This is my last hope for a good Sonic games. *Please be good* I'm still hyping high A to low AA, which is god for a 3D Sonic. :P I know it's sad. :( I know many here on these forums have already lost hope in Sonic but I plead to you guys to at least wait until this reveiw and see what happens. :) What do you guys think?
That's ridiculous. Only Shadow and the new one for 360 and PS3 have been bad. Heroes was good, the GC ports and Rivals were decent, and all of the GBA games, Dreamcast games and Sonic Rush were great. Don't come and tell me they should give up on such a long lasting series just because Gamespot says so. Go and actually play the games instead of just taking GS's word as the word of god.
[QUOTE="poopinloop32"]I hope if this game flops Sheep dont just go saying "Well i give up on Sonic" man up and handle the flopSyluxElite
But anyone, sheep, cow, or leeming has a right to give up on Sonic........... :? I understand they do...but im just hoping they dont run away from the flop...if it flops
[QUOTE="SyluxElite"][QUOTE="poopinloop32"]I hope if this game flops Sheep dont just go saying "Well i give up on Sonic" man up and handle the floppoopinloop32
But anyone, sheep, cow, or leeming has a right to give up on Sonic........... :? I understand they do...but im just hoping they dont run away from the flop...if it flops I will tell you that I will face it and not run away. Hell I'll even make a thread for it. :P
That's ridiculous. Only Shadow and the new one for 360 and PS3 have been bad. Heroes was good, the GC ports and Rivals were decent, and all of the GBA games, Dreamcast games and Sonic Rush were great. Don't come and tell me they should give up on such a long lasting series just because Gamespot says so. Go and actually play the games instead of just taking GS's word as the word of god.SmashBrosLegend
That's ridiculous. Only Shadow and the new one for 360 and PS3 have been bad. Heroes was good, the GC ports and Rivals were decent, and all of the GBA games, Dreamcast games and Sonic Rush were great. Don't come and tell me they should give up on such a long lasting series just because Gamespot says so. Go and actually play the games instead of just taking GS's word as the word of god.SmashBrosLegend
But Sonic never had a proper 3D outing other then Adventures which was years ago on the Dereamcast. :?
That's ridiculous. Only Shadow and the new one for 360 and PS3 have been bad. Heroes was good, the GC ports and Rivals were decent, and all of the GBA games, Dreamcast games and Sonic Rush were great. Don't come and tell me they should give up on such a long lasting series just because Gamespot says so. Go and actually play the games instead of just taking GS's word as the word of god.SmashBrosLegend
I agree. And besides that, a 7/10 is considered "good". System Wars has brainwashed people into believing that a 7 is actually a bad score.
[QUOTE="SmashBrosLegend"]That's ridiculous. Only Shadow and the new one for 360 and PS3 have been bad. Heroes was good, the GC ports and Rivals were decent, and all of the GBA games, Dreamcast games and Sonic Rush were great. Don't come and tell me they should give up on such a long lasting series just because Gamespot says so. Go and actually play the games instead of just taking GS's word as the word of god.Sooshy
I agree. And besides that, a 7/10 is considered "good". System Wars has brainwashed people into believing that a 7 is actually a bad score. I don't even care about scores. People need to play games before passing judgment on them.
[QUOTE="Kaarstein"]You do know that Sonic is still good in the handheld-games right? http://uk.gamespot.com/ds/action/sonicds/index.html Oh, don't worry I know. :)
[QUOTE="Sooshy"][QUOTE="SmashBrosLegend"]That's ridiculous. Only Shadow and the new one for 360 and PS3 have been bad. Heroes was good, the GC ports and Rivals were decent, and all of the GBA games, Dreamcast games and Sonic Rush were great. Don't come and tell me they should give up on such a long lasting series just because Gamespot says so. Go and actually play the games instead of just taking GS's word as the word of god.SmashBrosLegend
I agree. And besides that, a 7/10 is considered "good". System Wars has brainwashed people into believing that a 7 is actually a bad score. I don't even care about scores. People need to play games before passing judgment on them. Trust me I will try it only if it gets above a 7. :)
[QUOTE="SmashBrosLegend"]That's ridiculous. Only Shadow and the new one for 360 and PS3 have been bad. Heroes was good, the GC ports and Rivals were decent, and all of the GBA games, Dreamcast games and Sonic Rush were great. Don't come and tell me they should give up on such a long lasting series just because Gamespot says so. Go and actually play the games instead of just taking GS's word as the word of god.SyluxElite
But Sonic never had a proper 3D outing other then Adventures which was years ago on the Dereamcast. :? Sonic Heroes? Think about it. Sonic has only really had one bad 3D game. Shadow doesn't count, and the Gamecube versions were ports. Screw scores. Play the damn games.
Well actually, if it does get below 7.5, I'll rent it and if I like it I'll buy it. Scores and reviews won't affect me too greatly. They only judge whether it's worth buying or renting.
[QUOTE="SmashBrosLegend"][QUOTE="Sooshy"][QUOTE="SmashBrosLegend"]That's ridiculous. Only Shadow and the new one for 360 and PS3 have been bad. Heroes was good, the GC ports and Rivals were decent, and all of the GBA games, Dreamcast games and Sonic Rush were great. Don't come and tell me they should give up on such a long lasting series just because Gamespot says so. Go and actually play the games instead of just taking GS's word as the word of god.SyluxElite
I agree. And besides that, a 7/10 is considered "good". System Wars has brainwashed people into believing that a 7 is actually a bad score. I don't even care about scores. People need to play games before passing judgment on them. Trust me I will try it only if it gets above a 7. :) That's a dumb attitude. Review scores are opinions. Learn to form your own.
[QUOTE="SyluxElite"][QUOTE="SmashBrosLegend"][QUOTE="Sooshy"][QUOTE="SmashBrosLegend"]That's ridiculous. Only Shadow and the new one for 360 and PS3 have been bad. Heroes was good, the GC ports and Rivals were decent, and all of the GBA games, Dreamcast games and Sonic Rush were great. Don't come and tell me they should give up on such a long lasting series just because Gamespot says so. Go and actually play the games instead of just taking GS's word as the word of god.SmashBrosLegend
I agree. And besides that, a 7/10 is considered "good". System Wars has brainwashed people into believing that a 7 is actually a bad score. I don't even care about scores. People need to play games before passing judgment on them. Trust me I will try it only if it gets above a 7. :) That's a dumb attitude. Review scores are opinions. Learn to form your own.Sorry its just the way I am. :P But trust me when I say that I willl be looking at MANY different reveiw sites to see if it is worth my time. :)
[QUOTE="Hir0_N"]I hope its not jeff who reviews it...SyluxElite
Why?
He underated twilight Princess.
Not really. After beating it and getting almost everything and logging almost 70 hours into the game, I'd say his review is very accurate. What got to me mostly was it didn't seem fresh enough. Wolf form helped keep it alive and a much better story, but it lacked sidequests that weren't about collecting bugs or poes or w/e. Quests like the one where you take the thing to the person to get the other thing to trade with the other person to get the thing etc etc. Lol know what I mean :P. 9 seems like a more accurate score, 8.8 and 8.9 (Wii and GC respectively) seems about right as well.
Edit: I don't really care who reviews Sonic as long it's an unbiased non Sonic hater person. :P
Gamerankings of recent Sonic games: Sonic Heroes(Xbox): 74.4% Sonic Adventure DX (GC): 63% Sonic Adventure 2: Battle(GC) : 72.2% Sonic Adventure(DC):87.2% Sonic Adventure 2 (DC):83.2% Sonic the Hedgehog (360&PS3): 46.7% Those are all of the real 3D Sonic games. No Spin-offs or collections. Only one of them has been truly bad, and the handheld versions have been great. Sonic is not in nearly as bad of shape as everyone says.
[QUOTE="SyluxElite"][QUOTE="poopinloop32"]I hope if this game flops Sheep dont just go saying "Well i give up on Sonic" man up and handle the floppoopinloop32
But anyone, sheep, cow, or leeming has a right to give up on Sonic........... :? I understand they do...but im just hoping they dont run away from the flop...if it flops dude it's Sonic's last chance. Sonic is a beloved videogame character hat once competed with Mario. I'm sure there is a part in all gamers that doesn't want to see Sonic die like this. But if it does flop..then the Sheep shouldn't be owned because..well lets just fase it....hoping that this game is good is nothing but wishful thinking. Deep down...all of us, including sheep,know that this game is probablly gonna flop.
[QUOTE="Hir0_N"]I hope its not jeff who reviews it...SyluxElite
Why?
He underated twilight Princess. No he didnt..he might have underated Crackdown but not to a large effect he is still a great reveiwer...and whats the offical hype for Sonic High A?
[QUOTE="Hir0_N"]I hope its not jeff who reviews it...poopinloop32
Why?
He underated twilight Princess. No he didnt..he might have underated Crackdown but not to a large effect he is still a great reveiwer...and whats the offical hype for Sonic High A? Probaly. Why does it matter though? :?
[QUOTE="Hir0_N"]I hope its not jeff who reviews it...Sooshy
Why?
He underated twilight Princess. That doesn't mean he underrates every game he reviews. he also gave warioware an AAA score. I'm sorry,...but once he gives a Zelda game AA...and then a collection of minnigames an AAA score.....you know there's somthing wrong.
[QUOTE="Hir0_N"]I hope its not jeff who reviews it...Shinobishyguy
Why?
He underated twilight Princess. That doesn't mean he underrates every game he reviews. he also gave warioware an AAA score. I'm sorry,...but once he gives a Zelda game AA...and then a collection of minnigames an AAA score.....you know there's somthing wrong. The man speaks the thruth. 8)
[QUOTE="Hir0_N"]I hope its not jeff who reviews it...SyluxElite
Why?
He underated twilight Princess. That doesn't mean he underrates every game he reviews. he also gave warioware an AAA score. I'm sorry,...but once he gives a Zelda game AA...and then a collection of minnigames an AAA score.....you know there's somthing wrong. it's basically the entire opposite*Zelda AAA, wario ware A-AA* everywhere else.....BESIDES GAMESPOT The man speaks the thruth. 8)
I am sorry but Zelda TP is AAA content. It is epic and it deserved at least AAA. To me this type of game deferiencates itself from other games in terms of quality and Zelda is quality. I mean 4 years in the making and all this attention to the details. Every other site except GS gave it AAA! Jeff also seems to not like the Wii. And I truly believes he is biased against it. He even said it's a good secondary console. Tell me if that's not beeing biaised. He's a m$ fanboy imo.
The AAA warioware was sort of a message and reflected what he thinks about the Wii. He thinks the Wii is just good for mini games and can't have epic games like Zelda.
[QUOTE="Hir0_N"]I hope its not jeff who reviews it...Shinobishyguy
Why?
He underated twilight Princess. That doesn't mean he underrates every game he reviews. he also gave warioware an AAA score. I'm sorry,...but once he gives a Zelda game AA...and then a collection of minnigames an AAA score.....you know there's somthing wrong.Why? It's not like you're supposed to directly compare the two. Just because Warioware got a better score than Zelda doesn't mean it's an overall better game.
[QUOTE="Hir0_N"]I am sorry but Zelda TP is AAA content. It is epic and it deserved at least AAA. To me this type of game deferiencates itself from other games in terms of quality and Zelda is quality. I mean 4 years in the making and all this attention to the details. Every other site except GS gave it AAA! Jeff also seems to not like the Wii. And I truly believes he is biased against it. He even said it's a good secondary console. Tell me if that's not beeing biaised. He's a m$ fanboy imo. I thought he was a Sony fanboy. :?
[QUOTE="Hir0_N"]I am sorry but Zelda TP is AAA content. It is epic and it deserved at least AAA. To me this type of game deferiencates itself from other games in terms of quality and Zelda is quality. I mean 4 years in the making and all this attention to the details. Every other site except GS gave it AAA! Jeff also seems to not like the Wii. And I truly believes he is biased against it. He even said it's a good secondary console. Tell me if that's not beeing biaised. He's a m$ fanboy imo. Prepare to get flamed by poopinloop32
[QUOTE="Hockey_Slayer"][QUOTE="Hir0_N"]I am sorry but Zelda TP is AAA content. It is epic and it deserved at least AAA. To me this type of game deferiencates itself from other games in terms of quality and Zelda is quality. I mean 4 years in the making and all this attention to the details. Every other site except GS gave it AAA! Jeff also seems to not like the Wii. And I truly believes he is biased against it. He even said it's a good secondary console. Tell me if that's not beeing biaised. He's a m$ fanboy imo. Prepare to get flamed by poopinloop32 He always seems to turn up in a thread of mine. It's kinda wierd. :?
Log in to comment