They both should have had at least a gig, but the economic reality is that while all of us would have gladly forked over another $50 to have it we don't control who wins console battles.
The casuals control that and they don't care about the RAM, they care about the price.
I thought it was the guys at Epic that begged MS to put in the 512 thatthe 360ended up getting.
They both should have had at least a gig, but the economic reality is that while all of us would have gladly forked over another $50 to have it we don't control who wins console battles.
The casuals control that and they don't care about the RAM, they care about the price.
I thought it was the guys at Epic that begged MS to put in the 512 thatthe 360ended up getting.
Riverwolf007
Well think about it epic said 512 mb and mircosoft said lets go for it lets put in 1 gig
They both should have had at least a gig, but the economic reality is that while all of us would have gladly forked over another $50 to have it we don't control who wins console battles.
The casuals control that and they don't care about the RAM, they care about the price.
I thought it was the guys at Epic that begged MS to put in the 512 thatthe 360ended up getting.
scottishsohot
Well think about it epic said 512 mb and mircosoft said lets go for it lets put in 1 gig
we could spend the rest ofthis consolegeneration complaining about how things could have been better:cry:. but the reality is that things are staying the way they are, and there is no point in discussing what could have been. this is all on the devs' shoulders, and MS and Sony both have the money to motivate them into using every byte of RAM to the fullest. :D
we could spend the rest ofthis consolegeneration complaining about how things could have been better:cry:. but the reality is that things are staying the way they are, and there is no point in discussing what could have been. this is all on the devs' shoulders, and MS and Sony both have the money to motivate them into using every byte of RAM to the fullest. :DMordred19
Heh, Unfortunately monday morning quaterbacking about how a console should have been built is a pretty old video game tradition.
[QUOTE="Mordred19"]we could spend the rest ofthis consolegeneration complaining about how things could have been better:cry:. but the reality is that things are staying the way they are, and there is no point in discussing what could have been. this is all on the devs' shoulders, and MS and Sony both have the money to motivate them into using every byte of RAM to the fullest. :DRiverwolf007
Heh, Unfortunately monday morning quaterbacking about how a console should have been built is a pretty old video game tradition.
"Monday morning quarterbacking" :lol: I've never heard that one before. anyway, monday morning quarterbacking is the most sad of traditions. it solves even less than arguing over which console is more powerful. we could all be discussing more constructive subjects, like which video game girl is hotter, or "who could kill who?" debates.
man, i cant believe the ps3 is weaker, what a rip offironwarrior2
Considering the PS3 XDR ram is much faster then the 360's its hardly weaker not to mention First party PS3 titles clearly look superiorto anything on the 360.
Log in to comment