Is more better? The quality versus quantity arguement.

A lot of people believe more is better in todays world. But is it really?

We shop at places like costco, BJ's as well as other places in order to get the most bang for our buck.

But the question I will ask is, Are more games better or is it just an out to make your system look better?

I believe the answer is we do it to justify our feelings. Because at the end of the day despite the fact some systems have more games, are you really going to go the extra mile to make your system look good by saying it has sneak king, party babies, Gundam Wing Dynasty warriors and big rigs?

With the PC comign in with over 2000 games rated at metacritic people will still have to sift through a lot of things to find the games they want to play. As well as the other systems.

The 360 has A little over 800 games now.

The PS3 Has a little over 400.

And the wii is closing in on 600.
All Rated on metacritic.

Because I believe at the end of the day we do find our little niche titles that we enjoy that scored low.

But I believe a majority of the user populace buys games that are more well known and heavily advertised.

Because people will say their system has more, but yet they fail to mention the extremely poor rated games.

The bolded statements are my opinions so take them as you will.

Well I'd take two AAA games over four A games, but it also depends on the game because there are certain AAA games (Warioware: Smooth Moves/PDZ) that I despise. But I'd generally take quality. Two AAA games on paper sounds better than four A games to me.

more games=more choices =more fun

I do not see how any real gamer would want less choices.

More is clearly better. More games, more variety, more freedom, more choice. (Provided the games aren't all crap)locopatho

[QUOTE="locopatho"]More is clearly better. More games, more variety, more freedom, more choice. (Provided the games aren't all crap)Animal-Mother

[QUOTE="locopatho"]More is clearly better. More games, more variety, more freedom, more choice. (Provided the games aren't all crap)Animal-Mother

more games=more choices =more fun

I do not see how any real gamer would want less choices.

SilentlyMad

[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"][QUOTE="locopatho"]More is clearly better. More games, more variety, more freedom, more choice. (Provided the games aren't all crap)locopatho

i thought this was about long gameplay...

[QUOTE="SilentlyMad"]

more games=more choices =more fun

I do not see how any real gamer would want less choices.

Animal-Mother

One mans garbage is another mans treasure. Do you only play AAA titles and that is it?

Also most people do not enjoy every style of gaming so one system could have 14 AAA games but only one or 2 interest that person. Lets say a person enjoys racers and that is pretty much it. That person would rather have 40 games to choose from then 10.

I also enjoy many games that are not AAA I feel bad for the people that only play AAA games.

[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"][QUOTE="SilentlyMad"]

more games=more choices =more fun

I do not see how any real gamer would want less choices.

SilentlyMad

One mans garbage is another mans treasure. Do you only play AAA titles and that is it?

Also most people do not enjoy every style of gaming so one system could have 14 AAA games but only one or 2 interest that person. Lets say a person enjoys racers and that is pretty much it. That person would rather have 40 games to choose from then 10.

I also enjoy many games that are not AAA I feel bad for the people that only play AAA games.

i thought this was about long gameplay...

Kandros

[QUOTE="locopatho"][QUOTE="Animal-Mother"] But you still have to sift through some garbage to find quality titles.Animal-Mother

[QUOTE="SilentlyMad"]

[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"] But you failed to answer one of my questions would you go as far to say your system has the burger king games on them? As I said to iocopatho, more means more garbage to sift through, as well as my statement of a majority of people buying high quality titles. We all do it ,we say it has more but in the end we only go for the popular titles the more well known. It be interesting to see some collections.Animal-Mother

One mans garbage is another mans treasure. Do you only play AAA titles and that is it?

Also most people do not enjoy every style of gaming so one system could have 14 AAA games but only one or 2 interest that person. Lets say a person enjoys racers and that is pretty much it. That person would rather have 40 games to choose from then 10.

I also enjoy many games that are not AAA I feel bad for the people that only play AAA games.

Also it is weird because it is quality Vs quantity but the 360 has more AAA,AA,A games and more games in general also so it has quality and quantity.

With my schedule being crowded with various activity, I am going to choose the quality side this time over quantity.

Quality > Quantity for me :D

Also it is weird because it is quality Vs quantity but the 360 has more AAA,AA,A games and more games in general also so it has quality and quantity.

SilentlyMad

[QUOTE="SilentlyMad"]

Also it is weird because it is quality Vs quantity but the 360 has more AAA,AA,A games and more games in general also so it has quality and quantity.

Animal-Mother

Not talking personal taste just review numbers (quality ) PC>360>PS3>Wii

Now (quantity) PC>360>Wii>PS3

The issue with your question is that quality and quantity are not mutually exclusive things. Also for the most part (at least in terms of most SW discussions) quality is a subjective thing. If given the option for a system that had MGS4, RE5, Resistance, Orange Box, and Halo, vs one with Heavenly Sword, Rabbids Go Home, Boy and His Blob, Kameo, Cooking Mama, Petz, Nicktoons Game 100, Planet 54, Geoforce, and Monopoly, I'll take the second one. While not all the games may interest me, more of them do than the "High Quality" games from the first system.

I think people like to make poor scoring games more important than they really are. I have no problem going to a store and finding the games I'm interested. The fact that there are also 5 versions of Petz on the shelf next to them really doesn't effect me.

I'll take Quality AND quantity.

[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"][QUOTE="SilentlyMad"]

Also it is weird because it is quality Vs quantity but the 360 has more AAA,AA,A games and more games in general also so it has quality and quantity.

SilentlyMad

Not talking personal taste just review numbers (quality ) PC>360>PS3>Wii

Now (quantity) PC>360>Wii>PS3

[QUOTE="SilentlyMad"]

[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"] in response to your post above But if you look, their all fairly hyped well known games. Also Despite the fact it has more. It's also been out a year longer. I think people need to realize sony is really relying on first and second party this gen.Animal-Mother

Not talking personal taste just review numbers (quality ) PC>360>PS3>Wii

Now (quantity) PC>360>Wii>PS3

The issue with your question is that quality and quantity are not mutually exclusive things. Also for the most part (at least in terms of most SW discussions) quality is a subjective thing. If given the option for a system that had MGS4, RE5, Resistance, Orange Box, and Halo, vs one with Heavenly Sword, Rabbids Go Home, Boy and His Blob, Kameo, Cooking Mama, Petz, Nicktoons Game 100, Planet 54, Geoforce, and Monopoly, I'll take the second one. While not all the games may interest me, more of them do than the "High Quality" games from the first system.

I think people like to make poor scoring games more important than they really are. I have no problem going to a store and finding the games I'm interested. The fact that there are also 5 versions of Petz on the shelf next to them really doesn't effect me.

shadowcat2576

[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"][QUOTE="SilentlyMad"]You can say whatever excuse but numbers would be this

Not talking personal taste just review numbers (quality ) PC>360>PS3>Wii

Now (quantity) PC>360>Wii>PS3

SilentlyMad

For me quality is always better than quantity.

[QUOTE="SilentlyMad"]

[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"] Tell me how is it an excuse. How many 1st party games has MS released compared to sony? Also I never denied the numbers.,Animal-Mother

Also what question did you think I dodged? The who developed what game one? I have no idea for every game but like I said I do not care. I play games not developers. If you only play certain developers that is your choice.

[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"][QUOTE="SilentlyMad"]If you wanted to make another PS3 Vs 360 thread then you should have. Fact is the PC is first in both areas and the 360 is second in both areas. Also I do not care who makes a game I just care if I like it.

SilentlyMad

Also what question did you think I dodged? The who developed what game one? I have no idea for every game but like I said I do not care. I play games not developers. If you only play certain developers that is your choice.

[QUOTE="SilentlyMad"]

[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"] I asked a question & you dodged it so it's obvious what the answer is. Also where did I say the numbers are false. It's true the numbers show PC>>360>>PS3>>>wii as far as more and in quality. I never disagreed. PC will always be miles ahead of the console, heck even in terms of quality.Animal-Mother

Also what question did you think I dodged? The who developed what game one? I have no idea for every game but like I said I do not care. I play games not developers. If you only play certain developers that is your choice.

[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"][QUOTE="SilentlyMad"]well you can disagree with quality because everyone has personal opinions but since we can not poll every gamer going by reviews the PS3 is in 3rd place.

Also what question did you think I dodged? The who developed what game one? I have no idea for every game but like I said I do not care. I play games not developers. If you only play certain developers that is your choice.

SilentlyMad

I prefer lots of quality games. 360 is the perfect example of both

I prefer lots of quality games. 360 is the perfect example of both

PAL360

You can only play ONE game at a time. Quantity isn't one.