like the one hit wonder bands in the 80s. KC_Hokie

You Can't seriously say tHat Considering Rare's games on tHe N64. (Sorry for some reason lower Case C and H are not working rigHt now :? )

Avatar image for MattDistillery
MattDistillery

969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 MattDistillery
Member since 2010 • 969 Posts

Even Rare's most dedicated and oldest fansites have abandoned them, if that doesn't start the alarm bells then nothing will. I'd say Rare is closer to being shut down than creating a new game game worthy of their legacy.

hypoty

Surely someone would buy them out before that happened..... the name alone has so much potential to bring in good coders of brand name. I would love Nintendo to get a hold on them again and turn them round.

Avatar image for IndianaPwns39
IndianaPwns39

5037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 0

#16 IndianaPwns39
Member since 2008 • 5037 Posts

[QUOTE="Vesica_Prime"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Let's just say for sake of argument I agree with you that they were a good developer. Since when is it a good idea to buy a console because a single developer? That's never been a good strategy for buying a console.KC_Hokie

Really? People bought the Xbox just for Halo.

Halo plus many other games. I doubt many people bought an Xbox simply because Bungie made games just for the Xbox.

Not for Bungie, but certainly Halo. It's often speculated that if it wasn't for Halo's success the original Xbox would have crashed and burned.

Avatar image for tomarlyn
tomarlyn

20148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#17 tomarlyn
Member since 2005 • 20148 Posts
[QUOTE="Vesica_Prime"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Let's just say for sake of argument I agree with you that they were a good developer. Since when is it a good idea to buy a console because a single developer? That's never been a good strategy for buying a console.KC_Hokie

Really? People bought the Xbox just for Halo.

Halo plus many other games. I doubt many people bought an Xbox simply because Bungie made games just for the Xbox.

I think you would be surprised.
Avatar image for hypoty
hypoty

2825

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 hypoty
Member since 2009 • 2825 Posts

[QUOTE="hypoty"]

Even Rare's most dedicated and oldest fansites have abandoned them, if that doesn't start the alarm bells then nothing will. I'd say Rare is closer to being shut down than creating a new game game worthy of their legacy.

MattDistillery

Surely someone would buy them out before that happened..... the name alone has so much potential to bring in good coders of brand name. I would love Nintendo to get a hold on them again and turn them round.

Possibly, but then again Ensemble was an extremely popular and best selling developer and no-one came to their rescue before they got disbanded by Microsoft. I just don't see how anybody would think buying Rare would be a wise investment, especially considering much of the talent has left the studio and how their sales haven't exactly been significantly high. I'm willing to bet that if Kinect Sports 2 is a commercial failure Rare will be history.

Avatar image for quickposter
quickposter

1735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 quickposter
Member since 2010 • 1735 Posts

Possibly, but then again Ensemble was an extremely popular and best selling developer and no-one came to their rescue before they got disbanded by Microsoft. I just don't see how anybody would think buying Rare would be a wise investment, especially considering much of the talent has left the studio and how their sales haven't exactly been significantly high. I'm willing to bet that if Kinect Sports 2 is a commercial failure Rare will be history.hypoty

I think you are right tbh. MS talked about shutting them down before but backpedalled because of how much money they spent. They clearly blew their cash hoping they would achieve the success they had with Nintendo but its partly because of Nintendo their games were so great back then.

They clearly don't know what to do with Rare. They have restructured them a few times and keep switching around what they want them to do. MS need to realise just because the games don't sell as well as they did on N64 doesn't mean they are failures.

Avatar image for WithoutGraceXII
WithoutGraceXII

1797

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 WithoutGraceXII
Member since 2007 • 1797 Posts

Now that I think about it, you're right. It's insane we haven't seen another Perfect Dark game from Rare. I wasn't a huge fan of PDZ but it was definitely worth playing. In terms of quality I don't think Rare has dropped all that much, I just think they're focused on weird stuff. It would be nice to see them do a shooter again. Rare developed Halo anyone? :P

Avatar image for campzor
campzor

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 campzor
Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts
Hate to break it to you but Rare was never a very good developer. They were like the one hit wonder bands in the 80s. KC_Hokie
yep, 1 hit wonders... 10 years in a row.
Avatar image for xXDrPainXx
xXDrPainXx

4001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 xXDrPainXx
Member since 2008 • 4001 Posts
[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Hate to break it to you but Rare was never a very good developer. They were like the one hit wonder bands in the 80s. campzor
yep, 1 hit wonders... 10 years in a row.

They had the 3 Donkey Kongs on the SNES, Goldeneye, Perfect Dark, The 2 Banjo's and Conkers? That doesn't seem to be 10 years in a row to me. I don't think they are that awesome like everyone makes them out to be. I did enjoy playing the 4 way Goldeneye matches though and that game was great.
Avatar image for campzor
campzor

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 campzor
Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts
[QUOTE="campzor"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Hate to break it to you but Rare was never a very good developer. They were like the one hit wonder bands in the 80s. xXDrPainXx
yep, 1 hit wonders... 10 years in a row.

They had the 3 Donkey Kongs on the SNES, Goldeneye, Perfect Dark, The 2 Banjo's and Conkers? That doesn't seem to be 10 years in a row to me. I don't think they are that awesome like everyone makes them out to be. I did enjoy playing the 4 way Goldeneye matches though and that game was great.

it was just an exaggeration. But they were gods in the 90s upto 2001. No1 can deny that. Donkey kong country 1 - 3 Killer Instinct Goldeneye Perfect Dark Diddy Kong Racing Banjo 1 - 2 Conkers Bad Fur day and they hold the crown for hardest game(battletoads) Very good portfolio
Avatar image for PurpleMan5000
PurpleMan5000

10531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 PurpleMan5000
Member since 2011 • 10531 Posts
[QUOTE="campzor"][QUOTE="xXDrPainXx"][QUOTE="campzor"] yep, 1 hit wonders... 10 years in a row.

They had the 3 Donkey Kongs on the SNES, Goldeneye, Perfect Dark, The 2 Banjo's and Conkers? That doesn't seem to be 10 years in a row to me. I don't think they are that awesome like everyone makes them out to be. I did enjoy playing the 4 way Goldeneye matches though and that game was great.

it was just an exaggeration. But they were gods in the 90s upto 2001. No1 can deny that. Donkey kong country 1 - 3 Killer Instinct Goldeneye Perfect Dark Diddy Kong Racing Banjo 1 - 2 Conkers Bad Fur day and they hold the crown for hardest game(battletoads) Very good portfolio

Don't forget Arch Rivals, Donkey Kong 64, Blast Corps, and Star Fox Adventures
Avatar image for Forza4Champion
Forza4Champion

722

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Forza4Champion
Member since 2011 • 722 Posts
Hate to break it to you but Rare was never a very good developer. They were like the one hit wonder bands in the 80s. KC_Hokie
I disagree but I still laughed
Avatar image for RyanShazam
RyanShazam

6498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 RyanShazam
Member since 2006 • 6498 Posts

[QUOTE="Vesica_Prime"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Let's just say for sake of argument I agree with you that they were a good developer. Since when is it a good idea to buy a console because a single developer? That's never been a good strategy for buying a console.KC_Hokie

Really? People bought the Xbox just for Halo.

Halo plus many other games. I doubt many people bought an Xbox simply because Bungie made games just for the Xbox.

I bought my original Xbox just to play Halo. I mean i bought other games for it eventually but when i got it, it was just to play Halo.

Avatar image for iammason
iammason

4189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#27 iammason
Member since 2004 • 4189 Posts
Let's just say for sake of argument I agree with you that they were a good developer. Since when is it a good idea to buy a console because a single developer? That's never been a good strategy for buying a console.KC_Hokie
When FF 7 made the jump from Nintendo to Sony, tons of people witched consoles. Customers WILL follow a developer.
Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45567 Posts

I'm not going to do what I normally do with these kind of threads having to do with Rare this gen. but suffice to say, they have indeed had some quality creative game production thus far. That said, I'm holding out hope for a Rare megaton announcement this E3, shy of that, I may start making these type of Rare threads myself. :shock:

:P

Avatar image for Renegade_Fury
Renegade_Fury

21753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#29 Renegade_Fury
Member since 2003 • 21753 Posts

[QUOTE="Vesica_Prime"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Let's just say for sake of argument I agree with you that they were a good developer. Since when is it a good idea to buy a console because a single developer? That's never been a good strategy for buying a console.KC_Hokie

Really? People bought the Xbox just for Halo.

Halo plus many other games. I doubt many people bought an Xbox simply because Bungie made games just for the Xbox.

Not for Bungie, but for Halo. I know I did, along with everyone else I know who bought an Xbox.

As for Rare, they've been dead since last gen, so I'm not sure why you thought they'd pull a 180, TC.

Avatar image for PurpleMan5000
PurpleMan5000

10531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 PurpleMan5000
Member since 2011 • 10531 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="Vesica_Prime"]

Really? People bought the Xbox just for Halo.

Renegade_Fury

Halo plus many other games. I doubt many people bought an Xbox simply because Bungie made games just for the Xbox.

Not for Bungie, but for Halo. I know I did, along with everyone else I know who bought an Xbox.

As for Rare, they've been dead since last gen, so I'm not sure why you thought they'd pull a 180, TC.

