[QUOTE="Jameslols"]That wasn't a remake... I'ma go Corporate and say REmake was the best. fine remastering BUT it's just a rerelease in HD and it is the best ever the sound is lovely
[QUOTE="kuraimen"]Yes! Still trying to figure out why they reviewed the Splinter Cell collection here and not the good ones like this though... *scratches head*Jandurin
bc in splinter cell the guns go pew pew Lol that might be it!
I hate the games. Always have. But these are just HD upgrades and most of the time the HD upgrades are average at best. A remake is what Halo is getting or what Riddick-Butcher Bay got.
[QUOTE="kuraimen"]Yes! Still trying to figure out why they reviewed the Splinter Cell collection here and not the good ones like this though... *scratches head*sts106mat
hopefully its because they are too busy with skyrim and are giving it the hundreds of hours it requires, instead of spending time re-reviewing old games. Well they didn't have a problem "wasting time" reviewing old Splinter Cell's though.
I hate the games. Always have. But these are just HD upgrades and most of the time the HD upgrades are average at best. A remake is what Halo is getting or what Riddick-Butcher Bay got.
WarTornRuston
you should check them out ICO looks amazing i never played it on the PS2 but god damn is it pretty on the PS3
[QUOTE="sts106mat"][QUOTE="kuraimen"]Yes! Still trying to figure out why they reviewed the Splinter Cell collection here and not the good ones like this though... *scratches head*kuraimen
hopefully its because they are too busy with skyrim and are giving it the hundreds of hours it requires, instead of spending time re-reviewing old games. Well they didn't have a problem "wasting time" reviewing old Splinter Cell's though.
go to the under review section of the site and have a look whats under review guess what its SOTC.
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="sts106mat"] hopefully its because they are too busy with skyrim and are giving it the hundreds of hours it requires, instead of spending time re-reviewing old games.razgriz_101
Well they didn't have a problem "wasting time" reviewing old Splinter Cell's though.
go to the under review section of the site and have a look whats under review guess what its SOTC.
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="sts106mat"] hopefully its because they are too busy with skyrim and are giving it the hundreds of hours it requires, instead of spending time re-reviewing old games.razgriz_101
Well they didn't have a problem "wasting time" reviewing old Splinter Cell's though.
go to the under review section of the site and have a look whats under review guess what its SOTC.
The Perfect Dark remaster. Playing Perfect Dark in dual analogue controls with 60 frames per second? Yes please. I contest that PD needed a remaster more than any other.
The Perfect Dark remaster. Playing Perfect Dark in dual analogue controls with 60 frames per second? Yes please. I contest that PD needed a remaster more than any other.organic_machine
sotc is smooth like butter and ico brings tears to my eyes eff yo PD Pee EwE
[QUOTE="organic_machine"]The Perfect Dark remaster. Playing Perfect Dark in dual analogue controls with 60 frames per second? Yes please. I contest that PD needed a remaster more than any other.Jandurin
sotc is smooth like butter and ico brings tears to my eyes eff yo PD Pee EwEHey!! PD brings tears!! Uhh.. sort of...
I've have only played through Ico so far....incredible. Really is surprising how good it looks. There were textures that you couldn't really make out before that look pretty good now. I know that Shadow of the Colossus is supposed to look really good as well with the detail on the colossi.
[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]Drinking in the morning is not healthy, Mr. Jandurin. Perfect Dark on XBLA comes to mind. lol you wish why even remaster such a boring game
I haven't played Ico yet so I reserve judgment for when I do, but SotC is excellent. If you've never played it and you have the audacity to still call yourself a gamer, you owe it to yourself to play it and the remaster is the ideal way to experience it.
I haven't played Ico yet so I reserve judgment for when I do, but SotC is excellent. If you've never played it and you have the audacity to still call yourself a gamer, you owe it to yourself to play it and the remaster is the ideal way to experience it.
Basinboy
i've been switching between ico and killing a guardian in sotc though i own sotc and have played it before
[QUOTE="sts106mat"][QUOTE="kuraimen"]Yes! Still trying to figure out why they reviewed the Splinter Cell collection here and not the good ones like this though... *scratches head*kuraimen
hopefully its because they are too busy with skyrim and are giving it the hundreds of hours it requires, instead of spending time re-reviewing old games. Well they didn't have a problem "wasting time" reviewing old Splinter Cell's though. But it's the busy season for games/reviews.
My favourite remake is probably Resident Evil on the Gamecube. But that's because I'm not particularly keep on buying HD remakes. The only other one that comes to mind is Half-Life: Source, if that counts. Maybe even the Monkey Island remakes...
[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]Drinking in the morning is not healthy, Mr. Jandurin. Perfect Dark on XBLA comes to mind. But playing SoTC HD is. :P Jandurin, 100% agree man!
[QUOTE="CR00K"]I know that Shadow of the Colossus is supposed to look really good as well with the detail on the colossi.Jandurin
i think the bigger difference in sotc is that they fixed the frame rate issuesframe rate is wayyy better now , but the detail in the colossi just looks amazing, especially on a big tv. I love just holding L1 and running around them , looks so epic.
The Perfect Dark remaster. Playing Perfect Dark in dual analogue controls with 60 frames per second? Yes please. I contest that PD needed a remaster more than any other.organic_machine
I disagree I hated that remaster... The controls were actually made WORSE... They didn't make it true dual analog... The right stick doesn't move the screen it just moves the reticule... And the left stick moves your character... it plays really really awkwardly it is almost impossible to aim.. It was easier with the N64 actually because there was only one stick the direction of where you where moving and where the aiming of the reticule was going didn't conflict one another.
All these "remastered" games are a waste of money imo. The developers should put in some effort and actually create new content instead of just porting the same game at a higher res.
How good a remaster is should be based on the remastering process and the end product, not on how good the game itself already was. From my understanding the Shadow of the Colossus/Ico HD port didn't do anything special versus what other HD port have already done.
How good a remaster is should be based on the remastering prcess and the end pruduct, not on how good the game itself already was. From my understanding the Shadow of the Colossus/Ico HD port didn't anything special. vashkey
I don't understand.. are u saying that the ps3 versions don't look much different than the ps2 version? Cause that's very wrong , very very wrong
[QUOTE="vashkey"]How good a remaster is should be based on the remastering prcess and the end pruduct, not on how good the game itself already was. From my understanding the Shadow of the Colossus/Ico HD port didn't anything special. ultraking
I don't understand.. are u saying that the ps3 versions don't look much different than the ps2 version? Cause that's very wrong , very very wrong The only difference is the resolution, frame rate and draw distance. Nothing else has been altered.
This is the bare minimum for the HD collections you see with the exception of maybe 3d which is par for the course for Sony's HD collections.
If you want an actually drastic improvement of graphics thenthe Halo, MGS and Resident Evil Remakes completely blow the Shadow of the Colossus port out of the water in terms of improvements.
[QUOTE="ultraking"][QUOTE="vashkey"]How good a remaster is should be based on the remastering prcess and the end pruduct, not on how good the game itself already was. From my understanding the Shadow of the Colossus/Ico HD port didn't anything special. vashkey
I don't understand.. are u saying that the ps3 versions don't look much different than the ps2 version? Cause that's very wrong , very very wrong The only difference is the resolution and draw distance. Nothing else has been altered. They also fixed the frame rate problems that SoTC had on PS2.
[QUOTE="ultraking"][QUOTE="vashkey"]How good a remaster is should be based on the remastering prcess and the end pruduct, not on how good the game itself already was. From my understanding the Shadow of the Colossus/Ico HD port didn't anything special. vashkey
I don't understand.. are u saying that the ps3 versions don't look much different than the ps2 version? Cause that's very wrong , very very wrong The only difference is the resolution and draw distance. Nothing else has been altered.that's not all they did. You should watch the behind the scenes that come with the game. Or if you don't want to own epicness you can prolly watch them on youtube. They did more then up rez and higher framerate
[QUOTE="vashkey"][QUOTE="ultraking"]I don't understand.. are u saying that the ps3 versions don't look much different than the ps2 version? Cause that's very wrong , very very wrongsoulitane
The only difference is the resolution and draw distance. Nothing else has been altered. They also fixed the frame rate problems that SoTC had on PS2. Yeah, and this is exactly what you should come to expect from any of these HD ports. In this respect the team ico collection is nothing special. The core game experience might be much better than whats seen in alot of other HD ports but thats saying something about the actual games, not the "remastering" process.
[QUOTE="vashkey"][QUOTE="ultraking"]I don't understand.. are u saying that the ps3 versions don't look much different than the ps2 version? Cause that's very wrong , very very wrongultraking
The only difference is the resolution and draw distance. Nothing else has been altered.that's not all they did. You should watch the behind the scenes that come with the game. Or if you don't want to own epicness you can prolly watch them on youtube. They did more then up rez and higher framerate I've watched the comparisons. They really haven't added anything. Aside from resolution, draw distance and frame rates it's the same game.
[QUOTE="vashkey"][QUOTE="ultraking"][QUOTE="vashkey"] The only difference is the resolution and draw distance. Nothing else has been altered.that's not all they did. You should watch the behind the scenes that come with the game. Or if you don't want to own epicness you can prolly watch them on youtube. They did more then up rez and higher framerate I've watched the comparisons. They really haven't added anything. Aside from resolution, draw distance and frame rates it's the same game.I'm not sure what u were expecting from this game. Its not a remake, its a remaster. On top of the resolution and frame and draw distance they also went back and fixed a ton of textures
[QUOTE="vashkey"][QUOTE="ultraking"]that's not all they did. You should watch the behind the scenes that come with the game. Or if you don't want to own epicness you can prolly watch them on youtube. They did more then up rez and higher framerateultraking
I've watched the comparisons. They really haven't added anything. Aside from resolution, draw distance and frame rates it's the same game.I'm not sure what u were expecting from this game. Its not a remake, its a remaster. On top of the resolution and frame and draw distance they also went back and fixed a ton of textures I wasn't expecting more from it. But Like I said, doing the same thing other hd ports did doesn't make it any better a remaster than any of these other hd collections
[QUOTE="vashkey"][QUOTE="ultraking"][QUOTE="vashkey"] I've watched the comparisons. They really haven't added anything. Aside from resolution, draw distance and frame rates it's the same game.I'm not sure what u were expecting from this game. Its not a remake, its a remaster. On top of the resolution and frame and draw distance they also went back and fixed a ton of textures I wasn't expecting more from it. But Like I said, doing the same thing other hd ports did doesn't make it any better a remaster than any of these other hd collectionsyou make it sound like team ico said they were making a be all end all remaster. I don't understand what your saying at all
[QUOTE="vashkey"][QUOTE="ultraking"]I'm not sure what u were expecting from this game. Its not a remake, its a remaster. On top of the resolution and frame and draw distance they also went back and fixed a ton of texturesultraking
I wasn't expecting more from it. But Like I said, doing the same thing other hd ports did doesn't make it any better a remaster than any of these other hd collectionsyou make it sound like team ico said they were making a be all end all remaster. I don't understand what your saying at all The topic creator suggested that the team ico collection is the best remaster ever. I disagreed and provided reasons as to why.
yes the graphics blew me away. looks better than most ps3 games. Reminds me of how stunned i was by the graphics back on the ps2Androvinus
I think I ran around the turtle colossus for like 15 minutes just looking at how aweome he looked. It really does stand up to most new games on the market
Log in to comment