Who knows and who cares, PC Crysis 2 is going to be the king :P. What amazes me is the optomization for it. I should be able to run it silky smooth on max settings :).
People first thought it would, most of these bold words were said before the game was even shown. Now not so much, haven't seen much from it that screams unmatched on consoles.
No. Played the demo and wasn't impressed. Wait for a game like Rage. KC_Hokie
and you think rage will look impressive? :lol: Rage has low poly models, blurry textures eveywhere weak lighting and prebaked shadows, just few of the many things it did in order to achieve 60 fps on consoles.
[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]No. Played the demo and wasn't impressed. Wait for a game like Rage. dakan45
and you think rage will look impressive? :lol: Rage has low poly models, blurry textures eveywhere weak lighting and prebaked shadows, just few of the many things it did in order to achieve 60 fps on consoles. the levels in rage were all modeled by hand though, crysis is all copy and pasted bs.
you can make any game that looks better, but killzone doesn't try to achieve the same thing as crysis so its not a good way to compare the systems power, like in killzone there are a lot of static effects and crysis almost everything is dymanic, so to get a good understanding of a consoles strengths they have to be trying to achieve the same thing.
Log in to comment