Well, when Perfect Dark Zero is announced as a launch title, it's pretty easy to get your hopes up. The game came out and was horrible, but Kameo was definitely a step in the right direction. I really think that Microsoft is hampering Rare, and if they were to sell Rare back to Nintendo, Rare would be pretty good again.
Avatar image for ohthemanatee
ohthemanatee

8104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 ohthemanatee
Member since 2010 • 8104 Posts

[QUOTE="campzor"][QUOTE="xXDrPainXx"] They had the 3 Donkey Kongs on the SNES, Goldeneye, Perfect Dark, The 2 Banjo's and Conkers? That doesn't seem to be 10 years in a row to me. I don't think they are that awesome like everyone makes them out to be. I did enjoy playing the 4 way Goldeneye matches though and that game was great.PurpleMan5000
it was just an exaggeration. But they were gods in the 90s upto 2001. No1 can deny that. Donkey kong country 1 - 3 Killer Instinct Goldeneye Perfect Dark Diddy Kong Racing Banjo 1 - 2 Conkers Bad Fur day and they hold the crown for hardest game(battletoads) Very good portfolio

Don't forget Arch Rivals, Donkey Kong 64, Blast Corps, and Star Fox Adventures

I will never understand why people stop at starfox adventures

Kameo and the Viva pinata games were amazing as well

Avatar image for jasonharris48
jasonharris48

21441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 jasonharris48
Member since 2006 • 21441 Posts

Hate to break it to you but Rare was never a very good developer. They were like the one hit wonder bands in the 80s. KC_Hokie
They were pretty good during the SNES, N64 days. Then they started going downhill during the 6th gen

Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

Hate to break it to you but Rare was never a very good developer. They were like the one hit wonder bands in the 80s. KC_Hokie

This statement is not correct

Avatar image for percech
percech

5237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 percech
Member since 2011 • 5237 Posts
[QUOTE="quickposter"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Hate to break it to you but Rare was never a very good developer. They were like the one hit wonder bands in the 80s. KC_Hokie

They created some of the best games on N64. And while it is true their quality plummeted after MS bought them I still think they made good games. But you are entitled to your opinion.

Let's just say for sake of argument I agree with you that they were a good developer. Since when is it a good idea to buy a console because a single developer? That's never been a good strategy for buying a console.

You have yet to mention why they weren't a good developer. One hit wonder? Do you even know what that means?
Avatar image for Phazevariance
Phazevariance

12356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Phazevariance
Member since 2003 • 12356 Posts
Hate to break it to you but Rare was never a very good developer. They were like the one hit wonder bands in the 80s. KC_Hokie
Actually, they made a few, Killer Instincs, Banjo-Kazooie, GoldenEye 007, Perfect Dark, Conker, Donkey Kong Country, Star Fox Adventures, Battletoads.... like you area gamer so I know you've heard of those games.... hardly a one hit wonder. Now, TC, the thing is, most of the actual people who made those games left Rare and the Rare that Microsoft has currently is not the same company. This is reflected in the change of logo they made af ew years ago, and the quality of their games of late.
Avatar image for yellosnolvr
yellosnolvr

19302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#36 yellosnolvr
Member since 2005 • 19302 Posts
Hate to break it to you but Rare was never a very good developer. They were like the one hit wonder bands in the 80s. KC_Hokie
well actually, they had 3 good games back in the day, then fell flat on their faces right afterwards.
Avatar image for PurpleMan5000
PurpleMan5000

10531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 PurpleMan5000
Member since 2011 • 10531 Posts
[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Hate to break it to you but Rare was never a very good developer. They were like the one hit wonder bands in the 80s. yellosnolvr
well actually, they had 3 good games back in the day, then fell flat on their faces right afterwards.

Only 3? Really?
Avatar image for yellosnolvr
yellosnolvr

19302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#38 yellosnolvr
Member since 2005 • 19302 Posts
[QUOTE="yellosnolvr"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Hate to break it to you but Rare was never a very good developer. They were like the one hit wonder bands in the 80s. PurpleMan5000
well actually, they had 3 good games back in the day, then fell flat on their faces right afterwards.

Only 3? Really?

by good i meant 'great'. i actually should've specified. they had a few other good titles, but nothing shined as much (imo) as jet force gemini, perfect dark, and goldeneye. i did enjoy banjo-kazooie and donkey kong country, but i lost interest before i could get to the end. and i just couldnt get into conker as much as everyone else.
Avatar image for p3anut
p3anut

6636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 p3anut
Member since 2005 • 6636 Posts

[QUOTE="Vesica_Prime"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Let's just say for sake of argument I agree with you that they were a good developer. Since when is it a good idea to buy a console because a single developer? That's never been a good strategy for buying a console.KC_Hokie

Really? People bought the Xbox just for Halo.

Halo plus many other games. I doubt many people bought an Xbox simply because Bungie made games just for the Xbox.

Nope Halo single-handedly saved the Xbox from being a total failure and that's a fact.