if PS3 has better hardware then why does 360 get the edge on games

am i wrong in assuming that the ps3 has better hardware (blue ray aside) or are the dev just preferıng to work on the 360 . It seems to be that the xbox 360 gets the edge on almost every Multi plat. Assumption on ps3 vs xbox 360 gameplay ıs based on the comparison GS made....so I'm assuming there neutral.....ıt seems that the 360 gets the edge graphics and gameplay exprience

Because our lord and creator, the Flying Spaghetti Monster made it so, and lo it was good.

But in truth because the 360 is easier too work with, so the developers don't have too spend much time figuring out how too use it. There's probebly other reasons, but I don't really care right now.

1. X360 games are easier to make while the PS3 hardware is relatively new, hence developers aren't quite used to it. Actually, I don't even know if they'll get used to it someday.

2. Cell processor in the PS3 crushes the X360 one but the GPU in the X360 is better than the PS3 one.

Sony released late, and that means way too many games get ported from my awesome 360 to the machine...instead of making it deliberately for the PS3.

Case in point : bioshock is coming to the PS3. Ports dont refect the actual machine well, however, exclusives do.

the exclusive ps3 games do look nice (many of them) but there aren't enough.

because developers favor the 360 and that's a factedo-tensei

No, that's not a fact. While it's probably true that more developers favor the 360 than the PS3 (this is mostly due to it being "easier" to develop for the 360; it's less different), don't generalize them all into the same.

1. X360 games are easier to make while the PS3 hardware is relatively new, hence developers aren't quite used to it. Actually, I don't even know if they'll get used to it someday.

2. Cell processor in the PS3 crushes the X360 one but the GPU in the X360 is better than the PS3 one.

Adversary16

am i wrong in assuming that the ps3 has better hardware (blue ray aside) or are the dev just preferıng to work on the 360 . It seems to be that the xbox 360 gets the edge on almost every Multi plat. Assumption on ps3 vs xbox 360 gameplay ıs based on the comparison GS made....so I'm assuming there neutral.....ıt seems that the 360 gets the edge graphics and gameplay exprience

fsem10

lemmings always forget that the 360 has the edge FOR NOW, and even that is not true if you look at games where the devs put some effort into it the ps3 is even superior (e.g. dmc4, burnout, gta4)

[QUOTE="fsem10"]

am i wrong in assuming that the ps3 has better hardware (blue ray aside) or are the dev just preferıng to work on the 360 . It seems to be that the xbox 360 gets the edge on almost every Multi plat. Assumption on ps3 vs xbox 360 gameplay ıs based on the comparison GS made....so I'm assuming there neutral.....ıt seems that the 360 gets the edge graphics and gameplay exprience

sambalimbo

lemmings always forget that the 360 has the edge FOR NOW, and even that is not true if you look at games where the devs put some effort into it the ps3 is even superior (e.g. dmc4, burnout, gta4)

am i wrong in assuming that the ps3 has better hardware (blue ray aside) or are the dev just preferıng to work on the 360 . It seems to be that the xbox 360 gets the edge on almost every Multi plat. Assumption on ps3 vs xbox 360 gameplay ıs based on the comparison GS made....so I'm assuming there neutral.....ıt seems that the 360 gets the edge graphics and gameplay exprience

fsem10

If the 360 has such superior hardware then why does the ps3 have the edge on reliability?

If the wii is not next gen and is inferior as most of u cows and lemmings would say then why is it outselling the 360 and ps3?

U see how I could have made a thread yapping about something that is pointless here and can be fanboyish aswell but its a waste of time because u are not going to get a correct answer, its always going to be an arguement. Both consoles are about the same when generating graphics, just some devs know how to take full advantage of a certain system better then others.

THe PS3 will be dependant on its exclusives.

THe multiplats will never fall in the PS3s favor in a massive way.

But games like Killzone 2, Final Fantasy 13, GT 5, MGS 4 are showing the horsepower very well.

[QUOTE="fsem10"]

am i wrong in assuming that the ps3 has better hardware (blue ray aside) or are the dev just preferıng to work on the 360 . It seems to be that the xbox 360 gets the edge on almost every Multi plat. Assumption on ps3 vs xbox 360 gameplay ıs based on the comparison GS made....so I'm assuming there neutral.....ıt seems that the 360 gets the edge graphics and gameplay exprience

sambalimbo

lemmings always forget that the 360 has the edge FOR NOW, and even that is not true if you look at games where the devs put some effort into it the ps3 is even superior (e.g. dmc4, burnout, gta4)

we have been hearing that since 2006.... enough is enough

so a small number of multiplats look better on the PS3.... great well all the other multiplats are either equal or better on the 360

am i wrong in assuming that the ps3 has better hardware (blue ray aside) or are the dev just preferıng to work on the 360 . It seems to be that the xbox 360 gets the edge on almost every Multi plat. Assumption on ps3 vs xbox 360 gameplay ıs based on the comparison GS made....so I'm assuming there neutral.....ıt seems that the 360 gets the edge graphics and gameplay exprience

fsem10

Numerous factors. Firstly, the Xbox 360 is usually used as the primary development platform. This makes most multiplatform games on the PS3, essentially ports. Secondly, the PS3's CPU is vastly different to the Xbox 360's CPU, however, games developed on the Xbox 360 can be ported more easily to the PS3 however, games which are build from the ground up to harness the powre of the PS3's CPU, cannot be easily ported to the Xbox 360. Thirdly, the Xbox 360 is easier to develop for, making it often the viable choice as the primary development platform. this is because Microsoft is very good at software so it would stand to reason that this would be the case. In addition, having been out for a year longer, devs have more experience with it, so it makes sense to primarily develop on it.

1. X360 has a standard PC DirectX structure. I mean, it is a 'DirectX Box' after all, from the team that designed DirectX on the PC.

2. The Playstation 3 has the friggin' cell.

If the 360 has such superior hardware then why does the ps3 have the edge on reliability?

clintos59

that doesnt make any sense, a car can run faster then all the others but it can also break down easilly, does that stop said car from still being the fastest? no

and by the way nobody claims the 360 has superior hardware, its sony fanboys that claim the PS3 has superior hardware

[QUOTE="fsem10"]

am i wrong in assuming that the ps3 has better hardware (blue ray aside) or are the dev just preferıng to work on the 360 . It seems to be that the xbox 360 gets the edge on almost every Multi plat. Assumption on ps3 vs xbox 360 gameplay ıs based on the comparison GS made....so I'm assuming there neutral.....ıt seems that the 360 gets the edge graphics and gameplay exprience

donwoogie

Numerous factors. Firstly, the Xbox 360 is usually used as the primary development platform. This makes most multiplatform games on the PS3, essentially ports. Secondly, the PS3's CPU is vastly different to the Xbox 360's CPU, however, games developed on the Xbox 360 can be ported more easily to the PS3 however, games which are build from the ground up to harness the powre of the PS3's CPU, cannot be easily ported to the Xbox 360. Thirdly, the Xbox 360 is easier to develop for, making it often the viable choice as the primary development platform. this is because Microsoft is very good at software so it would stand to reason that this would be the case. In addition, having been out for a year longer, devs have more experience with it, so it makes sense to primarily develop on it.

thats pretty much it, Devs want to make money and porting games from the 360 is the cheapest way to go.

I dont mind if multiplats look the same on both consoles, but I think its silly when one version looks worse. On the comparason GS did you could see that COD4 was pretty much identical on both consoles, and with multiplats thats the way it shuld be.

I think that the ps3 is more powerful, but we can only tell from exclusives and its difficult to compare 2 different games.

ill list them;

the 360 is the lead development platform

the 360 is much easyer to program for

the ps3 isnt quite as powerfull as people say, its comparable to the 360 thus making the first two out-weigh its slight power advantage.

multiplats look almost identical on both, rendering (pun intended:P) this argument futile. they are so close its all just pixel counting.

am i wrong in assuming that the ps3 has better hardware (blue ray aside) or are the dev just preferıng to work on the 360 . It seems to be that the xbox 360 gets the edge on almost every Multi plat. Assumption on ps3 vs xbox 360 gameplay ıs based on the comparison GS made....so I'm assuming there neutral.....ıt seems that the 360 gets the edge graphics and gameplay exprience

fsem10