Im actually wondering if AAA MGS4 is even possible

  • 141 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#51 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

The graphics are horrible and you know this game will lose points in that area. Games with poor graphics are forgiven for the Wii but we expect so much more from our friendly neighborhood "super computer."

Definitely think the graphics are 2-D, flat, and lackluster and think that will take points away from it's score.

L1qu1dSword
You lost me right there.
Avatar image for thrones
thrones

12178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#52 thrones
Member since 2004 • 12178 Posts
[QUOTE="p2rus"]

[QUOTE="wemhim"]My God, will the 13 year old users who cut their eyes out after playing a game because it came out in 2003 please leave? I mean, the graphics horrible? Whatever. I'm sure you guys think Transformers is leik the kewlest movie evar! mingo123

micheal bay: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=byKrCUk4JaA

best. movie. ever.

movie gear solid 3 is the best movie imo

A bit like Lost Odyssey? :|

Avatar image for p2rus
p2rus

2859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 p2rus
Member since 2005 • 2859 Posts
[QUOTE="p2rus"]

[QUOTE="wemhim"]My God, will the 13 year old users who cut their eyes out after playing a game because it came out in 2003 please leave? I mean, the graphics horrible? Whatever. I'm sure you guys think Transformers is leik the kewlest movie evar! wemhim

micheal bay: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=byKrCUk4JaA

best. movie. ever.

That made me laugh so much when I first saw that episode.

the funny thing is that once i saw the actually movie...so bad. he seriously doesnt understand creativity.

Avatar image for USSJAndrew
USSJAndrew

5042

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#54 USSJAndrew
Member since 2004 • 5042 Posts

/Thread

At least it definatly ended the doubts for me(somebody who hated MGS3, though 2 was great.)

Oh yea, and it also ended my doubts if there was a black adam sessler haha...

Avatar image for wemhim
wemhim

16110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 wemhim
Member since 2005 • 16110 Posts
[QUOTE="wemhim"][QUOTE="p2rus"]

[QUOTE="wemhim"]My God, will the 13 year old users who cut their eyes out after playing a game because it came out in 2003 please leave? I mean, the graphics horrible? Whatever. I'm sure you guys think Transformers is leik the kewlest movie evar! p2rus

micheal bay: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=byKrCUk4JaA

best. movie. ever.

That made me laugh so much when I first saw that episode.

the funny thing is that once i saw the actually movie...so bad. he seriously doesnt understand creativity.

The special effects are really cool, but they should EFFECTS, not the meat of the film. Zodiac had a lot of effects going on in it, they even digitally creating a neighborhood because it doesn't look like it did in the 60s'/70s' anymore(When the movie takes place mainly), but it actually had a story and stuff like that to go with it. Technical achievements should help portray art, not make it. Even Crysis(Being the biggest technical game out there) had more than just tech stuff, like some cool game design and stuff like that, it's not just a tech demo. But some people think just making something look really cool makes it really cool. Although it'd be nice to have MGS4 look like Advent Children, the graphics get the job done. Anthing further is just bonus points.
Avatar image for bobbetybob
bobbetybob

19370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#56 bobbetybob
Member since 2005 • 19370 Posts
I'm a fan of no system but even I'm not stupid enough to say MGS4 has bad graphics. You're the most blatant fanboy I've ever seen.
Avatar image for ogvampire
ogvampire

9210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 ogvampire
Member since 2008 • 9210 Posts
[QUOTE="L1qu1dSword"]

SSBB is packed with all kinds of features and gameplay options whereas MGS4 is the opposite. Single player only and no online( starter kit is a demo that doesnt count).

Funkyhamster

I'm not saying it'll get a 9.5; I think if anything it'll only be able to get a 9.0. Look at COD4 for a precedent - it had an extremely short single player game, and not many extra features ala Halo 3, but the innate quality was enough to get it the 9.0.

i thought COD4 got a good rating for its stellar MP.

Avatar image for wemhim
wemhim

16110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 wemhim
Member since 2005 • 16110 Posts
[QUOTE="Funkyhamster"][QUOTE="L1qu1dSword"]

SSBB is packed with all kinds of features and gameplay options whereas MGS4 is the opposite. Single player only and no online( starter kit is a demo that doesnt count).

ogvampire

I'm not saying it'll get a 9.5; I think if anything it'll only be able to get a 9.0. Look at COD4 for a precedent - it had an extremely short single player game, and not many extra features ala Halo 3, but the innate quality was enough to get it the 9.0.

i thought COD4 got a good rating for its stellar MP.

Probably. But I think people take the whole length thing too seriously. Yes, it can hurt a review, but if they feel a game is great they're not going to say, "Lulz horrible game, it's not long enough". And even then MGS4 is coming off as fairly long with a small MP mode. BioShock wasn't even that long, although some said it was 20 hours... Not for me, and I listened to the tapes and looked for them too and stuff.
Avatar image for Private_Vegas
Private_Vegas

2783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Private_Vegas
Member since 2007 • 2783 Posts

I just played Metal Gear Solid: The Twin Snakes yesterday. I couldn't stop playing and 12 hours later.... I was done. Very few games compel me to finish them in one sitting. I finished MGS 2 in two sittings, and Snake Eater in a handfull.

I'm expecting "Guns of the Patriots" to maintain the tradition of making me miss meals.

You can play the alphabet game all you like, but Metal Gear Solid 4 will almost definitely be one of my top games for 08.

Avatar image for mingo123
mingo123

9005

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 mingo123
Member since 2007 • 9005 Posts

/Thread

At least it definatly ended the doubts for me(somebody who hated MGS3, though 2 was great.)

Oh yea, and it also ended my doubts if there was a black adam sessler haha...

USSJAndrew

geeezzzz snake just HAD to touch the statues d*** at 10:31...didnt he....+ snake has portable barrels and boxes bigger then snake himself wow cool + magazine as well so if you feel sick u can look at some naked chicks in war which makes you feel good....thats so EPIC

Avatar image for Arjdagr8
Arjdagr8

3865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 Arjdagr8
Member since 2003 • 3865 Posts

im not saying the game changes. im saying that the rating goes down assuming the game stays the same. for example if resistance came out today it might be an 8.0 instead of 8.5 this is because as time goes on new precedents are set and factored into the rating.

L1qu1dSword

each MGS has changed from each sequel much more than halo has. the game is not the same as before.

Avatar image for wemhim
wemhim

16110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 wemhim
Member since 2005 • 16110 Posts
[QUOTE="USSJAndrew"]

/Thread

At least it definatly ended the doubts for me(somebody who hated MGS3, though 2 was great.)

Oh yea, and it also ended my doubts if there was a black adam sessler haha...

mingo123

geeezzzz snake just HAD to touch the statues d*** at 10:31...didnt he....+ snake has portable barrels and boxes bigger then snake himself wow cool + magazine as well so if you feel sick u can look at some naked chicks in war which makes you feel good....thats so EPIC

You must have started gaming on the Xbox or something. The whole portable large stuff is nothing new, it actually can make a game FUN sometimes...Not having to look around for crap. And not everybody is homophobic. It was funny...
Avatar image for mingo123
mingo123

9005

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 mingo123
Member since 2007 • 9005 Posts
[QUOTE="mingo123"][QUOTE="USSJAndrew"]

/Thread

At least it definatly ended the doubts for me(somebody who hated MGS3, though 2 was great.)

Oh yea, and it also ended my doubts if there was a black adam sessler haha...

wemhim

geeezzzz snake just HAD to touch the statues d*** at 10:31...didnt he....+ snake has portable barrels and boxes bigger then snake himself wow cool + magazine as well so if you feel sick u can look at some naked chicks in war which makes you feel good....thats so EPIC

You must have started gaming on the Xbox or something. The whole portable large stuff is nothing new, it actually can make a game FUN sometimes...Not having to look around for crap. And not everybody is homophobic. It was funny...

no its stupid, u have mgs4's story trying to be serious and stuff and then suddenly theres portable barrels lulz

Avatar image for thrones
thrones

12178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#64 thrones
Member since 2004 • 12178 Posts
[QUOTE="wemhim"][QUOTE="mingo123"][QUOTE="USSJAndrew"]

/Thread

At least it definatly ended the doubts for me(somebody who hated MGS3, though 2 was great.)

Oh yea, and it also ended my doubts if there was a black adam sessler haha...

mingo123

geeezzzz snake just HAD to touch the statues d*** at 10:31...didnt he....+ snake has portable barrels and boxes bigger then snake himself wow cool + magazine as well so if you feel sick u can look at some naked chicks in war which makes you feel good....thats so EPIC

You must have started gaming on the Xbox or something. The whole portable large stuff is nothing new, it actually can make a game FUN sometimes...Not having to look around for crap. And not everybody is homophobic. It was funny...

no its stupid, u have mgs4's story trying to be serious and stuff and then suddenly theres portable barrels lulz

Every game has been like that.

Avatar image for L1qu1dSword
L1qu1dSword

2835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#65 L1qu1dSword
Member since 2006 • 2835 Posts
[QUOTE="L1qu1dSword"]

im not saying the game changes. im saying that the rating goes down assuming the game stays the same. for example if resistance came out today it might be an 8.0 instead of 8.5 this is because as time goes on new precedents are set and factored into the rating.

Arjdagr8

each MGS has changed from each sequel much more than halo has. the game is not the same as before.

apples to oranges dude. besides halo3 was a huge leap with new vehicles, weapons, 4 player co-op, forge mode, theater mode, etc.... mgs4 is still just a single player only so i dont see how thats so revolutionary.

Avatar image for DarkCloud79
DarkCloud79

997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 DarkCloud79
Member since 2006 • 997 Posts

If MGS4 can't be AAA because of the graphics then how do you explain Halo 3?

Thatgame looked like the devs picked up halo 2, pretended to put it in 720p and added rainbow colors to mask it.

Avatar image for wemhim
wemhim

16110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 wemhim
Member since 2005 • 16110 Posts
[QUOTE="wemhim"][QUOTE="mingo123"][QUOTE="USSJAndrew"]

/Thread

At least it definatly ended the doubts for me(somebody who hated MGS3, though 2 was great.)

Oh yea, and it also ended my doubts if there was a black adam sessler haha...

mingo123

geeezzzz snake just HAD to touch the statues d*** at 10:31...didnt he....+ snake has portable barrels and boxes bigger then snake himself wow cool + magazine as well so if you feel sick u can look at some naked chicks in war which makes you feel good....thats so EPIC

You must have started gaming on the Xbox or something. The whole portable large stuff is nothing new, it actually can make a game FUN sometimes...Not having to look around for crap. And not everybody is homophobic. It was funny...

no its stupid, u have mgs4's story trying to be serious and stuff and then suddenly theres portable barrels lulz

So? Games don't have to be realistic. Resident Evil, and Silent Hill, and Max Payne, and Mafia: All serious stories...
Avatar image for Ragashahs
Ragashahs

8785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Ragashahs
Member since 2005 • 8785 Posts
poor graphics + no multiplayer...only single player and nothing else....GS will officially be MGS fanboys if this game gets 9.0mingo123
umm what the graphics don't suck. they may not be the greatest they still prety good and it does of multiplayer
Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts

You obviously havn't seen the gameplayf50p90

what? the barrel rolling? protection from bullets via rusty old barrel? or is it the adult magazine snake can read? or.. hiding in dumpsters with ai mobs 2 feet away while you hold the lid up 10 inches - with none of them even glancing.. ? or is it the camo suit that gives you a poor disguise anybody should be able to see? or is it the killing mobs by grabbing their junk?

it might be fun, but i wouldn't go counting your eggs before they hatch. gameplay doesn't seem all that great to me to be honest. could be wrong though.

Avatar image for manicfoot
manicfoot

2670

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#70 manicfoot
Member since 2006 • 2670 Posts
I honestly don't care what MGS gets. Fact is I've been playing MGS games for little under half of my life and I simply must see it to the end. I don't care if the graphics aren't revolutionary. I want to experience everything in this game.
Avatar image for Mordred19
Mordred19

8259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 Mordred19
Member since 2007 • 8259 Posts

The graphics are horrible and you know this game will lose points in that area. Games with poor graphics are forgiven for the Wii but we expect so much more from our friendly neighborhood "super computer."

Definitely think the graphics are 2-D, flat, and lackluster and think that will take points away from it's score.

L1qu1dSword

just because the graphics aren't eye-bleedingly beautiful doesn't mean they are bad. textures aren't the full experience. you've cited nothing but graphics in your post, which is, frankly, shallow.

Avatar image for bobbetybob
bobbetybob

19370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#73 bobbetybob
Member since 2005 • 19370 Posts

[QUOTE="f50p90"]You obviously havn't seen the gameplay3picuri3

what? the barrel rolling? protection from bullets via rusty old barrel? or is it the adult magazine snake can read? or.. hiding in dumpsters with ai mobs 2 feet away while you hold the lid up 10 inches - with none of them even glancing.. ? or is it the camo suit that gives you a poor disguise anybody should be able to see? or is it the killing mobs by grabbing their junk?

it might be fun, but i wouldn't go counting your eggs before they hatch. gameplay doesn't seem all that great to me to be honest. could be wrong though.

Wow at least know about the game first, killing people by grabbing their junk? Yeah you really kill them...and hiding in a dumpster with the lid open 10 inches? What would you prefer then, that you have to open it with the analogue stick and if you slip and open too much they spot you and then it's a waste of time? And as for the camo suit, are you just stupid, I don't know about you but I don't think the idea of controlling an invisible person in a game is a great one really, oh wheres my character, ahh I don't have a freaking clue. Trust me I played SotC with the invisible cloak it's impossible to use.

Avatar image for USSJAndrew
USSJAndrew

5042

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#74 USSJAndrew
Member since 2004 • 5042 Posts
[QUOTE="USSJAndrew"]

/Thread

At least it definatly ended the doubts for me(somebody who hated MGS3, though 2 was great.)

Oh yea, and it also ended my doubts if there was a black adam sessler haha...

mingo123

geeezzzz snake just HAD to touch the statues d*** at 10:31...didnt he....+ snake has portable barrels and boxes bigger then snake himself wow cool + magazine as well so if you feel sick u can look at some naked chicks in war which makes you feel good....thats so EPIC

You're not worthy of that tupac avatar ;)

Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts
[QUOTE="3picuri3"]

[QUOTE="f50p90"]You obviously havn't seen the gameplaybobbetybob

what? the barrel rolling? protection from bullets via rusty old barrel? or is it the adult magazine snake can read? or.. hiding in dumpsters with ai mobs 2 feet away while you hold the lid up 10 inches - with none of them even glancing.. ? or is it the camo suit that gives you a poor disguise anybody should be able to see? or is it the killing mobs by grabbing their junk?

it might be fun, but i wouldn't go counting your eggs before they hatch. gameplay doesn't seem all that great to me to be honest. could be wrong though.

Wow at least know about the game first, killing people by grabbing their junk? Yeah you really kill them...and hiding in a dumpster with the lid open 10 inches? What would you prefer then, that you have to open it with the analogue stick and if you slip and open too much they spot you and then it's a waste of time? And as for the camo suit, are you just stupid, I don't know about you but I don't think the idea of controlling an invisible person in a game is a great one really, oh wheres my character, ahh I don't have a freaking clue. Trust me I played SotC with the invisible cloak it's impossible to use.

maybe you don't kill them, but the fact there is a groin squeeze move, adult magazines, and all this other hokey gameplay stuff i just don't think it'll score well. let me explain a bit more.

i feel like mgs4 is trying too hard to pay homage to all the previous ones. it includes all these hokey gameplay elements that just seem a bit lame given the technology we have today to work with. it's just depressing that kojima is so focussed on all of this camp stuff when he has all this potential to work with.

i'm kind of torn though, part of me thinks it's neat he's doing it - the other part just thinks it'll flop because of it. given how much better the game looks i'm just thinking these weird elements might not fit so well, but i guess it's the game people have grown to love. can't mess with it too much.

either way - these are my reasons for thinking it'll never get AAA here.

Avatar image for Blackfriend8
Blackfriend8

1982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Blackfriend8
Member since 2004 • 1982 Posts
ok the graphics arent the best in the world but to say that they are horrible is dumb. they dont look that bad just not as good as Gears or Crysis. Also what makes the Metal Gear series good is the crazy story with insane characters, well at least thats what i play it for.
Avatar image for NSR34GTR
NSR34GTR

13179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 NSR34GTR
Member since 2007 • 13179 Posts
the gfx look great to me
Avatar image for wemhim
wemhim

16110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 wemhim
Member since 2005 • 16110 Posts
[QUOTE="bobbetybob"][QUOTE="3picuri3"]

[QUOTE="f50p90"]You obviously havn't seen the gameplay3picuri3

what? the barrel rolling? protection from bullets via rusty old barrel? or is it the adult magazine snake can read? or.. hiding in dumpsters with ai mobs 2 feet away while you hold the lid up 10 inches - with none of them even glancing.. ? or is it the camo suit that gives you a poor disguise anybody should be able to see? or is it the killing mobs by grabbing their junk?

it might be fun, but i wouldn't go counting your eggs before they hatch. gameplay doesn't seem all that great to me to be honest. could be wrong though.

Wow at least know about the game first, killing people by grabbing their junk? Yeah you really kill them...and hiding in a dumpster with the lid open 10 inches? What would you prefer then, that you have to open it with the analogue stick and if you slip and open too much they spot you and then it's a waste of time? And as for the camo suit, are you just stupid, I don't know about you but I don't think the idea of controlling an invisible person in a game is a great one really, oh wheres my character, ahh I don't have a freaking clue. Trust me I played SotC with the invisible cloak it's impossible to use.

maybe you don't kill them, but the fact there is a groin squeeze move, adult magazines, and all this other hokey gameplay stuff i just don't think it'll score well. let me explain a bit more.

i feel like mgs4 is trying too hard to pay homage to all the previous ones. it includes all these hokey gameplay elements that just seem a bit lame given the technology we have today to work with. it's just depressing that kojima is so focussed on all of this camp stuff when he has all this potential to work with.

i'm kind of torn though, part of me thinks it's neat he's doing it - the other part just thinks it'll flop because of it. given how much better the game looks i'm just thinking these weird elements might not fit so well, but i guess it's the game people have grown to love. can't mess with it too much.

either way - these are my reasons for thinking it'll never get AAA here.

Maybe HERE, but either way, it'll have its fanbase. I mean, movies like the Warriors have their fanbases, and well....Yeah...
Avatar image for niall077
niall077

1729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 niall077
Member since 2006 • 1729 Posts

well it all depends who reviews it. Brad shoemaker is doing all the MGS4 previews so I guess he will review it (if is still working at GS by then)

but if it doesnt get AAA, well by then giantbomb.com will have its forums up and running and I will have no need for gamespot ;)

and we all know Jeff isnt the biggest MGS fan so his review wont effect me.

Avatar image for -Spock-
-Spock-

7072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 -Spock-
Member since 2006 • 7072 Posts

poor graphics + no multiplayer...only single player and nothing else....GS will officially be MGS fanboys if this game gets 9.0mingo123

It has multiplayer. There's even a beta starting on April 17th. :|

Avatar image for Shensolidus
Shensolidus

931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#82 Shensolidus
Member since 2003 • 931 Posts
[QUOTE="TMontana1004"][QUOTE="f50p90"][QUOTE="TMontana1004"]

The thing that will hold MGS4 back from being AAA is the fact that the online doesn't come with the game and because it will be LOADED with cut scenes.

L1qu1dSword

that didn't hold MGS 1 2 and 3 back

Ah we'll see what happens. Looks like a good game none the less. Do you have to buy MGO?

ratings change drammatically as time goes on. just cause it was ok ten years ago does not mean its ok now.

Yeah good thing right that they changed the gameplay from almost the ground up for this title and using the older games as a foundation. Take a look at the gameplay demo L1qu1dSword and then compare to older MGS titles. Previewers who tried it out and admitted they did not like the previous iterations LOVED MGS4. It is on Kotaku if your looking for proof btw. And i'm not going to link it because this thread ain't worth the trouble.

Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts

:? It looks great to me. Seriously, I'm not asking for Crysis-level visuals. I just want more of the great, character-driven plots that I have grown to love.

Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts
isn't MGS4 multi coming separate? for additional money? or did they scrap that idea?
Avatar image for bobbetybob
bobbetybob

19370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#85 bobbetybob
Member since 2005 • 19370 Posts
[QUOTE="bobbetybob"][QUOTE="3picuri3"]

[QUOTE="f50p90"]You obviously havn't seen the gameplay3picuri3

what? the barrel rolling? protection from bullets via rusty old barrel? or is it the adult magazine snake can read? or.. hiding in dumpsters with ai mobs 2 feet away while you hold the lid up 10 inches - with none of them even glancing.. ? or is it the camo suit that gives you a poor disguise anybody should be able to see? or is it the killing mobs by grabbing their junk?

it might be fun, but i wouldn't go counting your eggs before they hatch. gameplay doesn't seem all that great to me to be honest. could be wrong though.

