Is 3D just a gimmick? I think I'd have to say yes.

  • 68 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Timstuff
Timstuff

26840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#1 Timstuff
Member since 2002 • 26840 Posts

I have never played a game in 3D or even watched one, so I don't know how it affects the experience, but seeing Sony and Nintendo push 3D is a bit annoying to me in some ways, but especially Sony. I understand that with the 3DS they needed something to distinguish it from the DSI and regular DS, and honestly the prospect of glasses-free 3D does sound exciting, especially since the system will likely be cheap and affordable, which means the cost of admission is quite low. But what I've got to ask, is whether or not 3D will actually make gaming more enjoyable to the point that it's worth cutting the horizontal resolution in half. Will this be something that changes the way I play games, or will I find myself wanting to turn the feature off after a while and then just play around with it occasionally, like when I get a new game or I want to show it off to a friend?

With the PS3, it gets worse. In order to even see what a PS3 game looks like in 3D, you have to buy a ridiculously expensive 3D television. That is what you can an investment with limited returns. If it turns out that 3D is just a gimmick, well, you'll still have a nice TV, but you will have spent way more money on it than you should have. A 3D TV that's the same size as one that costs $600 will end up costing you like $2,000 or more, which is a pretty high price to pay considering how limited the options are for viewing 3D content. And on top of that, you have to wear 3D glasses. 3D glasses are inconvinient, expensive, and make the picture quality crappier since 1) they don't work perfectly and 2) they make everything darker. Even with the glasses and expense forgiven, you come back to the same problem as the 3DS: is this a feature that will fundamentally change the way I look at gaming, or is it just a gimmick that I'll want to play with occasionally? And the fact is, with the 3DS it's a $200 dollar gimmick (most likely), while with the PS3 it's a gimmick that will cost as much as your first car.

I don't mean to sound like a whiner, but I've always been skeptical as to whether or not 3D is here to stay. It's always come and gone as a fad every decade or so since the 1950's, and I honestly don't see what's different this time. Yeah, the quality of 3D has improved tremendously, but the fact is that I get just as much out of watching a movie in 2D as I can watching it in 3D, and for less money. Sony and Nintendo have a lot to prove if they want to convince me that 3D is not going to start disappearing in the next few years just like it always does.

Avatar image for Animal-Mother
Animal-Mother

27362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#2 Animal-Mother
Member since 2003 • 27362 Posts

How can you claim somethings a gimmick without even experiencing it.

You wanna know a good gimmick

Smell-O-Vision

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

60 inch, 1080p, 120hz, and 3d ready for $900 when it's on sale.

http://www.hhgregg.com/ProductDetail.asp?SID=n&ProductID=23675

the cnet and hdtv review sites say it blows led, lcd and plasma outta the water.

the 2pack of glasses for it are $400.

Avatar image for dontshackzmii
dontshackzmii

6026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#4 dontshackzmii
Member since 2009 • 6026 Posts

we just got hd tvs now they want us to upgrade agian no thanks

Avatar image for Animal-Mother
Animal-Mother

27362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#5 Animal-Mother
Member since 2003 • 27362 Posts

we just got hd tvs now they want us to upgrade agian no thanks

dontshackzmii
who's They, and they WANT us too? I don't see people telling me I HAVE TO
Avatar image for gameguy6700
gameguy6700

12197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 gameguy6700
Member since 2004 • 12197 Posts
The PC has been doing 3D gaming for awhile and the consensus of PC gamers seems to be that it's cool for awhile but then the novelty wears off. But then again I think that up to this point most of the 3D in games hasn't been very well utilized, so perhaps opinions would change if it were implemented better. And like you said, not only is 3D not a new technology at all for movies and TV, but it's also not new for gaming. Even the Sega Master System did 3D and supposedly it wasn't half bad either.
Avatar image for OreoMilkshake
OreoMilkshake

12833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#7 OreoMilkshake
Member since 2009 • 12833 Posts
they WANT us too?Animal-Mother
They want us to spend money on their stuff, yeah.
Avatar image for GreyFoXX4
GreyFoXX4

3612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 GreyFoXX4
Member since 2008 • 3612 Posts

PN50C7000YF by samsung, look it up at Bestbuy.com its a 50" plasma for $1800 and these tv's also have a function that you can turn on that makes programs 3d that aren't orginally 3d, so it has a return for the life time of the tv.

Also if you don't want to like it or pay for it, don't worry no one is going to make you to.

Avatar image for gameguy6700
gameguy6700

12197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 gameguy6700
Member since 2004 • 12197 Posts

60 inch, 1080p, 120hz, and 3d ready for $900 when it's on sale.

http://www.hhgregg.com/ProductDetail.asp?SID=n&ProductID=23675

the cnet and hdtv review sites say it blows led, lcd and plasma outta the water.

the 2pack of glasses for it are $400.

Riverwolf007
If I had 60" of wall space to put that thing I would so buy that...
Avatar image for starmetroid
starmetroid

5000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#10 starmetroid
Member since 2007 • 5000 Posts
I don't care for 3D either, I'll probably turn the 3D off for my 3DS. Good thing it's line up is legendary.
Avatar image for thejakel11225
thejakel11225

2217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#11 thejakel11225
Member since 2005 • 2217 Posts

What about motion controls?? you know, the thing that's driving the industry off a cliff??

Avatar image for Meinhard1
Meinhard1

6790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Meinhard1
Member since 2010 • 6790 Posts
I think 3D can do a lot for racing games, I bet it really gives you a sense of speed.
Avatar image for Timstuff
Timstuff

26840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#13 Timstuff
Member since 2002 • 26840 Posts

60 inch, 1080p, 120hz, and 3d ready for $900 when it's on sale.

http://www.hhgregg.com/ProductDetail.asp?SID=n&ProductID=23675

the cnet and hdtv review sites say it blows led, lcd and plasma outta the water.

the 2pack of glasses for it are $400.

Riverwolf007
WTF!? I had no idea the glasses for these TVs were that friggin' expensive! I never realized that they aren't using the same kind that you get at the local cinema. That just makes the whole thing even more of a put off to me. If I'm going to have 20 people over to watch a movie, what's the point if my brand new TV can't even play the movie unless everyone is wearing a $200 pair of glasses? If the glasses were on $20 a pair I'd still say that was expensive, but FREAKING $200!? That's obscene.
Avatar image for dontshackzmii
dontshackzmii

6026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#14 dontshackzmii
Member since 2009 • 6026 Posts

The PC has been doing 3D gaming for awhile and the consensus of PC gamers seems to be that it's cool for awhile but then the novelty wears off. But then again I think that up to this point most of the 3D in games hasn't been very well utilized, so perhaps opinions would change if it were implemented better. And like you said, not only is 3D not a new technology at all for movies and TV, but it's also not new for gaming. Even the Sega Master System did 3D and supposedly it wasn't half bad either.gameguy6700

3d has come and gone many times.

Avatar image for Timstuff
Timstuff

26840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#15 Timstuff
Member since 2002 • 26840 Posts

OreoMilkshake

:lol:

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#16 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

Like better lighting in games it is mostly there for the improved looks/feeling that it's really there.
In terms of gameplay, all that it can really do for now is give You a much better sense of depth. Meaning that for example platforming in 3D will work fantastically.

in the future 3d will have a bigger impact but i don't think it will be a real revolution for gameplay specific. A form of 3d tagging will let us interact with virtual 3d objects that pop out of the screen as if we are touching them. Those things will influence gameplay as well, but especially (nongame and game) interfaces.

When we gain tactile feedback with a sort of glove or skeleton for our hands it could allow You to grab a weapon with Your hand that You see and feel is there. That would be like an advanced wiimote pointer control.

Avatar image for CDUB316
CDUB316

6589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 CDUB316
Member since 2009 • 6589 Posts

[QUOTE="OreoMilkshake"]Timstuff

:lol:

i know, i cracked up as well at that

Avatar image for flazzle
flazzle

6507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 flazzle
Member since 2007 • 6507 Posts

I can only guess that wearing 3D glasses would get old really fast. I don't think my eyes are going to like it after an hour or so.

The 3DS looks compelling. I saw some game examples (before E3) and some of them looked pretty cool.

Avatar image for Animal-Mother
Animal-Mother

27362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#19 Animal-Mother
Member since 2003 • 27362 Posts
[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"]they WANT us too?OreoMilkshake
They want us to spend money on their stuff, yeah.

