Would you guys agree ? This years Nintendo conference must have been the best N-Dub conference ever ! Sonys was average and Microsofts was bad ! BAD ! That is my opinion of course but what do u guys think ??
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Would you guys agree ? This years Nintendo conference must have been the best N-Dub conference ever ! Sonys was average and Microsofts was bad ! BAD ! That is my opinion of course but what do u guys think ??
yep you got it just how i see it. i give nintendo a 9/10, sony a 8/10, and microsoft isnt even on the scale, but if i have to a -1/10
well this is about the 100th who won E3 topic...but yes i agree with your rankings TC
Nintendo just had an amazing show all around
and while i'm looking forward to Gears 3, Reach, and fable 3 more than anything on the PS3....i'd still rank sony's show MUCH better than MS's....sony had overall more core games than MS...but i'm not looking forward to many of em
How was Sony's average? It had a crapload of awesome games coming out this year and early 2011 and it had KEVIN BUTLER. But yeah Nintendo's was better, Sony a close second and MS a far off third (i don't think i'll ever get that image of the asian girl pretending to be cuddled by the tiger out of my mind, one of the worst and corniest things i've ever seen).
Sony had Little Big Planet 2 and a few others like Final Fantasy XIV and XIII Versus, but yeah, not quite as good as past conferences.How was Sony's average? It had a crapload of awesome games coming out this year and early 2011 and it had KEVIN BUTLER. But yeah Nintendo's was better, Sony a close second and MS a far off third (i don't think i'll ever get that image of the asian girl pretending to be cuddled by the tiger out of my mind, one of the worst and corniest things i've ever seen).
shani_boy101
Actually if you just count Wii's titles E3, it wasn't a win over PS3, even Xbox had more titles to show. It's the 3DS that took the show.mysterjNo...., what u talkin bout willis ?
Actually if you just count Wii's titles E3, it wasn't a win over PS3, even Xbox had more titles to show. It's the 3DS that took the show.mysterji dont think so there are a lot of wii shovelware games that did not get any coverage but that was present at e3 if you count that the wii had probably more titles then ps3 and xbox 360 combined
[QUOTE="PAL360"]
Nintendo >>> MS > Sony
BPoole96
Just out of curiosity, what did you like better about MS's conference that made it better than Sony's?
Halo and Gears are 2 of my favourite series so in terms of games MS obviously won against Sony.
Also, while i wont support any motion control, i have to give credit to MS for taking some risks with Kinect. Move is just a copy/peste of Nintendo´s technology from 06.
Im also curious to know why do many ppl think Sony had a better conference than MS!!!
Since most Nintendo games appealed for certain group ( we all know who :P ) ... i would go for Sony E3 ... there were alot of surprises and trailers for games i liked.
Nintendo E3 is like always, about causal games, and they didn't change abit this time either, even Zelda, unless for its name, people would have been calling it the crappiest game shown at N E3's ..... 3Ds was the real deal.
MS, i dun have to take about that .... but i am looking forward to kingdoms.
In terms of quality, Sony>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MS=Nintendo ( each in its way).
[QUOTE="St_muscat"]
[QUOTE="THETRUEDOZAH"]
Nintendo doesn't make quality games,they make appealing games.
What isn't quality about the Kid Icarus game for 3DS, Golden Sun DS, LOZ:Skyward Sword, DK:Country Returns, Kirby's Epic Yarn and Metroid Other M?Nintendo games are substandard visually, almost always have terrible and recycled audio, and completely neglect storytelling or character development/progression. They know how to make games that attract people's attention, but as far as creating deep, engaging, and rewarding gameplay experiences they are woefully lacking. Nintendo has managed to almost completely ignore any kind of meaningful progression the video game industry as a whole has undergone, and yet still somehow manages to be riding at the top of the wave. It's remarkable really.Anyways, I realized after posting that my comment wasn't on the topic of the thread. Nintendo easily had the best E3. I guess my mind must have just balked at reading the words Nintendo, quality, and games all put together in the same sentence like that. :)
Really? Nintendo doesn't create compelling experiences? You know what's the most important part of a game? It's GAMEPLAY. Nintendo has that nailed. For good. Visuals and sound, andpresentation is all secondary, story and character development? Tertially. If you say that Zelda or Metroid or Mario are no compelling, then really man, I have nthing to say. I mean, your very credentials as a gamer... seriously.[QUOTE="BPoole96"]
[QUOTE="PAL360"]
Nintendo >>> MS > Sony
PAL360
Just out of curiosity, what did you like better about MS's conference that made it better than Sony's?
Halo and Gears are 2 of my favourite series so in terms of games MS obviously won against Sony.
Also, while i wont support any motion control, i have to give credit to MS for taking some risks with Kinect. Move is just a copy/peste of Nintendo´s technology from 06.
Im also curious to know why do many ppl think Sony had a better conference than MS!!!
I guess I can understand that if you're a really big Halo and Gears fan. I just didn't think the Reach footage that was shown had that awe factor since we have already heard a lot about it and the beta has already been out. Gears 3 looked sweet as hell though. The co-op campaign looks like a ton of fun.
I liked Sony's conference more (aside from the fact I only own a PS3) just because they showed a wider variety of games. I've got an FPS to look forward to (KZ3), a racing sim (GT5), a sandbox game (Infamous 2), Car Combat (Twisted Metal), a platformer (LBP2), Valve actually developing for the PS3, etc. There was just a lot of of stuff to be excited about.
As for the motion controls, Sony is copying off of Nintendo, but they are taking somewhat of a risk in the sense that they are trying to incorporate motion controls to the core audience, rather than just casuals.
Since most Nintendo games appealed for certain group ( we all know who :P ) ... i would go for Sony E3 ... there were alot of surprises and trailers for games i liked.
Nintendo E3 is like always, about causal games, and they didn't change abit this time either, even Zelda, unless for its name, people would have been calling it the crappiest game shown at N E3's ..... 3Ds was the real deal.
MS, i dun have to take about that .... but i am looking forward to kingdoms.
In terms of quality, Sony>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MS=Nintendo ( each in its way).
2mrw
nintendo appeals to all group its sony who appeals to a certain group which is why you are probably the only one who voted sony as winning E3....
[QUOTE="PAL360"]
[QUOTE="BPoole96"]
Just out of curiosity, what did you like better about MS's conference that made it better than Sony's?
BPoole96
Halo and Gears are 2 of my favourite series so in terms of games MS obviously won against Sony.
Also, while i wont support any motion control, i have to give credit to MS for taking some risks with Kinect. Move is just a copy/peste of Nintendo´s technology from 06.
Im also curious to know why do many ppl think Sony had a better conference than MS!!!
I guess I can understand that if you're a really big Halo and Gears fan. I just didn't think the Reach footage that was shown had that awe factor since we have already heard a lot about it and the beta has already been out. Gears 3 looked sweet as hell though. The co-op campaign looks like a ton of fun.
I liked Sony's conference more (aside from the fact I only own a PS3) just because they showed a wider variety of games. I've got an FPS to look forward to (KZ3), a racing sim (GT5), a sandbox game (Infamous 2), Car Combat (Twisted Metal), a platformer (LBP2), Valve actually developing for the PS3, etc. There was just a lot of of stuff to be excited about.
As for the motion controls, Sony is copying off of Nintendo, but they are taking somewhat of a risk in the sense that they are trying to incorporate motion controls to the core audience, rather than just casuals.
what audience do they have left to cater too?nintendo has the casuals all rapped up sony knows that they would lose major credibility if they "sold out"to the casuals audience.
Nintendo kicked ass.
Sony and Microsofts' conferences were something we saw 4 years ago.Lto_thaG
and took our name :( :lol:
anyway it went
Nintendo > Sony > Skittles > Microsoft
[QUOTE="2mrw"]
Since most Nintendo games appealed for certain group ( we all know who :P ) ... i would go for Sony E3 ... there were alot of surprises and trailers for games i liked.
Nintendo E3 is like always, about causal games, and they didn't change abit this time either, even Zelda, unless for its name, people would have been calling it the crappiest game shown at N E3's ..... 3Ds was the real deal.
MS, i dun have to take about that .... but i am looking forward to kingdoms.
In terms of quality, Sony>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MS=Nintendo ( each in its way).
nintendo appeals to all group its sony who appeals to a certain group which is why you are probably the only one who voted sony as winning E3....
actually it wasn't me who voted Sony, i didn't see the poll ..... now there is two of us which proves you are wrong :D .[QUOTE="Mario1331"][QUOTE="2mrw"]
Since most Nintendo games appealed for certain group ( we all know who :P ) ... i would go for Sony E3 ... there were alot of surprises and trailers for games i liked.
Nintendo E3 is like always, about causal games, and they didn't change abit this time either, even Zelda, unless for its name, people would have been calling it the crappiest game shown at N E3's ..... 3Ds was the real deal.
MS, i dun have to take about that .... but i am looking forward to kingdoms.
In terms of quality, Sony>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MS=Nintendo ( each in its way).
2mrw
nintendo appeals to all group its sony who appeals to a certain group which is why you are probably the only one who voted sony as winning E3....
actually it wasn't me who voted Sony, i didn't see the poll ..... now there is two of us which proves you are wrong :D .well i did said probably lol,still sony conference was good but to say that a multiplat(portal 2),and TM beats out 3DS is kind of crazy talk. the 3DS lineup alone gets anybody excited even my mother got excited:)
Since most Nintendo games appealed for certain group ( we all know who :P ) ... i would go for Sony E3 ... there were alot of surprises and trailers for games i liked.
Nintendo E3 is like always, about causal games, and they didn't change abit this time either, even Zelda, unless for its name, people would have been calling it the crappiest game shown at N E3's ..... 3Ds was the real deal.
MS, i dun have to take about that .... but i am looking forward to kingdoms.
In terms of quality, Sony>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MS=Nintendo ( each in its way).
What? Nintendo showed a single "casual" game, the rest was all "hardcore" (god I hate those words) stuff. Were you watching the right conference? :?[QUOTE="Lto_thaG"]
Nintendo kicked ass.
Sony and Microsofts' conferences were something we saw 4 years ago.
and took our name :( :lol:
anyway it went
Nintendo > Sony > Skittles > Microsoft
Hey, Sony is not greater than me. Though I am greater than Microsoft 8)[QUOTE="2mrw"][QUOTE="Mario1331"]
nintendo appeals to all group its sony who appeals to a certain group which is why you are probably the only one who voted sony as winning E3....
actually it wasn't me who voted Sony, i didn't see the poll ..... now there is two of us which proves you are wrong :D .well i did said probably lol,still sony conference was good but to say that a multiplat(portal 2),and TM beats out 3DS is kind of crazy talk. the 3DS lineup alone gets anybody excited even my mother got excited:)
i did say 3Ds was the real deal .... other than this, it was "meh" for any hardcore gamer or any gamer above 20 years ..... even Zelda looked " meh" .... sorccer played and looked more exciting imo.[QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"][QUOTE="Lto_thaG"]
Nintendo kicked ass.
Sony and Microsofts' conferences were something we saw 4 years ago.Skittles_McGee
and took our name :( :lol:
anyway it went
Nintendo > Sony > Skittles > Microsoft
Hey, Sony is not greater than me. Though I am greater than Microsoft 8)I'm sorry. I meant Skittles the Tiger. :P
[QUOTE="Skittles_McGee"][QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"]
and took our name :( :lol:
anyway it went
Nintendo > Sony > Skittles > Microsoft
Hey, Sony is not greater than me. Though I am greater than Microsoft 8)I'm sorry. I meant Skittles the Tiger. :P
I know. I just wanted to have my fun >.>[QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"]I know. I just wanted to have my fun >.>I'm sorry. I meant Skittles the Tiger. :P
Skittles_McGee
I was playing along....:|
way to ruin my day.
[QUOTE="2mrw"]What? Nintendo showed a single "casual" game, the rest was all "hardcore" (god I hate those words) stuff. Were you watching the right conference? :?Technically Nintendo showed two "casual" titles. Wii Party and Just Dance 2. But only one was developed by Nintendo.Since most Nintendo games appealed for certain group ( we all know who :P ) ... i would go for Sony E3 ... there were alot of surprises and trailers for games i liked.
Nintendo E3 is like always, about causal games, and they didn't change abit this time either, even Zelda, unless for its name, people would have been calling it the crappiest game shown at N E3's ..... 3Ds was the real deal.
MS, i dun have to take about that .... but i am looking forward to kingdoms.
In terms of quality, Sony>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MS=Nintendo ( each in its way).
Skittles_McGee
This is what I think. Nintendo and Sony were really good and about the same to me, but MS disappointed me on so many levels.Nintendo >= Sony >>>> Microsoft
windsquid9000
lets see who has the most 3rd first party combined this year
nintendo
goldeneye
nfs hot pursuit 3
driver san francisco
gr future soldier
metroid other m
zelda skyward sword
kirby epic yarn
donkeykong country returns
call of duty black ops
wii party
mario sports mix
sony
twisted metal
gt5
kz3
resistance 3
motorstorm 3
cod bo
driver 5
mortal kombat 8
splatter house
move games
microsoft
cod bo
kenict titles
me3
gears 3
crackdown 2
mk8
driver sf
tdu2
and halo reach
other titles on all 3
obviously
wwe 2011
wwe all stars
madden 11
nfs hp2
cod bo
mk8
so over all
nintendo 10/10
sony 9/10
microsoft 1 /10
horable by ms bad worst then nintendos 08 i must say ,
at least nintendo had mario and wii sports resort etc
ms past 3 e3s all had the same game
halo reach
lol isnt that worth noting also is it worth noting all ms e3 games were announced before e3 besides the natal /kenict stuff
sony and nintendo how ever had suprises
bigger suprises
[QUOTE="windsquid9000"]This is what I think. Nintendo and Sony were really good and about the same to me, but MS disappointed me on so many levels. I think it would've been.Nintendo >= Sony >>>> Microsoft
Ragnarok1051
Nintendo >> Sony >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Microsoft.
I liked what Sony showed I just wish they had better presentation if they did I would've put it closer to Nintendo.
This is what I think. Nintendo and Sony were really good and about the same to me, but MS disappointed me on so many levels. I think it would've been.[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"][QUOTE="windsquid9000"]
Nintendo >= Sony >>>> Microsoft
Nintendo_Ownes7
Nintendo >> Sony >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Microsoft.
I liked what Sony showed I just wish they had better presentation if they did I would've put it closer to Nintendo.
Yeah the first part of Sony's conference was really boring, but it picked up at the end when they quit with the Move talk. Nintendo just kept announcing games though and of course the 3DS.[QUOTE="Skittles_McGee"][QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"]
I'm sorry. I meant Skittles the Tiger. :P
I know. I just wanted to have my fun >.>I was playing along....:|
way to ruin my day.
:| Just doing my job. Now to ride off into the sunset.How was Sony's average? It had a crapload of awesome games coming out this year and early 2011 and it had KEVIN BUTLER. But yeah Nintendo's was better, Sony a close second and MS a far off third (i don't think i'll ever get that image of the asian girl pretending to be cuddled by the tiger out of my mind, one of the worst and corniest things i've ever seen).
shani_boy101
Two words: mon tage. I counted six of them when I watched Sony's conference. They showed off many of the games coming up for Sony's systems, but only for a few seconds per game. My memory of the rest is rather hazy due to my hatred of the excessive use of montages, but the games I do remember (other than Twisted Metal) were announced and shown off before the conference, reducing their impact.
Kevin was only on-stage for a few minutes. Nintendo had Reggie for almost their entire conference.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment