This topic is locked from further discussion.
Neither console will max it out (DX10), but both can handle it in some form.-GeordiLaForge-Indeed, anyone who says otherwise is foolish.
then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.In time I think it will be possible in some way. Since the 360 has a limited GPU and RAM. The CPU is fine though. Anyways by the time a 360 does look good like crysis. Crysis will be a thing of the past and better looking game will come out. SO the question is will the 360 be able to have games that look better than crysis???
On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
zazoo4455
[QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.In time I think it will be possible in some way. Since the 360 has a limited GPU and RAM. The CPU is fine though. Anyways by the time a 360 does look good like crysis. Crysis will be a thing of the past and better looking game will come out. SO the question is will the 360 be able to have games that look better than crysis???No. The better the graphics, the smaller the environments will have to be. Sure, the 360 improves over time with optimization, but it doesn't get more RAM or a faster CPU.
On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
Killfox
obviously. Ninja Gaiden: Sigma looks better than Crysis, and thats not the main NG game, just a upgraded port. Imagine NG 2 on the 360 (Team Ninjas home base accordfing to Itagaki. They also know the architecture better)Conker-FanThe Halo 3 alpha looks as good as Crysis according to you so why should anyone take you seriously?
obviously. Ninja Gaiden: Sigma looks better than Crysis, and thats not the main NG game, just a upgraded port. Imagine NG 2 on the 360 (Team Ninjas home base accordfing to Itagaki. They also know the architecture better)Conker-FanWow dont make me laugh so hard that I **** myself and my computer.
[QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.In time I think it will be possible in some way. Since the 360 has a limited GPU and RAM. The CPU is fine though. Anyways by the time a 360 does look good like crysis. Crysis will be a thing of the past and better looking game will come out. SO the question is will the 360 be able to have games that look better than crysis???No. The better the graphics, the smaller the environments will have to be. Sure, the 360 improves over time with optimization, but it doesn't get more RAM or a faster CPU.
On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
AlbertE-
[QUOTE="AlbertE-"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.In time I think it will be possible in some way. Since the 360 has a limited GPU and RAM. The CPU is fine though. Anyways by the time a 360 does look good like crysis. Crysis will be a thing of the past and better looking game will come out. SO the question is will the 360 be able to have games that look better than crysis???No. The better the graphics, the smaller the environments will have to be. Sure, the 360 improves over time with optimization, but it doesn't get more RAM or a faster CPU.
On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
-GeordiLaForge-
[QUOTE="Conker-Fan"]obviously. Ninja Gaiden: Sigma looks better than Crysis, and thats not the main NG game, just a upgraded port. Imagine NG 2 on the 360 (Team Ninjas home base accordfing to Itagaki. They also know the architecture better)smokeydabear076The Halo 3 alpha looks as good as Crysis according to you so why should anyone take you seriously?
[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="Conker-Fan"]obviously. Ninja Gaiden: Sigma looks better than Crysis, and thats not the main NG game, just a upgraded port. Imagine NG 2 on the 360 (Team Ninjas home base accordfing to Itagaki. They also know the architecture better)MGS9150The Halo 3 alpha looks as good as Crysis according to you so why should anyone take you seriously?
[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="Conker-Fan"]obviously. Ninja Gaiden: Sigma looks better than Crysis, and thats not the main NG game, just a upgraded port. Imagine NG 2 on the 360 (Team Ninjas home base accordfing to Itagaki. They also know the architecture better)MGS9150The Halo 3 alpha looks as good as Crysis according to you so why should anyone take you seriously?
then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.Lol , The guy is on Denial!!!! LMAO
On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
zazoo4455
[QUOTE="MGS9150"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="Conker-Fan"]obviously. Ninja Gaiden: Sigma looks better than Crysis, and thats not the main NG game, just a upgraded port. Imagine NG 2 on the 360 (Team Ninjas home base accordfing to Itagaki. They also know the architecture better)mark4091The Halo 3 alpha looks as good as Crysis according to you so why should anyone take you seriously?
halo wont match crysis...someone said crysis is being made for a comp with sli 8800gtxs and a quad core cpu
I think both PS3 and 360 could handle Crysis. I'm sure we'll see the game soon on consoles. I'd be very surprised if we didn't.The key word you just said was handle it. Which didnt mean at smooth framerates with all the same things the PC has. If they ported the same game from PC to console the game would run at maybe 15 FPS to about 0 FPS. This is jsut a guestimate from seeing what the new 8800GTX cards can do which is way more powerful than 360s GPU.
the-very-best
The Halo 3 alpha looks as good as Crysis according to you so why should anyone take you seriously?[QUOTE="mark4091"][QUOTE="MGS9150"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="Conker-Fan"]obviously. Ninja Gaiden: Sigma looks better than Crysis, and thats not the main NG game, just a upgraded port. Imagine NG 2 on the 360 (Team Ninjas home base accordfing to Itagaki. They also know the architecture better)Kahuna_1
halo wont match crysis...someone said crysis is being made for a comp with sli 8800gtxs and a quad core cpu
That is a load of BS. I heard somewhere (slipped my mind) that the devs said all the bells and whistles can be run with a single 8800 as long as your other hardware is up to snuff.[QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="AlbertE-"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.In time I think it will be possible in some way. Since the 360 has a limited GPU and RAM. The CPU is fine though. Anyways by the time a 360 does look good like crysis. Crysis will be a thing of the past and better looking game will come out. SO the question is will the 360 be able to have games that look better than crysis???No. The better the graphics, the smaller the environments will have to be. Sure, the 360 improves over time with optimization, but it doesn't get more RAM or a faster CPU.
On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
Killfox
[QUOTE="Kahuna_1"]The Halo 3 alpha looks as good as Crysis according to you so why should anyone take you seriously?[QUOTE="mark4091"][QUOTE="MGS9150"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="Conker-Fan"]obviously. Ninja Gaiden: Sigma looks better than Crysis, and thats not the main NG game, just a upgraded port. Imagine NG 2 on the 360 (Team Ninjas home base accordfing to Itagaki. They also know the architecture better)AlbertE-
halo wont match crysis...someone said crysis is being made for a comp with sli 8800gtxs and a quad core cpu
That is a load of BS. I heard somewhere (slipped my mind) that the devs said all the bells and whistles can be run with a single 8800 as long as your other hardware is up to snuff.I said it was being made with that...not that you need that to play the game.
[QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="AlbertE-"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.In time I think it will be possible in some way. Since the 360 has a limited GPU and RAM. The CPU is fine though. Anyways by the time a 360 does look good like crysis. Crysis will be a thing of the past and better looking game will come out. SO the question is will the 360 be able to have games that look better than crysis???No. The better the graphics, the smaller the environments will have to be. Sure, the 360 improves over time with optimization, but it doesn't get more RAM or a faster CPU.
On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
-GeordiLaForge-
OMG! not this again, the devs who are making the game said that Crysis can not be done on console, and won't deliver the intended experience. Crysis draw distance is atleast 5x that of GeOW. And don't get too exiced, 360 won't put out graphics much better than GeOW. Look at Ninja gaiden and Conker.muscleserge
but the environments on the 360 will always be weaksauce.That's only up to talented devs, not speculation.
AlbertE-
[QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="AlbertE-"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.In time I think it will be possible in some way. Since the 360 has a limited GPU and RAM. The CPU is fine though. Anyways by the time a 360 does look good like crysis. Crysis will be a thing of the past and better looking game will come out. SO the question is will the 360 be able to have games that look better than crysis???No. The better the graphics, the smaller the environments will have to be. Sure, the 360 improves over time with optimization, but it doesn't get more RAM or a faster CPU.
On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
AlbertE-
Any console can handle Crysis but are console gamers prepared to handle the downgrade.Spartan070You think the Wii can handle Crysis? I am not sure, the Wii can not even handle Oblivion. Then again Crysis can be played on 3 year old PCs.
[QUOTE="AlbertE-"][QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="AlbertE-"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.In time I think it will be possible in some way. Since the 360 has a limited GPU and RAM. The CPU is fine though. Anyways by the time a 360 does look good like crysis. Crysis will be a thing of the past and better looking game will come out. SO the question is will the 360 be able to have games that look better than crysis???No. The better the graphics, the smaller the environments will have to be. Sure, the 360 improves over time with optimization, but it doesn't get more RAM or a faster CPU.
On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
-GeordiLaForge-
then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.
On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
zazoo4455
Baloney. You seem to not understand how consoles work. There is no "improvement" over time, just slight tweaks here and there to make commands run faster. GeOW has been in development for as long as there was an iota of information available about the 360. There aren't that many tweaks left to go around. Any further "improvement" in graphics is going to come at a price elsewhere. That is usually paid in longer load times, smaller environments, reduced clip distances, less complex AI, simpler shadows, etc. And unlike the Xbox, the 360 needs to run at high resolutions meaning one can't get that traditional boost when switching from PC to console. As for the PS3, I think its further ahead then the 360 was released.
[QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.
On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
greatatlantic
Baloney. You seem to not understand how consoles work. There is no "improvement" over time, just slight tweaks here and there to make commands run faster. GeOW has been in development for as long as there was an iota of information available about the 360. There aren't that many tweaks left to go around. Any further "improvement" in graphics is going to come at a price elsewhere. That is usually paid in longer load times, smaller environments, reduced clip distances, less complex AI, simpler shadows, etc. And unlike the Xbox, the 360 needs to run at high resolutions meaning one can't get that traditional boost when switching from PC to console. As for the PS3, I think its further ahead then the 360 was released.
You forgot the fact that the UE3 was originally developed for the PC. Do you honestly believe that a game built from the ground up for the 360 won't look and run better? Plus, GeOW doesn't take advantage of the EDRAM.then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.Whatever you say fanboy.
On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
zazoo4455
[QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="AlbertE-"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.In time I think it will be possible in some way. Since the 360 has a limited GPU and RAM. The CPU is fine though. Anyways by the time a 360 does look good like crysis. Crysis will be a thing of the past and better looking game will come out. SO the question is will the 360 be able to have games that look better than crysis???No. The better the graphics, the smaller the environments will have to be. Sure, the 360 improves over time with optimization, but it doesn't get more RAM or a faster CPU.
On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
AlbertE-
[QUOTE="greatatlantic"][QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.
On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
-GeordiLaForge-
Baloney. You seem to not understand how consoles work. There is no "improvement" over time, just slight tweaks here and there to make commands run faster. GeOW has been in development for as long as there was an iota of information available about the 360. There aren't that many tweaks left to go around. Any further "improvement" in graphics is going to come at a price elsewhere. That is usually paid in longer load times, smaller environments, reduced clip distances, less complex AI, simpler shadows, etc. And unlike the Xbox, the 360 needs to run at high resolutions meaning one can't get that traditional boost when switching from PC to console. As for the PS3, I think its further ahead then the 360 was released.
You forgot the fact that the UE3 was originally developed for the PC. Do you honestly believe that a game built from the ground up for the 360 won't look and run better? Plus, GeOW doesn't take advantage of the EDRAM.i cant believe that even if it is a small linear game.
I'm pretty sure that the PS3 can handle Gears-level graphics. UT3 arguably looks better than Gears.blurb1324
which will also be on and better on 360
[QUOTE="greatatlantic"][QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.
On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
-GeordiLaForge-
Baloney. You seem to not understand how consoles work. There is no "improvement" over time, just slight tweaks here and there to make commands run faster. GeOW has been in development for as long as there was an iota of information available about the 360. There aren't that many tweaks left to go around. Any further "improvement" in graphics is going to come at a price elsewhere. That is usually paid in longer load times, smaller environments, reduced clip distances, less complex AI, simpler shadows, etc. And unlike the Xbox, the 360 needs to run at high resolutions meaning one can't get that traditional boost when switching from PC to console. As for the PS3, I think its further ahead then the 360 was released.
You forgot the fact that the UE3 was originally developed for the PC. Do you honestly believe that a game built from the ground up for the 360 won't look and run better?[QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="greatatlantic"][QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.
On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
Kahuna_1
Baloney. You seem to not understand how consoles work. There is no "improvement" over time, just slight tweaks here and there to make commands run faster. GeOW has been in development for as long as there was an iota of information available about the 360. There aren't that many tweaks left to go around. Any further "improvement" in graphics is going to come at a price elsewhere. That is usually paid in longer load times, smaller environments, reduced clip distances, less complex AI, simpler shadows, etc. And unlike the Xbox, the 360 needs to run at high resolutions meaning one can't get that traditional boost when switching from PC to console. As for the PS3, I think its further ahead then the 360 was released.
You forgot the fact that the UE3 was originally developed for the PC. Do you honestly believe that a game built from the ground up for the 360 won't look and run better? Plus, GeOW doesn't take advantage of the EDRAM.i cant believe that even if it is a small linear game.
If you don't want to believe cold hard facts, then I'm through trying to talk some sense into you.[QUOTE="Kahuna_1"][QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="greatatlantic"][QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.
On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
-GeordiLaForge-
Baloney. You seem to not understand how consoles work. There is no "improvement" over time, just slight tweaks here and there to make commands run faster. GeOW has been in development for as long as there was an iota of information available about the 360. There aren't that many tweaks left to go around. Any further "improvement" in graphics is going to come at a price elsewhere. That is usually paid in longer load times, smaller environments, reduced clip distances, less complex AI, simpler shadows, etc. And unlike the Xbox, the 360 needs to run at high resolutions meaning one can't get that traditional boost when switching from PC to console. As for the PS3, I think its further ahead then the 360 was released.
You forgot the fact that the UE3 was originally developed for the PC. Do you honestly believe that a game built from the ground up for the 360 won't look and run better? Plus, GeOW doesn't take advantage of the EDRAM.i cant believe that even if it is a small linear game.
If you don't want to believe cold hard facts, then I'm through trying to talk some sense into you.your word is not fact, a link that has a developer saying it is fact.
[QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="greatatlantic"][QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.
On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
skulper34
Baloney. You seem to not understand how consoles work. There is no "improvement" over time, just slight tweaks here and there to make commands run faster. GeOW has been in development for as long as there was an iota of information available about the 360. There aren't that many tweaks left to go around. Any further "improvement" in graphics is going to come at a price elsewhere. That is usually paid in longer load times, smaller environments, reduced clip distances, less complex AI, simpler shadows, etc. And unlike the Xbox, the 360 needs to run at high resolutions meaning one can't get that traditional boost when switching from PC to console. As for the PS3, I think its further ahead then the 360 was released.
You forgot the fact that the UE3 was originally developed for the PC. Do you honestly believe that a game built from the ground up for the 360 won't look and run better?[QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="Kahuna_1"][QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="greatatlantic"][QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.
On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
Kahuna_1
Baloney. You seem to not understand how consoles work. There is no "improvement" over time, just slight tweaks here and there to make commands run faster. GeOW has been in development for as long as there was an iota of information available about the 360. There aren't that many tweaks left to go around. Any further "improvement" in graphics is going to come at a price elsewhere. That is usually paid in longer load times, smaller environments, reduced clip distances, less complex AI, simpler shadows, etc. And unlike the Xbox, the 360 needs to run at high resolutions meaning one can't get that traditional boost when switching from PC to console. As for the PS3, I think its further ahead then the 360 was released.
You forgot the fact that the UE3 was originally developed for the PC. Do you honestly believe that a game built from the ground up for the 360 won't look and run better? Plus, GeOW doesn't take advantage of the EDRAM.i cant believe that even if it is a small linear game.
If you don't want to believe cold hard facts, then I'm through trying to talk some sense into you.your word is not fact, a link that has a developer saying it is fact.
It's called common sense. A game developed mainly for the PS3 and then ported to the 360 won't look as good as a game developed and optimized specifically for the 360. Just like a game built from the ground up for the 360 will look better than a game ported to the 360 from the pc. And the fact that GeOW runs at 720p without tiling proves that it doesn't take advantage of the EDRAM. The first game to do so will be Halo 3...[QUOTE="Kahuna_1"][QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="Kahuna_1"][QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="greatatlantic"][QUOTE="zazoo4455"]then Crysis is definitely possible on the 360. Graphics will just get better on the 360, and may eventually even surpass Crysis graphics by a good margin.
On the other hand, the PS3 could probably never handle Crysis graphics or even GeOW graphics.
-GeordiLaForge-
Baloney. You seem to not understand how consoles work. There is no "improvement" over time, just slight tweaks here and there to make commands run faster. GeOW has been in development for as long as there was an iota of information available about the 360. There aren't that many tweaks left to go around. Any further "improvement" in graphics is going to come at a price elsewhere. That is usually paid in longer load times, smaller environments, reduced clip distances, less complex AI, simpler shadows, etc. And unlike the Xbox, the 360 needs to run at high resolutions meaning one can't get that traditional boost when switching from PC to console. As for the PS3, I think its further ahead then the 360 was released.
You forgot the fact that the UE3 was originally developed for the PC. Do you honestly believe that a game built from the ground up for the 360 won't look and run better? Plus, GeOW doesn't take advantage of the EDRAM.i cant believe that even if it is a small linear game.
If you don't want to believe cold hard facts, then I'm through trying to talk some sense into you.your word is not fact, a link that has a developer saying it is fact.
It's called common sense. A game developed mainly for the PS3 and then ported to the 360 won't look as good as a game developed and optimized specifically for the 360. Just like a game built from the ground up for the 360 will look better than a game ported to the 360 from the pc. And the fact that GeOW runs at 720p without tiling proves that it doesn't take advantage of the EDRAM. The first game to do so will be Halo 3...? ok arent we talking about gears which was designed for the 360...unless i missed something
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment