i guess we can say x360 is on par with the ps3's graphic....bioshock is proof...

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for mamoru
mamoru

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 mamoru
Member since 2005 • 637 Posts

NUFF SAID...

this sux.....i was expecting more from my ps3....

Avatar image for Lto_thaG
Lto_thaG

22611

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Lto_thaG
Member since 2006 • 22611 Posts

These threads just gotta stop.

Avatar image for mamoru
mamoru

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 mamoru
Member since 2005 • 637 Posts

heres my ps3 tag for proof im a cow....cause u know..fanboys ask 2 much.....

Avatar image for Velocitas8
Velocitas8

10748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Velocitas8
Member since 2006 • 10748 Posts
lolwut?
Avatar image for Lto_thaG
Lto_thaG

22611

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Lto_thaG
Member since 2006 • 22611 Posts

It says user not found :|

Avatar image for mamoru
mamoru

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 mamoru
Member since 2005 • 637 Posts

These threads just gotta stop.

Lto_thaG

oh,im sorry if a lot off pl made this thread alot of times....i didnt see any 2day...my bad...:?

Avatar image for Lto_thaG
Lto_thaG

22611

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Lto_thaG
Member since 2006 • 22611 Posts
[QUOTE="Lto_thaG"]

These threads just gotta stop.

mamoru

oh,im sorry if a lot off pl made this thread alot of times....i didnt see any 2day...my bad...:?


Why don't you just elaborate why you think the ps3is not so goodinstead of just saying "nuff said,I was expecting more"
Avatar image for Utensilman
Utensilman

1571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 Utensilman
Member since 2006 • 1571 Posts
as far asi see it, PS3 hasen't shown me that it's on par with the 360 yet
Avatar image for mamoru
mamoru

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 mamoru
Member since 2005 • 637 Posts
[QUOTE="mamoru"][QUOTE="Lto_thaG"]

These threads just gotta stop.

Lto_thaG

oh,im sorry if a lot off pl made this thread alot of times....i didnt see any 2day...my bad...:?


Why don't you just elaborate why you think the ps3is not so goodinstead of just saying "nuff said,I was expecting more"

well....just look at the ps3~!!!! it has all that power.....but NONE....I MEAN NONE~games that are like bioshock...dissapoints me big timne~I WAS EXPECTING more~

Avatar image for mamoru
mamoru

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 mamoru
Member since 2005 • 637 Posts

as far asi see it, PS3 hasen't shown me that it's on par with the 360 yetUtensilman

agreed...u think i could get my money bck?? since i still have the 30 days money bck guarentee....

Avatar image for Lto_thaG
Lto_thaG

22611

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Lto_thaG
Member since 2006 • 22611 Posts
[QUOTE="Lto_thaG"][QUOTE="mamoru"][QUOTE="Lto_thaG"]

These threads just gotta stop.

mamoru

oh,im sorry if a lot off pl made this thread alot of times....i didnt see any 2day...my bad...:?


Why don't you just elaborate why you think the ps3is not so goodinstead of just saying "nuff said,I was expecting more"

well....just look at the ps3~!!!! it has all that power.....but NONE....I MEAN NONE~games that are like bioshock...dissapoints me big timne~I WAS EXPECTING more~


Bioshock is impressive but that doesn't leave the ps3 behind.I like bioshock,but I like mgs4 more,should I hate the pc or 360 for not having that game?no.
Avatar image for mamoru
mamoru

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 mamoru
Member since 2005 • 637 Posts
[QUOTE="mamoru"][QUOTE="Lto_thaG"][QUOTE="mamoru"][QUOTE="Lto_thaG"]

These threads just gotta stop.

Lto_thaG

oh,im sorry if a lot off pl made this thread alot of times....i didnt see any 2day...my bad...:?


Why don't you just elaborate why you think the ps3is not so goodinstead of just saying "nuff said,I was expecting more"

well....just look at the ps3~!!!! it has all that power.....but NONE....I MEAN NONE~games that are like bioshock...dissapoints me big timne~I WAS EXPECTING more~


Bioshock is impressive but that doesn't leave the ps3 behind.I like bioshock,but I like mgs4 more,should I hate the pc or 360 for not having that game?no.

i don hate my ps3.....i love it....im just dissapointed the fact that we dont have bioshock~SURE we got all those other great games in our line-up..i know that~hyping for mgs4 BTW....

but i just don know why we don get bioshock???? shouldt they put it on the ps3 because he have greater hardware and we dont break as much???

Avatar image for Lto_thaG
Lto_thaG

22611

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Lto_thaG
Member since 2006 • 22611 Posts
[QUOTE="Lto_thaG"][QUOTE="mamoru"][QUOTE="Lto_thaG"][QUOTE="mamoru"][QUOTE="Lto_thaG"]

These threads just gotta stop.

mamoru

oh,im sorry if a lot off pl made this thread alot of times....i didnt see any 2day...my bad...:?


Why don't you just elaborate why you think the ps3is not so goodinstead of just saying "nuff said,I was expecting more"

well....just look at the ps3~!!!! it has all that power.....but NONE....I MEAN NONE~games that are like bioshock...dissapoints me big timne~I WAS EXPECTING more~


Bioshock is impressive but that doesn't leave the ps3 behind.I like bioshock,but I like mgs4 more,should I hate the pc or 360 for not having that game?no.

i don hate my ps3.....i love it....im just dissapointed the fact that we dont have bioshock~SURE we got all those other great games in our line-up..i know that~hyping for mgs4 BTW....

but i just don know why we don get bioshock???? shouldt they put it on the ps3 because he have greater hardware and we dont break as much???


Well It would be nice to have a ps3 version of bioshock,it would be good for sales I think and game now and then won't hurt either.It's up to the developer or publisher to witch platform thegame goedI think (correct me if I'm wrong).
Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#14 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts
The PC offers *better* presentation than any console, thanks to Moore's Law. Look at this latest tidbit from the Cult of Rapture website:

  • How does the DX10 version compare to the 360 graphics? And DX9?
    The 360 and DX9 graphics are roughly equivalent. The DX10 graphics add a few additional features and image quality enhancements on top of this.
  • What kind of frame rates can you expect using an 8600 card and DX10?
    Depends on what detail settings you use and what resolution as well as your CPU. Obviously this card will support the game pretty well though, so I would expect at least 30-40 FPS on high detail.
  • How high a resolution can you play this game at with recommended specs for DX9 and DX10? What will the frame rates be?
    Pretty much whatever your monitor and card support. For a really good frame rate we would probably recommend 1280x1024, though you could go higher if you prefer higher resolution to super high FPS.
  • Will the game run fairly consistently at 30 FPS on the recommended system specs with medium graphical settings?
    Definitely, and probably higher.

In summation, I am upgrading my PC with an Athlon x2, 2gb of DDR2-800, a GeForce 8600 (factory overclocked), and an Xbox 360 controller. In total, I am spending $365 on upgrades (shipping & tax included) - less than an Xbox 360 (with sales tax). According to the *creators of Bioshock* my PC will run the game on a setting that offers more graphical features than the Xbox 360 version, for less money.

In other words - mainstream PC gaming has definitively surpassed the PS3 / 360, and the high-end has long been well past them. These idiotic "graphics debates" between the system from game-to-game are almost pointless. If you own both systems, you get the version that works best - if you only one own system, you get that version. However, you're all debating like you're concerned about there being some serious graphics gap between your system in the competition, and, well, here's a hint - don't own static hardware if that's your goal.


The moral of this story? The PS3 and Xbox 360 are static hardware - and frankly the differences between them are incredibly slim. If you are going to try and use "bioshock" to defend the Xbox 360 hardware, you're missing that it's just a back-and-forth tussle from game-to-game.