Wow at least know about the game first, killing people by grabbing their junk? Yeah you really kill them...and hiding in a dumpster with the lid open 10 inches? What would you prefer then, that you have to open it with the analogue stick and if you slip and open too much they spot you and then it's a waste of time? And as for the camo suit, are you just stupid, I don't know about you but I don't think the idea of controlling an invisible person in a game is a great one really, oh wheres my character, ahh I don't have a freaking clue. Trust me I played SotC with the invisible cloak it's impossible to use.

maybe you don't kill them, but the fact there is a groin squeeze move, adult magazines, and all this other hokey gameplay stuff i just don't think it'll score well. let me explain a bit more.

i feel like mgs4 is trying too hard to pay homage to all the previous ones. it includes all these hokey gameplay elements that just seem a bit lame given the technology we have today to work with. it's just depressing that kojima is so focussed on all of this camp stuff when he has all this potential to work with.

i'm kind of torn though, part of me thinks it's neat he's doing it - the other part just thinks it'll flop because of it. given how much better the game looks i'm just thinking these weird elements might not fit so well, but i guess it's the game people have grown to love. can't mess with it too much.

either way - these are my reasons for thinking it'll never get AAA here.

Fair enough, but 3 words, No More Heroes, it's one of the most immature games ever but the reason people like it is because it has a sense of humour just like MGS does.

Avatar image for niall077
niall077

1729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 niall077
Member since 2006 • 1729 Posts

isn't MGS4 multi coming separate? for additional money? or did they scrap that idea?3picuri3

it comes with MGS4 with 5 maps. more maps will be DLC and down the line

there could be a retail "MGO sub" with more maps on the disc, but it hasnt been confirmed

or atleast thats my understanding

Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#87 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts
why the hate for MGS4? This is the game of games! cant wait!!!
Avatar image for armymen4
armymen4

501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 armymen4
Member since 2008 • 501 Posts

poor graphics + no multiplayer...only single player and nothing else....GS will officially be MGS fanboys if this game gets 9.0mingo123

its comming with Metal Gear Online which is going to have extremely good online. and its not supposed to be played like halo or Gears. it actually has a story to it, that you have to understand. and it has incredible graphics, what are you talking about? and its in 1080p resolution. its so annoying hearing people say "i dont know what kind of campain mode MGS has", um its not halo. i suggest you buy the $30 mgs 1-3 collection por ps2. then youl know why mgs1 was rated the best game for ps1, mgs2 goty for ps2, and mgs3 was good too, not as much hype. you have to be a fan of the series to truely appreciate it, its like a sony classic, because mgs3 isnt a true sequel, its a prologue to mgs1. so mgs4 people have been waiting for is the true sequel to mgs2 which came out in 2002

Avatar image for armymen4
armymen4

501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 armymen4
Member since 2008 • 501 Posts

poor graphics + no multiplayer...only single player and nothing else....GS will officially be MGS fanboys if this game gets 9.0mingo123

its comming with Metal Gear Online which is going to have extremely good online. and its not supposed to be played like halo or Gears. it actually has a story to it, that you have to understand. and it has incredible graphics, what are you talking about? and its in 1080p resolution. its so annoying hearing people say "i dont know what kind of campain mode MGS has", um its not halo. i suggest you buy the $30 mgs 1-3 collection por ps2. then youl know why mgs1 was rated the best game for ps1, mgs2 goty for ps2, and mgs3 was good too, not as much hype. you have to be a fan of the series to truely appreciate it, its like a sony classic, because mgs3 isnt a true sequel, its a prologue to mgs1. so mgs4 people have been waiting for is the true sequel to mgs2 which came out in 2002

Avatar image for hamstergeddon
hamstergeddon

7188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 hamstergeddon
Member since 2006 • 7188 Posts
poor graphics + no multiplayer...only single player and nothing else....GS will officially be MGS fanboys if this game gets 9.0mingo123


If I'm not mistaken, MGS4 comes with MGS online, which is multiplayer. As for the TC...just stop.
Avatar image for _KenKittyragi_
_KenKittyragi_

1967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 _KenKittyragi_
Member since 2007 • 1967 Posts
I think there is a 50/50 chance of AAA or AA. The game will probably get a con for being a lot like the other mgs, no online, short game, etc.
Avatar image for sambalimbo
sambalimbo

568

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 sambalimbo
Member since 2007 • 568 Posts

poor graphics + no multiplayer...only single player and nothing else....GS will officially be MGS fanboys if this game gets 9.0mingo123

following your logic games like awesome games like okami dont deserve over 9.0 -.-

Avatar image for _KenKittyragi_
_KenKittyragi_

1967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 _KenKittyragi_
Member since 2007 • 1967 Posts

[QUOTE="mingo123"]poor graphics + no multiplayer...only single player and nothing else....GS will officially be MGS fanboys if this game gets 9.0sambalimbo

following your logic games like awesome games like okami dont deserve over 9.0 -.-

well, that was last gen and that was a totally new game no one had ever really seen. The standards have risen and MGS is the 4th in the franchise now.

Avatar image for Arjdagr8
Arjdagr8

3865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 Arjdagr8
Member since 2003 • 3865 Posts

I think there is a 50/50 chance of AAA or AA. The game will probably get a con for being a lot like the other mgs, no online, short game, etc._KenKittyragi_

what makes it a lot like the other mgs?

Avatar image for hayato_
hayato_

5165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 hayato_
Member since 2007 • 5165 Posts

Don't care, want game now :cry:

I think it will be AA status.

Avatar image for Mordred19
Mordred19

8259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 Mordred19
Member since 2007 • 8259 Posts
[QUOTE="bobbetybob"][QUOTE="3picuri3"]

[QUOTE="f50p90"]You obviously havn't seen the gameplay3picuri3

what? the barrel rolling? protection from bullets via rusty old barrel? or is it the adult magazine snake can read? or.. hiding in dumpsters with ai mobs 2 feet away while you hold the lid up 10 inches - with none of them even glancing.. ? or is it the camo suit that gives you a poor disguise anybody should be able to see? or is it the killing mobs by grabbing their junk?

it might be fun, but i wouldn't go counting your eggs before they hatch. gameplay doesn't seem all that great to me to be honest. could be wrong though.

Wow at least know about the game first, killing people by grabbing their junk? Yeah you really kill them...and hiding in a dumpster with the lid open 10 inches? What would you prefer then, that you have to open it with the analogue stick and if you slip and open too much they spot you and then it's a waste of time? And as for the camo suit, are you just stupid, I don't know about you but I don't think the idea of controlling an invisible person in a game is a great one really, oh wheres my character, ahh I don't have a freaking clue. Trust me I played SotC with the invisible cloak it's impossible to use.

maybe you don't kill them, but the fact there is a groin squeeze move, adult magazines, and all this other hokey gameplay stuff i just don't think it'll score well. let me explain a bit more.

i feel like mgs4 is trying too hard to pay homage to all the previous ones. it includes all these hokey gameplay elements that just seem a bit lame given the technology we have today to work with. it's just depressing that kojima is so focussed on all of this camp stuff when he has all this potential to work with.

i'm kind of torn though, part of me thinks it's neat he's doing it - the other part just thinks it'll flop because of it. given how much better the game looks i'm just thinking these weird elements might not fit so well, but i guess it's the game people have grown to love. can't mess with it too much.

either way - these are my reasons for thinking it'll never get AAA here.

an asthetic nitpick like that is not criteria for rating a game. as a gameplay element, it only needs to work, to not be broken, and to serve a practical purpose to the player. squeezing an enemies junk has the same result as choking him or throwing him to the ground: *player knocks enemy unconcious* end of story. it doens't matter how it's done, as long as it serves it's function in the end.

MGS4 wouldn't be paying homage to the previous games through this, this is just the way MGS has been. crazy, weird stuff. but people need to step back and objectively look at how the gameplay works and achieves its end, and judge that. personal objections to the asthetic means are a different category.

if the crotch-grabbing was twitchy, glitchy, unresponsive, or served no practical purpose, that would be means to mark it negatively. if it is just a simple button press that works within the standards of polish to this game, there shouldn't be anything wrong with it.

adult magazines serve a practical purpose, to freeze enemies in place for a period of time. it's not much different than "freeze attacks" in other games that temporarly immobilize enemies. same function, but with a different face on it. that's all.

a dumspter would offer concealment in a real battlefield. if the AI wasn't responsive when you saw it, there is good reason for that. it was a highly scripted demo, that was supposed to go exactly as planned. they can't afford to be spotted too soon while demonstrating all the stealth aspects to an audience. that first gameplay video is over six months old now, and subsequent videos have shown better AI more in line with today's standards. they are aware of their enviorment, and can spot snake if he isn't particularly well-hidden.

Avatar image for _KenKittyragi_
_KenKittyragi_

1967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 _KenKittyragi_
Member since 2007 • 1967 Posts

[QUOTE="_KenKittyragi_"]I think there is a 50/50 chance of AAA or AA. The game will probably get a con for being a lot like the other mgs, no online, short game, etc.Arjdagr8

what makes it a lot like the other mgs?

The gameplay looks the same for the most part with a different setting. But that's how all sequels are right? If it brings a lot of new unique things to the table, than it's an easy AAA. Halo 3 had 4 player online co-op, forge, saved films, all integrated into bungie.net. Also had a better overall SP than Halo 2 and more balanced MP. But the gameplay was still the same for the most part. am right?

Avatar image for Arjdagr8
Arjdagr8

3865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 Arjdagr8
Member since 2003 • 3865 Posts

an asthetic nitpick like that is not criteria for rating a game. as a gameplay element, it only needs to work, to not be broken, and to serve a practical purpose to the player. squeezing an enemies junk has the same result as choking him or throwing him to the ground: *player knocks enemy unconcious* end of story. it doens't matter how it's done, as long as it serves it's function in the end.

MGS4 wouldn't be paying homage to the previous games through this, this is just the way MGS has been. crazy, weird stuff. but people need to step back and objectively look at how the gameplay works and achieves its end, and judge that. personal objections to the asthetic means are a different category.

if the crotch-grabbing was twitchy, glitchy, unresponsive, or served no practical purpose, that would be means to mark it negatively. if it is just a simple button press that works within the standards of polish to this game, there shouldn't be anything wrong with it.

adult magazines serve a practical purpose, to freeze enemies in place for a period of time. it's not much different than "freeze attacks" in other games that temporarly immobilize enemies. same function, but with a different face on it. that's all.

a dumspter would offer concealment in a real battlefield. if the AI wasn't responsive when you saw it, there is good reason for that. it was a highly scripted demo, that was supposed to go exactly as planned. they can't afford to be spotted too soon while demonstrating all the stealth aspects to an audience. that first gameplay video is over six months old now, and subsequent videos have shown better AI more in line with today's standards. they are aware of their enviorment, and can spot snake if he isn't particularly well-hidden.

Mordred19

great post but you shouldnt waste time trying to speak logic to fanboys.

Avatar image for Arjdagr8
Arjdagr8

3865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 Arjdagr8
Member since 2003 • 3865 Posts
[QUOTE="Arjdagr8"]

[QUOTE="_KenKittyragi_"]I think there is a 50/50 chance of AAA or AA. The game will probably get a con for being a lot like the other mgs, no online, short game, etc._KenKittyragi_

what makes it a lot like the other mgs?

The gameplay looks the same for the most part with a different setting. But that's how all sequels are right? If it brings a lot of new unique things to the table, than it's an easy AAA. Halo 3 had 4 player online co-op, forge, saved films, all integrated into bungie.net. Also had a better overall SP than Halo 2 and more balanced MP. But the gameplay was still the same for the most part. am right?

erm no it doesnt, you obviously know nothing about the game. the gameplay has changed a lot. im not gonna bother posting in this thread its a waste of time.

Avatar image for Bren128
Bren128

2358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 Bren128
Member since 2003 • 2358 Posts
After watching the demo i thought it looked amazing, the war atmosphere, helping out one side of opposing forces while there engaged in battle. Everything ive seen screams 9.5. The whole feel of the game is just incredible, i cant wait to get my hands on it. It just looks so new and fresh.