I Have a Dream

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for RockHardNuts
RockHardNuts

89

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 RockHardNuts
Member since 2006 • 89 Posts

I have a dream that one day, all systems will be one, great system. I dream that there will not be 3 factions vying for supremecy over the other, but instead one system with the capabilities of all three. I have a dream that one day, all this "system wars" BS will be ended with this "messiah of video games"

Of course this only a dream

~PS3,Wii,360 owner

Avatar image for Fire_Hurts
Fire_Hurts

250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Fire_Hurts
Member since 2007 • 250 Posts

you do the man proud

Avatar image for mattyftm
mattyftm

7306

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 mattyftm
Member since 2005 • 7306 Posts
That would lead to a monopoly which would mean they could charge whatever they wanted for the consoles and games. Which would mean consumers lose out.
Avatar image for Saturos3091
Saturos3091

14937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 Saturos3091
Member since 2005 • 14937 Posts

...all this "system wars" BS will be ended with this "messiah of video games"

RockHardNuts



Already here. Kane (with the help of CABAL) can play PS3, 360, and Wii games.
Avatar image for Dilrod
Dilrod

4264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 Dilrod
Member since 2003 • 4264 Posts

I have a dream that one day, all systems will be one, great system. I dream that there will not be 3 factions vying for supremecy over the other, but instead one system with the capabilities of all three. I have a dream that one day, all this "system wars" BS will be ended with this "messiah of video games"

Of course this only a dream

~PS3,Wii,360 owner

RockHardNuts

Then you woke up and realized that each of the 3 console makers are out for their own good and in no way would ever team up with one another and make a super console. Reality bites. :(

Avatar image for SuperNecro
SuperNecro

1423

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 SuperNecro
Member since 2005 • 1423 Posts
Monopoly = not good. Why, you ask? The monpolizer dictates price and other aspects of said "messiah of video games."
Avatar image for Corvin
Corvin

7266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Corvin
Member since 2002 • 7266 Posts

That would lead to a monopoly which would mean they could charge whatever they wanted for the consoles and games. Which would mean consumers lose out.mattyftm

It would have to work more like VHS or DVD, where a standard is reached, and any company is free to make their own form of the hardware with features above and beyond the minimum standards, sort of like video players are today. In this sense, the market would be even more free than today. Instead of 3 companies you would have dozens to chose from, just like TVs and DVD players and surround systems, etc. Licensing should also be cheaper, so theoretically the games could get cheaper (although we know they wouldn't).

Avatar image for GnR-SLaSh
GnR-SLaSh

3021

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 GnR-SLaSh
Member since 2006 • 3021 Posts

I was thinking about that the other day, if some day they combine to make an epic console, it would just be AMAZING..

Avatar image for SuperNecro
SuperNecro

1423

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 SuperNecro
Member since 2005 • 1423 Posts
Now, if you're proposing that Sony, Nintendo, and Microsoft got drunk one night and decided to make one big system for the next generation, then you might be on to something. Nintendo would vouch for a low price and fun "pick-up-and-go" games while Sony would bring the hardware, while Microsoft brought the money. Then Sontindendosoft would be born. Of course, that would never happen.
Avatar image for MoldOnHold
MoldOnHold

11760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#11 MoldOnHold
Member since 2005 • 11760 Posts
A monopoly would not be good, as it discourages advancement and encourages high prices....
Avatar image for SapSacPrime
SapSacPrime

8925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 SapSacPrime
Member since 2004 • 8925 Posts
Good idea, the lack of competition would really help drive prices down and put pressure on developers to innovate!
Avatar image for shoeman12
shoeman12

8744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#13 shoeman12
Member since 2005 • 8744 Posts

That would lead to a monopoly which would mean they could charge whatever they wanted for the consoles and games. Which would mean consumers lose out.mattyftm

yep, that pretty much sums it up.

Avatar image for realistgamer
realistgamer

835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#14 realistgamer
Member since 2006 • 835 Posts
amen to u brother, amen!
Avatar image for Jecht01
Jecht01

5727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 Jecht01
Member since 2005 • 5727 Posts
The Nintendo PlayStation X :o
Avatar image for goddamn_
goddamn_

884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 goddamn_
Member since 2008 • 884 Posts

Why don't buy all of them? It will be like 250+300+400 = 950$, average working US guy could buy it from one monthly salary.

Avatar image for hip-hop-cola2
hip-hop-cola2

2454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 hip-hop-cola2
Member since 2007 • 2454 Posts

one console would be great!!

only company's like money.... i have a dream, company's don't like to much money

Avatar image for Fiji-Water
Fiji-Water

933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Fiji-Water
Member since 2008 • 933 Posts
.
Avatar image for nintendofreak_2
nintendofreak_2

25896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#20 nintendofreak_2
Member since 2005 • 25896 Posts
One system in the market would be the worst thing to happen to gaming.
Avatar image for Gh0st_Of_0nyx
Gh0st_Of_0nyx

8992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 Gh0st_Of_0nyx
Member since 2007 • 8992 Posts
.Fiji-Water
:lol: good one
Avatar image for dewmandew7
dewmandew7

4152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#22 dewmandew7
Member since 2005 • 4152 Posts
Your dream is flawed. A lot of other people have probably already said it, but competition is important. If there was just one console on the market, what motivation do they have to make a better product if everybody who wants to play games is forced to buy their product?
Avatar image for PullTheTricker
PullTheTricker

4749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 PullTheTricker
Member since 2006 • 4749 Posts

PC is only 1 platform. We don't see bad games on it do we? Lets take the MMO and RTS genre for example. Belongs exclusively to the PC platform.

EA = potential monopoly (NFS allready being milked etc etc)

The danger of a monopoly lies not in the system creators. Its only a pain for the consumer to have to buy all 3 consoles. And a PC gaming on top of that. And I didn't even mention handhelds.

The Movie Industry has PLENTY of competition. Competition does not lie in the system manufacturer.

I personally think it could potentially work well. I might be wrong though...

Avatar image for AdobeArtist
AdobeArtist

25184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 AdobeArtist  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25184 Posts

As it's already been pointed out, a monopoly would create a crushing environment for the consumer with total price control. If there wasn't an X360 or Wii, PS3 would still be $600 today.

And there's another downside I'm surprised nobody else mentioned. Quality of games. Competition brings about innovation. The need for each company to one-up their rivals for the sole motivation of making sure your dollar goes to them and not the other guy. And when each company is breaking their backs to be better than the rivals to earn your favor, we all win with a higher selection of quality titles to choose from.

Avatar image for Mad_Rhetoric
Mad_Rhetoric

3642

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 Mad_Rhetoric
Member since 2005 • 3642 Posts
That would lead to a monopoly which would mean they could charge whatever they wanted for the consoles and games. Which would mean consumers lose out.mattyftm
not only that, the standards of the hardware could be really low, meaning crappy games, also what would you do if you didn't like the controller
Avatar image for omgimba
omgimba

2645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 omgimba
Member since 2007 • 2645 Posts
Let the bells of freedom ring?
Avatar image for redstormrisen
redstormrisen

2015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 redstormrisen
Member since 2007 • 2015 Posts

This situation is not a monopoly. This is a single unified platform much like the blu ray disks or VHS back in the day.

And seeing we are already in an ologopoly it really wouldn't matter much.

Avatar image for RockHardNuts
RockHardNuts

89

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 RockHardNuts
Member since 2006 • 89 Posts

of course there is a lot of downside to my dream( anybody up for a game of Monopoly?)......but it is still my DREAM

Avatar image for Arjdagr8
Arjdagr8

3865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Arjdagr8
Member since 2003 • 3865 Posts
i had a dream, i was in the matrix, then i fell off my bed.
Avatar image for RockHardNuts
RockHardNuts

89

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 RockHardNuts
Member since 2006 • 89 Posts

Now, if you're proposing that Sony, Nintendo, and Microsoft got drunk one night and decided to make one big system for the next generation, then you might be on to something. Nintendo would vouch for a low price and fun "pick-up-and-go" games while Sony would bring the hardware, while Microsoft brought the money. Then Sontindendosoft would be born. Of course, that would never happen.SuperNecro

That name is kind of catchy....

Avatar image for wemhim
wemhim

16110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 wemhim
Member since 2005 • 16110 Posts
Seriously, I bet 80 percent of fanboys are homophobic, sexist, racists.
Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts

[QUOTE="Fiji-Water"].Gh0st_Of_0nyx
:lol: good one

:lol: Thats cool!