Everything out of the review can be expected, but what amazes me is how in the video review, he says that he has not played the ps2 games, but he feels that the game formula is getting old, therefore people must be getting tired of it (he can not make this assumption, especially since he is not one who has played the entire series). I have played all originally console R&C games, and I will be able to judge for myself whether or not this aged gameplay is becoming tedious or not.
If gamespot gives it a different score than the 7.5 then they would be very inconsistant. Ign even said that this game is very similar to the previous.
Well this is ryan clements and i rarely disagree with him. One of the only guys to give VC the correct score :D Happy to see this one turned out well. Ive never actually owned a console rachet and clank game so ill probably buy it seeing as how I wont find it to be just more of the same XD
Nice review, though it could have specified a few things, like the level of humor in comparison to the other games in the series, and to a degree, the quality of the story. Even though I haven't been a huge fan of platformers that were born on the PS2, I still enjoy the series. The reviewer though, is definitely a hardcore fan, you can tell that from beggining to end, so I'll definitely take that into account. With that said, you at least know of what to expect from the game: If you liked the previous games and if the formula still holds your interest, you'll definitely enjoy it.
It would have been more if Insomniac would have brought back multiplayer and co-op.:evil: Heck co-op in DL is still one of my favorite co-op campaigns.
Log in to comment