[QUOTE="Knightbringr"][QUOTE="Zhengi"]Why would anyone be scared of OnLive? It hasn't proven it can actually deliver what it does and that it will get all the support.jjenkins78x
Everyone is saying that OnLive "hasn't proven itself" and is probably "going to be a failure" and "Why would Sony care?", but Sony obviously cares (at least a little bit) if they release a press statement regarding it. I just find it almost hypocritical that they say this the day after they file a trademark for the name "PS Cloud".
My question is, I'm wondering what Sony is really up to (because this looks mighty familiar to the Dreamcast incident) and if my suspicions of them trying to sabotage OnLive are shared. Saying that "Sony doesn't care about OnLive" seems like a moot point considering that Sony commented about OnLive and therefore must care (at least a little bit).
Example: I don't talk about butterflies to my friends and they don't talk about butterflies to me. Because we don't care about butterflies.
The difference is that you and your friends are not international, publicly traded corporations that have shareholders to answer to. You don't HAVE to care about butterflies, but Sony is in the gaming industry and therefore HAS to care about OnLive. This thread just reeks of fail, I'm sorry. Why Sony would be more "scared" of OnLive than MS is a mystery to me. I am going to laugh my ass off when all the naysayers find out that OnLive is not quite what people are projecting. I agree with you. Sony HAD to comment on OnLive since they are in the same field. Just previous people who posted were saying that Sony didn't even care about OnLive. I was trying to show that of course they do because they are in competition. But either way, whatever.
The thing is, Sony willingly stated that cloud computing won't work, yet they trademarked "PS Cloud" the day before. This is how the conversation probably happened:
Mr. X - Sony, how do you feel about OnLive?
Sony - OnLive sucks! This whole cloud computing concept is not plausible. OnLive will Fail. They're just trying to rip people off!
Mr. X - Didn't you just trademark the name "PS Cloud" yesterday?
Sony - hmm... *shrugs shoulders* So? What are you getting at?
Mr. X - You say cloud computing will not work, but you trademarked a sort of cloud-computing name that is associated with your name brand yesterday. Are you anticipating taking some venture into the realm of cloud computing in the future?
Sony - "PS Cloud" could mean anything. Maybe we want to use it for a Final Fantasy VII themed PSP. Maybe we just don't want that name floating around. *starts sweating* Look, this interview is ridiculous. We (Sony) don't even really care about OnLive. Did I mention that they will rip you off?
Mr. X - O... K...
I just think that Sony is trying to reduce some of OnLive's hype. I'm not saying that Sony is turning it's sights solely to OnLive (response to "why would sony be more scared of OnLive than MS") and I'm not trying to make an angry thread (response to "What's with these "X company is scared of Y company" type threads?!?!"). I think that Sony (who probably never even considered cloud computing before) is jumping on the cloud computing bandwagon and not admitting it.
BTW, Thanks for all of you guy's opinions.
Log in to comment