Yeah but I dun see them putting a gun to our heads acting like we have to upgrade
Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#20 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts
Yes I think it's gimmicky but who knows. Eventually they'll get the technology down that it doesn't give me such a headache or annoy my eyes. So I don't see it being much of an issue. I will say this. 3DS will be fine, but Sony is on something if they think 3-D with the PS3 is going to be a major hit. There just isn't much of a userbase for it that will have the tech to take advantage of it. WHere as with the 3DS. All you need is the well 3DS. PS3 you are going to need a 3DTV with those glasses and that's not cheap.
Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

60 inch, 1080p, 120hz, and 3d ready for $900 when it's on sale.

http://www.hhgregg.com/ProductDetail.asp?SID=n&ProductID=23675

the cnet and hdtv review sites say it blows led, lcd and plasma outta the water.

the 2pack of glasses for it are $400.

Timstuff

WTF!? I had no idea the glasses for these TVs were that friggin' expensive! I never realized that they aren't using the same kind that you get at the local cinema. That just makes the whole thing even more of a put off to me. If I'm going to have 20 people over to watch a movie, what's the point if my brand new TV can't even play the movie unless everyone is wearing a $200 pair of glasses? If the glasses were on $20 a pair I'd still say that was expensive, but FREAKING $200!? That's obscene.

lulz, well man i saved you $1300 on the tv so you will have to find your own damn cheap glasses. there is only so much i can do.

seriously though, the prices will fall eventualy, we all know early adopters get screwed on everything.

http://www.4electronicwarehouse.com/products/mitsubishi/3dc-1000-3d-starter-pack.html

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

Untill Pseudo 3d *and thats what it is* doesn't make me physically ill then yes its a gimmick. and I'm not the only one that it gives headaches and worse too.

Avatar image for Animal-Mother
Animal-Mother

27362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#23 Animal-Mother
Member since 2003 • 27362 Posts

Untill Pseudo 3d *and thats what it is* doesn't make me physically ill then yes its a gimmick. and I'm not the only one that it gives headaches and worse too.

WilliamRLBaker
if you got seasick from riding a boat would it be a gimmick?
Avatar image for VideoGameGuy
VideoGameGuy

7695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 VideoGameGuy
Member since 2002 • 7695 Posts
it's not if it improves gameplay and or the expereince of the user.
Avatar image for Timstuff
Timstuff

26840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#25 Timstuff
Member since 2002 • 26840 Posts

Untill Pseudo 3d *and thats what it is* doesn't make me physically ill then yes its a gimmick. and I'm not the only one that it gives headaches and worse too.

WilliamRLBaker
You make a good point. The entertainment gimmick that we call "3D" is not actually 3D at all. It's a set of two entirely different 2D images that we show to teach eye, and we use them to trick our brain into thinking that both images are actually one physical object. However, this concept is hardly perfect, which is probably why a lot of people get headaches from 3D. I actually got a headache towards the end of "How to Train your Dragon" even though as far as 3D goes it was well done for the most part. 3D relies entirely on an optical illusion to work, and with that said I think there might always be people who get headaches from it unless there's a fundamental change in how the illusion is created.
Avatar image for FFCYAN
FFCYAN

4969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#26 FFCYAN
Member since 2005 • 4969 Posts

Untill Pseudo 3d *and thats what it is* doesn't make me physically ill then yes its a gimmick. and I'm not the only one that it gives headaches and worse too.

WilliamRLBaker

1UP Editor Jeremy Parish, who suffers from 3D sickness related issues, blogged about not having any problems with it.

Avatar image for RavenLoud
RavenLoud

2874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 RavenLoud
Member since 2009 • 2874 Posts

It's a gimmick until 3DTVs are completely common (meaning that it goes hand to hand with all TVs, I guess that'll happen somewhere in 2015), and when glasses cost 5$.

It would be cool if we have glasses-free 3DHDTV soon.

Avatar image for moose_knuckler
moose_knuckler

5722

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 moose_knuckler
Member since 2007 • 5722 Posts
No, I think it will be used right (sooner rather than later) and help benefit gaming. While I found Avatar to be so-so, I did appreciate the way Cameron used 3-D to make the world have a better sense of atmosphere. I think greatly-acclaimed horror games (or just any games with a great focus on atmosphere) can benefit from this if done right.
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

Untill Pseudo 3d *and thats what it is* doesn't make me physically ill then yes its a gimmick. and I'm not the only one that it gives headaches and worse too.

Animal-Mother

if you got seasick from riding a boat would it be a gimmick?

No but if it gives me blinding headaches that take a day to go away yes its a gimmick..If I get seasick then I don't get on a boat...but when all games, movies and tv shows some how someday become 3d only...then Im pretty well screwed unless they fix the problem that me and other people have with 3d stuff.

Avatar image for nintendofreak_2
nintendofreak_2

25896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#30 nintendofreak_2
Member since 2005 • 25896 Posts

Because you can turn off the 3D on the 3DS, I'd have to agree that it is a gimmick of sorts, but I do think that with certain types of games the 3D effect could add to the atmosphere and gameplay.

Avatar image for 88mphSlayer
88mphSlayer

3201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 88mphSlayer
Member since 2010 • 3201 Posts

The PC has been doing 3D gaming for awhile and the consensus of PC gamers seems to be that it's cool for awhile but then the novelty wears off. But then again I think that up to this point most of the 3D in games hasn't been very well utilized, so perhaps opinions would change if it were implemented better. And like you said, not only is 3D not a new technology at all for movies and TV, but it's also not new for gaming. Even the Sega Master System did 3D and supposedly it wasn't half bad either.gameguy6700

yeah, which i think is what makes the 3DS nice is that its 3D isn't on your face or intrusive, it's pretty convenient to turn on/off, and the graphics upgrade means you're getting something of substance regardless of how you feel about 3D

otherwise i'm with everybody else about not really wanting to have glasses on my face all the time, or having to purchase another tv

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

Because you can turn off the 3D on the 3DS, I'd have to agree that it is a gimmick of sorts, but I do think that with certain types of games the 3D effect could add to the atmosphere and gameplay.

nintendofreak_2
I actually like that fact, I want to have the option of turning it off, if they never fix the problems me and others have with it...then we are pretty much screwed if 3d ever becomes a standard.
Avatar image for murat8
murat8

10362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#33 murat8
Member since 2006 • 10362 Posts
the main thing i dont like about 3d is i cant experience it through my laptop screen so i have to read peoples opinions instead of seeing it myself and thats pretty annoying i cant wait till the 3ds is in stores i really want to experience it myself
Avatar image for Dead-Memories
Dead-Memories

6587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 190

User Lists: 0

#34 Dead-Memories
Member since 2008 • 6587 Posts

I used a special nvidia 3d thing at fry's the other day,

Oh man was it terrible. I had such a huge headache afterall, and It didn't improve my gaming experience at all :?

not to mention how much the compatible TV's will cost for PS3 3-d, sony is setting themselves up if they keep promoting this crap.

Avatar image for Dead-Memories
Dead-Memories

6587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 190

User Lists: 0

#35 Dead-Memories
Member since 2008 • 6587 Posts

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

Untill Pseudo 3d *and thats what it is* doesn't make me physically ill then yes its a gimmick. and I'm not the only one that it gives headaches and worse too.

FFCYAN

1UP Editor Jeremy Parish, who suffers from 3D sickness related issues, blogged about not having any problems with it.

well imagine PS3 titles, that will give him heavy headahces i think, a friend of mine who attended the sony conference also said it was incredibly annoying to watch killzone 3 in 3-d.

Avatar image for gamer620
gamer620

3367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 gamer620
Member since 2004 • 3367 Posts

60 inch, 1080p, 120hz, and 3d ready for $900 when it's on sale.

http://www.hhgregg.com/ProductDetail.asp?SID=n&ProductID=23675

the cnet and hdtv review sites say it blows led, lcd and plasma outta the water.

the 2pack of glasses for it are $400.

Riverwolf007
Mitsubishi TVs are also well known for not being very long lasting and having poor audio.
Avatar image for gago-gago
gago-gago

12138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 gago-gago
Member since 2009 • 12138 Posts

The only time I like wearing 3D glasses is when I go to theme parks with 3D rides. I have yet to watch a movie in the theaters in 3D. Prolong use of 3D glasses messes up my eyes for some reason but I am interested in checking out the 3DS since it doesn't require 3D glasses. So yeah for me, they are a gimmick and I just don't see myself fully committing in buying 3D TVs and all that stuff.

Avatar image for jerkface96
jerkface96

9189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 jerkface96
Member since 2005 • 9189 Posts

If i want 3d ill spend 18 dollars at a movie theater, not thousands of dollars to do it at home lol.

yea gaming would be sweet in 3d, but the cost of it and having to wear clunky glasses......

i think i can live with out it

but once 4-d comes out ill be the first in line.

Avatar image for SambaLele
SambaLele

5552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 SambaLele
Member since 2004 • 5552 Posts

Wasn't HD also just a gimmick back in the day it was being introduced to the market?

Avatar image for osan0
osan0

18255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40 osan0
Member since 2004 • 18255 Posts
its just a natural evoltion of TV tech and companies need to be thinking of new things to sell more tellys. im not against it. im also not going to be getting a 3dTV until my current TV kicks the bucket. and ideally itll have a 3ds like implementation....no glasses or any of that nonsense. assuming the price is around 200 though...the 3ds is nice. not too expensive..nice effect, hassle free and if it annoys me..i can turn it off.
Avatar image for ZuneHD
ZuneHD

491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 ZuneHD
Member since 2009 • 491 Posts

it is when 99.9% of households currently dont own one.

Avatar image for Ross_the_Boss6
Ross_the_Boss6

4056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Ross_the_Boss6
Member since 2009 • 4056 Posts

It's a huge gimmick in movies and I refuse to pay extra money to experience it. **** you Avatar for making it popular. I don't mind it in the new DS but if it didn't have it I'd be just as excited for it.

Avatar image for jerkface96
jerkface96

9189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 jerkface96
Member since 2005 • 9189 Posts

Wasn't HD also just a gimmick back in the day it was being introduced to the market?

SambaLele
wow lol, was it? cause thats hard to imagine haha
Avatar image for LordQuorthon
LordQuorthon

5803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 LordQuorthon
Member since 2008 • 5803 Posts

it is when 99.9% of households currently dont own one.

ZuneHD

And that number is not going to change significantly as long as people have to wear THOSE GLASSES. If there's one part of Nintendo's E3 conference where they absolutely got it right, it was when Reggie kept saying "Ugh... THOSE GLASSES!" Reggie, and anyone who isn't obsessed with technology for the sake of technology, understands that 3D will be limited to movie theaters for as long as you have to wear THOSE GLASSES.

Avatar image for Animal-Mother
Animal-Mother

27362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#45 Animal-Mother
Member since 2003 • 27362 Posts

[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"][QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

Untill Pseudo 3d *and thats what it is* doesn't make me physically ill then yes its a gimmick. and I'm not the only one that it gives headaches and worse too.

WilliamRLBaker

if you got seasick from riding a boat would it be a gimmick?

No but if it gives me blinding headaches that take a day to go away yes its a gimmick..If I get seasick then I don't get on a boat...but when all games, movies and tv shows some how someday become 3d only...then Im pretty well screwed unless they fix the problem that me and other people have with 3d stuff.

So if you got sick on the boat it's not a gimmick, but considering the fact you don't have to use 3D like not getting on the boat it's a gimmick :?

In your first statement you basically said if it makes you physically ill it's a gimmick.


A lot of things can make you physically ill, are they all gimmicks too?

Avatar image for mushi799
mushi799

1163

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 mushi799
Member since 2006 • 1163 Posts

I have never played a game in 3D or even watched one, so I don't know how it affects the experienceTimstuff

I stopped after reading this

Avatar image for hexashadow13
hexashadow13

5157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 hexashadow13
Member since 2010 • 5157 Posts
Motion control was a gimmick and look how well that did.
Avatar image for Richymisiak
Richymisiak

2589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 Richymisiak
Member since 2007 • 2589 Posts

[QUOTE="ZuneHD"]

it is when 99.9% of households currently dont own one.

LordQuorthon

And that number is not going to change significantly as long as people have to wear THOSE GLASSES. If there's one part of Nintendo's E3 conference where they absolutely got it right, it was when Reggie kept saying "Ugh... THOSE GLASSES!" Reggie, and anyone who isn't obsessed with technology for the sake of technology, understands that 3D will be limited to movie theaters for as long as you have to wear THOSE GLASSES.

I completely agree. Improve the tech so you don't need glasses at all for the best experience and 3d has a chance
Avatar image for ThePlothole
ThePlothole

11515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 ThePlothole
Member since 2007 • 11515 Posts

Wasn't HD also just a gimmick back in the day it was being introduced to the market?

SambaLele

HD is still a gimmick, in the sense that it isn't required to watch TV or play games.

Another gimmick is achievements/trophies. And yet many people seem to thing it's wrong for a game not to include them.

Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#50 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts
Did anyone actually think otherwise? Likewise, it doesn't mean it's not an enjoyable gimmick.