Im Convinced.. Crysis COULD Work on PS3 and look as good

You have terrible judgement.

No way dude, not even close, the Ps3/360 can't handle all that action, physics, and graphics.retrib

Dude its only been 6 months and already games like Lair and Uncharted are being compared to coming close to crysis level quality.. I said in about 4 years we will see PS3 delivering crysis quality graphics and physics.

the phisics dont come anywhere near this.

http://www.gametrailers.com/umwatcher.php?id=53584

and the graphics speak for themselves. 

One word... SCALE

The scale of Crysis would be impossible for 512MB of System RAM... let alone 256.
foxhound_fox

QFT

the phisics dont come anywhere near this.

http://www.gametrailers.com/umwatcher.php?id=53584

and the graphics speak for themselves.

cobrax75

I disagree HS and uncharted don't look as good as your saying. On the level of Crysis, dream on..deangallop

I see you quoted me on Warhawk Being AAA like you think its going to flop?! Whats stopping this game from being AAA?!

Scale

Its on a console

For one thing to be awesome on a console, something is normmaly sacrificed.

On a PC, you dont get such limitations. 

[QUOTE="retrib"]No way dude, not even close, the Ps3/360 can't handle all that action, physics, and graphics.BrutonNYC

Dude its only been 6 months and already games like Lair and Uncharted are being compared to coming close to crysis level quality.. I said in about 4 years we will see PS3 delivering crysis quality graphics and physics.

4 years, eh? We're getting Crysis in half a year... You guys will be salvating over the next-gen of consoles by then... :roll: 

[QUOTE="deangallop"]I disagree HS and uncharted don't look as good as your saying. On the level of Crysis, dream on..BrutonNYC

I see you quoted me on Warhawk Being AAA like you think its going to flop?! Whats stopping this game from being AAA?!

Warhawk will not get AAA because its almost an exact clone of the Battlefield series. 

[QUOTE="deangallop"]I disagree HS and uncharted don't look as good as your saying. On the level of Crysis, dream on..BrutonNYC

I see you quoted me on Warhawk Being AAA like you think its going to flop?! Whats stopping this game from being AAA?!

To tell you the truth I havn't been paying much attention to HS. After watching the video you supplied in your first post I can easily say meh. Cows call this a graphical powerhouse??? I think it has graphics that are a tiny bit above average, the gameplay looks stale and boring, wrapped around in some cool little minicutscenes and button press minigames.

This isnt going to achieve AAA, you can quote me if you like.

http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php?id=19627&type=mov&pl=game Mix Heavenly sword's object physics with Uncharteds lush and rich enviroments and you have Crysis level graphics and physics. Watch that heavenly sword video and a couple minutes into it look how fluid and smooth the graphics of the barrels and tables are. After seeing these PS3 titles in action, there is no doubt that in a few years PS3 will be able to do Crysis ****graphics, hell maybe even better BrutonNYC

Not enough RAM for the environment. Get over it already and play your heavenly sword. It's being made for the PC, deal with it.

[QUOTE="deangallop"]I disagree HS and uncharted don't look as good as your saying. On the level of Crysis, dream on..BrutonNYC

I see you quoted me on Warhawk Being AAA like you think its going to flop?! Whats stopping this game from being AAA?!

The PS3's memory issues would probably hinder it, I'm not quite convinced either console could run Crysis without a major downgrade.

One word... SCALE

The scale of Crysis would be impossible for 512MB of System RAM... let alone 256.
foxhound_fox

Consoles work differently with memory vs pcs so that isnt a big issue unless they have crazy textures going in, the physics i would say could be easily done on the ps3 maybe better than pcs but not to sure on the graphics side, the gpu is pretty much a G70-G71 for the ps3. the min gpu spec for videocard they wanted for alpha testing was a g70, take in to count that alpha testing requires faster system requirements than the final finished product in most cases. Another interestings fact is now adays gpus are limited by the fact that cpus cant keep up so it might be different with the ps3 since it has a powerfull cpu. even the xbox gpu is limited by its cpu.

 also windows sucks at memory management.

[QUOTE="cobrax75"]

the phisics dont come anywhere near this.

 

http://www.gametrailers.com/umwatcher.php?id=53584

 

and the graphics speak for themselves.

deepdreamer256

What do you mean? 

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]One word... SCALE

The scale of Crysis would be impossible for 512MB of System RAM... let alone 256.
Amigwo

Consoles work differently with memory vs pcs so that isnt a big issue unless they have crazy textures going in, the physics i would say could be easily done on the ps3 maybe better than pcs but not to sure on the graphics side, the gpu is pretty much a G70-G71 for the ps3. the min gpu spec for videocard they wanted for alpha testing was a g70, take in to count that alpha testing requires faster system requirements than the final finished product in most cases. Another interestings fact is now adays gpus are limited by the fact that cpus cant keep up so it might be different with the ps3 since it has a powerfull cpu. even the xbox gpu is limited by its cpu.

That's all fine and dandy, but I wouldn't have wasted my time writing that. It's not being developed for any system expect the PC, so the thread is pointless to begin with. BTW, 512mb or ram  is still not enough, reguardless of the architecture.  

[QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="cobrax75"]

the phisics dont come anywhere near this.

http://www.gametrailers.com/umwatcher.php?id=53584

and the graphics speak for themselves.

Einhanderkiller

What do you mean?

This coming from someone who's thinking about selling his PS3 :lol: Is this guy for real? It's like PMS every week for this guy. Happy one moment, pissy the next on a system. hotdaisy18

True,

buying both consoles made him suffer from a split personality ;) 

[QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="cobrax75"]

the phisics dont come anywhere near this.

 

http://www.gametrailers.com/umwatcher.php?id=53584

 

and the graphics speak for themselves.

Einhanderkiller

What do you mean? 

hes basing all his facts on farcry which pretty much was to showcase graphics. gameplay sucked physics sucked. the devs main focus was pushing out the graphics on that engine. but with crysis its different, they are focusing on gameplay,graphics,physics,story.

One word. No. You know how I know how. I havent seen a game come close to crysis physics, graphics, scale, environment, real time ocean effects, real time day effects, particle effects, or explosions. Go watch the atom bomb for crysis and tell me it doesnt have insane physics.Killfox

http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php?id=19627&type=mov&pl=game Mix Heavenly sword's object physics with Uncharteds lush and rich enviroments and you have Crysis level graphics and physics. Watch that heavenly sword video and a couple minutes into it look how fluid and smooth the graphics of the barrels and tables are. After seeing these PS3 titles in action, there is no doubt that in a few years PS3 will be able to do Crysis ****graphics, hell maybe even better BrutonNYC

I didnt see anything but the standard physics in that Heavenly sword trailer.

[QUOTE="Amigwo"]

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]One word... SCALE

The scale of Crysis would be impossible for 512MB of System RAM... let alone 256.
mismajor99

Consoles work differently with memory vs pcs so that isnt a big issue unless they have crazy textures going in, the physics i would say could be easily done on the ps3 maybe better than pcs but not to sure on the graphics side, the gpu is pretty much a G70-G71 for the ps3. the min gpu spec for videocard they wanted for alpha testing was a g70, take in to count that alpha testing requires faster system requirements than the final finished product in most cases. Another interestings fact is now adays gpus are limited by the fact that cpus cant keep up so it might be different with the ps3 since it has a powerfull cpu. even the xbox gpu is limited by its cpu.

That's all fine and dandy, but I wouldn't have wasted my time writing that. It's not being developed for any system expect the PC, so the thread is pointless to begin with. BTW, 512mb or ram  is still not enough, reguardless of the architecture.  

crytek recently hired some folks for the ps3 programming department. lets just hope shall we ;o?

[QUOTE="Einhanderkiller"][QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="cobrax75"]

the phisics dont come anywhere near this.

http://www.gametrailers.com/umwatcher.php?id=53584

and the graphics speak for themselves.

Amigwo

What do you mean?

hes basing all his facts on farcry which pretty much was to showcase graphics. gameplay sucked physics sucked. the devs main focus was pushing out the graphics on that engine. but with crysis its different, they are focusing on gameplay,graphics,physics,story.

[QUOTE="mismajor99"][QUOTE="Amigwo"]

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]One word... SCALE

The scale of Crysis would be impossible for 512MB of System RAM... let alone 256.
Amigwo

Consoles work differently with memory vs pcs so that isnt a big issue unless they have crazy textures going in, the physics i would say could be easily done on the ps3 maybe better than pcs but not to sure on the graphics side, the gpu is pretty much a G70-G71 for the ps3. the min gpu spec for videocard they wanted for alpha testing was a g70, take in to count that alpha testing requires faster system requirements than the final finished product in most cases. Another interestings fact is now adays gpus are limited by the fact that cpus cant keep up so it might be different with the ps3 since it has a powerfull cpu. even the xbox gpu is limited by its cpu.

That's all fine and dandy, but I wouldn't have wasted my time writing that. It's not being developed for any system expect the PC, so the thread is pointless to begin with. BTW, 512mb or ram is still not enough, reguardless of the architecture.

crytek recently hired some folks for the ps3 programming department. lets just hope shall we ;o?

No doubt that they will make a game for the PS3, that's pretty much a given, just not Crysis. I'm looking forward to seeing more games use the Cryengine 2 myself. 

[QUOTE="retrib"]No way dude, not even close, the Ps3/360 can't handle all that action, physics, and graphics.BrutonNYC

Dude its only been 6 months and already games like Lair and Uncharted are being compared to coming close to crysis level quality.. I said in about 4 years we will see PS3 delivering crysis quality graphics and physics.

[QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Einhanderkiller"][QUOTE="deepdreamer256"][QUOTE="cobrax75"]

the phisics dont come anywhere near this.

 

http://www.gametrailers.com/umwatcher.php?id=53584

 

and the graphics speak for themselves.

deepdreamer256

What do you mean?

hes basing all his facts on farcry which pretty much was to showcase graphics. gameplay sucked physics sucked. the devs main focus was pushing out the graphics on that engine. but with crysis its different, they are focusing on gameplay,graphics,physics,story.

 have you tried the online aspect of the game?

[QUOTE="retrib"]No way dude, not even close, the Ps3/360 can't handle all that action, physics, and graphics.BrutonNYC

Dude its only been 6 months and already games like Lair and Uncharted are being compared to coming close to crysis level quality.. I said in about 4 years we will see PS3 delivering crysis quality graphics and physics.

hahahhahaha 4 years!!!

JUST WAIT GUYS!!!!! 

Does 256 mb RAM mean anything to you?MoldOnHold

you're such a fanboy, shoo 

[QUOTE="BrutonNYC"]

[QUOTE="retrib"]No way dude, not even close, the Ps3/360 can't handle all that action, physics, and graphics.KAS3Y_JAM3Z

Dude its only been 6 months and already games like Lair and Uncharted are being compared to coming close to crysis level quality.. I said in about 4 years we will see PS3 delivering crysis quality graphics and physics.

hahahhahaha 4 years!!!

JUST WAIT GUYS!!!!!

Yes, just wait, it's not like 360 is going to get there  any time soon either. And don't give me that GeOW looks better than crysis crud.

I'm new to these forums, and I've already learned that BrutonNYC is full of nonsense.WhoaNellie32

The force is strong in this one.

the phisics dont come anywhere near this.

 

http://www.gametrailers.com/umwatcher.php?id=53584

 

and the graphics speak for themselves.

cobrax75

That video is absolutely awesome 

[QUOTE="MoldOnHold"]Does 256 mb RAM mean anything to you?retrib

you're such a fanboy, shoo

Hes not being a fanboy buddy. 256 MB RAM is not nearly enough. 

Lolz Keeps dreaming Cows.. If you were really a serious graphic whore you should have become a Hermit instead..

 Cows are forgetting that Crysis run on DirectX10 which is something PS3 can't do.. And it'll be a b|tch trying to make the game run well on the (pain in the azz/hard to progarm processor) call the CELL lolz..

http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php?id=19627&type=mov&pl=game  Mix Heavenly sword's object physics with Uncharteds lush and rich enviroments and you have Crysis level graphics and physics. Watch that heavenly sword video and a couple minutes into it look how fluid and smooth the graphics of the barrels and tables are. After seeing these PS3 titles in action, there is no doubt that in a few years PS3 will be able to do Crysis graphics, hell maybe even betterBrutonNYC

But of course not Xbox 360.  Never. :|