If they gimp MW3 like blops will you still buy it? What I mean is if they gimp noob tubes and secondary weapons. Or if they gimp killstreaks by making them not chainable.Or if they gimp sniping. All of these things made blops unenjoyable to me.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I'm still confused as to why they gimped snipers the most in black ops... you'd think they'd gimp the most effective weapons, not the least effective.
If they gimp MW3 like blops will you still buy it? What I mean is if they gimp noob tubes and secondary weapons. Or if they gimp killstreaks by making them not chainable.Or if they gimp sniping. All of these things made blops unenjoyable to me.
jdc6305
All of what you mentioned weren't gimps but improvements...except sniping.
Dude it was good in Blops when things like Noob Tube and such were less powerful. They were ridiculously cheap in MW2.
I'll buy it either way, and BlOps definitely wasn't gimped or glitchy, especially compared to MW2 and World at War. It was also the most balanced even if about half of the weapons weren't all that powerful as a result.
I have high hopes for MW3, with Ravn, Sledgehammer and the new IW at work on it I'd say it has a great chance at moving the series forward like MW1 did.
All of those things drastically improved the online experience.If they gimp MW3 like blops will you still buy it? What I mean is if they gimp noob tubes and secondary weapons. Or if they gimp killstreaks by making them not chainable.Or if they gimp sniping. All of these things made blops unenjoyable to me.
jdc6305
So you hate Black Ops because it's a more balanced game.
Seriously?
DarkLink77
Hey noobs be noobin.
Anyways, I forgot to mention that I will not be getting this game at all.
You mean if they make an actual fun game that doesn't cater to noobs by letting you get 20 kills without even shooting anyone? Yes, yes I will.bobbetybobNicely said.
if mw3 didnt cater to campers,toned down the killstreaks and balance out perks then i will buy it.....jesus the ideas IW came up with were terribad in mw2
and dont get me started on treyarch and black ops because it's in the same boat
Im not exactly looking foward to it but i know it will be a day 1 buy since everyone i know will have it.
the only gimped on black ops in my opinion was the graphics. all the kill streaks were fine. maybe its just cuz i had the ps3 version but the game could of been alot better with decent graphics and a steady frame rate. although hope MW3 has a wow factor or something to make it beatter than just another call of duty
If it has Spec Ops, then I'm 90% sure I'm buying it.
Blabadon
Funny how I posted my response right after you. Quite opposite views LOL.
[QUOTE="DarkLink77"]
So you hate Black Ops because it's a more balanced game.
Seriously?
psn8214
This plus ...
>gimped like Blops
>gimped
>Blops
>implying that MW2 wasn't gimped
>you know, MW2, with its fantastic PC support like text chat and mouse control
>:|
If that's a negative for you, please take whatever game console you own, and throw it out the window. Thanks.If they gimp MW3 like blops will you still buy it? What I mean is if they gimp noob tubes and secondary weapons. .
jdc6305
gimped? They improved the game by doing those. :?If they gimp MW3 like blops will you still buy it? What I mean is if they gimp noob tubes and secondary weapons. Or if they gimp killstreaks by making them not chainable.Or if they gimp sniping. All of these things made blops unenjoyable to me.
jdc6305
:lol: Nothing shall ever be as gimped as the PC version of MW2 ever again.
DarkLink77
True that. I fired it up just to see how the community was the other day, and it took me ~4 min to connect to a game (yeah that P2P was so much faster and easier than dedicated servers IW :| ) and when I got in I'm lagging and everyone's hacking. Black Ops, which I play regularly, takes maybe 15 sec to click on one of my favorite servers and join. Never seen a hacker, and my connection is consistently great.
I'm still confused as to why they gimped snipers the most in black ops... you'd think they'd gimp the most effective weapons, not the least effective.
the_mitch28
I never play as sniper, but I remember being irrated playing MW2 where a sniper would hit you in the foot and it would count as a 1 shot kill. Especially since you know the sniper is just sitting there waiting for you to run through some high traffic area. Sometimes it appeared you weren't even hit, like the sniper rifle had a "blast radius". That was just messed up. I can tell you as a "late arriver" to MW2 that stuff was hella annoying, as were all the killstreaks. In some games it felt like you would get killed 3 or 4 times in a row before you could even move (thanks to chopper gunners killing you right as you spawn). Black Ops had some spawn trapping depending on the map/gametype as well, but from what I could tell it wasn't nearly as bad as MW2. Plus you could play the "barebones" modes where you don't even get scopes or killstreaks. That was actually my favorite mode in black ops, just gunplay, no BS.
Really it should be like Bad Company 2 where with most sniper rifles, only a headshot is a 1 shot kill at a distance. So only a skillshot kills you, not some random "blast radius" snipe that barely knicks you in the foot or doesn't appear to hit you at all in the killcam. Up close it can be 1 shot on the body but extremeties definitely should not be 1 shot kills, bodyshots at a distance should take you down to like 10% health. Not kill you instantly
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment