If Microsoft launches next system early

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for keabrown79
keabrown79

626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 keabrown79
Member since 2008 • 626 Posts

How much trouble do you think Sony will be in if any?

Avatar image for nethernova
nethernova

5721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 nethernova
Member since 2008 • 5721 Posts

How much trouble do you think Sony will be in if any?

keabrown79
37% I'd say.
Avatar image for mayceV
mayceV

4633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#3 mayceV
Member since 2008 • 4633 Posts

How much trouble do you think Sony will be in if any?

keabrown79
OVER 9000!!!!!
Avatar image for gamecubepad
gamecubepad

7214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -12

User Lists: 0

#4 gamecubepad
Member since 2003 • 7214 Posts

At least this much trouble.

Avatar image for lloveLamp
lloveLamp

2891

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 lloveLamp
Member since 2009 • 2891 Posts
i dont think sony is gonna be in trouble in japan as mr. kurt russel seems to think. but I dont see the advantage of launching a new xbox right now. the graphical improvement would be really small compared to the previous generational leaps.
Avatar image for Jacobistheman
Jacobistheman

3975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Jacobistheman
Member since 2007 • 3975 Posts

If microsoft launches early, they will be in more trouble than sony. They will lose exclusives because developers don't want to put that much money into a game that will only go on a system that will be on the market for 4 or 5 years, and won't get a huge base. They will loose support of a lot of people who bought the 360 (especially later) becuase those people don't want to have to get a new system all of the time in order to be able to play games. If microsoft rushes the next xbox, there is a good chance it will have another major problem like RROD and if that happens, no one will trust xbox. I don't see how rushing the xbox could be good for microsoft at all. For sony, I don't think it would hurt much. Most of those poeple, and developers who abandon microsoft will go to sony.

Plus, I can't see most people paying 300-600 dollars for a small increase in power that would result from new console released in the next few years.

Avatar image for aia89
aia89

2828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 aia89
Member since 2009 • 2828 Posts

If microsoft launches early, they will be in more trouble than sony. They will lose exclusives because developers don't want to put that much money into a game that will only go on a system that will be on the market for 4 or 5 years, and won't get a huge base. They will loose support of a lot of people who bought the 360 (especially later) becuase those people don't want to have to get a new system all of the time in order to be able to play games. If microsoft rushes the next xbox, there is a good chance it will have another major problem like RROD and if that happens, no one will trust xbox. I don't see how rushing the xbox could be good for microsoft at all. For sony, I don't think it would hurt much. Most of those poeple, and developers who abandon microsoft will go to sony.

Jacobistheman
this is a wise post. bravo!
Avatar image for ChrisJ2004
ChrisJ2004

2818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 ChrisJ2004
Member since 2003 • 2818 Posts

i dont think sony is gonna be in trouble in japan as mr. kurt russel seems to think. but I dont see the advantage of launching a new xbox right now. the graphical improvement would be really small compared to the previous generational leaps.lloveLamp

Obviously, you haven't seen what PCS are doing now. A 100$ graphics card can max most multiplats at 2560x1600 at 30-45 FPS.

Avatar image for Tauu
Tauu

825

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 Tauu
Member since 2005 • 825 Posts

More reliability problems me thinks.

Avatar image for Shinobi120
Shinobi120

5728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Shinobi120
Member since 2004 • 5728 Posts

[QUOTE="lloveLamp"]i dont think sony is gonna be in trouble in japan as mr. kurt russel seems to think. but I dont see the advantage of launching a new xbox right now. the graphical improvement would be really small compared to the previous generational leaps.ChrisJ2004

Obviously, you haven't seen what PCS are doing now. A 100$ graphics card can max most multiplats at 2560x1600 at 30-45 FPS.

Which ones? Do you know? I want to buy one.

Avatar image for -ArchAngeL-777-
-ArchAngeL-777-

3840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#11 -ArchAngeL-777-
Member since 2007 • 3840 Posts
It depends on a few things: 1) how much Microsoft's new system will cost. It will probably be more expensive than the current 360 lineup which means the PS3 will at worse be the same price. Im sure by then it will be at a point where Sony can drop the price some more. This is important because pricing appears to be the number one factor in consoles these days. Sony has actually outsold 360 when the prices are comparable which leads me to point 2)... 2) How will the new console be perceived? The first year perception of 360 was not very good and often was joked as a slightly better Xbox. The PS3's high launch price bailed it out a bit, but that wont be the case this time. Microsoft will have to come up with something that is significantly better than both the PS3 and 360. I truly find this hard to believe. The PS3 has been producing increasingly more impressive games as the years move on, and Blu-ray doesnt appear to be going out of style soon. Unlike the PS2 compared to this gen consoles, the PS3 will most certainly be able to keep up at a cheaper price. Think about what another Microsoft console would have to be to make Uncharted 2, God of War 3, or Gran Turismo 5 look like "last gen"...I cant imagine that lol. 3) will Microsoft end the 360 line with the new console to try to force potential 360 owners to buy their new one, like they did the Xbox? It will be just as tough for a new Microsoft console to make 360 look "last gen" for people to upgrade or skip on a cheaper 360. I almost think they would have to stop production on the 360.
Avatar image for KGB32
KGB32

4279

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 KGB32
Member since 2007 • 4279 Posts
honestly, if either sony, nintendo, or MS release a new console within 2 years, i'll just upgrade my pc and keep my 360
Avatar image for SpideR_CentS
SpideR_CentS

4766

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#13 SpideR_CentS
Member since 2006 • 4766 Posts

Depends what you think is early. Theres another thread talking about 2 years from now being too soon. I would think a 12.12.12 launch date would be awesome and about right.

Avatar image for gamecubepad
gamecubepad

7214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -12

User Lists: 0

#14 gamecubepad
Member since 2003 • 7214 Posts

If microsoft launches early, they will be in more trouble than sony. They will lose exclusives because developers don't want to put that much money into a game that will only go on a system that will be on the market for 4 or 5 years, and won't get a huge base. They will loose support of a lot of people who bought the 360 (especially later) becuase those people don't want to have to get a new system all of the time in order to be able to play games. If microsoft rushes the next xbox, there is a good chance it will have another major problem like RROD and if that happens, no one will trust xbox. I don't see how rushing the xbox could be good for microsoft at all. For sony, I don't think it would hurt much. Most of those poeple, and developers who abandon microsoft will go to sony.

Plus, I can't see most people paying 300-600 dollars for a small increase in power that would result from new console released in the next few years.

Jacobistheman

The irony is that the opposite has shown itself to be true. MS gained devs and took exclusives by launching early this gen. Despite losing money on RROD, they gained market share and users as well.

If MS launched a new Xbox in 2011, and Sony doesn't launch the new PS within a year, then Sony will be screwed. The same cycle will repeat itself. Devs will jump ship to make games for PC and the new Xbox(which is basically 2 for 1), the hardcore gaming base will adopt the NextBox even faster than they did for the 360, and MS will have Natal to get the casuals. MS owned Sony. The Blu-Ray dominance plan failed.

Avatar image for Meowmixxvi
Meowmixxvi

2243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 0

#15 Meowmixxvi
Member since 2008 • 2243 Posts
i just cant see a big improvement from the upcoming gen (graphic wise) within the next 2-4 years... either way if its being release that early, expect long waits for games. the cost of games are going to be pricy due to its production cost.
Avatar image for Legendaryscmt
Legendaryscmt

12532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Legendaryscmt
Member since 2005 • 12532 Posts

Sony won't be in trouble, they'd just be laughing their asses off at how backed up the repair centers get from Microsoft releasing another console too early.

Avatar image for CanYouDiglt
CanYouDiglt

8500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 CanYouDiglt
Member since 2009 • 8500 Posts

How much trouble do you think Sony will be in if any?

keabrown79

I am sure they will be in a lot more trouble they are this gen. Last 2 gens they were the clear winner but this gen still last in sales and going by this website still behind the 360 in game scores. So two gens in a row of getting beat up like this Sony has no chance.

Heck look how far into the gen we are now and Sony is last in console and handheld sales and this is off of the success of ps1 and ps2. I have to admit i am loving this!

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

If microsoft launches early, they will be in more trouble than sony. They will lose exclusives because developers don't want to put that much money into a game that will only go on a system that will be on the market for 4 or 5 years, and won't get a huge base. They will loose support of a lot of people who bought the 360 (especially later) becuase those people don't want to have to get a new system all of the time in order to be able to play games. If microsoft rushes the next xbox, there is a good chance it will have another major problem like RROD and if that happens, no one will trust xbox. I don't see how rushing the xbox could be good for microsoft at all. For sony, I don't think it would hurt much. Most of those poeple, and developers who abandon microsoft will go to sony.

Plus, I can't see most people paying 300-600 dollars for a small increase in power that would result from new console released in the next few years.

Jacobistheman
there SURE is alot of assumption and speculation there. 1. early could mean in the next 3 years. 2.5-7 years has all ways been the cycle of consoles. 3.If microsoft started making it as soon as the 360 was done in spec, then its not likely it will be unreliable specially after what they learned this generation. 4.They wont lose developers Sony follows the same 5-6 year console cycle, so does nintendo and they don't lose em. 5. the generation cycles have all ways resulted in jumps in power not small ones.
Avatar image for GulliversTravel
GulliversTravel

3110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 GulliversTravel
Member since 2009 • 3110 Posts
Depends completely on what both MS and Sony are trying to do. After the flat-lining Wii sales, i dont think neither of them is considering going casual anymore.
Avatar image for furomaster_99
furomaster_99

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 furomaster_99
Member since 2009 • 737 Posts

[QUOTE="keabrown79"]

How much trouble do you think Sony will be in if any?

CanYouDiglt

I am sure they will be in a lot more trouble they are this gen. Last 2 gens they were the clear winner but this gen still last in sales and going by this website still behind the 360 in game scores. So two gens in a row of getting beat up like this Sony has no chance.

Heck look how far into the gen we are now and Sony is last in console and handheld sales and this is off of the success of ps1 and ps2. I have to admit i am loving this!

MS is 2nd place 2 gens in a row, and still way behind first place. That's considered awesome? Second place is the first loser, so at least you lems are first at something. ;)

Avatar image for goldeneye343
goldeneye343

154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 goldeneye343
Member since 2005 • 154 Posts

ya i think microsoft wants to make that mistake again and watch nintendo zoom right passed them ,,

haha ya that wont spell trouble for sony , because loo kat whats happening now, wii and ps3 are out selling 360s worldwide ,

with wii having a substansail lead ,

so if ms repeats mistake 1-release a faulty console for 300 , i am certainally not paying ,

because i have already had 7 360s break due to 3 major problems rrod disc drive problems and power problems and it has also scratched and cracked some of my games mostly gta iv ,, , for some reason and saints row `1

so ya . , good luck ms fans youll need it

they will be known as the disasters of the video game industry

and they didnt win , , if you look at these facts

1 million -so far total xboxs were modded and banned off xbox live , there for only 19 million legal 360s were sold ,

the extra is coming from those modders

2 ,, if the 360 hadnt had problems in the masses half these sales wouldnt exist -i had 4 total bought with 3 times sent into repair

so ya

plus a year lead that did not help them stay out front , in fact it was only a year later ironically ,, wii had already out sold the 360 in total sales

so do you really think after reasearch , that microsoft benefited from the extra year start?

no they actually paid the price , , billions lost to repairs ,,

and they did not lead the generation of consoles available, much like sega , has never lead their console, they had popular much more popularity the ms but they did not come close to its nearest competitor nintendo , ms is comparable to that

Avatar image for CanYouDiglt
CanYouDiglt

8500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 CanYouDiglt
Member since 2009 • 8500 Posts

[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]

[QUOTE="keabrown79"]

How much trouble do you think Sony will be in if any?

furomaster_99

I am sure they will be in a lot more trouble they are this gen. Last 2 gens they were the clear winner but this gen still last in sales and going by this website still behind the 360 in game scores. So two gens in a row of getting beat up like this Sony has no chance.

Heck look how far into the gen we are now and Sony is last in console and handheld sales and this is off of the success of ps1 and ps2. I have to admit i am loving this!

MS is 2nd place 2 gens in a row, and still way behind first place. That's considered awesome? Second place is the first loser, so at least you lems are first at something. ;)

360 is ahead of the PS3 and I am sure most lems on here just smile from ear to ear knowing that fact. The leader of the last 2 gens is still watching the backsides of the 360 and the wii after all this time.
Avatar image for furomaster_99
furomaster_99

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 furomaster_99
Member since 2009 • 737 Posts

[QUOTE="furomaster_99"]

[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]I am sure they will be in a lot more trouble they are this gen. Last 2 gens they were the clear winner but this gen still last in sales and going by this website still behind the 360 in game scores. So two gens in a row of getting beat up like this Sony has no chance.

Heck look how far into the gen we are now and Sony is last in console and handheld sales and this is off of the success of ps1 and ps2. I have to admit i am loving this!

CanYouDiglt

MS is 2nd place 2 gens in a row, and still way behind first place. That's considered awesome? Second place is the first loser, so at least you lems are first at something. ;)

360 is ahead of the PS3 and I am sure most lems on here just smile from ear to ear knowing that fact. The leader of the last 2 gens is still watching the backsides of the 360 and the wii after all this time.

It seems like the xbox is used to watching a back side for two gens in a row...Going for a third?

Avatar image for Blue-Sky
Blue-Sky

10381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#24 Blue-Sky
Member since 2005 • 10381 Posts

If microsoft launches early, they will be in more trouble than sony. They will lose exclusives because developers don't want to put that much money into a game that will only go on a system that will be on the market for 4 or 5 years, and won't get a huge base. They will loose support of a lot of people who bought the 360 (especially later) becuase those people don't want to have to get a new system all of the time in order to be able to play games. If microsoft rushes the next xbox, there is a good chance it will have another major problem like RROD and if that happens, no one will trust xbox. I don't see how rushing the xbox could be good for microsoft at all. For sony, I don't think it would hurt much. Most of those poeple, and developers who abandon microsoft will go to sony.

Plus, I can't see most people paying 300-600 dollars for a small increase in power that would result from new console released in the next few years.

Jacobistheman

You're wrong. Let me explain why you're wrong:

"They will lose exclusives because developers don't want to put that much money into a game that will only go on a system that will be on the market for 4 or 5 years,"
A typical Gen is 4-5 years. Many developers said the reason why they released sequels to 360 first was because they got their developers kits way before SONY. They wanted to work on next gen right away [remember Xbox had 4 years]

"won't get a huge base."
Low install bases are lucrative for a publisher because it gives them the opportunity to release new IPs. This is why many devs switch to a new gen once a dev kits roll out because they know if they have the hottest game on a brand new console, most likely everyone who picks the system up will pick the game up.

"They will loose support of a lot of people who bought the 360 (especially later) becuase those people don't want to have to get a new system all of the time in order to be able to play games."
This is the same for all consoles. People buy consoles every 4-5 years, people in 2005-2007 will be upgrading while the recent adopters probably won't for another 3-4.

"If microsoft rushes the next xbox, there is a good chance it will have another major problem like RROD and if that happens, no one will trust xbox."
How do you know theres a "good chance" that will happen? Launching early just means they're releasing before the competition. It doesn't mean they are "rushing"

"Most of those poeple, and developers who abandon microsoft will go to sony."
Support isn't just console to console, its company to company relationships. Microsoft have been successfully building these relationships with third party devs. They are in and it isn't going away. I'd be more worried about MS's first party.

Avatar image for CanYouDiglt
CanYouDiglt

8500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 CanYouDiglt
Member since 2009 • 8500 Posts

[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"][QUOTE="furomaster_99"]MS is 2nd place 2 gens in a row, and still way behind first place. That's considered awesome? Second place is the first loser, so at least you lems are first at something. ;)

furomaster_99

360 is ahead of the PS3 and I am sure most lems on here just smile from ear to ear knowing that fact. The leader of the last 2 gens is still watching the backsides of the 360 and the wii after all this time.

It seems like the xbox is used to watching a back side for two gens in a row...Going for a third?

Well at leats it is not like the PS3 which is watching everyones backside. While the Wii can laugh at everyone the 360 can laugh at the PS3 the PS3 can laugh at no one.
Avatar image for furomaster_99
furomaster_99

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 furomaster_99
Member since 2009 • 737 Posts

[QUOTE="furomaster_99"]

[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]360 is ahead of the PS3 and I am sure most lems on here just smile from ear to ear knowing that fact. The leader of the last 2 gens is still watching the backsides of the 360 and the wii after all this time.CanYouDiglt

It seems like the xbox is used to watching a back side for two gens in a row...Going for a third?

Well at leats it is not like the PS3 which is watching everyones backside. While the Wii can laugh at everyone the 360 can laugh at the PS3 the PS3 can laugh at no one.

Where's your GOTY nominee? Yeah, I thought so...

Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 blue_hazy_basic  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts
[QUOTE="Jacobistheman"]

If microsoft launches early, they will be in more trouble than sony. They will lose exclusives because developers don't want to put that much money into a game that will only go on a system that will be on the market for 4 or 5 years, and won't get a huge base. They will loose support of a lot of people who bought the 360 (especially later) becuase those people don't want to have to get a new system all of the time in order to be able to play games. If microsoft rushes the next xbox, there is a good chance it will have another major problem like RROD and if that happens, no one will trust xbox. I don't see how rushing the xbox could be good for microsoft at all. For sony, I don't think it would hurt much. Most of those poeple, and developers who abandon microsoft will go to sony.

Plus, I can't see most people paying 300-600 dollars for a small increase in power that would result from new console released in the next few years.

This gen seems to have proved your first paragraph wrong and I'm sure MS will have learned their mistakes (hopefully) from RROD as Sony did from its drives in the PS2. Even if they did "abandon" Sony (only fanboys think like that) why not Nintendo like PS2 users seemed to have gone to? And in 6-7 years why would it only be a small increase in power? Why would it be any difference from the leap from any gen? It seems maybe your post consists of your own biases and hopes rather than any real proof.
Avatar image for RedMasterDX
RedMasterDX

717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 RedMasterDX
Member since 2006 • 717 Posts

I think if Microsoft shouldnt really release a whole new console, but upgrade the 360 with Blu-Ray, package it with Natal w/ game, and maybe even do a hardware upgrade for better performance. All you have to do is swap the hard drive from your old 360 into the new one.

Avatar image for WithoutGraceXII
WithoutGraceXII

1797

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 WithoutGraceXII
Member since 2007 • 1797 Posts
I wonder how many people would lose their jobs if Microsoft's next system launched with the failure rate of Xbox 360. Oh that's right none, because they wanted to release flawed hardware and then lose millions of dollars replacing them all for free.
Avatar image for reveiwer
reveiwer

650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 reveiwer
Member since 2008 • 650 Posts

Depends completely on what both MS and Sony are trying to do. After the flat-lining Wii sales, i dont think neither of them is considering going casual anymore.GulliversTravel

explain why wii still beat both hardcore consoles last month then

and anyway MS would probably release their console in 2011 since many different engines would come by then. Although I dont expect a major jump from this gen I do expect NATAL to be bundled with it and I expect a $300 price tag because as the WII and the PS3 haveproven price is a major factor in console purchases.

Avatar image for get-ka12
get-ka12

1946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#32 get-ka12
Member since 2009 • 1946 Posts
I don't think they really can with the recession. Plus, how many people can even afford to buy it?
Avatar image for lloveLamp
lloveLamp

2891

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 lloveLamp
Member since 2009 • 2891 Posts

[QUOTE="lloveLamp"]i dont think sony is gonna be in trouble in japan as mr. kurt russel seems to think. but I dont see the advantage of launching a new xbox right now. the graphical improvement would be really small compared to the previous generational leaps.ChrisJ2004

Obviously, you haven't seen what PCS are doing now. A 100$ graphics card can max most multiplats at 2560x1600 at 30-45 FPS.

well TVs dont do 1600p. i think that next gen is going to be more about incorporating the whole motion control and home media center aspect of gaming consoles. they want to make it your one stop shop for home entertainment and 1600p is not going to help that
Avatar image for Sonwhy
Sonwhy

1032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Sonwhy
Member since 2009 • 1032 Posts

None becuz they most likely will want alot of money for the new console that they are not going to get from most people this time around due to the high failure rate of next gen console systems. Its bound to be alot worse.

Usually it takes awhile for these companies out there to decide if they even want to cover someting that is their fault. As MS recently did something about rrod but it took awhile and sony does nothing right now with ylod but that could change. Like I said when its their fault they are looking to make as much as possilbe whether its ethical or unethical.

Avatar image for ChartTopper93
ChartTopper93

880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 ChartTopper93
Member since 2006 • 880 Posts

If microsoft launches early, they will be in more trouble than sony. They will lose exclusives because developers don't want to put that much money into a game that will only go on a system that will be on the market for 4 or 5 years, and won't get a huge base. They will loose support of a lot of people who bought the 360 (especially later) becuase those people don't want to have to get a new system all of the time in order to be able to play games. If microsoft rushes the next xbox, there is a good chance it will have another major problem like RROD and if that happens, no one will trust xbox. I don't see how rushing the xbox could be good for microsoft at all. For sony, I don't think it would hurt much. Most of those poeple, and developers who abandon microsoft will go to sony.

Plus, I can't see most people paying 300-600 dollars for a small increase in power that would result from new console released in the next few years.

Jacobistheman

did it hurt when you pulled all that out your ***?

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50095

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#36 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50095 Posts
Huge trouble considering the vast sum of money they've yet to get back on the PS3. Microsoft would have the lead over Sony for a very long time--possibly even two or more years even.
Avatar image for chessik101
chessik101

43

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 chessik101
Member since 2009 • 43 Posts

am a xbox fan,but if sony didnt compete nex gen it would make me mad and sad,but there still nintendo!

Avatar image for walkingdream
walkingdream

4883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 walkingdream
Member since 2009 • 4883 Posts
People have to remember that Microsoft is looking into the future not today, they are looking at cards that our being planned or thought of not the top line we see today. So yes by the time they release the console the graphics will be a big leap. However i don't think they should release it for at least another 2-3 years
Avatar image for Wings_008
Wings_008

3813

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 173

User Lists: 0

#39 Wings_008
Member since 2008 • 3813 Posts
i think the new console will be launched in late 2011, there is no reason to launch a new one right now the 360 is doing great, i suspect Sony will launch a new console early too to make up for the PS3's utter failure
Avatar image for Trmpt
Trmpt

2381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Trmpt
Member since 2008 • 2381 Posts

What is "early"?

Because 2011 is "ontime".

Avatar image for Trmpt
Trmpt

2381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Trmpt
Member since 2008 • 2381 Posts

Plus, I can't see most people paying 300-600 dollars for a small increase in power that would result from new console released in the next few years.

Jacobistheman

There will most likely be a bigger leap in power going from this gen to next than there was last gen to this gen.

Mainly because of how this gen is going to last longer than last gen.

Personally, I cant wait. :)

Avatar image for furomaster_99
furomaster_99

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 furomaster_99
Member since 2009 • 737 Posts

i think the new console will be launched in late 2011, there is no reason to launch a new one right now the 360 is doing great, i suspect Sony will launch a new console early too to make up for the PS3's utter failureWings_008
Compared to what, the wii? If you are speaking of sales, then the 360 is a failure too. Take out the year head start and the ps3 and 360 have sold at basically the same rate. That failure you speak of is up for yet another GOTY, and currently beat itself with another console graphics king. Okay, you can go back to playing Halo; I'm done. Have a nice day! :)

Avatar image for battalionwars13
battalionwars13

1264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#43 battalionwars13
Member since 2007 • 1264 Posts

[QUOTE="Wings_008"]i think the new console will be launched in late 2011, there is no reason to launch a new one right now the 360 is doing great, i suspect Sony will launch a new console early too to make up for the PS3's utter failurefuromaster_99

Compared to what, the wii? If you are speaking of sales, then the 360 is a failure too. Take out the year head start and the ps3 and 360 have sold at basically the same rate. That failure you speak of is up for yet another GOTY, and currently beat itself with another console graphics king. Okay, you can go back to playing Halo; I'm done. Have a nice day! :)

Failure to Sony, seeing as they lose money on each one sold.
Avatar image for Shinobi120
Shinobi120

5728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Shinobi120
Member since 2004 • 5728 Posts

[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]360 is ahead of the PS3 and I am sure most lems on here just smile from ear to ear knowing that fact. The leader of the last 2 gens is still watching the backsides of the 360 and the wii after all this time.furomaster_99
It seems like the xbox is used to watching a back side for two gens in a row...Going for a third?

They don't care about being in 1st place, or whatever. Just as long as their console is profitable. Plus Nintendo may have won in sales, but they didn't win in the most important category of the gaming industry: Games.

The irony is that the opposite has shown itself to be true. MS gained devs and took exclusives by launching early this gen. Despite losing money on RROD, they gained market share and users as well.

If MS launched a new Xbox in 2011, and Sony doesn't launch the new PS within a year, then Sony will be screwed. The same cycle will repeat itself. Devs will jump ship to make games for PC and the new Xbox(which is basically 2 for 1), the hardcore gaming base will adopt the NextBox even faster than they did for the 360, and MS will have Natal to get the casuals. MS owned Sony. The Blu-Ray dominance plan failed.

gamecubepad

Indeed. A lot of people aren't going to care if a certain gaming system comes out much, much later. Look at both Gamecube & X-Box 1. X-Box first arrived back on November 15, 2001 in the U.S., while Gamecube first arrived in September 14, 2001 in Japan. They came out longer after the PS2 came out, & both of them were more powerful than the PS2, but last gen was already decided that the PS2 was the winner (with X-Box coming in 2nd place with 22 million units, & Gamecube came out in 3rd place with about 21.74 million units), & they already have about 140+ million units sold. People want to play games now, not later.

Avatar image for HOMIE_G64
HOMIE_G64

1482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#45 HOMIE_G64
Member since 2005 • 1482 Posts

[QUOTE="furomaster_99"][QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]It seems like the xbox is used to watching a back side for two gens in a row...Going for a third?

garland51

They don't care about being in 1st place, or whatever. Just as long as their console is profitable.

The irony is that the opposite has shown itself to be true. MS gained devs and took exclusives by launching early this gen. Despite losing money on RROD, they gained market share and users as well.

If MS launched a new Xbox in 2011, and Sony doesn't launch the new PS within a year, then Sony will be screwed. The same cycle will repeat itself. Devs will jump ship to make games for PC and the new Xbox(which is basically 2 for 1), the hardcore gaming base will adopt the NextBox even faster than they did for the 360, and MS will have Natal to get the casuals. MS owned Sony. The Blu-Ray dominance plan failed.

gamecubepad

Indeed. A lot of people aren't going to care if a certain gaming system comes out much, much later. Look at both Gamecube & X-Box 1. X-Box first arrived back on November 15, 2001 in the U.S., while Gamecube first arrived in September 14, 2001 in Japan. They came out longer after the PS2 came out, & both of them were more powerful than the PS2, but last gen was already decided that the PS2 was the winner (with X-Box coming in 2nd place with 22 million units, & Gamecube came out in 3rd place with about 21.74 million units), & they already have about 140+ million units sold. People want to play games now, not later.

I'm pretty sure the quality of the games on the PS2 were what sold the system, not the release date.
Avatar image for get-ka12
get-ka12

1946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#46 get-ka12
Member since 2009 • 1946 Posts
Don't forget that the consoles this gen were unusually expensive at the start, so don't be surprised if the cycle delays a couple years due to the more powerful hardware the three companies invested into their creations. This is beating a dead horse, but the Wii has barely managed to take off and show its potential. Yes, there are good games, but they are way too few and far between. Not enough to justify the time to "move on" when the current one hasn't even proved itself yet.
Avatar image for MAJOR_KANE
MAJOR_KANE

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#47 MAJOR_KANE
Member since 2009 • 26 Posts

Sony is releasing systems left and right, not only systems but good quality ones too. They are also releasing constant updates for the PS3 System, as well as the PSP System. The only thing I will give Microsoft, is that whenever I owned an Xbox 360 Elite, I got the dashboard update that added the ability to have clothes and whatnot for your avatar. So far though Sony has a rather large head start in the gaming industry.