Is Sony scared of OnLive?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Knightbringr
Knightbringr

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Knightbringr
Member since 2008 • 140 Posts

I've been busy the past week and have been unable to post this question, but was hoping someone else would and I would just read the responses. Well, no one did, so I will just ask it. Is Sony scared of OnLive?

I ask this because Sony released a press statement last week stating they doubt OnLive's approach to gaming. Article can be found here. Yet, the day before they trademarked the name "PS Cloud". That article can be found here. It appears more like Sony is scared they may be missing the boat and are trying to catch up, while at the same time criticizing OnLive's business model so as to ruin the hype around it.

And if you think I am looking too much into it, we just need to turn back the clock to 1999 when the Sega Dreamcast was coming out and everyone (developers, vgame fans, and vgame journalists) were all excited about it, and Sony did everything they could to quell the hype by releasing press statement after press statement about how they were going to be coming out with a PlayStation 2 within a year of Dreamcast's release and it was going to be nothing short of vgame nirvana (Sony accomplished the release but with extreme shortages).

The thing is sometimes you have to read between the lines of what companies say. I personally think that Sony is trying to wreck the momentum of OnLive and then within a few years of OnLive's (supposed) release, come out with their own service. My friends are casual gamers, so I can't really ask them their opinion, because they don't follow vgame world as closely as us... So what do you think?

Thanks.

Avatar image for Puckhog04
Puckhog04

22814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Puckhog04
Member since 2003 • 22814 Posts

I think alot of people are looking at OnLive as a threat. I don't see why. IMO there is no way it's going to be viable like they hope for a long time. Even then it won't be getting rid of the enormous Console market. Sony isn't the only one looking at themthough. Even Crytek has made comments about them lately.

Avatar image for EmperorSupreme
EmperorSupreme

7686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 EmperorSupreme
Member since 2006 • 7686 Posts
I think it's OnLive who should be scared. It looks like they have good technology but what they don't have is exclusive games and that's something that Sony does very well.
Avatar image for _SWAG_
_SWAG_

2674

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 _SWAG_
Member since 2009 • 2674 Posts

sony has nothing to be afraid of, onlive is not a threat to them or anyone

Avatar image for JunkTrap
JunkTrap

2640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 JunkTrap
Member since 2006 • 2640 Posts
Onlive is a great idea!.. just not right now.
Avatar image for Knightbringr
Knightbringr

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Knightbringr
Member since 2008 • 140 Posts

Onlive is a great idea!.. just not right now. JunkTrap

I agree. I keep reading about researchers and experts of cloud computing stating that it is 5 - 7 years off at least. I personally don't think that OnLive will be able to pull it off. Too soon.

Avatar image for Gxgear
Gxgear

10425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Gxgear
Member since 2003 • 10425 Posts

Never too early to put the damper on potential competition!

Scared is way too strong a word for something so far away in the future.

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#8 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

Why should they be scared of an unproven product when they have so many brainwashed fanboys ready to line up and buy the PS4?

Plus Onlive is just technical snake oil.

Avatar image for nhh18
nhh18

6538

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 nhh18
Member since 2009 • 6538 Posts

Pay 30+ dollars for online cable service a monthand you could get onlive. Only good for college students.

Avatar image for Couth_
Couth_

10369

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Couth_
Member since 2008 • 10369 Posts
I think it's OnLive who should be scared. It looks like they have good technology but what they don't have is exclusive games and that's something that Sony does very well.EmperorSupreme
Yeah I think at best OnLive would be a secondary console(if that's what it is) to play multiplat games that aren't worth a full buy sort of thing. At least that's what I'm hoping to use it for if it doesn't cost too much. But that's if it even works. A lot of companies are skeptical about it, not just Sony. Crytek came out and was pretty harsh too
Avatar image for Zhengi
Zhengi

8479

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Zhengi
Member since 2006 • 8479 Posts
Why would anyone be scared of OnLive? It hasn't proven it can actually deliver what it does and that it will get all the support.
Avatar image for Mckenna1845
Mckenna1845

4410

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Mckenna1845
Member since 2005 • 4410 Posts
not really, onlive will only at first have multiplatform games, until the company starts making some serious exclusive games, it won't effect consoles at all. Why would any one give up their console, for less games and no exclusives, playing them at a lesser quality (unless there is no lag and you have a great connection), plus it's likely to be more expensive like steam and their new games. pc gamers aren't going to give up pc gaming, because they can play the games at much higher settings, and they have mods, old games, cheap games and the general use of a computer. It's not going to make much of a dent. Good idea though, just not the right company.
Avatar image for kingdre
kingdre

9456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 kingdre
Member since 2005 • 9456 Posts

Why should anyone be scared of OnLive? It's a great idea in theory, but whether or not it will be a hit remains to be seen.

Avatar image for psychobrew
psychobrew

8888

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#14 psychobrew
Member since 2008 • 8888 Posts
Even if OnLive eats in to their proffits (or losses, as it stands now), Sony would just create their own cloud system and force every TV, PC/PC hardware, digital and video camera, etc. consumer to sign up for the service when they purchase one of their products.
Avatar image for jigglebilly1983
jigglebilly1983

2696

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 jigglebilly1983
Member since 2006 • 2696 Posts

Ill say this about OnLive: Anybody remember "the Phantom"?

Avatar image for jjenkins78x
jjenkins78x

751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 jjenkins78x
Member since 2009 • 751 Posts
People are so vastly misinformed about this OnLive thing. I don't think it's going to be the miracle some people are expecting. I don't think any of the companies are scared of it either. Sony (or any company) patenting a similar idea is just to cover their bases. If it makes any money at all, Sony is in a position to benefit. It doesn't mean they are planning on ditching physical software this afternoon. I am extremely skeptical of this OnLive business the more I hear of it. It's amazing in concept, but in reality there are bandwidth limitations to consider, input lag, etc... I mean we're barely at the point where we can stream Youtube videos without buffering, I don't see how they will make this evolutionary jump instantaneously and suddenly my old laptop will run Crysis. I also suspect you will end up downloading a lot more than you expect to your HDD.
Avatar image for LordQuorthon
LordQuorthon

5803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 LordQuorthon
Member since 2008 • 5803 Posts

Sony are not afraid of anything. Mainly because they live in their own little world, a world where they are still dominating everything 4EVARS. When you think about it, Sony and System Wars have a lot in common.

Avatar image for alextherussian
alextherussian

2642

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 alextherussian
Member since 2009 • 2642 Posts
sony is and should be scared of onlive. whether or not onlive succeeds in its current iteration is irrelevant.. the simple fact that the possibility of this kind of technology being available should be a threat to them. Odds are it wont succeed this year, maybe not even in the next 3 or 4 years. But sony like microsoft and nintendo are in the console business for the long run if in 4 years something like onlive works, and works well, then it could very well canabalize their sales. saying they are afraid of onlive specifically may be a misnomer, but sony is definitetly afraid or weary of the technology standing behind it. something they have proven themselves by buying up PS Cloud..
Avatar image for tarheels4789
tarheels4789

45

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 tarheels4789
Member since 2008 • 45 Posts

I think sony is treating it the same way microsoft is treating the RROD.. Just sweeping it under the rug.

Avatar image for jjenkins78x
jjenkins78x

751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 jjenkins78x
Member since 2009 • 751 Posts

Why should they be scared of an unproven product when they have so many brainwashed fanboys ready to line up and buy the PS4?

Plus Onlive is just technical snake oil.

heretrix
Only a brainwashed fanboy would buy a Sony product. Does it ever get old hating a company so much?
Avatar image for Knightbringr
Knightbringr

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Knightbringr
Member since 2008 • 140 Posts

Why would anyone be scared of OnLive? It hasn't proven it can actually deliver what it does and that it will get all the support.Zhengi

Everyone is saying that OnLive "hasn't proven itself" and is probably "going to be a failure" and "Why would Sony care?", but Sony obviously cares (at least a little bit) if they release a press statement regarding it. I just find it almost hypocritical that they say this the day after they file a trademark for the name "PS Cloud".

My question is, I'm wondering what Sony is really up to (because this looks mighty familiar to the Dreamcast incident) and if my suspicions of them trying to sabotage OnLive are shared. Saying that "Sony doesn't care about OnLive" seems like a moot point considering that Sony commented about OnLive and therefore must care (at least a little bit).

Example: I don't talk about butterflies to my friends and they don't talk about butterflies to me. Because we don't care about butterflies.

Avatar image for jjenkins78x
jjenkins78x

751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 jjenkins78x
Member since 2009 • 751 Posts
[QUOTE="alextherussian"]sony is and should be scared of onlive. whether or not onlive succeeds in its current iteration is irrelevant.. the simple fact that the possibility of this kind of technology being available should be a threat to them. Odds are it wont succeed this year, maybe not even in the next 3 or 4 years. But sony like microsoft and nintendo are in the console business for the long run if in 4 years something like onlive works, and works well, then it could very well canabalize their sales. saying they are afraid of onlive specifically may be a misnomer, but sony is definitetly afraid or weary of the technology standing behind it. something they have proven themselves by buying up PS Cloud..

New account for this? You are still wrong. Sony, MS, Ninty and the rest know what OnLive is and what it is all about. They know better than you, they know better than the next uninformed speculator. They are in the business of knowing. If it was in danger of crippling their entire business (and MS and Ninty blah blah), do you think they might have done something? Or do you think they heard of this concept of Cloud Gaming for the first time at GDC? Maybe you think they are so out of touch they need to get their info third-hand from Gamespot forum posters. OnLive is just another source for games. It's 2009, I don't think anyone "fears" technology. It's just media hype to facilitate the console war.
Avatar image for RTUUMM
RTUUMM

4859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 RTUUMM
Member since 2008 • 4859 Posts
Why would SONY be scared of ONLIVE? And you do know that ONLIVE only plays pc games right?
Avatar image for jjenkins78x
jjenkins78x

751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 jjenkins78x
Member since 2009 • 751 Posts

[QUOTE="Zhengi"]Why would anyone be scared of OnLive? It hasn't proven it can actually deliver what it does and that it will get all the support.Knightbringr

Everyone is saying that OnLive "hasn't proven itself" and is probably "going to be a failure" and "Why would Sony care?", but Sony obviously cares (at least a little bit) if they release a press statement regarding it. I just find it almost hypocritical that they say this the day after they file a trademark for the name "PS Cloud".

My question is, I'm wondering what Sony is really up to (because this looks mighty familiar to the Dreamcast incident) and if my suspicions of them trying to sabotage OnLive are shared. Saying that "Sony doesn't care about OnLive" seems like a moot point considering that Sony commented about OnLive and therefore must care (at least a little bit).

Example: I don't talk about butterflies to my friends and they don't talk about butterflies to me. Because we don't care about butterflies.

The difference is that you and your friends are not international, publicly traded corporations that have shareholders to answer to. You don't HAVE to care about butterflies, but Sony is in the gaming industry and therefore HAS to care about OnLive. This thread just reeks of fail, I'm sorry. Why Sony would be more "scared" of OnLive than MS is a mystery to me. I am going to laugh my ass off when all the naysayers find out that OnLive is not quite what people are projecting.
Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#26 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts
What's with these "X company is scared of Y company" type threads?!?!
Avatar image for alextherussian
alextherussian

2642

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 alextherussian
Member since 2009 • 2642 Posts
Yeah new account...good a time as any. yeah fear might be the wrong word, but your post seems to imply that sony and rest just dont care about this. I fully agree that the 3 are in the business of knowing, and without a doubt know the ins and outs of cloud technology considerably better then i ever would or probably could. however if 4 or 5 years before the arrival of youtube (feb 2001/2000) someone told you about it, you would probably be skeptical as well. its very possible that in a few years when this technology becomes more viable sony and microsoft will jump on the bandwagon. PS Cloud is possibly a precaution for this very contingency.
Avatar image for Knightbringr
Knightbringr

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Knightbringr
Member since 2008 • 140 Posts

[QUOTE="Knightbringr"]

[QUOTE="Zhengi"]Why would anyone be scared of OnLive? It hasn't proven it can actually deliver what it does and that it will get all the support.jjenkins78x

Everyone is saying that OnLive "hasn't proven itself" and is probably "going to be a failure" and "Why would Sony care?", but Sony obviously cares (at least a little bit) if they release a press statement regarding it. I just find it almost hypocritical that they say this the day after they file a trademark for the name "PS Cloud".

My question is, I'm wondering what Sony is really up to (because this looks mighty familiar to the Dreamcast incident) and if my suspicions of them trying to sabotage OnLive are shared. Saying that "Sony doesn't care about OnLive" seems like a moot point considering that Sony commented about OnLive and therefore must care (at least a little bit).

Example: I don't talk about butterflies to my friends and they don't talk about butterflies to me. Because we don't care about butterflies.

The difference is that you and your friends are not international, publicly traded corporations that have shareholders to answer to. You don't HAVE to care about butterflies, but Sony is in the gaming industry and therefore HAS to care about OnLive. This thread just reeks of fail, I'm sorry. Why Sony would be more "scared" of OnLive than MS is a mystery to me. I am going to laugh my ass off when all the naysayers find out that OnLive is not quite what people are projecting.

I agree with you. Sony HAD to comment on OnLive since they are in the same field. Just previous people who posted were saying that Sony didn't even care about OnLive. I was trying to show that of course they do because they are in competition. But either way, whatever.

The thing is, Sony willingly stated that cloud computing won't work, yet they trademarked "PS Cloud" the day before. This is how the conversation probably happened:

Mr. X - Sony, how do you feel about OnLive?

Sony - OnLive sucks! This whole cloud computing concept is not plausible. OnLive will Fail. They're just trying to rip people off!

Mr. X - Didn't you just trademark the name "PS Cloud" yesterday?

Sony - hmm... *shrugs shoulders* So? What are you getting at?

Mr. X - You say cloud computing will not work, but you trademarked a sort of cloud-computing name that is associated with your name brand yesterday. Are you anticipating taking some venture into the realm of cloud computing in the future?

Sony - "PS Cloud" could mean anything. Maybe we want to use it for a Final Fantasy VII themed PSP. Maybe we just don't want that name floating around. *starts sweating* Look, this interview is ridiculous. We (Sony) don't even really care about OnLive. Did I mention that they will rip you off?

Mr. X - O... K...

I just think that Sony is trying to reduce some of OnLive's hype. I'm not saying that Sony is turning it's sights solely to OnLive (response to "why would sony be more scared of OnLive than MS") and I'm not trying to make an angry thread (response to "What's with these "X company is scared of Y company" type threads?!?!"). I think that Sony (who probably never even considered cloud computing before) is jumping on the cloud computing bandwagon and not admitting it.

BTW, Thanks for all of you guy's opinions.

Avatar image for Svarthek
Svarthek

1431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 Svarthek
Member since 2005 • 1431 Posts

I think that if OnLive succeeds it would be a tough contender for any of the big three. If this generation has tought us anything the Top Dog and Under Dog can switch positions faily suddenly. If I were to suggest anything to a company looking for their place in the console market it would be to be unique. To answer your question: I guess Sony should be scared of everyone right now. Microsoft is beating them at their own game, and Nintendo and OnLive have their own unique niche. Sony had better be paying attention.

Avatar image for Knightbringr
Knightbringr

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Knightbringr
Member since 2008 • 140 Posts

I think that if OnLive succeeds it would be a tough contender for any of the big three. If this generation has tought us anything the Top Dog and Under Dog can switch positions faily suddenly. If I were to suggest anything to a company looking for their place in the console market it would be to be unique. To answer your question: I guess Sony should be scared of everyone right now. Microsoft is beating them at their own game, and Nintendo and OnLive have their own unique niche. Sony had better be paying attention.

Svarthek

Yes. I agree. This is probably the most intelligent, unbiased answer so far.

Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12861

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#32 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12861 Posts
Sony has been thinking about DD and Online Service's since PS1.Go onto Youtube and Search the History of Playstation. Here is the first video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZoIYLYd8uUU&feature=channel_page. This is a great documentary how Sony got into the gaming industry and owned.
Avatar image for Svarthek
Svarthek

1431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 Svarthek
Member since 2005 • 1431 Posts

[QUOTE="Svarthek"]

I think that if OnLive succeeds it would be a tough contender for any of the big three. If this generation has tought us anything the Top Dog and Under Dog can switch positions faily suddenly. If I were to suggest anything to a company looking for their place in the console market it would be to be unique. To answer your question: I guess Sony should be scared of everyone right now. Microsoft is beating them at their own game, and Nintendo and OnLive have their own unique niche. Sony had better be paying attention.

jjenkins78x

Word, OnLive is only a threat to Sony. I bet they will knock Sony out of the gaming industry, NAY the electronics industry!!!!!111 within a year or two. :roll: I'm smelling a pattern here.

I definitly said that OnLive is a potential threat to more than just Sony, emphasis on potential. I don't really know what you're trying to say but if you are saying that I'm a Sony hater you would be wrong. I own a PS3. But, if you honestly think it's irrational to think Sony has no threats you would be suffering from the disease known as wrong. Even if OnLive turns out to be unsuccessful, it represents an idea that things are changing, if Sony fails to change with it, what do you think will happen? So now that we've taken this squabble into a second thread lets just agree to disagree, because you're now putting words in my mouth.

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#35 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

Why should they be scared of an unproven product when they have so many brainwashed fanboys ready to line up and buy the PS4?

Plus Onlive is just technical snake oil.

jjenkins78x

Only a brainwashed fanboy would buy a Sony product. Does it ever get old hating a company so much?

Yeah I hate Sony so much I bought a top of the line Bravia from them. Now THAT's HATE.

Oh and I think I have a PS3 also. I can play the Blu-ray's and there's something called PSN that shows up on my TV periodically. Do Bravias have built in PS3s? And that PS2 that I'm playing Persona 4 on (which I LOVE BTW) must be my imagination. And the PSP that I carry to work (The one I thought I bought on launch day, nah it isn't that one, it's the OTHER PSP that I bought (PSP slim) that I THINK I have..

That Sony Dream Theater system in my bedroom? Meh, that's cardboard. I hate Sony so much that my friggin house is filled with their products. :|

As for my PS4 comment:

You are a brainwashed fanboy if you are pledging to buy a product years before it's even developed.

Avatar image for jjenkins78x
jjenkins78x

751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 jjenkins78x
Member since 2009 • 751 Posts
Owning a lot of Sony products apparently doesn't stop a person, if a person were so inclined, from trashing them at every opportunity and making broad generalizations about people who own their products... even if said person was also an owner of said products.
Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#37 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

Owning a lot of Sony products apparently doesn't stop a person, if a person were so inclined, from trashing them at every opportunity and making broad generalizations about people who own their products... even if said person was also an owner of said products. jjenkins78x
Sometimes being critical of a product or corporation doesn't mean that you hate them, it's just criticism. If I hated Sony I wouldn't have so many Sony products in my house. There are alternatives. I'm just not into kissing their butt.