Infamous 2 new gameplay footage .

Looks fantastic.

HERE

I was expecting something I haven't seen besides his new ugly face.

Looks like the same mission to me. Although I noticed this time that Ionic Vortex is activated by pressing right on the d-pad. Does that means no GigaWatt Blades? I suppose they won't be needed now that Cole has a weapon on him at all times.

****ing epic there. This was one of the games I was considering passing up for the other exclusives. I don't know now.

Looks amazing :shock:

Does a new playthrough of the exact same level that has been done 10000000000000000000000 times count as new?hexashadow13

This is very old footage

great footage but this is far from new, as far as i can tell the newest footage is this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fGnb2zpyGk

i'm glad they are going to use the wires up the sides of buildings to be able to climb easier.

it was a chore in the first one and hopping up the buildings made me cringe every time i had to do it.

I feel less impressed every time i see footage of this game... sadly. 8.0 calling it now.

That sir... looks amazing. :shock: In every area. But the footage is a bit old :P

I feel less impressed every time i see footage of this game... sadly. 8.0 calling it now.

Phazevariance

why? Maybe only on GS. I don't even care about their scores anyway.

I dunno about this game, wasn't really a fan the first one. :(

You think Sucker Punch will give players the ability to change the look of Cole in the game?

meh i hope sucker punch releases this trash ASAP and start working on sly 4

New new Cole sucks... brind back new cole! He was much cooler looking. Stupid fans complaining about pointless things... HellsAngel2c

^^ This x100. I have no idea why people want this boring and generic look for Cole when the E3 version had some actual personality behind him. Now he just looks like a plain nobody.

Stupid fans complaining about pointless things, indeed. Funny part is that Cole's character design in inFamous 1 was one of the things everyone seemed to have a problem with. Sort of oxymoronic if you ask me...

I was expecting something I haven't seen besides his new ugly face.

Luxen90

[QUOTE="Phazevariance"]

I feel less impressed every time i see footage of this game... sadly. 8.0 calling it now.

theuncharted34

why? Maybe only on GS. I don't even care about their scores anyway.

I loved the first game but it had a lot of untapped potential, and from everything I have seen including this old video I can tell inFAMOUS 2 will be much better than the first title, a change akin to Uncharted(1&2) series.[QUOTE="Luxen90"]

I was expecting something I haven't seen besides his new ugly face.

Swift_Boss_A

It has nothing to do with him looking attractive. It has everything to do with bad character design. Kratos is one of the ugliest main characters I've seen in a video game, but his character design is superb.

[QUOTE="HellsAngel2c"]New new Cole sucks... brind back new cole! He was much cooler looking. Stupid fans complaining about pointless things... xYamatox

^^ This x100. I have no idea why people want this boring and generic look for Cole when the E3 version had some actual personality behind him. Now he just looks like a plain nobody.

Stupid fans complaining about pointless things, indeed. Funny part is that Cole's character design in inFamous 1 was one of the things everyone seemed to have a problem with. Sort of oxymoronic if you ask me...

[QUOTE="xYamatox"]

[QUOTE="HellsAngel2c"]New new Cole sucks... brind back new cole! He was much cooler looking. Stupid fans complaining about pointless things... mrmusicman247

^^ This x100. I have no idea why people want this boring and generic look for Cole when the E3 version had some actual personality behind him. Now he just looks like a plain nobody.

Stupid fans complaining about pointless things, indeed. Funny part is that Cole's character design in inFamous 1 was one of the things everyone seemed to have a problem with. Sort of oxymoronic if you ask me...

Oh god no...! :cry:

[QUOTE="HellsAngel2c"]New new Cole sucks... brind back new cole! He was much cooler looking. Stupid fans complaining about pointless things... xYamatox

^^ This x100. I have no idea why people want this boring and generic look for Cole when the E3 version had some actual personality behind him. Now he just looks like a plain nobody.

Stupid fans complaining about pointless things, indeed. Funny part is that Cole's character design in inFamous 1 was one of the things everyone seemed to have a problem with. Sort of oxymoronic if you ask me...

[QUOTE="xYamatox"]

[QUOTE="HellsAngel2c"]New new Cole sucks... brind back new cole! He was much cooler looking. Stupid fans complaining about pointless things... mrmusicman247

^^ This x100. I have no idea why people want this boring and generic look for Cole when the E3 version had some actual personality behind him. Now he just looks like a plain nobody.

Stupid fans complaining about pointless things, indeed. Funny part is that Cole's character design in inFamous 1 was one of the things everyone seemed to have a problem with. Sort of oxymoronic if you ask me...

No, but that is a very different situation then the one with Cole. There is nothing wrong with GIVING a character personality when there wasn't one there to begin with. Cole in inFamous 1 had no emotion in wht he said, seemed to care little to what was going on, and was more recognizable by his outfit than his actual personality. Nathan Drake on the other hand ALREADY has a generally accepted personality to his character, so changing things probably would annoy the fanbase.

Let me ask you this, though. Imagine in Uncharted 1, Nathan Drake hardly had any of his charismatic nature about him. He was more or less a "John Doe" character. Would you be opposed if they gave him his personality in Uncharted 2, or would you rather have him be another uninteresting character for "consistantcy"?

The looks were fine of cole (before they reredid him) but his voice was not, yet they changed the looks (closer to the first game) but left his voice. His voice is SOOO bad. The game looks good and I am sure I will pick it up, but highly unlikely as a first day purchase. I REALLY wish they would fix the framerate.

The looks were fine of cole (before they reredid him) but his voice was not, yet they changed the looks (closer to the first game) but left his voice. His voice is SOOO bad. The game looks good and I am sure I will pick it up, but highly unlikely as a first day purchase. I REALLY wish they would fix the framerate.

NaveedLife

there was nothing wrong with the framerate... But I did see the pop up from the first infamous has barely got any better :P

[QUOTE="xYamatox"]

[QUOTE="HellsAngel2c"]New new Cole sucks... brind back new cole! He was much cooler looking. Stupid fans complaining about pointless things... Swift_Boss_A

^^ This x100. I have no idea why people want this boring and generic look for Cole when the E3 version had some actual personality behind him. Now he just looks like a plain nobody.

Stupid fans complaining about pointless things, indeed. Funny part is that Cole's character design in inFamous 1 was one of the things everyone seemed to have a problem with. Sort of oxymoronic if you ask me...

Guerrilla changed the forumla from Killzone 2-3 by a large margin, yet I have no problems with it. Improvement is improvement no matter how you look at it. If giving the Helghast blue eyes and blond hair improves their characeristics and leads to an overall better design, then why the hell not?

Oh wait, it;s already been done!

Official concept art from Killzone: Liberation. :P

[QUOTE="NaveedLife"]

The looks were fine of cole (before they reredid him) but his voice was not, yet they changed the looks (closer to the first game) but left his voice. His voice is SOOO bad. The game looks good and I am sure I will pick it up, but highly unlikely as a first day purchase. I REALLY wish they would fix the framerate.

theuncharted34

there was nothing wrong with the framerate... But I did see the pop up from the first infamous has barely got any better :P

The first Infamous has framerate issues and this one appears to as well. I don't understand how people don't notice this. At times it got pretty bad in the first one and it was quite annoying. Of course it never made the game completely unplayable, just super annoying and distracting. It is my biggest gripe with Infamous.

It has nothing to do with him looking attractive. It has everything to do with bad character design. Kratos is one of the ugliest main characters I've seen in a video game, but his character design is superb.xYamatox

I dunno about this game, wasn't really a fan the first one. :(

You think Sucker Punch will give players the ability to change the look of Cole in the game?

Wesrcks13

[QUOTE="theuncharted34"]

[QUOTE="NaveedLife"]

The looks were fine of cole (before they reredid him) but his voice was not, yet they changed the looks (closer to the first game) but left his voice. His voice is SOOO bad. The game looks good and I am sure I will pick it up, but highly unlikely as a first day purchase. I REALLY wish they would fix the framerate.

NaveedLife

there was nothing wrong with the framerate... But I did see the pop up from the first infamous has barely got any better :P

The first Infamous has framerate issues and this one appears to as well. I don't understand how people don't notice this. At times it got pretty bad in the first one and it was quite annoying. Of course it never made the game completely unplayable, just super annoying and distracting. It is my biggest gripe with Infamous.

[QUOTE="NaveedLife"]

[QUOTE="theuncharted34"]

there was nothing wrong with the framerate... But I did see the pop up from the first infamous has barely got any better :P

hexashadow13

The first Infamous has framerate issues and this one appears to as well. I don't understand how people don't notice this. At times it got pretty bad in the first one and it was quite annoying. Of course it never made the game completely unplayable, just super annoying and distracting. It is my biggest gripe with Infamous.

It got a lot worse as you progressed through the game, the near end was pretty rough at points. So it really depends on where you are in the game. Even IGN said there are noticeable framerate hiccups but that it was nothing that made the game unplayable. I think they sort of understated it, as the framerate can get quite bad IMO. It is one of the few games I have played recently where it was actually a problem for me.

[QUOTE="mrmusicman247"][QUOTE="xYamatox"]

^^ This x100. I have no idea why people want this boring and generic look for Cole when the E3 version had some actual personality behind him. Now he just looks like a plain nobody.

Stupid fans complaining about pointless things, indeed. Funny part is that Cole's character design in inFamous 1 was one of the things everyone seemed to have a problem with. Sort of oxymoronic if you ask me...

xYamatox

No, but that is a very different situation then the one with Cole. There is nothing wrong with GIVING a character personality when there wasn't one there to begin with. Cole in inFamous 1 had no emotion in wht he said, seemed to care little to what was going on, and was more recognizable by his outfit than his actual personality. Nathan Drake on the other hand ALREADY has a generally accepted personality to his character, so changing things probably would annoy the fanbase.

Let me ask you this, though. Imagine in Uncharted 1, Nathan Drake hardly had any of his charismatic nature about him. He was more or less a "John Doe" character. Would you be opposed if they gave him his personality in Uncharted 2, or would you rather have him be another uninteresting character for "consistantcy"?

[QUOTE="xYamatox"]

[QUOTE="mrmusicman247"] I never had a problem with the old Cole. I like him. And it's more about consistency than anything else. I mean imagine if Drake from Uncharted looked more like a teenager with long hair and had a younger voice. You wouldn't like that right?mrmusicman247

No, but that is a very different situation then the one with Cole. There is nothing wrong with GIVING a character personality when there wasn't one there to begin with. Cole in inFamous 1 had no emotion in wht he said, seemed to care little to what was going on, and was more recognizable by his outfit than his actual personality. Nathan Drake on the other hand ALREADY has a generally accepted personality to his character, so changing things probably would annoy the fanbase.

Let me ask you this, though. Imagine in Uncharted 1, Nathan Drake hardly had any of his charismatic nature about him. He was more or less a "John Doe" character. Would you be opposed if they gave him his personality in Uncharted 2, or would you rather have him be another uninteresting character for "consistantcy"?

Growing out some hair and getting some tattoos isn't that dramatic of a change, and it's something people do all the time.

The voice actor thing I can relate with you about, but even then I can excuse it. What is new Cole ended up being 5x more interesting then the old one? Would Sucker Punch have been wrong to change him? Better IS better in the end of the day (assuming the newCole design ended up being better, that is).

[QUOTE="hexashadow13"][QUOTE="NaveedLife"]

The first Infamous has framerate issues and this one appears to as well. I don't understand how people don't notice this. At times it got pretty bad in the first one and it was quite annoying. Of course it never made the game completely unplayable, just super annoying and distracting. It is my biggest gripe with Infamous.

NaveedLife

It got a lot worse as you progressed through the game, the near end was pretty rough at points. So it really depends on where you are in the game. Even IGN said there are noticeable framerate hiccups but that it was nothing that made the game unplayable. I think they sort of understated it, as the framerate can get quite bad IMO. It is one of the few games I have played recently where it was actually a problem for me.

Old, but yes, Infamous 2 looks absolutely fantastic.

[QUOTE="mrmusicman247"][QUOTE="xYamatox"]

No, but that is a very different situation then the one with Cole. There is nothing wrong with GIVING a character personality when there wasn't one there to begin with. Cole in inFamous 1 had no emotion in wht he said, seemed to care little to what was going on, and was more recognizable by his outfit than his actual personality. Nathan Drake on the other hand ALREADY has a generally accepted personality to his character, so changing things probably would annoy the fanbase.

Let me ask you this, though. Imagine in Uncharted 1, Nathan Drake hardly had any of his charismatic nature about him. He was more or less a "John Doe" character. Would you be opposed if they gave him his personality in Uncharted 2, or would you rather have him be another uninteresting character for "consistantcy"?

xYamatox

Growing out some hair and getting some tattoos isn't that dramatic of a change, and it's something people do all the time.

The voice actor thing I can relate with you about, but even then I can excuse it. What is new Cole ended up being 5x more interesting then the old one? Would Sucker Punch have been wrong to change him? Better IS better in the end of the day (assuming the newCole design ended up being better, that is).

wheres the mini map?

This will be my favorite PS3 game in 2011. I loved Infamous and can't wait for the next one. 2011 the year of the PS3.