This topic is locked from further discussion.
Simply because prolly in less than a year ps3 and 360 will have similar controllers and still better graphics. .tazzydnc
Â
No way on earth. Besides, with a whole army of 360 and PS3 owners calling the Wii-mote "gimicky" and "for kids", why would "hardcore" gaming companies like Sony or MS fashion new controllers to imitate the Wii?
Either "hardcore" gamers admit that the Wii rocks, or what you're saying simply doesn't make any logical sense.
What you're saying is, "360 and PS3 will have the best, coolest stuff because....they're 360 and PS3, and all cool stuff is released on those platforms.. The Wii-mote sucks, but....we're gonna have one on the 360 anyways!"
I mean honestly. Do you really think in 5 years the wii will still be selling as good as it is?! It looks to me that the Wii is going in the same direction the N64 and Gamecube is going. Selling great to begin with but will slowly die down. I mean in 5 years when people get tired of the new controller feature, people will want superior games and superior graphics. Most likely PS3 will be the dominating Console within 5 years. I was done with nintendo ever since the N64, Yes I use to love the NES/Snes but those days are long gone and I need something more powerful. Call me shallow, but im very big on graphics. Despite me being a PS3 fan, I love gears becasue of the graphics and its a fun game. I mean the Wii just wont have the lasting appeal. Infact I take that back, id be suprised if it even lasted 5 years, I think after 2 years the wii is going to end up like the gamecube and N64, its just not future proof whatsoeverAhammer80first of all dont all game systems stop selling by 5 years....self owned? and also look at ps3 its stop selling and its only been out for 6months../thread owned
[QUOTE="Ahammer80"]I mean honestly. Do you really think in 5 years the wii will still be selling as good as it is?! It looks to me that the Wii is going in the same direction the N64 and Gamecube is going. Selling great to begin with but will slowly die down. I mean in 5 years when people get tired of the new controller feature, people will want superior games and superior graphics. Most likely PS3 will be the dominating Console within 5 years. I was done with nintendo ever since the N64, Yes I use to love the NES/Snes but those days are long gone and I need something more powerful. Call me shallow, but im very big on graphics. Despite me being a PS3 fan, I love gears becasue of the graphics and its a fun game. I mean the Wii just wont have the lasting appeal. Infact I take that back, id be suprised if it even lasted 5 years, I think after 2 years the wii is going to end up like the gamecube and N64, its just not future proof whatsoeversauska_sunfirst of all dont all game systems stop selling by 5 years....self owned? and also look at ps3 its stop selling and its only been out for 6months../thread owned Well for the past few generations it's been trendy for the big boys to release a new console at five year intervals, but certainly not all game systems (or even home consoles) stop selling within 5 years. Look at how the PS2 is outselling the PS3.
I mean honestly. Do you really think in 5 years the wii will still be selling as good as it is?! It looks to me that the Wii is going in the same direction the N64 and Gamecube is going. Selling great to begin with but will slowly die down. I mean in 5 years when people get tired of the new controller feature, people will want superior games and superior graphics. Most likely PS3 will be the dominating Console within 5 years. I was done with nintendo ever since the N64, Yes I use to love the NES/Snes but those days are long gone and I need something more powerful. Call me shallow, but im very big on graphics. Despite me being a PS3 fan, I love gears becasue of the graphics and its a fun game. I mean the Wii just wont have the lasting appeal. Infact I take that back, id be suprised if it even lasted 5 years, I think after 2 years the wii is going to end up like the gamecube and N64, its just not future proof whatsoeverAhammer80if you get of the graphics port and focused on the online titles that the x360 and the ps3 don't get the wii will do way better then the gamecube nintend said from the beginning its not about the graphics, its about the gameplay and online to.
As much as it bothers me, the Wii is on a better pace than both 360 and PS3, let alone Nintendo's last two home consoles. And stop with this "future proof" crap Sony feeds you. If people cared about power, PSone and 2 wouldn't have won the last two gens, period. I think a better argument is the future lineups for each console. To me, 360 and PS3 both have outstanding future lineups, Nintendo's is full of "games" that appeal to a far different crowd, but right now, it's looking like their strategy is going pay off, which is unfortunate. Also, I saw, somebody mention how Sony and MS may release controllers similar to what the Wii has. I agree, but they probably (hopefully) won't make them standard until the next round of consoles. Even still, I've yet to see how the Wii remote makes games better than traditional controllers. Not one FPS on Wii is better than Rainbow Six: Vegas or F.E.A.R.Gamer46And have we seen any respectable developers design a FPS the ground up for the Wii? Really though, you all know that Metroid Prime 3's controls will be fantastic (same goes for RE:UC), so I don't think you need to worry.
Even still, I've yet to see how the Wii remote makes games better than traditional controllers. Not one FPS on Wii is better than Rainbow Six: Vegas, F.E.A.R., Call of Duty 2, or Resistance.Gamer46By all accounts, Godfather is best on the Wii purely because of the controls. Ditto with Madden 07. As for FPS games, I'd wait until decent FPS developers start working on the Wii. Current Wii FPS games suffer from the same control issue. IMO, they aren't using the Wiimote + nunchuck correctly for FPSes. "Pushing" the screen with the Wiimote pointer simply does not work.
[QUOTE="sauska_sun"][QUOTE="Ahammer80"]I mean honestly. Do you really think in 5 years the wii will still be selling as good as it is?! It looks to me that the Wii is going in the same direction the N64 and Gamecube is going. Selling great to begin with but will slowly die down. I mean in 5 years when people get tired of the new controller feature, people will want superior games and superior graphics. Most likely PS3 will be the dominating Console within 5 years. I was done with nintendo ever since the N64, Yes I use to love the NES/Snes but those days are long gone and I need something more powerful. Call me shallow, but im very big on graphics. Despite me being a PS3 fan, I love gears becasue of the graphics and its a fun game. I mean the Wii just wont have the lasting appeal. Infact I take that back, id be suprised if it even lasted 5 years, I think after 2 years the wii is going to end up like the gamecube and N64, its just not future proof whatsoeverTristam22first of all dont all game systems stop selling by 5 years....self owned? and also look at ps3 its stop selling and its only been out for 6months../thread owned Well for the past few generations it's been trendy for the big boys to release a new console at five year intervals, but certainly not all game systems (or even home consoles) stop selling within 5 years. Look at how the PS2 is outselling the PS3. Look at how the PS1 outsold the PS2 for the PS2's first year or two, too.
[QUOTE="Gamer46"]As much as it bothers me, the Wii is on a better pace than both 360 and PS3, let alone Nintendo's last two home consoles. And stop with this "future proof" crap Sony feeds you. If people cared about power, PSone and 2 wouldn't have won the last two gens, period. I think a better argument is the future lineups for each console. To me, 360 and PS3 both have outstanding future lineups, Nintendo's is full of "games" that appeal to a far different crowd, but right now, it's looking like their strategy is going pay off, which is unfortunate. Also, I saw, somebody mention how Sony and MS may release controllers similar to what the Wii has. I agree, but they probably (hopefully) won't make them standard until the next round of consoles. Even still, I've yet to see how the Wii remote makes games better than traditional controllers. Not one FPS on Wii is better than Rainbow Six: Vegas or F.E.A.R.Tristam22
Â
Red Steel was made by Ubisoft, you can say what you want, but they are a well regarded developer and RS SUCKED compared to what you can get on other consoles. I'll give you MP 3, it will be phenomenal, but I don't think it's going to make me want to stay away from Halo 3. RE: UC... I'm not sold on this one at all, but it's Capcom, so I'll play it before judging.
[QUOTE="Tristam22"][QUOTE="Gamer46"]As much as it bothers me, the Wii is on a better pace than both 360 and PS3, let alone Nintendo's last two home consoles. And stop with this "future proof" crap Sony feeds you. If people cared about power, PSone and 2 wouldn't have won the last two gens, period. I think a better argument is the future lineups for each console. To me, 360 and PS3 both have outstanding future lineups, Nintendo's is full of "games" that appeal to a far different crowd, but right now, it's looking like their strategy is going pay off, which is unfortunate. Also, I saw, somebody mention how Sony and MS may release controllers similar to what the Wii has. I agree, but they probably (hopefully) won't make them standard until the next round of consoles. Even still, I've yet to see how the Wii remote makes games better than traditional controllers. Not one FPS on Wii is better than Rainbow Six: Vegas or F.E.A.R.Gamer46
Red Steel was made by Ubisoft, you can say what you want, but they are a well regarded developer and RS SUCKED compared to what you can get on other consoles. I'll give you MP 3, it will be phenomenal, but I don't think it's going to make me want to stay away from Halo 3. RE: UC... I'm not sold on this one at all, but it's Capcom, so I'll play it before judging.
Ubisoft Paris worked on Red Steel. Considering they were also working on both GRAW 1 and GRAW 2 during the same time period, I'd say it's pretty clear where their priorities lay at the time.Red Steel was made by Ubisoft, you can say what you want, but they are a well regarded developer and RS SUCKED compared to what you can get on other consoles. I'll give you MP 3, it will be phenomenal, but I don't think it's going to make me want to stay away from Halo 3. RE: UC... I'm not sold on this one at all, but it's Capcom, so I'll play it before judging.
Gamer46
Fusion Frenzy 2 (and XBLA) sucked compared to what you can get on the Wii. If you want shooters, buy a 360 or wait for some heavy hitters to land on the Wii. If you want party games and imersive adventure games, look no further than the Wii. Even when the 360 came out, me and all my friends were still mutliplaying Halo 2. We could have cared less about the newest FPSs.
[QUOTE="Tristam22"][QUOTE="Gamer46"]As much as it bothers me, the Wii is on a better pace than both 360 and PS3, let alone Nintendo's last two home consoles. And stop with this "future proof" crap Sony feeds you. If people cared about power, PSone and 2 wouldn't have won the last two gens, period. I think a better argument is the future lineups for each console. To me, 360 and PS3 both have outstanding future lineups, Nintendo's is full of "games" that appeal to a far different crowd, but right now, it's looking like their strategy is going pay off, which is unfortunate. Also, I saw, somebody mention how Sony and MS may release controllers similar to what the Wii has. I agree, but they probably (hopefully) won't make them standard until the next round of consoles. Even still, I've yet to see how the Wii remote makes games better than traditional controllers. Not one FPS on Wii is better than Rainbow Six: Vegas or F.E.A.R.Gamer46
Red Steel was made by Ubisoft, you can say what you want, but they are a well regarded developer and RS SUCKED compared to what you can get on other consoles. I'll give you MP 3, it will be phenomenal, but I don't think it's going to make me want to stay away from Halo 3. RE: UC... I'm not sold on this one at all, but it's Capcom, so I'll play it before judging.
This is my point: Ubisoft has not been a respectable developer for the Wii. They've introduced the worst of the worst shovelware and ports on the system. And yeah, from what I did play of Red Steel (not much), it sucked. Of course, my Wii Remote's batteries were wasted and it kept disconnecting and going all wonky on me, so that might have had something to do with it. I hope to go back again and play it properly. Like I said, developers have made less-than-stellar efforts to create a proper FPS on the Wii thus far. If you play Elebits you get the idea that a FPS would suit the Wii Remote perfectly. Metroid Prime 3 will prove the controller's capabilities for a FPS though (yes I know that it isn't a FPS strictly speaking, but it still controls the same). As for RE:UC, I'm giving Capcom the benefit of the doubt simply because it's the RE franchise and they're Capcom.[QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="Tristam22"][QUOTE="Gamer46"]As much as it bothers me, the Wii is on a better pace than both 360 and PS3, let alone Nintendo's last two home consoles. And stop with this "future proof" crap Sony feeds you. If people cared about power, PSone and 2 wouldn't have won the last two gens, period. I think a better argument is the future lineups for each console. To me, 360 and PS3 both have outstanding future lineups, Nintendo's is full of "games" that appeal to a far different crowd, but right now, it's looking like their strategy is going pay off, which is unfortunate. Also, I saw, somebody mention how Sony and MS may release controllers similar to what the Wii has. I agree, but they probably (hopefully) won't make them standard until the next round of consoles. Even still, I've yet to see how the Wii remote makes games better than traditional controllers. Not one FPS on Wii is better than Rainbow Six: Vegas or F.E.A.R.mjarantilla
Â
Red Steel was made by Ubisoft, you can say what you want, but they are a well regarded developer and RS SUCKED compared to what you can get on other consoles. I'll give you MP 3, it will be phenomenal, but I don't think it's going to make me want to stay away from Halo 3. RE: UC... I'm not sold on this one at all, but it's Capcom, so I'll play it before judging.
Damage control at its finest. And I've yet to play games in other genres that make me say "I don't want to go back." I'm looking forward to playing Super Mario Galaxy, but it's not going to make me want to miss out on Ratchet and Clank Future or Banjo 3 (Rare may make me want to miss this one, but hopefully they can get it right).
[QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="Tristam22"][QUOTE="Gamer46"]As much as it bothers me, the Wii is on a better pace than both 360 and PS3, let alone Nintendo's last two home consoles. And stop with this "future proof" crap Sony feeds you. If people cared about power, PSone and 2 wouldn't have won the last two gens, period. I think a better argument is the future lineups for each console. To me, 360 and PS3 both have outstanding future lineups, Nintendo's is full of "games" that appeal to a far different crowd, but right now, it's looking like their strategy is going pay off, which is unfortunate. Also, I saw, somebody mention how Sony and MS may release controllers similar to what the Wii has. I agree, but they probably (hopefully) won't make them standard until the next round of consoles. Even still, I've yet to see how the Wii remote makes games better than traditional controllers. Not one FPS on Wii is better than Rainbow Six: Vegas or F.E.A.R.Gamer46
Red Steel was made by Ubisoft, you can say what you want, but they are a well regarded developer and RS SUCKED compared to what you can get on other consoles. I'll give you MP 3, it will be phenomenal, but I don't think it's going to make me want to stay away from Halo 3. RE: UC... I'm not sold on this one at all, but it's Capcom, so I'll play it before judging.
Damage control at its finest. And I've yet to play games in other genres that make me say "I don't want to go back." I'm looking forward to playing Super Mario Galaxy, but it's not going to make me want to miss out on Ratchet and Clank Future or Banjo 3 (Rare may make me want to miss this one, but hopefully they can get it right).
I fail to see the damage control, considering that EVERYONE has commented on the "rushed" feeling of Red Steel.You wanted a game made ground up for the Wii, I gave you one. Until I see actual proof that Wii can do FPS better than PS3, 360, or PC, I'm not going to believe that it can.Gamer46So you're just setting yourself up for ownage when Metroid Prime 3 comes out. Hardly the wisest thing to do.
[QUOTE="Gamer46"]You wanted a game made ground up for the Wii, I gave you one. Until I see actual proof that Wii can do FPS better than PS3, 360, or PC, I'm not going to believe that it can.Tristam22
Â
I need to see it to believe it. And frankly, it seems to me you and your fellow sheep are banking on this game making people forget about Halo 3 and other FPS coming to 360, and PS3. That's far less wise than me telling it like it is right now. I don't live in the future, I live in the present, and at this time, nothing suggests to me that Wii is the machine to get for FPS.
[QUOTE="Tristam22"][QUOTE="Gamer46"]You wanted a game made ground up for the Wii, I gave you one. Until I see actual proof that Wii can do FPS better than PS3, 360, or PC, I'm not going to believe that it can.Gamer46
I need to see it to believe it. And frankly, it seems to me you and your fellow sheep are banking on this game making people forget about Halo 3 and other FPS coming to 360, and PS3. That's far less wise than me telling it like it is right now. I don't live in the future, I live in the present, and at this time, nothing suggests to me that Wii is the machine to get for FPS.
Halo 3 will use dual analog JUST like its predecessors (thus, no room for improving the controls, at least not from an aiming/strafing perspective), and I won't even discuss how awful the joysticks feel on the SIXAXIS. Of course we're freaking banking on MP3! It's f***ing Retro and it's f***ing Metroid. It's going to rock hard. And I'll shove it in your face when it does.[QUOTE="Tristam22"][QUOTE="Gamer46"]You wanted a game made ground up for the Wii, I gave you one. Until I see actual proof that Wii can do FPS better than PS3, 360, or PC, I'm not going to believe that it can.Gamer46
Â
I need to see it to believe it. And frankly, it seems to me you and your fellow sheep are banking on this game making people forget about Halo 3 and other FPS coming to 360, and PS3. That's far less wise than me telling it like it is right now. I don't live in the future, I live in the present, and at this time, nothing suggests to me that Wii is the machine to get for FPS.
Â
That sort of argument would make it seem "sheepish" when everyone hyped up Halo 2 before it came out(which was a major single-player let-down) and how everyone is hyping Halo 3.
Both MP and MP2 have delivered the goods with flying colors.
[QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="Tristam22"][QUOTE="Gamer46"]You wanted a game made ground up for the Wii, I gave you one. Until I see actual proof that Wii can do FPS better than PS3, 360, or PC, I'm not going to believe that it can.Maelkav
Â
I need to see it to believe it. And frankly, it seems to me you and your fellow sheep are banking on this game making people forget about Halo 3 and other FPS coming to 360, and PS3. That's far less wise than me telling it like it is right now. I don't live in the future, I live in the present, and at this time, nothing suggests to me that Wii is the machine to get for FPS.
Â
That sort of argument would make it seem "sheepish" when everyone hyped up Halo 2 before it came out(which was a major single-player let-down) and how everyone is hyping Halo 3.
Both MP and MP2 have delivered the goods with flying colors.
 And yet due to the aweseome online experience Halo 2 topped MP2's score here at GS. My money is Halo again.
[QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="Tristam22"][QUOTE="Gamer46"]You wanted a game made ground up for the Wii, I gave you one. Until I see actual proof that Wii can do FPS better than PS3, 360, or PC, I'm not going to believe that it can.Tristam22
Â
I need to see it to believe it. And frankly, it seems to me you and your fellow sheep are banking on this game making people forget about Halo 3 and other FPS coming to 360, and PS3. That's far less wise than me telling it like it is right now. I don't live in the future, I live in the present, and at this time, nothing suggests to me that Wii is the machine to get for FPS.
Â
First of all, I didn't say the game wasn't going to rock, I'm a Metroid fan, I'm getting the game. But to act like it's the end all be all is fanboyish. Especially when it's yet to be proven that Wii is the way to go with this genre.
[QUOTE="Tristam22"][QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="Tristam22"][QUOTE="Gamer46"]You wanted a game made ground up for the Wii, I gave you one. Until I see actual proof that Wii can do FPS better than PS3, 360, or PC, I'm not going to believe that it can.Gamer46
I need to see it to believe it. And frankly, it seems to me you and your fellow sheep are banking on this game making people forget about Halo 3 and other FPS coming to 360, and PS3. That's far less wise than me telling it like it is right now. I don't live in the future, I live in the present, and at this time, nothing suggests to me that Wii is the machine to get for FPS.
First of all, I didn't say the game wasn't going to rock, I'm a Metroid fan, I'm getting the game. But to act like it's the end all be all is fanboyish. Especially when it's yet to be proven that Wii is the way to go with this genre.
I'm saying that Corruption will be the game to prove it. You dig?[QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="Maelkav"][And yet due to the aweseome online experience Halo 2 topped MP2's score here at GS. My money is Halo again.
Maelkav
:lol:
Using GS as your guideline is like using your 5-year-old sister to determine the year's Oscar winners...
Â
Gamerankings.com:
Halo 2- 94.6%
MP2- 92.2%
 Truthfully, I was disappointed in both games single player wise, but Halo 2 had online to make up for it. I give each company the benefit of the doubt though, because many times I don't enjoy the second installment of a series as much I did the first, unless it's a racing game or something like Guitar Hero, where it's easier to make improvements.
[QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="Tristam22"][QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="Tristam22"][QUOTE="Gamer46"]You wanted a game made ground up for the Wii, I gave you one. Until I see actual proof that Wii can do FPS better than PS3, 360, or PC, I'm not going to believe that it can.Tristam22
Â
I need to see it to believe it. And frankly, it seems to me you and your fellow sheep are banking on this game making people forget about Halo 3 and other FPS coming to 360, and PS3. That's far less wise than me telling it like it is right now. I don't live in the future, I live in the present, and at this time, nothing suggests to me that Wii is the machine to get for FPS.
Â
First of all, I didn't say the game wasn't going to rock, I'm a Metroid fan, I'm getting the game. But to act like it's the end all be all is fanboyish. Especially when it's yet to be proven that Wii is the way to go with this genre.
Â
Yeah, I get it. I hope you're right. Seeing as how MP 3: C is a BIG (granted it's not the only) reason I went with the Wii over the PS3, I'd be disappointed if it doesn't turn out to be in-your-face awesome.
[QUOTE="Maelkav"][QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="Maelkav"][And yet due to the aweseome online experience Halo 2 topped MP2's score here at GS. My money is Halo again.
Gamer46
:lol:
Using GS as your guideline is like using your 5-year-old sister to determine the year's Oscar winners...
Â
Gamerankings.com:
Halo 2- 94.6%
MP2- 92.2%
Â
Â
2.4% difference.
Â
:?
Â
You sure owned me. I was wrong. Halo 2 was way better...
[QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="Maelkav"][QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="Maelkav"][And yet due to the aweseome online experience Halo 2 topped MP2's score here at GS. My money is Halo again.
Maelkav
:lol:
Using GS as your guideline is like using your 5-year-old sister to determine the year's Oscar winners...
Â
Gamerankings.com:
Halo 2- 94.6%
MP2- 92.2%
Â
Â
2.4% difference.
Â
:?
Â
You sure owned me. I was wrong. Halo 2 was way better...
Â
Not way better, but it was better.Â
[QUOTE="Maelkav"][QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="Maelkav"][QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="Maelkav"][And yet due to the aweseome online experience Halo 2 topped MP2's score here at GS. My money is Halo again.
Gamer46
:lol:
Using GS as your guideline is like using your 5-year-old sister to determine the year's Oscar winners...
Â
Gamerankings.com:
Halo 2- 94.6%
MP2- 92.2%
Â
Â
2.4% difference.
Â
:?
Â
You sure owned me. I was wrong. Halo 2 was way better...
Â
Not way better, but it was better.Â
wow you got really owned[QUOTE="Tristam22"][QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="Tristam22"][QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="Tristam22"][QUOTE="Gamer46"]You wanted a game made ground up for the Wii, I gave you one. Until I see actual proof that Wii can do FPS better than PS3, 360, or PC, I'm not going to believe that it can.Gamer46
I need to see it to believe it. And frankly, it seems to me you and your fellow sheep are banking on this game making people forget about Halo 3 and other FPS coming to 360, and PS3. That's far less wise than me telling it like it is right now. I don't live in the future, I live in the present, and at this time, nothing suggests to me that Wii is the machine to get for FPS.
First of all, I didn't say the game wasn't going to rock, I'm a Metroid fan, I'm getting the game. But to act like it's the end all be all is fanboyish. Especially when it's yet to be proven that Wii is the way to go with this genre.
Yeah, I get it. I hope you're right. Seeing as how MP 3: C is a BIG (granted it's not the only) reason I went with the Wii over the PS3, I'd be disappointed if it doesn't turn out to be in-your-face awesome.
RPGamer got to play an early build at the Fusion tour and he ran through the boss fight with Ridley (where Samus fights Ridley while falling down a 20,000 meter shaft...think Gandalf versus that demon in the first LotR). He said it was f***ing badass.[QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="Tristam22"][QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="Tristam22"][QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="Tristam22"][QUOTE="Gamer46"]You wanted a game made ground up for the Wii, I gave you one. Until I see actual proof that Wii can do FPS better than PS3, 360, or PC, I'm not going to believe that it can.Tristam22
Â
I need to see it to believe it. And frankly, it seems to me you and your fellow sheep are banking on this game making people forget about Halo 3 and other FPS coming to 360, and PS3. That's far less wise than me telling it like it is right now. I don't live in the future, I live in the present, and at this time, nothing suggests to me that Wii is the machine to get for FPS.
Â
First of all, I didn't say the game wasn't going to rock, I'm a Metroid fan, I'm getting the game. But to act like it's the end all be all is fanboyish. Especially when it's yet to be proven that Wii is the way to go with this genre.
Â
Yeah, I get it. I hope you're right. Seeing as how MP 3: C is a BIG (granted it's not the only) reason I went with the Wii over the PS3, I'd be disappointed if it doesn't turn out to be in-your-face awesome.
Â
Cool, hopefully we get the game this year.Â
Gamecube died fairly quickly in Japan, sinking to sub-20k sales per week. Gamecube sold only a bit over a million per year in Europe, and even then sank lower after that. North America was the only place the Gamecube at all sold decently, and even then it was constantly outsold by the competition. I don't understand where people seem to have gotten the idea that the Gamecube sold well for a while, unless by "a while" you mean like the first two weeks or something. Ultimate_Peon
Guess what other platform just sunk sub-20k? It's the TC's future-proof precious. It is over in Japan. over.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment