I have a dilema. It involves your opinion.

Alright, so im debating on either getting dragon age origins or halo reach. Ill get the money by selling read dead redemption and the forced unleashed 1. So, do you think that (in addition to 10 bucks) it would be enough for halo reach or should i get dragon age instead? I tried dao and i loved it but, due to blockbuster, i had to return it. I *SPOILERS* finished the zombie infested town, the wizards tower that got invaded and i was in the dwarves place *END SPOILERS* So, did i have alot of play time left in that game or not? Because i was thinking if i didnt have enough for reach, that id for sure have enough for dao. Ill be selling this at gamestop. Im not asking for prices, im asking if you think ill get at least 20 or 50 for it. Well, opinion on.

Dragon Age on PC if you can.

Halo Reach if you only have a 360.

If they keep improving on the singleplayer in Halo like they have lately then it Reach should have a veyr good campaign. Also Halo online is very popular. Its not my fav, but it does what it does very well. I played hte beta and it was fun, ill def be getting the game evne though im not a big halo fan.

Both games will be worht your money imo

Dragon Age on PC if you can.

Halo Reach if you only have a 360.

[QUOTE="kozzy1234"]

Dragon Age on PC if you can.

Halo Reach if you only have a 360.

kipohippo021

I would say get Reach then, I wasnt really impressed with Dragon Age on consoles to be honest. Still worht playing, but Halo Reach looks to be the years big online game, well see.

[QUOTE="kipohippo021"][QUOTE="kozzy1234"]

Dragon Age on PC if you can.

Halo Reach if you only have a 360.

I would say get Reach then, I wasnt really impressed with Dragon Age on consoles to be honest. Still worht playing, but Halo Reach looks to be the years big online game, well see.

get a job hippie.

I imagine Dragon Age has a much longer story.

but Reach will probably have a solid campaign, and then there's a guaranteed plethora of features, which works into replaybility.

and it has MP, so if you like Halo MP, you'll get your worth out of it for more time to come, possibly.

get a job hippie.

Casboof

I imagine Dragon Age has a much longer story.

but Reach will probably have a solid campaign, and then there's a guaranteed plethora of features, which works into replaybility.

and it has MP, so if you like Halo MP, you'll get your worth out of it for more time to come, possibly.

[QUOTE="Casboof"]

get a job hippie.

kipohippo021

I imagine Dragon Age has a much longer story.

but Reach will probably have a solid campaign, and then there's a guaranteed plethora of features, which works into replaybility.

and it has MP, so if you like Halo MP, you'll get your worth out of it for more time to come, possibly.

Good RPG > Average FPS...

Good RPG > Average FPS...

Kan0nF0dder

Gamespot thinks they're a great RPG and great FPS series.

I don't think TC cares about biased fanboy opinions:) unless you can actually provide an argument to support your claim. otherwise you might as well type a garbled mess.

Wait for the Dragon Age Ultimate Edition.

Good RPG > Average FPS...

Kan0nF0dder

I assume both are for the 360? then I would go for Reach without a second thought. DA:O might be good on console, you know, you playied it ;) but I assume Reach will be the better game, and while in SP Reach is shorter (very likely atleast) I think it have more overall value due to MP.

DA:O is not going anywhere anyways, you can always buy it when it is on sale, reach however is partially an MP based game, so it helps to be there early ;)

[QUOTE="kozzy1234"]

[QUOTE="kipohippo021"] my pc sucks. But i dont have money, you think ill get enough to get reach? kipohippo021

I would say get Reach then, I wasnt really impressed with Dragon Age on consoles to be honest. Still worht playing, but Halo Reach looks to be the years big online game, well see.

yea probably. Dragon age takes like 50 hours to beat.,, and i even went back and played it a second time for achievements.

but personally i would say reach, but thats probably only because i have already beaten dragon age twice, and im psyched for reach. Its a real tough call, imo. But probably try to get reach now and get the $20 pre order code while its out there.

and PS you should trade in your games through amazon, they give you more money... and then you can get credit towards halo reach w/ $20 pre order gift certificate from amazon... and then maybe put that $20 gift card towards dragon age.

I think that would be the cheapest plan in the long run.

Even as a bigger fan of rpg's than any other genre I still recommend Reach. Don't get me wrong I loved my time with DA:O and I put a lot of time into it, but it has far less freedom than one of Bethesda's games and I started to feel walled in which eventually led to me becoming bored.

I found Dragon Age: Origins to be tediously bad.

You still had quite a bit to do in your playthrough of Dragon Age. I'd warrant at least another solid 30 hours, hell, maybe you'd even start a second playthrough and see how things would play out differently. I personally love Dragon Age (though I played it on PC and it really should be played on PC) I was also very unimpressed with the Reach beta. I went back to Halo 3 immediately afterwards and found it superior. I'm hoping the multiplayer is significantly altered from what we were given, if not then I don't know what to say.

You still had quite a bit to do in your playthrough of Dragon Age. I'd warrant at least another solid 30 hours, hell, maybe you'd even start a second playthrough and see how things would play out differently. I personally love Dragon Age (though I played it on PC and it really should be played on PC) I was also very unimpressed with the Reach beta. I went back to Halo 3 immediately afterwards and found it superior. I'm hoping the multiplayer is significantly altered from what we were given, if not then I don't know what to say.

NeonNinja

[QUOTE="NeonNinja"]

You still had quite a bit to do in your playthrough of Dragon Age. I'd warrant at least another solid 30 hours, hell, maybe you'd even start a second playthrough and see how things would play out differently. I personally love Dragon Age (though I played it on PC and it really should be played on PC) I was also very unimpressed with the Reach beta. I went back to Halo 3 immediately afterwards and found it superior. I'm hoping the multiplayer is significantly altered from what we were given, if not then I don't know what to say.

kipohippo021

Offtopic

;Gives you a cookie; ^ -^

Halo: Reach, for sure. Dragon Age: Orgins is also a safe bet, but In my opinion, Reach is one of th best games I've played (I say this because I've tried the beta).

In short:

Reach. Kick. Ass.

I've never played Dragon Age, so I can't comment on that. But Halo Reach looks awesome. I have the Limited Edition console preordered at Gamestop.

reach i would get it if i had a threesixty, but if u cant afford it u should wait until u can buy it, they probbably wont run out:D

Dragon Age sucks, get Gothic 4 or Fallout Vegas if you want an rpg this year.