is this the year fable live up to the hype?

action/adventure/rpg fable 3 look like its ready 2 take that next step and with fable 2 sellin 3.5 million, fable 3 could be a classic if done right.

Fable has only ever been a really good sleep aid.

I'm expecting nothing less out of Fable 3. I'm getting sleepy just thinking about it.

What was the hype for Fable 2? I expected AA, and I was right. Loved the game tooAnjunaddict

Hmmm nothing could ever match the hype Peter put on the first game *though the first game was awesome* the 2nd game was good up untill the before the ending and ending parts where the story got lame, and the endings were lame.

I hope fable 3 is far better then fable 2 and more like fable 1.

action/adventure/rpg fable 3 look like its ready 2 take that next step and with fable 2 sellin 3.5 million, fable 3 could be a classic if done right.

AD216

Didn't you read about it? From what I read, they took out the action adventure, and it support motion's Natal. E3 will help us know more, but I don't like the direction.
It seems like a different game.

[QUOTE="AD216"]

action/adventure/rpg fable 3 look like its ready 2 take that next step and with fable 2 sellin 3.5 million, fable 3 could be a classic if done right.

SolidTy

Didn't you read about it? From what I read, they took out the action adventure, and it support motion's Natal. E3 will help us know more, but I don't like the direction.
It seems like a different game.

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

[QUOTE="AD216"]

action/adventure/rpg fable 3 look like its ready 2 take that next step and with fable 2 sellin 3.5 million, fable 3 could be a classic if done right.

AD216

Didn't you read about it? From what I read, they took out the action adventure, and it support motion's Natal. E3 will help us know more, but I don't like the direction.
It seems like a different game.

IMO, the series wasn't an RPG before. If it was, then Zelda is. Honestly, it was action / adventure, this one seems to be different, but it's all words. We will have to wait for the game's E3 unveiling to know what we are dealing with.

I didnt like Fable1 and 2 that much but this "touch" thing looks interesting. Lets see how it turns out

Well, Fable 1 was a merely decent action-adventure game, Fable 2 was an irredeemable piece of ****, and now Molyneux thinks those two incredibly simple games were overly complicated and wants to make them more accessible to idiots, so no, I don't have very much hope for this next entry.

Seems to me as though it's all heading rapidly downhill, not that it was much of a hill to begin with.

Fable 3 has the stuff that Molynuex confirmed for Fable 1. AAAA GOTY confirmed :P But honestly I like fable. The graphics are nice and its so pretty. Its just so pretty. Fix the running animation and game is perfect. But now that you have wings and such and changing weapons. Ill be happy, and the new town looks sweeeeeeeet.

Well, Fable 1 was a merely decent action-adventure game, Fable 2 was an irredeemable piece of ****, and now Molyneux thinks those two incredibly simple games were overly complicated and wants to make them more accessible to idiots, so no, I don't have very much hope for this next entry.

Seems to me as though it's all heading rapidly downhill, not that it was much of a hill to begin with.

jethrovegas

I find myself agreeing, I didn't despise Fable 2, but maybe I should have. I certainly didn't like it as much as I thought it would. It was just very simple, and it drug me around by my nose.

Still, the latest news revealed that Fable 3 uses one button, and is becoming super simplified, I don't think many have read up on the game to be honest.

Just the words, Fable 3 gets some hype, but people are going to be surprised when the finally see the changes.

I think Peter M is losing it, and has been losing it for some time.

[QUOTE="jethrovegas"]

Well, Fable 1 was a merely decent action-adventure game, Fable 2 was an irredeemable piece of ****, and now Molyneux thinks those two incredibly simple games were overly complicated and wants to make them more accessible to idiots, so no, I don't have very much hope for this next entry.

Seems to me as though it's all heading rapidly downhill, not that it was much of a hill to begin with.

SolidTy

I find myself agreeing, I didn't despise Fable 2, but maybe I should have. I certainly didn't like it as much as I thought it would. It was just very simple, and it drug me around by my nose.

Still, the latest news revealed that Fable 3 uses one button, and is becoming super simplified, I don't think many have read up on the game to be honest.

Just the words, Fable 3 gets some hype, but people are going to be surprised when the finally see the changes.

I think Peter M is losing it, and has been losing it for some time.

Gotta to disagree with you Ty. I think people enjoy Fable for everything buts its gameplay. The first and second were insultingly easy, and I'm getting the idea it'll be even easier now. It'd be hard to find someone who is "wow'd" by Fable's gameplay.

Personally, I enjoy Fable because of the setting and humor. The world doesn't take itself seriously which is an appreciated break from most games, with their emphasis on drama and sadness. And then there's the small snippets of grimness - such as finding Terry Cotter's body surrounded by clay soldiers in Fable 2. Or the online website detailing the grisly fall of the Hero's Guild.

Those are the areas Fable exceeds in, and if nothing else I think Molyneux can deliver on.

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

[QUOTE="jethrovegas"]

Well, Fable 1 was a merely decent action-adventure game, Fable 2 was an irredeemable piece of ****, and now Molyneux thinks those two incredibly simple games were overly complicated and wants to make them more accessible to idiots, so no, I don't have very much hope for this next entry.

Seems to me as though it's all heading rapidly downhill, not that it was much of a hill to begin with.

Kickinurass

I find myself agreeing, I didn't despise Fable 2, but maybe I should have. I certainly didn't like it as much as I thought it would. It was just very simple, and it drug me around by my nose.

Still, the latest news revealed that Fable 3 uses one button, and is becoming super simplified, I don't think many have read up on the game to be honest.

Just the words, Fable 3 gets some hype, but people are going to be surprised when the finally see the changes.

I think Peter M is losing it, and has been losing it for some time.

Gotta to disagree with you Ty. I think people enjoy Fable for everything buts its gameplay. The first and second were insultingly easy, and I'm getting the idea it'll be even easier now. It'd be hard to find someone who is "wow'd" by Fable's gameplay.

Personally, I enjoy Fable because of the setting and humor. The world doesn't take itself seriously which is an appreciated break from most games, with their emphasis on drama and sadness. And then there's the small snippets of grimness - such as finding Terry Cotter's body surrounded by clay soldiers in Fable 2. Or the online website detailing the grisly fall of the Hero's Guild.

Those are the areas Fable exceeds in, and if nothing else I think Molyneux can deliver on.

So, I may be barking up the wrong tree. :P I guess the simplification bothers me, but the flip side is the humor and tragedy. I didn't like the ending for instance, but I guess others probably did (the choice).

[QUOTE="Kickinurass"]

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

I find myself agreeing, I didn't despise Fable 2, but maybe I should have. I certainly didn't like it as much as I thought it would. It was just very simple, and it drug me around by my nose.

Still, the latest news revealed that Fable 3 uses one button, and is becoming super simplified, I don't think many have read up on the game to be honest.

Just the words, Fable 3 gets some hype, but people are going to be surprised when the finally see the changes.

I think Peter M is losing it, and has been losing it for some time.

SolidTy

Gotta to disagree with you Ty. I think people enjoy Fable for everything buts its gameplay. The first and second were insultingly easy, and I'm getting the idea it'll be even easier now. It'd be hard to find someone who is "wow'd" by Fable's gameplay.

Personally, I enjoy Fable because of the setting and humor. The world doesn't take itself seriously which is an appreciated break from most games, with their emphasis on drama and sadness. And then there's the small snippets of grimness - such as finding Terry Cotter's body surrounded by clay soldiers in Fable 2. Or the online website detailing the grisly fall of the Hero's Guild.

Those are the areas Fable exceeds in, and if nothing else I think Molyneux can deliver on.

So, I may be barking up the wrong tree. :P I guess the simplification bothers me, but the flip side is the humor and tragedy. I didn't like the ending for instance, but I guess others probably did (the choice).

Oh god no. The ending was horrible. Even my 10 year sister agrees on that.

He better not pull anything close to that in Fable 3 :evil: