in 2007 with 2 AAAE titles.
Then by this very logic the PS3 must be considered the winner in terms of games for 2008.
Both systems have great games this year, but by those rules PS3 won 2008.
1x AAAAE MGS4 (10)
2x AAAE. LBP, RES2(9.0 9.0)
This topic is locked from further discussion.
in 2007 with 2 AAAE titles.
Then by this very logic the PS3 must be considered the winner in terms of games for 2008.
Both systems have great games this year, but by those rules PS3 won 2008.
1x AAAAE MGS4 (10)
2x AAAE. LBP, RES2(9.0 9.0)
But isnt that how we define winners (by their exclusive games) All through out 2007 people mentioned sonys lack of AAAE titles (at gamespot) carlisledavid79They were more just making fun of the console than determining the winner. As long as there are enough interesting games to play, everyone wins. ... Well, except the Wii, the Wii is losing in terms of interesting games.
But isnt that how we define winners (by their exclusive games) All through out 2007 people mentioned sonys lack of AAAE titles (at gamespot) carlisledavid79TRUE. but, as much as how i want your statement to be true, its not.. if we follow with this kind of logic, then teh DS>PS3 v 360 v PC v Wii v PSP
I mean mass effect is a good example. Its an epic game that only MAYBE 2 ps3 titles can surpass but cows just dont relize that.
See, the reason why this "rules" system doesn't work is because it's lame. That's why Casey's rule thread was voted down for anarchy. Because just going by fact, the Wii is the winner (or the PC, if we're counting that). So, it's just whoever can make the best argument (i.e. no one thing is a "set" winner)[QUOTE="lkjsdfjlk"]See, the reason why this "rules" system doesn't work is because it's lame. That's why Casey's rule thread was voted down for anarchy. Because just going by fact, the Wii is the winner (or the PC, if we're counting that). So, it's just whoever can make the best argument (i.e. no one thing is a "set" winner)I mean mass effect is a good example. Its an epic game that only MAYBE 2 ps3 titles can surpass but cows just dont relize that.
Jandurin
No anarchy won because all the sheep (they were a lot back then) voted for it just to stop "games" from winning. That's the only reason.RuinedMachineThat's just a blatant falsehood. There are far better reasons to vote anarchy than "being a Sheep". One of which being that if there were set rules, then one console would be winning, and there would be no point to System Wars.
in 2007 with 2 AAAE titles.
Then by this very logic the PS3 must be considered the winner in terms of games for 2008.
Both systems have great games this year, but by those rules PS3 won 2008.
1x AAAAE MGS4 (10)
2x AAAE. LBP, RES2(9.0 9.0)
carlisledavid79
Logic is a violation of T.O.S. and can get you flamed, trolled, and banned by some mods.
PS3 had a good year indeed.
ALSO, any Sheep just being Sheepish would've voted sales, obviously, as the Wii will win in terms of sales, and it's been obvious forever.Jandurin
[QUOTE="Jandurin"]ALSO, any Sheep just being Sheepish would've voted sales, obviously, as the Wii will win in terms of sales, and it's been obvious forever.RuinedMachine
[QUOTE="RuinedMachine"][QUOTE="Jandurin"]ALSO, any Sheep just being Sheepish would've voted sales, obviously, as the Wii will win in terms of sales, and it's been obvious forever.Jandurin
[QUOTE="carlisledavid79"]in 2007 with 2 AAAE titles.
Then by this very logic the PS3 must be considered the winner in terms of games for 2008.
Both systems have great games this year, but by those rules PS3 won 2008.
1x AAAAE MGS4 (10)
2x AAAE. LBP, RES2(9.0 9.0)
De_Bears
Logic is a violation of T.O.S. and can get you flamed, trolled, and banned by some mods.
PS3 had a good year indeed.
*Activating logic inhibitors(. If people say 2007 was the 360's year because of it's AAAE's, they have to say the same thing about 2008 with the PS3.Floppy_Jim
I don't think anyone said 2007 was the year of the 360. The saying "The Year of whatever" is something cows use try to convey the fact that the PS3 does not suck anymore. Sure, 2008 is the year the PS3 finally got some good games. I don't think those games were worth all the waiting.
In 2007 most people were just shocked at how crappy the game situation was for the PS3...after hearing what a wonderful console it was from Sony and all the cows (the cell was going to destroy the 360 -- lol)...even though it had the highest price....and after being warned by cows about how great the games (can you say Lair) Sony promised them were going to be (and how those games were going to crush the 360).
But isnt that how we define winners (by their exclusive games) All through out 2007 people mentioned sonys lack of AAAE titles (at gamespot) carlisledavid79No because games like Bioshock were counted for the 360 in 2007 because it wasnt available on the PS3. You also have to factor in downloadable games too.
in 2007 with 2 AAAE titles.
Then by this very logic the PS3 must be considered the winner in terms of games for 2008.
Both systems have great games this year, but by those rules PS3 won 2008.
1x AAAAE MGS4 (10)
2x AAAE. LBP, RES2(9.0 9.0)
No, when you added up exclusives, plus 360/PS3 multiplats, plus 360/PC multiplats = 360 wins. Cows are the ones who try to alway use JUST exclusives in arguments so that they can ignore the multitude of 360/PC multiplats that adds to the 360 library and doesn't add to the PS3 library.
Well, maybe if this site = worlds. Sadly ... nope. Also, the 360 library is generally rated higher.in 2007 with 2 AAAE titles.
Then by this very logic the PS3 must be considered the winner in terms of games for 2008.
Both systems have great games this year, but by those rules PS3 won 2008.
1x AAAAE MGS4 (10)
2x AAAE. LBP, RES2(9.0 9.0)
carlisledavid79
The PS3, by our "rules", has been winning this year.
But the thing is, the 360 has more games as a whole, pretty sure its still cheaper, and one good year isn't enough to say its the better system overall.
in 2007 with 2 AAAE titles.
Then by this very logic the PS3 must be considered the winner in terms of games for 2008.
Both systems have great games this year, but by those rules PS3 won 2008.
1x AAAAE MGS4 (10)
2x AAAE. LBP, RES2(9.0 9.0)
No, when you added up exclusives, plus 360/PS3 multiplats, plus 360/PC multiplats = 360 wins. Cows are the ones who try to alway use JUST exclusives in arguments so that they can ignore the multitude of 360/PC multiplats that adds to the 360 library and doesn't add to the PS3 library. Silly isnt it? Dam cows and their space logic!! :P
yeah but gears 2 is gonna sell more than those three games combined, in fact, fable 2 may sell more than them combinedin 2007 with 2 AAAE titles.
Then by this very logic the PS3 must be considered the winner in terms of games for 2008.
Both systems have great games this year, but by those rules PS3 won 2008.
1x AAAAE MGS4 (10)
2x AAAE. LBP, RES2(9.0 9.0)
carlisledavid79
so in theory arn't they the real winner?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment