If Sony had kinect would Sony fans be happy with it?

Kinect didn't kill Move, Move simply never had a chance at success. meetroid8

Kinect didn't kill Move, Move simply never had a chance at success. meetroid8

it already had it, it was called the eye toy

i don't think they would like it just like lems don't ike it but you can guarantee that it would not be in a bunch of guys sigs making fun of some kids games that is supposed to represent every game that will ever be on the 360 for the rest of the time it is around and the subject of 5 or 6 hate threads per week.

it already had it, it was called the eye toy

Chris_Williams

Touche'

and I never bothered with that (eyetoy) , nor did Sony make it mandatory to play most of it's games.

The funny part is 360 fans have to be invested into Kinect because MS didn't give them any other choice.

Asking PS3 fans if they would be happy with it is silly because Sony doesn't operate like MS, the attachment wouldnt be forced to be adopted in order to play new high-profile games. When MS wants something to succeed they shut down all other possible options (original xbox anyone? axed)...perhaps that is one of the reasons why other people choose to be sony fans--they are not forced to be invested into 1 game or product.

[QUOTE="Chris_Williams"]

it already had it, it was called the eye toy

casharmy

Touche'

and I never bothered with that (eyetoy) , nor did Sony make it mandatory to play most of it's games.

The funny part is 360 fans have to bevested to Kinect because MS didn't give them any other choice.

Asking PS3 fans if they would be happy with it is silly because Sony doesn't operate like MS. When MS wants something to succeed they shut down all other possible options (original xbox anyone? axed)...perhaps that is one of the reasons why other people choose to be sony fans--they are not forced to be invested into 1 game or product.

someone remind me again, how long was it before a jrpg came out for ps3. two and a half years? three years??? longer?

[QUOTE="casharmy"]

[QUOTE="Chris_Williams"]

it already had it, it was called the eye toy

Riverwolf007

Touche'

and I never bothered with that (eyetoy) , nor did Sony make it mandatory to play most of it's games.

The funny part is 360 fans have to bevested to Kinect because MS didn't give them any other choice.

Asking PS3 fans if they would be happy with it is silly because Sony doesn't operate like MS. When MS wants something to succeed they shut down all other possible options (original xbox anyone? axed)...perhaps that is one of the reasons why other people choose to be sony fans--they are not forced to be invested into 1 game or product.

someone remind me again, how long was it before a jrpg came out for ps3. two and a half years? three years??? longer?

[QUOTE="casharmy"]

[QUOTE="Chris_Williams"]

it already had it, it was called the eye toy

Riverwolf007

Touche'

and I never bothered with that (eyetoy) , nor did Sony make it mandatory to play most of it's games.

The funny part is 360 fans have to bevested to Kinect because MS didn't give them any other choice.

Asking PS3 fans if they would be happy with it is silly because Sony doesn't operate like MS. When MS wants something to succeed they shut down all other possible options (original xbox anyone? axed)...perhaps that is one of the reasons why other people choose to be sony fans--they are not forced to be invested into 1 game or product.

someone remind me again, how long was it before a jrpg came out for ps3. two and a half years? three years??? longer?

wooooooooooooh lol, a full on attack on the PS3 and it's games out of left feild lol...that's like totally not fanboish!!!!!!

You are just bashing and comming off like a wounded parent here. I'mnot going to trade insults over game consoles, really dude?

You think I care about the opinion of a lemming on the PS3's library? wait :lol:why does the PS3's library have anything to do with my post? Listen, bashing Sony or PS3 won't make MS any better of a company nor will it make you NOT have to invest into Kinect in order to enjoy the newer upcoming games in MS's exclusive line-up.

As we know kinect killed move and kinect is a cog of power for 360, but if Sony didn't make the grave mistake of passing on kinect would the fanbase embrace it?ForzaGearsFace

Hmmm, MS has been strangely quiet on Kinect sales since March (10M). I wonder why that might be? :? In the meantime, in June, Move quietly hit almost 9 million units, and all that without the $500 million budget. I wouldn't call that exactly killing ...

Nope. I gave up on motion controls (and Wii) about 2 years ago.

Nope, i wouldn't. the whole Wii/kinect/move hype is a hype that ends...look at Nintendo's Wii sales.

Didn't buy the eyetoy , and wouldn't waste my money on Kinect either.

No, they would continue to NOT care about it, the same way 360 fanboys ALSO dont care about it, they just pretend to ;).

Hell even they used to bash it before it came out and brushed it off as "hey its not meant for us, its meant for casuals". The only reason they all of a sudden force themselves/pretend to take an interest in it is because their really isnt anything else to talk about on the system. When PS3 fans mention "the 360 only has Gears and Forza" that is no exaggeration. If Gears 3 and Forza 4 were LITERALLY the ONLY non Kinect exclusives for the platform this entire year with atleast a 70 or higher metascore, I'd start defending Sesame Street too :roll:.

[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

[QUOTE="casharmy"]

Touche'

and I never bothered with that (eyetoy) , nor did Sony make it mandatory to play most of it's games.

The funny part is 360 fans have to bevested to Kinect because MS didn't give them any other choice.

Asking PS3 fans if they would be happy with it is silly because Sony doesn't operate like MS. When MS wants something to succeed they shut down all other possible options (original xbox anyone? axed)...perhaps that is one of the reasons why other people choose to be sony fans--they are not forced to be invested into 1 game or product.

Chris_Williams

someone remind me again, how long was it before a jrpg came out for ps3. two and a half years? three years??? longer?

[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

[QUOTE="casharmy"]

Touche'

and I never bothered with that (eyetoy) , nor did Sony make it mandatory to play most of it's games.

The funny part is 360 fans have to bevested to Kinect because MS didn't give them any other choice.

Asking PS3 fans if they would be happy with it is silly because Sony doesn't operate like MS. When MS wants something to succeed they shut down all other possible options (original xbox anyone? axed)...perhaps that is one of the reasons why other people choose to be sony fans--they are not forced to be invested into 1 game or product.

casharmy

someone remind me again, how long was it before a jrpg came out for ps3. two and a half years? three years??? longer?

wooooooooooooh lol, a full on attack on the PS3 and it's games out of left feild lol...that's like totally not fanboish!!!!!!

You are just bashing and comming off like a wounded parent here. I'mnot going to trade insults over game consoles, really dude?

You think I care about the opinion of a lemming on the PS3's library? wait :lol:why does the PS3's library have anything to do with my post? Listen, bashing Sony or PS3 won't make MS any better of a company nor will it make you NOT have to invest into Kinect in order to enjoy the newer upcoming games in MS's exclusive line-up.

i was attacking you not knowing how things work when the example is right in front of us not the ps3.

Probably not because Sony are useless at marketing and it would fail just like the Move has, and the Eyetoy before that.RR360DD

Move sold 9 million without $500 million budget. Hardly a failure ...

Microsoft just went nuts and advertised it as the second coming in gaming, which it honestly isn't ...

ps2 is still top selling console in the world and who cares wii had motion controls first ( not a wii fan ) all consoles have goods and bads every console is equal games are games who cares whats better than what.

ps2 is still top selling console in the world and who cares wii had motion controls first ( not a wii fan ) all consoles have goods and bads every console is equal games are games who cares whats better than what.

[QUOTE="Chris_Williams"][QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]lol, i always love it when people bring up killing off the og xbox as a bad thing then don't seem to remember the ps3 had a crap library for 3 years since everyone just went right on making ps2 games since that was where the money was.

someone remind me again, how long was it before a jrpg came out for ps3. two and a half years? three years??? longer?

Riverwolf007

it already had it, it was called the eye toy

Chris_Williams

Essentially, this. Kinect is more advanced, but it is still limited to the same simplistic games that the PS Eye was. The difference was that the PS Eye was never supposed to be a primary gaming platform. It excelled at adding to some games, like being able to import your own textures into LBP and what not. Other than that, PS Eye specific games were lousy, just as Kinect games are lousy.

Move has sold quite a bit, and gets support. I don't get why a few lems on here are so confident in its death.

[QUOTE="Chris_Williams"]

it already had it, it was called the eye toy

Pug-Nasty

Essentially, this. Kinect is more advanced, but it is still limited to the same simplistic games that the PS Eye was. The difference was that the PS Eye was never supposed to be a primary gaming platform. It excelled at adding to some games, like being able to import your own textures into LBP and what not. Other than that, PS Eye specific games were lousy, just as Kinect games are lousy.

Move has sold quite a bit, and gets support. I don't get why a few lems on here are so confident in its death.

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]Probably not because Sony are useless at marketing and it would fail just like the Move has, and the Eyetoy before that.KiZZo1

Move sold 9 million without $500 million budget. Hardly a failure ...

Microsoft just went nuts and advertised it as the second coming in gaming, which it honestly isn't ...

[QUOTE="KiZZo1"]

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]Probably not because Sony are useless at marketing and it would fail just like the Move has, and the Eyetoy before that.ForzaGearsFace

Move sold 9 million without $500 million budget. Hardly a failure ...

Microsoft just went nuts and advertised it as the second coming in gaming, which it honestly isn't ...

Move sold something like 8 or 9 mil last I heard, not much less than Kinect. I could be wrong and a lemming could be right but that never happens. No I wouldn't because it still looks like ass at this point in time to be honest. In fact so does Move. I'd hate for Sony's studios to become what Rare is now, abandoning the IPs we actually want.Floppy_Jim

[QUOTE="KiZZo1"]

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]Probably not because Sony are useless at marketing and it would fail just like the Move has, and the Eyetoy before that.ForzaGearsFace

Move sold 9 million without $500 million budget. Hardly a failure ...

Microsoft just went nuts and advertised it as the second coming in gaming, which it honestly isn't ...

You some sort of a comedian? Bringing the sales !!! Get back to the topic when kinect has some serious core games that actually work on it !!! Killzone - move works perfect and it's OPTIONAL !!! Socom 4 - again works perfect and yes again it's OPTIONAL !!!

PS.

Don't mention Forza please, we all know how kinect works for the game.

no, kinect is trash, is worth only for laugning once in a while.

[QUOTE="casharmy"]

[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]lol, i always love it when people bring up killing off the og xbox as a bad thing then don't seem to remember the ps3 had a crap library for 3 years since everyone just went right on making ps2 games since that was where the money was.

someone remind me again, how long was it before a jrpg came out for ps3. two and a half years? three years??? longer?

Riverwolf007

wooooooooooooh lol, a full on attack on the PS3 and it's games out of left feild lol...that's like totally not fanboish!!!!!!

You are just bashing and comming off like a wounded parent here. I'mnot going to trade insults over game consoles, really dude?

You think I care about the opinion of a lemming on the PS3's library? wait :lol:why does the PS3's library have anything to do with my post? Listen, bashing Sony or PS3 won't make MS any better of a company nor will it make you NOT have to invest into Kinect in order to enjoy the newer upcoming games in MS's exclusive line-up.

i was attacking you not knowing how things work when the example is right in front of us not the ps3.

:| But you didn't give an example.

You gave an extreemly bias and warped opinion that borders on the lines of some of the biggest fanboys known here:

Riverwolf007: wrote, "the ps3 had a crap library for 3 years"

So if i say every game on the 360 is crap, that serves as some kind of valide example for something? Lemmings

BTW:

this comment you made, "everyone just went right on making ps2 games since that was where the money was."

wow bud really? Sony ALLOWED developers to continue to create games for PS2 after PS3 came out...:o just like they did for PS1 when PS2 came out!!! That is how Sony operates, and that's exactly what I was talking about in my first post. To think you had the nerve to say you were attacking me for not knowing how things work. You just showed how much you know about how things work.........

[QUOTE="KiZZo1"]

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]Probably not because Sony are useless at marketing and it would fail just like the Move has, and the Eyetoy before that.ForzaGearsFace

Move sold 9 million without $500 million budget. Hardly a failure ...

Microsoft just went nuts and advertised it as the second coming in gaming, which it honestly isn't ...

You some sort of a comedian? Bringing the sales !!! Get back to the topic when kinect has some serious core games that actually work on it !!! Killzone - move works perfect and it's OPTIONAL !!! Socom 4 - again works perfect and yes again it's OPTIONAL !!! not to mention Infamous, LBP, The Fight and many more.

PS.

Don't mention Forza please, we all know how kinect works for the game.

i can play this game, killzone 3 has sold 1.8 million units, and just incase you claim its not a move game....... the game can be played in full just using nothing but the move controller and reviewers have said the game is waaay better with the sharp shooter attachment ForzaGearsFace

[QUOTE="Chris_Williams"]

it already had it, it was called the eye toy

casharmy

Touche'

and I never bothered with that (eyetoy) , nor did Sony make it mandatory to play most of it's games.

The funny part is 360 fans have to be invested into Kinect because MS didn't give them any other choice.

Asking PS3 fans if they would be happy with it is silly because Sony doesn't operate like MS, the attachment wouldnt be forced to be adopted in order to play new high-profile games. When MS wants something to succeed they shut down all other possible options (original xbox anyone? axed)...perhaps that is one of the reasons why other people choose to be sony fans--they are not forced to be invested into 1 game or product.

[QUOTE="ForzaGearsFace"][QUOTE="KiZZo1"]

Move sold 9 million without $500 million budget. Hardly a failure ...

Microsoft just went nuts and advertised it as the second coming in gaming, which it honestly isn't ...

DISSESHOWEDO

You some sort of a comedian? Bringing the sales !!! Get back to the topic when kinect has some serious core games that actually work on it !!! Killzone - move works perfect and it's OPTIONAL !!! Socom 4 - again works perfect and yes again it's OPTIONAL !!! not to mention Infamous, LBP, The Fight and many more.

PS.

Don't mention Forza please, we all know how kinect works for the game.

[QUOTE="KiZZo1"]

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]Probably not because Sony are useless at marketing and it would fail just like the Move has, and the Eyetoy before that.ForzaGearsFace

Move sold 9 million without $500 million budget. Hardly a failure ...

Microsoft just went nuts and advertised it as the second coming in gaming, which it honestly isn't ...

Ha ha, why Move only? How about games like LBP2, RE5, KZ3 etc. You know - high quality core games that can be played with Move. And by the way I'm not even saying it's the better way to play them, just don't act as if that wouldn't be a factor when people consider buying the hardware. Get back to me when you can play games like these on Kinect ...

[QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]Move sold something like 8 or 9 mil last I heard, not much less than Kinect. I could be wrong and a lemming could be right but that never happens. No I wouldn't because it still looks like ass at this point in time to be honest. In fact so does Move. I'd hate for Sony's studios to become what Rare is now, abandoning the IPs we actually want.ForzaGearsFace

[QUOTE="ForzaGearsFace"][QUOTE="KiZZo1"]

Move sold 9 million without $500 million budget. Hardly a failure ...

Microsoft just went nuts and advertised it as the second coming in gaming, which it honestly isn't ...

KiZZo1

Ha ha, why Move only? How about games like LBP2, RE5, KZ3 etc. You know - high quality core games that can be played with Move. And by the way I'm not even saying it's the better way to play them, just don't act as if that wouldn't be a factor when people consider buying the hardware. Get back to me when you can play games like these on Kinect ...

[QUOTE="ForzaGearsFace"][QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]Move sold something like 8 or 9 mil last I heard, not much less than Kinect. I could be wrong and a lemming could be right but that never happens. No I wouldn't because it still looks like ass at this point in time to be honest. In fact so does Move. I'd hate for Sony's studios to become what Rare is now, abandoning the IPs we actually want.Floppy_Jim

i can play this game, killzone 3 has sold 1.8 million units, and just incase you claim its not a move game....... the game can be played in full just using nothing but the move controller and reviewers have said the game is waaay better with the sharp shooter attachment ForzaGearsFace

I suggest changing your nickname to ForzaGearsHalo, i mean whats with that Face in the end ?!?. Again you are talking from god knows where. Move only, check again it sais PLAYSTATION MOVE COMPATIBLE as if you can play the game with standart controller and if you want you can play it with move, Jesus. And when the reviewers said it's way better with move/sharpshooter combo they actually mean it WORKS !!!

Again i don't see you talking about some core games for the kinect ?!? What's with that, oh wait THERE ARE NONE !!!

[QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"][QUOTE="ForzaGearsFace"] I'm a high level poster like yourself doesn't realize that the sales of 8 million are for wands and not installed base. Tell me one move only game that has sold over 1 million. You can also use Sony sports champions which was bundled with move, lol not even close to kinect software sales. Funny how Walmart black Friday sale advertised is the 4 gb kinect bundle for 199. Why no advertised nationally move bundles lol, I think you are wrong lolForzaGearsFace

Thread title:

If Sony had kinect would Sony fans be happy with it?

You change the subject in your own thread then accuse others of.....changing the subject.

[QUOTE="KiZZo1"]

[QUOTE="ForzaGearsFace"] Controllers not installed base. Get back to me when you have a game for the move only that sells over 1 million, kinect has several and some hitting 3 million, lolForzaGearsFace

Ha ha, why Move only? How about games like LBP2, RE5, KZ3 etc. You know - high quality core games that can be played with Move. And by the way I'm not even saying it's the better way to play them, just don't act as if that wouldn't be a factor when people consider buying the hardware. Get back to me when you can play games like these on Kinect ...

The fact that you compare Move only to Kinect only is laughable and shows you don't understand the basics behind them. It doesn't make any sense to make a Move only game (except as an incetive to get the hardware). The Move controller is much closer to a dualshock than Kinect is to the 360 pad.

[QUOTE="ForzaGearsFace"][QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"] Yes, 8/9 million wands, I know some people buy 2. I don't even know of any Move-only games other than Sports Champions and that Sony mascot circlejerk game (Heroes on the Move or something?). As I said it looks like ass so I don't follow it. Given your hypothetical situation I sure as hell would not be bragging over the sales of Sony's Kinect games when it comes at the expense of a weaker 1st party lineup for non-Kinect owners.Floppy_Jim

Thread title:

If Sony had kinect would Sony fans be happy with it?

You change the subject in your own thread then accuse others of.....changing the subject.

@ GearsHaloForza whatever. Strike 2, you now what happens after 3, right ?

As we know kinect killed move and kinect is a cog of power for 360, but if Sony didn't make the grave mistake of passing on kinect would the fanbase embrace it?ForzaGearsFace

Most 360 owners aren't interested in kinect... Why would Sony fans be any different?