If 360 can handle GeOW graphics just one year after release........

  • 93 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for zazoo4455
zazoo4455

458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 zazoo4455
Member since 2006 • 458 Posts
then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360.  Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.

On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
Avatar image for blurb1324
blurb1324

4551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 blurb1324
Member since 2004 • 4551 Posts
I'm pretty sure that the PS3 can handle Gears-level graphics. UT3 arguably looks better than Gears.
Avatar image for -GeordiLaForge-
-GeordiLaForge-

7167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 -GeordiLaForge-
Member since 2006 • 7167 Posts
Neither console will max it out (DX10), but both can handle it in some form.
Avatar image for AlbertE-
AlbertE-

300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 AlbertE-
Member since 2007 • 300 Posts
Huge outdoor environments, superior graphics, fully destructible environments, and full use of directx10 =/= Gears of War, sorry.
Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts
Neither console will max it out (DX10), but both can handle it in some form.-GeordiLaForge-
Indeed, anyone who says otherwise is foolish.
Avatar image for Killfox
Killfox

6666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Killfox
Member since 2004 • 6666 Posts
then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360.  Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.

On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
zazoo4455
In time I think it will be possible in some way. Since the 360 has a limited GPU and RAM. The CPU is fine though. Anyways by the time a 360 does look good like crysis. Crysis will be a thing of the past and better looking game will come out. SO the question is will the 360 be able to have games that look better than crysis???
Avatar image for Conker-Fan
Conker-Fan

1239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Conker-Fan
Member since 2007 • 1239 Posts
obviously. Ninja Gaiden: Sigma looks better than Crysis, and thats not the main NG game, just a upgraded port. Imagine NG 2 on the 360 (Team Ninjas home base accordfing to Itagaki. They also know the architecture better)
Avatar image for AlbertE-
AlbertE-

300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 AlbertE-
Member since 2007 • 300 Posts
[QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.

On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
Killfox
In time I think it will be possible in some way. Since the 360 has a limited GPU and RAM. The CPU is fine though. Anyways by the time a 360 does look good like crysis. Crysis will be a thing of the past and better looking game will come out. SO the question is will the 360 be able to have games that look better than crysis???

No.  The better the graphics, the smaller the environments will have to be.  Sure, the 360 improves over time with optimization, but it doesn't get more RAM or a faster CPU.
Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts
obviously. Ninja Gaiden: Sigma looks better than Crysis, and thats not the main NG game, just a upgraded port. Imagine NG 2 on the 360 (Team Ninjas home base accordfing to Itagaki. They also know the architecture better)Conker-Fan
The Halo 3 alpha looks as good as Crysis according to you so why should anyone take you seriously?
Avatar image for Killfox
Killfox

6666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Killfox
Member since 2004 • 6666 Posts
obviously. Ninja Gaiden: Sigma looks better than Crysis, and thats not the main NG game, just a upgraded port. Imagine NG 2 on the 360 (Team Ninjas home base accordfing to Itagaki. They also know the architecture better)Conker-Fan
Wow dont make me laugh so hard that I **** myself and my computer.
Avatar image for AlbertE-
AlbertE-

300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 AlbertE-
Member since 2007 • 300 Posts
Ninja Gaiden: Sigma looks better than CrysisConker-Fan
Yeah, you aren't biased or anything. :roll:
Avatar image for -GeordiLaForge-
-GeordiLaForge-

7167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 -GeordiLaForge-
Member since 2006 • 7167 Posts
[QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.

On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
AlbertE-
In time I think it will be possible in some way. Since the 360 has a limited GPU and RAM. The CPU is fine though. Anyways by the time a 360 does look good like crysis. Crysis will be a thing of the past and better looking game will come out. SO the question is will the 360 be able to have games that look better than crysis???

No. The better the graphics, the smaller the environments will have to be. Sure, the 360 improves over time with optimization, but it doesn't get more RAM or a faster CPU.

No, the more developers learn how to optimize for the hardware, the better games will look. Gears is definitely not all the 360 can handle. EU3 was originally developed for the pc after all.
Avatar image for Killfox
Killfox

6666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Killfox
Member since 2004 • 6666 Posts
[QUOTE="AlbertE-"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.

On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
-GeordiLaForge-
In time I think it will be possible in some way. Since the 360 has a limited GPU and RAM. The CPU is fine though. Anyways by the time a 360 does look good like crysis. Crysis will be a thing of the past and better looking game will come out. SO the question is will the 360 be able to have games that look better than crysis???

No. The better the graphics, the smaller the environments will have to be. Sure, the 360 improves over time with optimization, but it doesn't get more RAM or a faster CPU.

No, the more developers learn how to optimize for the hardware, the better games will look. Gears is definitely not all the 360 can handle. EU3 was originally developed for the pc after all.

I still think your lieing to yourself. 360 will never look better than PC. That is a fact.
Avatar image for muscleserge
muscleserge

3307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#14 muscleserge
Member since 2005 • 3307 Posts
OMG! not this again, the devs who are making the game said that Crysis can not be done on console, and won't deliver the intended experience. Crysis draw distance is atleast 5x that of GeOW. And don't get too exiced, 360 won't put out graphics much better than GeOW. Look at Ninja gaiden and Conker.
Avatar image for MGS9150
MGS9150

2491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 MGS9150
Member since 2004 • 2491 Posts
[QUOTE="Conker-Fan"]obviously. Ninja Gaiden: Sigma looks better than Crysis, and thats not the main NG game, just a upgraded port. Imagine NG 2 on the 360 (Team Ninjas home base accordfing to Itagaki. They also know the architecture better)smokeydabear076
The Halo 3 alpha looks as good as Crysis according to you so why should anyone take you seriously?



Halo 3 right now is in BETA or has passed it and does not look anywhere near crysis.
Avatar image for Killfox
Killfox

6666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Killfox
Member since 2004 • 6666 Posts
[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="Conker-Fan"]obviously. Ninja Gaiden: Sigma looks better than Crysis, and thats not the main NG game, just a upgraded port. Imagine NG 2 on the 360 (Team Ninjas home base accordfing to Itagaki. They also know the architecture better)MGS9150
The Halo 3 alpha looks as good as Crysis according to you so why should anyone take you seriously?



Halo 3 right now is in BETA or has passed it and does not look anywhere near crysis.

Crysis and halo3 in are in the same stages right now. Devs also said it could not be done consoles. Like the other guy said.
Avatar image for mark4091
mark4091

3780

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 mark4091
Member since 2007 • 3780 Posts
[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="Conker-Fan"]obviously. Ninja Gaiden: Sigma looks better than Crysis, and thats not the main NG game, just a upgraded port. Imagine NG 2 on the 360 (Team Ninjas home base accordfing to Itagaki. They also know the architecture better)MGS9150
The Halo 3 alpha looks as good as Crysis according to you so why should anyone take you seriously?



Halo 3 right now is in BETA or has passed it and does not look anywhere near crysis.

halo 3 was in alpha around september, all those videos were from around then
Avatar image for the-very-best
the-very-best

14486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#18 the-very-best
Member since 2006 • 14486 Posts
I think both PS3 and 360 could handle Crysis. I'm sure we'll see the game soon on consoles. I'd be very surprised if we didn't.
Avatar image for Kahuna_1
Kahuna_1

7948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Kahuna_1
Member since 2006 • 7948 Posts
No
Avatar image for AgentA-Mi6
AgentA-Mi6

16736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#20 AgentA-Mi6
Member since 2006 • 16736 Posts
then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360.  Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.

On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
zazoo4455
Lol , The guy is on Denial!!!! LMAO
Avatar image for Kahuna_1
Kahuna_1

7948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Kahuna_1
Member since 2006 • 7948 Posts

[QUOTE="MGS9150"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="Conker-Fan"]obviously. Ninja Gaiden: Sigma looks better than Crysis, and thats not the main NG game, just a upgraded port. Imagine NG 2 on the 360 (Team Ninjas home base accordfing to Itagaki. They also know the architecture better)mark4091
The Halo 3 alpha looks as good as Crysis according to you so why should anyone take you seriously?



Halo 3 right now is in BETA or has passed it and does not look anywhere near crysis.

halo 3 was in alpha around september, all those videos were from around then

halo wont match crysis...someone said crysis is being made for a comp with sli 8800gtxs and a quad core cpu

Avatar image for Killfox
Killfox

6666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Killfox
Member since 2004 • 6666 Posts
I think both PS3 and 360 could handle Crysis. I'm sure we'll see the game soon on consoles. I'd be very surprised if we didn't.
the-very-best
The key word you just said was handle it. Which didnt mean at smooth framerates with all the same things the PC has. If they ported the same game from PC to console the game would run at maybe 15 FPS to about 0 FPS. This is jsut a guestimate from seeing what the new 8800GTX cards can do which is way more powerful than 360s GPU.
Avatar image for AlbertE-
AlbertE-

300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 AlbertE-
Member since 2007 • 300 Posts

[QUOTE="mark4091"][QUOTE="MGS9150"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="Conker-Fan"]obviously. Ninja Gaiden: Sigma looks better than Crysis, and thats not the main NG game, just a upgraded port. Imagine NG 2 on the 360 (Team Ninjas home base accordfing to Itagaki. They also know the architecture better)Kahuna_1

The Halo 3 alpha looks as good as Crysis according to you so why should anyone take you seriously?



Halo 3 right now is in BETA or has passed it and does not look anywhere near crysis.

halo 3 was in alpha around september, all those videos were from around then

halo wont match crysis...someone said crysis is being made for a comp with sli 8800gtxs and a quad core cpu

That is a  load of BS.  I heard somewhere (slipped my mind) that the devs said all the bells and whistles can be run with a single 8800 as long as your other hardware is up to snuff.
Avatar image for asdasd
asdasd

4464

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 asdasd
Member since 2005 • 4464 Posts

Halo 3 - ALPHA Screen


Crysis - PREALPHA Shot

Avatar image for -GeordiLaForge-
-GeordiLaForge-

7167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 -GeordiLaForge-
Member since 2006 • 7167 Posts
[QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="AlbertE-"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.

On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
Killfox
In time I think it will be possible in some way. Since the 360 has a limited GPU and RAM. The CPU is fine though. Anyways by the time a 360 does look good like crysis. Crysis will be a thing of the past and better looking game will come out. SO the question is will the 360 be able to have games that look better than crysis???

No. The better the graphics, the smaller the environments will have to be. Sure, the 360 improves over time with optimization, but it doesn't get more RAM or a faster CPU.

No, the more developers learn how to optimize for the hardware, the better games will look. Gears is definitely not all the 360 can handle. EU3 was originally developed for the pc after all.

I still think your lieing to yourself. 360 will never look better than PC. That is a fact.

:| I didn't say that. I'm mainly a pc gamer after all... But Gears graphics are better than anything on the pc, so really, it already has. And the 360's graphics will surpass Crysis. But the pc will definitely get games that neither console can handle. But not for atleast 2 years...
Avatar image for Kahuna_1
Kahuna_1

7948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Kahuna_1
Member since 2006 • 7948 Posts
[QUOTE="Kahuna_1"]

[QUOTE="mark4091"][QUOTE="MGS9150"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="Conker-Fan"]obviously. Ninja Gaiden: Sigma looks better than Crysis, and thats not the main NG game, just a upgraded port. Imagine NG 2 on the 360 (Team Ninjas home base accordfing to Itagaki. They also know the architecture better)AlbertE-

The Halo 3 alpha looks as good as Crysis according to you so why should anyone take you seriously?



Halo 3 right now is in BETA or has passed it and does not look anywhere near crysis.

halo 3 was in alpha around september, all those videos were from around then

halo wont match crysis...someone said crysis is being made for a comp with sli 8800gtxs and a quad core cpu

That is a  load of BS.  I heard somewhere (slipped my mind) that the devs said all the bells and whistles can be run with a single 8800 as long as your other hardware is up to snuff.

I said it was being made with that...not that you need that to play the game.

Avatar image for AlbertE-
AlbertE-

300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 AlbertE-
Member since 2007 • 300 Posts

Halo 3 - ALPHA Screen


Crysis - PREALPHA Shot

asdasd
Crysis wins.  /thread
Avatar image for AlbertE-
AlbertE-

300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 AlbertE-
Member since 2007 • 300 Posts
[QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="AlbertE-"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.

On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
-GeordiLaForge-
In time I think it will be possible in some way. Since the 360 has a limited GPU and RAM. The CPU is fine though. Anyways by the time a 360 does look good like crysis. Crysis will be a thing of the past and better looking game will come out. SO the question is will the 360 be able to have games that look better than crysis???

No. The better the graphics, the smaller the environments will have to be. Sure, the 360 improves over time with optimization, but it doesn't get more RAM or a faster CPU.

No, the more developers learn how to optimize for the hardware, the better games will look. Gears is definitely not all the 360 can handle. EU3 was originally developed for the pc after all.

I still think your lieing to yourself. 360 will never look better than PC. That is a fact.

:| I didn't say that. I'm mainly a pc gamer after all... But Gears graphics are better than anything on the pc, so really, it already has. And the 360's graphics will surpass Crysis. But the pc will definitely get games that neither console can handle. But not for atleast 2 years...

This simply isn't true.  Neither will it match it.  Maybe the player models may look as good at some point, but the environments on the 360 will always be weaksauce.
Avatar image for Spartan070
Spartan070

16497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Spartan070
Member since 2004 • 16497 Posts
Any console can handle Crysis but are console gamers prepared to handle the downgrade.
Avatar image for zazoo4455
zazoo4455

458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#30 zazoo4455
Member since 2006 • 458 Posts
OMG! not this again, the devs who are making the game said that Crysis can not be done on console, and won't deliver the intended experience. Crysis draw distance is atleast 5x that of GeOW. And don't get too exiced, 360 won't put out graphics much better than GeOW. Look at Ninja gaiden and Conker.muscleserge


Ninja Gaiden came out almost 2 1/2 years after the Xbox was released, and Conker came out over 3 1/2 years after the Xbox was released.  Whereas, GeOW came out only 1 year after the 360 was released.  360's graphics will improve a lot over GeOW.  Try not to be so jealous of the 360.
Avatar image for Spartan070
Spartan070

16497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Spartan070
Member since 2004 • 16497 Posts
but the environments on the 360 will always be weaksauce.
AlbertE-
That's only up to talented devs, not speculation.
Avatar image for -GeordiLaForge-
-GeordiLaForge-

7167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 -GeordiLaForge-
Member since 2006 • 7167 Posts
[QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="AlbertE-"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.

On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
AlbertE-
In time I think it will be possible in some way. Since the 360 has a limited GPU and RAM. The CPU is fine though. Anyways by the time a 360 does look good like crysis. Crysis will be a thing of the past and better looking game will come out. SO the question is will the 360 be able to have games that look better than crysis???

No. The better the graphics, the smaller the environments will have to be. Sure, the 360 improves over time with optimization, but it doesn't get more RAM or a faster CPU.

No, the more developers learn how to optimize for the hardware, the better games will look. Gears is definitely not all the 360 can handle. EU3 was originally developed for the pc after all.

I still think your lieing to yourself. 360 will never look better than PC. That is a fact.

:| I didn't say that. I'm mainly a pc gamer after all... But Gears graphics are better than anything on the pc, so really, it already has. And the 360's graphics will surpass Crysis. But the pc will definitely get games that neither console can handle. But not for atleast 2 years...

This simply isn't true. Neither will it match it. Maybe the player models may look as good at some point, but the environments on the 360 will always be weaksauce.

lol, okay... neither the 360 nor PS3 are anywhere close to showing what they're capable of... Games that look better than Crysis will come out on the PC, 360, and PS3. Crysis will be old news soon enough...
Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts
Any console can handle Crysis but are console gamers prepared to handle the downgrade.Spartan070
You think the Wii can handle Crysis? I am not sure, the Wii can not even handle Oblivion. Then again Crysis can be played on 3 year old PCs.
Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#34 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts
[QUOTE="AlbertE-"][QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="AlbertE-"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.

On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
-GeordiLaForge-
In time I think it will be possible in some way. Since the 360 has a limited GPU and RAM. The CPU is fine though. Anyways by the time a 360 does look good like crysis. Crysis will be a thing of the past and better looking game will come out. SO the question is will the 360 be able to have games that look better than crysis???

No. The better the graphics, the smaller the environments will have to be. Sure, the 360 improves over time with optimization, but it doesn't get more RAM or a faster CPU.

No, the more developers learn how to optimize for the hardware, the better games will look. Gears is definitely not all the 360 can handle. EU3 was originally developed for the pc after all.

I still think your lieing to yourself. 360 will never look better than PC. That is a fact.

:| I didn't say that. I'm mainly a pc gamer after all... But Gears graphics are better than anything on the pc, so really, it already has. And the 360's graphics will surpass Crysis. But the pc will definitely get games that neither console can handle. But not for atleast 2 years...

This simply isn't true. Neither will it match it. Maybe the player models may look as good at some point, but the environments on the 360 will always be weaksauce.

lol, okay... neither the 360 nor PS3 are anywhere close to showing what they're capable of... Games that look better than Crysis will come out on the PC, 360, and PS3. Crysis will be old news soon enough...

So very true. Crysis is not going to be the best looking game ever, forever.
Avatar image for greatatlantic
greatatlantic

1764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#35 greatatlantic
Member since 2003 • 1764 Posts

then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360.  Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.

On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
zazoo4455

Baloney.  You seem to not understand how consoles work.  There is no "improvement" over time, just slight tweaks here and there to make commands run faster.  GeOW has been in development for as long as there was an iota of information available about the 360.  There aren't that many tweaks left to go around.  Any further "improvement" in graphics is going to come at a price elsewhere.  That is usually paid in longer load times, smaller environments, reduced clip distances, less complex AI, simpler shadows, etc.  And unlike the Xbox, the 360 needs to run at high resolutions meaning one can't get that traditional boost when switching from PC to console.  As for the PS3, I think its further ahead then the 360 was released.

Avatar image for -GeordiLaForge-
-GeordiLaForge-

7167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 -GeordiLaForge-
Member since 2006 • 7167 Posts

[QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.

On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
greatatlantic

Baloney. You seem to not understand how consoles work. There is no "improvement" over time, just slight tweaks here and there to make commands run faster. GeOW has been in development for as long as there was an iota of information available about the 360. There aren't that many tweaks left to go around. Any further "improvement" in graphics is going to come at a price elsewhere. That is usually paid in longer load times, smaller environments, reduced clip distances, less complex AI, simpler shadows, etc. And unlike the Xbox, the 360 needs to run at high resolutions meaning one can't get that traditional boost when switching from PC to console. As for the PS3, I think its further ahead then the 360 was released.

You forgot the fact that the UE3 was originally developed for the PC. Do you honestly believe that a game built from the ground up for the 360 won't look and run better? Plus, GeOW doesn't take advantage of the EDRAM.
Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts
360 and PS3 have no DX 10. So quit it.
Avatar image for JayPee89
JayPee89

3488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 JayPee89
Member since 2005 • 3488 Posts
then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360.  Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.

On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
zazoo4455
Whatever you say fanboy.
Avatar image for zazoo4455
zazoo4455

458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#39 zazoo4455
Member since 2006 • 458 Posts
As for the PS3, I think its further ahead then the 360 was released.greatatlantic


LOL!!! That's the joke of the century!! LOL!!!

PS3 is cr*p.
Avatar image for primetime2121
primetime2121

3953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 primetime2121
Member since 2004 • 3953 Posts
[QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="AlbertE-"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.

On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
AlbertE-
In time I think it will be possible in some way. Since the 360 has a limited GPU and RAM. The CPU is fine though. Anyways by the time a 360 does look good like crysis. Crysis will be a thing of the past and better looking game will come out. SO the question is will the 360 be able to have games that look better than crysis???

No. The better the graphics, the smaller the environments will have to be. Sure, the 360 improves over time with optimization, but it doesn't get more RAM or a faster CPU.

No, the more developers learn how to optimize for the hardware, the better games will look. Gears is definitely not all the 360 can handle. EU3 was originally developed for the pc after all.

I still think your lieing to yourself. 360 will never look better than PC. That is a fact.

:| I didn't say that. I'm mainly a pc gamer after all... But Gears graphics are better than anything on the pc, so really, it already has. And the 360's graphics will surpass Crysis. But the pc will definitely get games that neither console can handle. But not for atleast 2 years...

This simply isn't true. Neither will it match it. Maybe the player models may look as good at some point, but the environments on the 360 will always be weaksauce.


let me borrow your crystal ball
Avatar image for Kahuna_1
Kahuna_1

7948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Kahuna_1
Member since 2006 • 7948 Posts
[QUOTE="greatatlantic"]

[QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.

On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
-GeordiLaForge-

Baloney. You seem to not understand how consoles work. There is no "improvement" over time, just slight tweaks here and there to make commands run faster. GeOW has been in development for as long as there was an iota of information available about the 360. There aren't that many tweaks left to go around. Any further "improvement" in graphics is going to come at a price elsewhere. That is usually paid in longer load times, smaller environments, reduced clip distances, less complex AI, simpler shadows, etc. And unlike the Xbox, the 360 needs to run at high resolutions meaning one can't get that traditional boost when switching from PC to console. As for the PS3, I think its further ahead then the 360 was released.

You forgot the fact that the UE3 was originally developed for the PC. Do you honestly believe that a game built from the ground up for the 360 won't look and run better? Plus, GeOW doesn't take advantage of the EDRAM.

i cant believe that even if it is a small linear game.

Avatar image for gamergeekgeek
gamergeekgeek

3395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 gamergeekgeek
Member since 2006 • 3395 Posts

I'm pretty sure that the PS3 can handle Gears-level graphics. UT3 arguably looks better than Gears.blurb1324

which will also be on and better on 360

Avatar image for osan0
osan0

18245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 osan0
Member since 2004 • 18245 Posts
i think consoles will be handle alot of the crysis tech up to a point beyond the directx 9 level but below the dx10 level. however the actual game is out of the question in its current state. the draw distances are too big for a start. there as big as oblivions and the game looks a hell of alot better than oblivion. the GPUs and CPUs on the PS3 and 360 could certainly have a good shot at it but neither machine has enough ram to run the game at max details with a massive draw distance. yes devs can write more efficent code and do a nip and tuck here and there but that will only go so far. i think we will see a crysis game on consoles but it will be closer to the far cry game on the xbox. it wont be as big or as open ended as the PC version (though it will still more than likely be a great game).
Avatar image for skulper34
skulper34

2747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 skulper34
Member since 2004 • 2747 Posts
[QUOTE="greatatlantic"]

[QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.

On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
-GeordiLaForge-

Baloney. You seem to not understand how consoles work. There is no "improvement" over time, just slight tweaks here and there to make commands run faster. GeOW has been in development for as long as there was an iota of information available about the 360. There aren't that many tweaks left to go around. Any further "improvement" in graphics is going to come at a price elsewhere. That is usually paid in longer load times, smaller environments, reduced clip distances, less complex AI, simpler shadows, etc. And unlike the Xbox, the 360 needs to run at high resolutions meaning one can't get that traditional boost when switching from PC to console. As for the PS3, I think its further ahead then the 360 was released.

You forgot the fact that the UE3 was originally developed for the PC. Do you honestly believe that a game built from the ground up for the 360 won't look and run better?



Lol I have played COD2 on X360, and i remember back when i had my 6600GT, my pc played smoother and higher res that the X360, Seriously everyone thinks Consoles are better? Look at Oblivion... PC won... Look at other games that are PC and consoles... PC wins all the time, Better graphics and Smoother gameplay, Also Mods for games, something consoles will never have for their games, Look i hear Quake is coming to X360 and PS3? If Console is so Supirior play Quake on X360 and a PC with 8800GTX or ATi's X2000, Which will be relased before Crysis, it has little over 2X the power that of 8800GTX  from what i hear, it will be 800Mhz on core, and 1.8Ghz on Memory... with 1GB Ram. Play Crysis on consoles and it will slow you down, and the devs went for pc because gamers with high end PCs have a game to enjoy, and dont feel limited to what they can do because X360 hardware puts limit to what they can do.
Avatar image for -GeordiLaForge-
-GeordiLaForge-

7167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 -GeordiLaForge-
Member since 2006 • 7167 Posts
[QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="greatatlantic"]

[QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.

On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
Kahuna_1

Baloney. You seem to not understand how consoles work. There is no "improvement" over time, just slight tweaks here and there to make commands run faster. GeOW has been in development for as long as there was an iota of information available about the 360. There aren't that many tweaks left to go around. Any further "improvement" in graphics is going to come at a price elsewhere. That is usually paid in longer load times, smaller environments, reduced clip distances, less complex AI, simpler shadows, etc. And unlike the Xbox, the 360 needs to run at high resolutions meaning one can't get that traditional boost when switching from PC to console. As for the PS3, I think its further ahead then the 360 was released.

You forgot the fact that the UE3 was originally developed for the PC. Do you honestly believe that a game built from the ground up for the 360 won't look and run better? Plus, GeOW doesn't take advantage of the EDRAM.

i cant believe that even if it is a small linear game.

If you don't want to believe cold hard facts, then I'm through trying to talk some sense into you.
Avatar image for Kahuna_1
Kahuna_1

7948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Kahuna_1
Member since 2006 • 7948 Posts
[QUOTE="Kahuna_1"][QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="greatatlantic"]

[QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.

On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
-GeordiLaForge-

Baloney. You seem to not understand how consoles work. There is no "improvement" over time, just slight tweaks here and there to make commands run faster. GeOW has been in development for as long as there was an iota of information available about the 360. There aren't that many tweaks left to go around. Any further "improvement" in graphics is going to come at a price elsewhere. That is usually paid in longer load times, smaller environments, reduced clip distances, less complex AI, simpler shadows, etc. And unlike the Xbox, the 360 needs to run at high resolutions meaning one can't get that traditional boost when switching from PC to console. As for the PS3, I think its further ahead then the 360 was released.

You forgot the fact that the UE3 was originally developed for the PC. Do you honestly believe that a game built from the ground up for the 360 won't look and run better? Plus, GeOW doesn't take advantage of the EDRAM.

i cant believe that even if it is a small linear game.

If you don't want to believe cold hard facts, then I'm through trying to talk some sense into you.

your word is not fact, a link that has a developer saying it is fact.

Avatar image for -GeordiLaForge-
-GeordiLaForge-

7167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 -GeordiLaForge-
Member since 2006 • 7167 Posts
[QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="greatatlantic"]

[QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.

On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
skulper34

Baloney. You seem to not understand how consoles work. There is no "improvement" over time, just slight tweaks here and there to make commands run faster. GeOW has been in development for as long as there was an iota of information available about the 360. There aren't that many tweaks left to go around. Any further "improvement" in graphics is going to come at a price elsewhere. That is usually paid in longer load times, smaller environments, reduced clip distances, less complex AI, simpler shadows, etc. And unlike the Xbox, the 360 needs to run at high resolutions meaning one can't get that traditional boost when switching from PC to console. As for the PS3, I think its further ahead then the 360 was released.

You forgot the fact that the UE3 was originally developed for the PC. Do you honestly believe that a game built from the ground up for the 360 won't look and run better?



Lol I have played COD2 on X360, and i remember back when i had my 6600GT, my pc played smoother and higher res that the X360, Seriously everyone thinks Consoles are better? Look at Oblivion... PC won... Look at other games that are PC and consoles... PC wins all the time, Better graphics and Smoother gameplay, Also Mods for games, something consoles will never have for their games, Look i hear Quake is coming to X360 and PS3? If Console is so Supirior play Quake on X360 and a PC with 8800GTX or ATi's X2000, Which will be relased before Crysis, it has little over 2X the power that of 8800GTX from what i hear, it will be 800Mhz on core, and 1.8Ghz on Memory... with 1GB Ram. Play Crysis on consoles and it will slow you down, and the devs went for pc because gamers with high end PCs have a game to enjoy, and dont feel limited to what they can do because X360 hardware puts limit to what they can do.

:O Wow!! PC games look better on the pc than when ported to the 360??? :O You don't say...
Avatar image for RMage
RMage

1176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 RMage
Member since 2006 • 1176 Posts
The destroyable environments in crysis have been blown out of proportion. Destroying the trees are cool, but the building destruction is lackluster. The houses are made out of tin sheets, it doesnt blow up into a million splinter of wood or anything.
Avatar image for -GeordiLaForge-
-GeordiLaForge-

7167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 -GeordiLaForge-
Member since 2006 • 7167 Posts
[QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="Kahuna_1"][QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="greatatlantic"]

[QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.

On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
Kahuna_1

Baloney. You seem to not understand how consoles work. There is no "improvement" over time, just slight tweaks here and there to make commands run faster. GeOW has been in development for as long as there was an iota of information available about the 360. There aren't that many tweaks left to go around. Any further "improvement" in graphics is going to come at a price elsewhere. That is usually paid in longer load times, smaller environments, reduced clip distances, less complex AI, simpler shadows, etc. And unlike the Xbox, the 360 needs to run at high resolutions meaning one can't get that traditional boost when switching from PC to console. As for the PS3, I think its further ahead then the 360 was released.

You forgot the fact that the UE3 was originally developed for the PC. Do you honestly believe that a game built from the ground up for the 360 won't look and run better? Plus, GeOW doesn't take advantage of the EDRAM.

i cant believe that even if it is a small linear game.

If you don't want to believe cold hard facts, then I'm through trying to talk some sense into you.

your word is not fact, a link that has a developer saying it is fact.

It's called common sense. A game developed mainly for the PS3 and then ported to the 360 won't look as good as a game developed and optimized specifically for the 360. Just like a game built from the ground up for the 360 will look better than a game ported to the 360 from the pc. And the fact that GeOW runs at 720p without tiling proves that it doesn't take advantage of the EDRAM. The first game to do so will be Halo 3...
Avatar image for Kahuna_1
Kahuna_1

7948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Kahuna_1
Member since 2006 • 7948 Posts
[QUOTE="Kahuna_1"][QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="Kahuna_1"][QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="greatatlantic"]

[QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.

On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
-GeordiLaForge-

Baloney. You seem to not understand how consoles work. There is no "improvement" over time, just slight tweaks here and there to make commands run faster. GeOW has been in development for as long as there was an iota of information available about the 360. There aren't that many tweaks left to go around. Any further "improvement" in graphics is going to come at a price elsewhere. That is usually paid in longer load times, smaller environments, reduced clip distances, less complex AI, simpler shadows, etc. And unlike the Xbox, the 360 needs to run at high resolutions meaning one can't get that traditional boost when switching from PC to console. As for the PS3, I think its further ahead then the 360 was released.

You forgot the fact that the UE3 was originally developed for the PC. Do you honestly believe that a game built from the ground up for the 360 won't look and run better? Plus, GeOW doesn't take advantage of the EDRAM.

i cant believe that even if it is a small linear game.

If you don't want to believe cold hard facts, then I'm through trying to talk some sense into you.

your word is not fact, a link that has a developer saying it is fact.

It's called common sense. A game developed mainly for the PS3 and then ported to the 360 won't look as good as a game developed and optimized specifically for the 360. Just like a game built from the ground up for the 360 will look better than a game ported to the 360 from the pc. And the fact that GeOW runs at 720p without tiling proves that it doesn't take advantage of the EDRAM. The first game to do so will be Halo 3...

? ok arent we talking about gears which was designed for the 360...unless i missed something