1.sales 360 has more systems world wide. 2.game sales 360 has more. 3.the ps3 had only one truely good year...infact they had one truely good half a year where they got their game act together. 4.Attach rate overall 360 is higher. 5.In actual real living online users 360 has more. 6.Ultimate mac and cheese...made with milk, butter and about 2 lbs of velvetta cheese....mmmmmm....*dips into a cheese coma* X>
The gap in sales between the two system may eventually dissappear or not this is nothing like the difference between the Ps2 and the first Xbox, in terms of games its entirely subjective.
Sure why not. I'm opposed to looking at blanket facts. They are fierce competitors, they share much of the same library, they are always one uping each other, and the sales battle has become intense. While the 360 has the lead I would say they're neck and neck.
Neck and neck in what? Sales, no, the 360 has the obvious lead. Overall AMOUNT of games, no, 360 has a lead. Quality of exclusives (which is subjective before anyone attacks me), PS3 has a pretty clear lead
[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]What would they be neck and neck in? :?tylergamereview
That's what I thought. Sales? Hell no. Games? Maybe. It depends on what you are comparing. god this sucks... i paid 400 bucks for my ps3 in 2008 and even in 2010 it's no fun because the sales are still crappy...
Not when one is essentially a year ahead of the other in sales and still has a significantly larger lineup of quality titles. Not to mention not being in the hole financially, and has a much higher attach rate...
Sales: XBOX360 currently, but you have to consider that PS3 came out later Graphics: PS3 has a slight edge, but not by much Games: depends on your preferences. Also keep in mind that PS3 came out later and therefore naturally has fewer games to offer at the moment
Log in to comment