This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]Nothing against the Lemmings, but they haven't really had anything to be cocky about. What are yall's thoughts on this?Hewkii
this is what I think.
I'm talking about Sony and Nintendo being #1 in past generations, not by one game.
Ifyou had been playing baseball, and use to be extremely well at it, for 10 yearswithout hitting a home run and then suddenly started to carry your entire team in points, don't you think you would gloat just a bit?SA--X
That is a very good point, but don't you think it seems that the Sheep learned nothing with the N64 and Gamecube?
[QUOTE="SA--X"]Ifyou had been playing baseball, and use to be extremely well at it, for 10 yearswithout hitting a home run and then suddenly started to carry your entire team in points, don't you think you would gloat just a bit?Ragnarok1051
That is a very good point, but don't you think it seems that the Sheep learned nothing with the N64 and Gamecube?
What should I have learned? Each of those generations, though not being the top seller, had the larger number of GOTY title (at least on GS). That proved that in Nintendo's desperate hour, they maintained the quality and integrety that they always had. Now they are getting a cash flow. Last time that happened (NES I suppose) it was a great gaming system. The next one they made, the SNES, is considered to be the pinnacle of console gaming history. Why should I be conserend? This could lead to the second rise of N, bring a 2nd golden age to video gaming. (Yes, that was all done on a magic crystal ball)[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"][QUOTE="SA--X"]Ifyou had been playing baseball, and use to be extremely well at it, for 10 yearswithout hitting a home run and then suddenly started to carry your entire team in points, don't you think you would gloat just a bit?SA--X
That is a very good point, but don't you think it seems that the Sheep learned nothing with the N64 and Gamecube?
What should I have learned? Each of those generations, though not being the top seller, had the larger number of GOTY title (at least on GS). That proved that in Nintendo's desperate hour, they maintained the quality and integrety that they always had. Now they are getting a cash flow. Last time that happened (NES I suppose) it was a great gaming system. The next one they made, the SNES, is considered to be the pinnacle of console gaming history. Why should I be conserend? This could lead to the second rise of N, bring a 2nd golden age to video gaming. (Yes, that was all done on a magic crystal ball)Yeah that crystal ball doesn't work, cause all I see is the Big N bringing nothing but mini games.
[QUOTE="SA--X"][QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"][QUOTE="SA--X"]Ifyou had been playing baseball, and use to be extremely well at it, for 10 yearswithout hitting a home run and then suddenly started to carry your entire team in points, don't you think you would gloat just a bit?Ragnarok1051
That is a very good point, but don't you think it seems that the Sheep learned nothing with the N64 and Gamecube?
What should I have learned? Each of those generations, though not being the top seller, had the larger number of GOTY title (at least on GS). That proved that in Nintendo's desperate hour, they maintained the quality and integrety that they always had. Now they are getting a cash flow. Last time that happened (NES I suppose) it was a great gaming system. The next one they made, the SNES, is considered to be the pinnacle of console gaming history. Why should I be conserend? This could lead to the second rise of N, bring a 2nd golden age to video gaming. (Yes, that was all done on a magic crystal ball)Yeah that crystal ball doesn't work, cause all I see is the Big N bringing nothing but mini games.
Sigh, the minigames stuff again.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment