The people making this argument are quite confusing and they seem to try to ignore games when it seems convenient for them. all of a sudden people want to try to act like PC matters when compairing graphics on consoles. it seems to be a very despeate attempt to undermine the fact that PS3 has become the graphics leader here on consoles.
Everybody was fine with the origianl xbox having graphics kings right? but what happend? the PC didn't exist then or something?
Splinter Cell PC >>>>>>>>> SC xbox
Riddick pC >>>>>>>>>>>>> Riddick xbox
KOTOR PC >>>>>>>>>>>>> Koror xbox
Morrowind PC >>>>>>>>>>> Marrowind xbox
:? yet people said xbox had graphics kings and everybody was fine with that...why the change now?
Certian people try to play the PC as a damage control card to PS3 having superior graphics to xbox360 but that doesn't work and exposes those people as trolls when they try to say xbox360 ever had one because PC games never stopped existing and since the PC was never interjected into *console* gfx arguments before PS3 started dominating xbox360 in graphics I don't think that's a valid argument now.
graphics king is a term that always symbolized consoles, since PC is a leverageable system it never needed one because it's graphics are always dependant on your setup and could have the highest assets possible or total crap, eveyone before understood this but it seems fanboys want to change the rules now.
Disscus?
Log in to comment