Moore's Law is the undeniable reality here - you've got static hardware, and in the grand scheme of things both the PS3 and Xbox 360 are so similar compared to the growing gap between them and the graphical high-end (geforce 8800gtx... soon 8900) that these debates ad-nauseum are pointless.
Avatar image for CoreydaSpurmy
CoreydaSpurmy

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 CoreydaSpurmy
Member since 2004 • 47 Posts
[QUOTE="Lto_thaG"][QUOTE="mamoru"][QUOTE="Lto_thaG"][QUOTE="mamoru"][QUOTE="Lto_thaG"]

These threads just gotta stop.

mamoru

oh,im sorry if a lot off pl made this thread alot of times....i didnt see any 2day...my bad...:?


Why don't you just elaborate why you think the ps3is not so goodinstead of just saying "nuff said,I was expecting more"

well....just look at the ps3~!!!! it has all that power.....but NONE....I MEAN NONE~games that are like bioshock...dissapoints me big timne~I WAS EXPECTING more~


Bioshock is impressive but that doesn't leave the ps3 behind.I like bioshock,but I like mgs4 more,should I hate the pc or 360 for not having that game?no.

i don hate my ps3.....i love it....im just dissapointed the fact that we dont have bioshock~SURE we got all those other great games in our line-up..i know that~hyping for mgs4 BTW....

but i just don know why we don get bioshock???? shouldt they put it on the ps3 because he have greater hardware and we dont break as much???

No you will never get it because Irrational games has a exclusive deal with microsoft. Its not that PS3 could't run it, its just that PS3 is getting different games. It just so happens to be that 360 is getting all these good games this year, and sony and all its fanboys are saying wait till 2008. The only game coming out in 2008 that for sure will own is MGS4. You should have bought a system that has a present and a future. Not just a supposive future because thats all I hear with the PS3. The Future and just wait until... BTW all multiplat games will always be better on the 360 than PS3. The only time PS3 will shine is when it is first party. As far as FPSs go, Ps3 only has resitance to help it in that category. As of now its the only proven fps franchise on the ps3. And dont say Haze or Killzone because they havent proved anything until afterthey arereleased.

Avatar image for CoreydaSpurmy
CoreydaSpurmy

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 CoreydaSpurmy
Member since 2004 • 47 Posts
And no you won't get a game becausea console is faulty. What does that matter now that the warranty is extended until 3 years. No matter what people will still get a 360 even if their console breaks. Plus there are more 360s on the market so why would it need to go to PS3, whose future is still dependent on the "just wait theory." The world could end tomorrow, go get a console that you could enjoy games on today.
Avatar image for mamoru
mamoru

637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 mamoru
Member since 2005 • 637 Posts
The PC offers *better* presentation than any console, thanks to Moore's Law. Look at this latest tidbit from the Cult of Rapture website:

  • How does the DX10 version compare to the 360 graphics? And DX9?
    The 360 and DX9 graphics are roughly equivalent. The DX10 graphics add a few additional features and image quality enhancements on top of this.
  • What kind of frame rates can you expect using an 8600 card and DX10?
    Depends on what detail settings you use and what resolution as well as your CPU. Obviously this card will support the game pretty well though, so I would expect at least 30-40 FPS on high detail.
  • How high a resolution can you play this game at with recommended specs for DX9 and DX10? What will the frame rates be?
    Pretty much whatever your monitor and card support. For a really good frame rate we would probably recommend 1280x1024, though you could go higher if you prefer higher resolution to super high FPS.
  • Will the game run fairly consistently at 30 FPS on the recommended system specs with medium graphical settings?
    Definitely, and probably higher.


In summation, I am upgrading my PC with an Athlon x2, 2gb of DDR2-800, a GeForce 8600 (factory overclocked), and an Xbox 360 controller. In total, I am spending $365 on upgrades (shipping & tax included) - less than an Xbox 360 (with sales tax). According to the *creators of Bioshock* my PC will run the game on a setting that offers more graphical features than the Xbox 360 version, for less money.

In other words - mainstream PC gaming has definitively surpassed the PS3 / 360, and the high-end has long been well past them. These idiotic "graphics debates" between the system from game-to-game are almost pointless. If you own both systems, you get the version that works best - if you only one own system, you get that version. However, you're all debating like you're concerned about there being some serious graphics gap between your system in the competition, and, well, here's a hint - don't own static hardware if that's your goal.


The moral of this story? The PS3 and Xbox 360 are static hardware - and frankly the differences between them are incredibly slim. If you are going to try and use "bioshock" to defend the Xbox 360 hardware, you're missing that it's just a back-and-forth tussle from game-to-game.

Moore's Law is the undeniable reality here - you've got static hardware, and in the grand scheme of things both the PS3 and Xbox 360 are so similar compared to the growing gap between them and the graphical high-end (geforce 8800gtx... soon 8900) that these debates ad-nauseum are pointless.subrosian

a very LONG post and very interesting....

but i wasnt really reffering to the pc..THNX 4 D HEADS UP THOUGH~!!!

Avatar image for paranoiasurviva
paranoiasurviva

13621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#18 paranoiasurviva
Member since 2004 • 13621 Posts
lol.... topic should be ... x360 is on par and better than ps3s graphics.
Avatar image for CoreydaSpurmy
CoreydaSpurmy

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 CoreydaSpurmy
Member since 2004 • 47 Posts

lol.... topic should be ... x360 is on par and better than ps2's graphics.paranoiasurviva

And what game that is OUT for the PS3 has better graphics than Gears of War? (Mention i said out because you would most likely resort to Killzone 2, which you haven't even played so that doesn't count.)

Avatar image for V_Isle
V_Isle

1785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 V_Isle
Member since 2006 • 1785 Posts
Haha, it's the PS3 that has to catch up to the 360. But then again you like my chemical flatulence, so your opinions are worhtless and void anyway.
Avatar image for pro-nathan-07
pro-nathan-07

1591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 pro-nathan-07
Member since 2007 • 1591 Posts
the title should be "ps3 still isnt on par with the 360's graphics"
Avatar image for ball_of_air
ball_of_air

2105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 ball_of_air
Member since 2007 • 2105 Posts

as far asi see it, PS3 hasen't shown me that it's on par with the 360 yetUtensilman

If I say Oblivion though, everyone will go nuts. "Bu... but... teh zxtra year ov dvlopmenttttttt!!1!11!!!"

Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#23 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts

a very LONG post and very interesting....

but i wasnt really reffering to the pc..THNX 4 D HEADS UP THOUGH~!!!

mamoru


You cannot *ignore* the PC in a graphics debate. Debating the PS3 vs. Xbox 360 graphics is like debating whether a stock Honda Civic is a better race car than a Toyota Camry - who really cares? They end product is quite similar here - and at the end of the day, the differences between the two are so subtle that you have no room to claim any "ownage" here.

Meanwhile, you're completely ignoring the Enzo Ferrari known as the PC that just blew past you. Console gamers only ignore the PC in the 360 vs. PS3 debate because it puts into perspective how miniscule the difference between the two consoles really is... it is the ultimate mirror in which the stupidity of the fanboyism surrounding both consoles is shown.
Avatar image for ball_of_air
ball_of_air

2105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 ball_of_air
Member since 2007 • 2105 Posts
[QUOTE="mamoru"]

a very LONG post and very interesting....

but i wasnt really reffering to the pc..THNX 4 D HEADS UP THOUGH~!!!

subrosian



You cannot *ignore* the PC in a graphics debate. Debating the PS3 vs. Xbox 360 graphics is like debating whether a stock Honda Civic is a better race car than a Toyota Camry - who really cares? They end product is quite similar here - and at the end of the day, the differences between the two are so subtle that you have no room to claim any "ownage" here.

Meanwhile, you're completely ignoring the Enzo Ferrari known as the PC that just blew past you. Console gamers only ignore the PC in the 360 vs. PS3 debate because it puts into perspective how miniscule the difference between the two consoles really is... it is the ultimate mirror in which the stupidity of the fanboyism surrounding both consoles is shown.

I'll just stick with my Koenigsegg CCR, thank you.;)

Avatar image for Lto_thaG
Lto_thaG

22611

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Lto_thaG
Member since 2006 • 22611 Posts

[QUOTE="paranoiasurviva"]lol.... topic should be ... x360 is on par and better than ps2's graphics.CoreydaSpurmy

And what game that is OUT for the PS3 has better graphics than Gears of War? (Mention i said out because you would most likely resort to Killzone 2, which you haven't even played so that doesn't count.)


yeesh,Gears of War is like the king of graphics on the 360 and amongst other released games,the ps3 has yet to have a game like that.
Avatar image for TTDog
TTDog

3565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 75

User Lists: 0

#26 TTDog
Member since 2007 • 3565 Posts

When the PS3 comes out with in game graphics, on say a playable demo, that get near Bioshock's we'll agree that the PS3's graphics are on par with the 360.

So far the PS3 hasn't really produced anything that even gets near Bioshock.

Avatar image for CoreydaSpurmy
CoreydaSpurmy

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 CoreydaSpurmy
Member since 2004 • 47 Posts
[QUOTE="mamoru"]

a very LONG post and very interesting....

but i wasnt really reffering to the pc..THNX 4 D HEADS UP THOUGH~!!!

subrosian



You cannot *ignore* the PC in a graphics debate. Debating the PS3 vs. Xbox 360 graphics is like debating whether a stock Honda Civic is a better race car than a Toyota Camry - who really cares? They end product is quite similar here - and at the end of the day, the differences between the two are so subtle that you have no room to claim any "ownage" here.

Meanwhile, you're completely ignoring the Enzo Ferrari known as the PC that just blew past you. Console gamers only ignore the PC in the 360 vs. PS3 debate because it puts into perspective how miniscule the difference between the two consoles really is... it is the ultimate mirror in which the stupidity of the fanboyism surrounding both consoles is shown.

And who cares why? Ferraris are so much more expensive and so much better than the honda and toyota. However the PC is not much better than either console in terms of graphics, only slightly as of right now. The cost however is huge. Atleast with the Ferrari and toyota comparison the ferrari is way more expensive but way better. the PC on the other hand is not way better that the two consoles at this point and its way more expensive.

Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#28 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts
[QUOTE="subrosian"][QUOTE="mamoru"]

a very LONG post and very interesting....

but i wasnt really reffering to the pc..THNX 4 D HEADS UP THOUGH~!!!

CoreydaSpurmy



You cannot *ignore* the PC in a graphics debate. Debating the PS3 vs. Xbox 360 graphics is like debating whether a stock Honda Civic is a better race car than a Toyota Camry - who really cares? They end product is quite similar here - and at the end of the day, the differences between the two are so subtle that you have no room to claim any "ownage" here.

Meanwhile, you're completely ignoring the Enzo Ferrari known as the PC that just blew past you. Console gamers only ignore the PC in the 360 vs. PS3 debate because it puts into perspective how miniscule the difference between the two consoles really is... it is the ultimate mirror in which the stupidity of the fanboyism surrounding both consoles is shown.

And who cares why? Ferraris are so much more expensive and so much better than the honda and toyota. However the PC is not much better than either console in terms of graphics, only slightly as of right now. The cost however is huge. Atleast with the Ferrari and toyota comparison the ferrari is way more expensive but way better. the PC on the other hand is not way better that the two consoles at this point and its way more expensive.



No, it isn't. In my original post I demonstrated that my dual-core, 2gb DDR2-800, GeForce 8600 system *including an xbox 360 controller* upgrade costs less than an Xbox 360, yet offers better performance. It runs Oblivion better, it runs Bioshock better, and in a few months, it will be running Gears of War and Unreal Tournament 3 better.

PC gaming gets far too maligned by console gamers - and for what? So you can have a pointless showdown between PS3 and 360, while ignoring that consoles have become so expensive, that it's really not much more to build a PC that offers a leap in performance?

If you are going to talk about PCs being "only slightly better" - yet claim they are "way more expensive", you're trying to have your cake and eat it too. I demonstrated that my mid-range PC offered better performance for less money, I didn't claim a world record. Yet, if you're going to claim a high-end PC (which can be significantly more expensive - it's the cutting edge) is only "slightly better" - you've absolutely ignored reality. A GeForce 8800gtx with a Core 2 Duo or Quad chews apart what consoles can do.

They only reason I bring all of this up, is that it's simply pointless to have a PS3 vs 360 graphics debate anymore. It's relevant if you say "I want a 360 over a Wii because the graphics are significantly better" - it's not really relevant to say "the PS3 is slightly better in some games, worse in others, than the 360, therefore because of this one game, it wins the graphics trophy!". Please, if you're that concerned, buy a gaming PC - if you bought both these consoles (360 + PS3) you've already spent enough to demonstrate you can easily afford one.

Otherwise, stop tarnishing Bioshock's good name by dragging it through the mud of this console war.
Avatar image for CoreydaSpurmy
CoreydaSpurmy

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 CoreydaSpurmy
Member since 2004 • 47 Posts
[QUOTE="CoreydaSpurmy"][QUOTE="subrosian"][QUOTE="mamoru"]

a very LONG post and very interesting....

but i wasnt really reffering to the pc..THNX 4 D HEADS UP THOUGH~!!!

subrosian



You cannot *ignore* the PC in a graphics debate. Debating the PS3 vs. Xbox 360 graphics is like debating whether a stock Honda Civic is a better race car than a Toyota Camry - who really cares? They end product is quite similar here - and at the end of the day, the differences between the two are so subtle that you have no room to claim any "ownage" here.

Meanwhile, you're completely ignoring the Enzo Ferrari known as the PC that just blew past you. Console gamers only ignore the PC in the 360 vs. PS3 debate because it puts into perspective how miniscule the difference between the two consoles really is... it is the ultimate mirror in which the stupidity of the fanboyism surrounding both consoles is shown.

And who cares why? Ferraris are so much more expensive and so much better than the honda and toyota. However the PC is not much better than either console in terms of graphics, only slightly as of right now. The cost however is huge. Atleast with the Ferrari and toyota comparison the ferrari is way more expensive but way better. the PC on the other hand is not way better that the two consoles at this point and its way more expensive.



No, it isn't. In my original post I demonstrated that my dual-core, 2gb DDR2-800, GeForce 8600 system *including an xbox 360 controller* upgrade costs less than an Xbox 360, yet offers better performance. It runs Oblivion better, it runs Bioshock better, and in a few months, it will be running Gears of War and Unreal Tournament 3 better.

PC gaming gets far too maligned by console gamers - and for what? So you can have a pointless showdown between PS3 and 360, while ignoring that consoles have become some expensive, that it's really not much more to build a PC that offers a huge leap in performance?

If you are going to talk about PCs being "only slightly better" - yet claim they are "way more expensive", you're out of your mind. I claimed that my mid-range PC offered better performance for less money, I didn't claim a record. Yet, if you're going to claim a high-end PC (which can be significantly more expensive - it's the cutting edge) is only "slightly better" - you've absolutely ignored reality. A GeForce 8800gtx with a Core 2 Duo or Quad absolutely chews what consoles could do.

They only reason I bring all of this up, is that it's simply pointless to have a PS3 vs 360 graphics debate anymore. It's relevant if you say "I want a 360 over a Wii because the graphics are significantly better" - it's not really relevant to say "the PS3 is slightly better in some games, worse in others, than the 360, therefore because of this one game, it wins the graphics trophy!". Please, if you're that concerned, buy a gaming PC - if you bought both these consoles (360 + PS3) you've already spent enough to demonstrate you can easily afford one.

Otherwise, stop tarnishing Bioshock's good name by dragging it through the mud of this console war.

I have seen games at there best on the PC and I have seen games at there best on a PS3 and a 360 and there is little diffrence between graphics. So you are crazy. BTW I didn't know its irrlevant to like to relax on a nice sofa chair with surround sound, anda 60 inch hdtv. Rather than being hobbled over onan uncomfortablecomputer chair. Some people work all day with computers, being able to get away from then for any small time at all is a relief. BTW I prefer a controller over a keyboard and mose, so how is it irrlevant to want a console over a PC and use graphics as justification?

Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#30 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts

I have seen games at there best on the PC and I have seen games at there best on a PS3 and a 360 and there is little diffrence between graphics. So you are crazy. BTW I didn't know its irrlevant to like to relax on a nice sofa chair with surround sound, anda 60 inch hdtv. Rather than being hobbled over onan uncomfortablecomputer chair. Some people work all day with computers, being able to get away from then for any small time at all is a relief. BTW I prefer a controller over a keyboard and mose, so how is it irrlevant to want a console over a PC and use graphics as justification?

CoreydaSpurmy



I game on a 27" 720p HDTV. I personally prefer my leather recliner to my couch, at least for gaming. I have it so my face is literally 4' from the screen, laying back, looking up lazily at it. I use a spherex 5.1 surround system, and everything (including the PC) is all set that I don't have to get up to change anything.

I use a KB&M for some things, a controller for others - as you can see - I'll be gaming on Bioshock using a Xbox 360 controller.

The only difference being I'll be getting some graphical goodies I wouldn't be able to get on the console version. It's not a huge deal, but the point I'm making is:

Please don't drag Bioshock's good name through the dirt for some idiotic PS3 vs. 360 graphics war. I know many of you have never seen what a high-end GPU and a high-res monitor (or HDTV) can do, but, it's quite impressive, and it's really what I look to for the high-end. The first time I saw a high-end PC setup, it put last generation's graphics debates into a pretty stark perspective - this generation, where the PS3 and 360 really aren't that different graphically, it just strikes me as utterly pointless to encourage Sony fanboys to bash what will likely be GOTY (bioshock) by waving it in their face in a graphics thread.

Avatar image for CoreydaSpurmy
CoreydaSpurmy

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 CoreydaSpurmy
Member since 2004 • 47 Posts

I guess you prefer your leather chair, but thats because you never sat in my recliner, its a thing a of beauty ;). BTW I have seen what a high end PC can do because I have friends with them and I have playedon many PC games on high end pc at pc gaming lounges. I don't get why it isn't a legit reason why360 users can't rub Bioshock in Ps3 users faces.For some reason your trying to associate a majority of the ps3 users with PC gamers. Unless you are a hardcore gamer you most lieklywill not invest in a good gaming PC and a PS3. With that said most PS3 users will never get to experience Bioshock. therefore I can rub it in there faces because they don't have a game as good looking right now.

Avatar image for ofx360
ofx360

729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 ofx360
Member since 2003 • 729 Posts
You know the ps3 isnt that much more powerfull that the 360 mgs4 can be done on the 360 no prob its just the size of the game. Let me give you an example, UT3 coming out for the ps3 this year will be getting more content because the ps3 has more disc space. Thats how i think it will probly continue with the ps3 getting more content the the 360 but as you already know you're gonna have to wait and wait for results. Well if you have a 360 and a ps3(like i do) you really cant complain but if ur a ps3 only owner then wait till 08 wen you start seen good things happen for the ps3
Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#33 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts

I guess you prefer your leather chair, but thats because you never sat in my recliner, its a thing a of beauty ;). BTW I have seen what a high end PC can do because I have friends with them and I have playedon many PC games on high end pc at pc gaming lounges. I don't get why it isn't a legit reason why360 users can't rub Bioshock in Ps3 users faces.For some reason your trying to associate a majority of the ps3 users with PC gamers. Unless you are a hardcore gamer you most lieklywill not invest in a good gaming PC and a PS3. With that said most PS3 users will never get to experience Bioshock. therefore I can rub it in there faces because they don't have a game as good looking right now.

CoreydaSpurmy


In a graphics debate thread... something you have to admit is pointless for ps3 vs 360 if you've seen what the high-end looks like on PC? Bioshock is such an excellent game that it's an absolute shame PS3-only gamers will be missing out. Rubbing graphics that aren't even the high-end for this particular game in PS3 owner's faces though?

And my leather chair is a recliner with an ottoman and rocks some serious socks.
Avatar image for tidus222
tidus222

1452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 tidus222
Member since 2004 • 1452 Posts

killzone 2 isnt possible on the xbox360

xbox360 cant render realistic faces like OUR THE KILLZONE 2, they are stuck with some warped gorilla things like in gears of war....

Avatar image for CoreydaSpurmy
CoreydaSpurmy

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 CoreydaSpurmy
Member since 2004 • 47 Posts
Yea okay bud, the faces in mass effect and alan wake look better than Kill Zone easily. Are you an idiot? Because Kill Zone 1 sucked and Kill Zone 2will suck. Nothing innovative about it at all. The only thing it has going for it is the animations.
Avatar image for CoreydaSpurmy
CoreydaSpurmy

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 CoreydaSpurmy
Member since 2004 • 47 Posts
[QUOTE="CoreydaSpurmy"]

I guess you prefer your leather chair, but thats because you never sat in my recliner, its a thing a of beauty ;). BTW I have seen what a high end PC can do because I have friends with them and I have playedon many PC games on high end pc at pc gaming lounges. I don't get why it isn't a legit reason why360 users can't rub Bioshock in Ps3 users faces.For some reason your trying to associate a majority of the ps3 users with PC gamers. Unless you are a hardcore gamer you most lieklywill not invest in a good gaming PC and a PS3. With that said most PS3 users will never get to experience Bioshock. therefore I can rub it in there faces because they don't have a game as good looking right now.

subrosian



In a graphics debate thread... something you have to admit is pointless for ps3 vs 360 if you've seen what the high-end looks like on PC? Bioshock is such an excellent game that it's an absolute shame PS3-only gamers will be missing out. Rubbing graphics that aren't even the high-end for this particular game in PS3 owner's faces though?

And my leather chair is a recliner with an ottoman and rocks some serious socks.

True. Im not really using the graphics of Bioshock to piss ps3 users off, just the game in general. It is no secret that the PS3 could run Bioshock. However, the game itself is a thing of beauty and I love that they won't get to experience it. Most of them that is.

Avatar image for TTDog
TTDog

3565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 75

User Lists: 0

#37 TTDog
Member since 2007 • 3565 Posts

killzone 2 isnt possible on the xbox360

xbox360 cant render realistic faces like OUR THE KILLZONE 2, they are stuck with some warped gorilla things like in gears of war....

tidus222

Mass Effect slaps that cow argument in the face and laughs,

Avatar image for xAngelxDustx
xAngelxDustx

392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 xAngelxDustx
Member since 2007 • 392 Posts

360 > ps3

Avatar image for dubvisions
dubvisions

1815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 dubvisions
Member since 2006 • 1815 Posts

[QUOTE="Utensilman"]as far asi see it, PS3 hasen't shown me that it's on par with the 360 yetmamoru

agreed...u think i could get my money bck?? since i still have the 30 days money bck guarentee....

yeah, go get your money back. And then go buy a 360. And then, in a year, figure out the impossibility of selling a used 360 and that you can't get back into a PS3. Smart move.

Avatar image for Just_in
Just_in

696

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Just_in
Member since 2006 • 696 Posts

No legs when you look down, fail.

Avatar image for SXG
SXG

1766

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 SXG
Member since 2003 • 1766 Posts

No legs when you look down, fail.

Just_in

Yeah, fail. Obviously, because the graphics all of a sudden suck with no legs.