Its all about the Polygons

And that is why Playstation 3 is the best system. It has tons of processing power and the ability to pump out way more polygons than the 360 or the Wii. That is why you will see amazing games come out for the PS3 that wouldnt be possible on the 360.

Sure the 360 can do textures better, but thats just because devs are very used to programing that way. By pumping out insane amounts of polygons on the PS3, devs will start to make characters and environments more detailed by adding polygons of different colors, thus making textures from the polygons. Plus the cell processor can easily handle any lighting effect dutys it needs to preform, with out slowing the game down.

Halo 3, you are awesome. Mario Galaxy, I will buy a Wii for you. But PS3 you will win this console war.

Don't ask for a link, I am smart.

Xbox360: 500 million Tris per Sec.

PS3: 275/333 million Tris per sec.

White Knight Story
Disgea 3
Persona 4
Yakuza 3
Tekken 6
Final Fantasy XIII
Metal Gear solid 4
Gran Turismo 5
Little Big Planet
Eight Days
Getaway
Killzone 2
Socom: C
Star Ocean 4
-- PSN HOme
-- Dual Shock 3

Or cause of the games?

But we all know PS3 is the more powerful console and each next-gen system has its pros and cons.

what good is it when all 3rd party devs r developing for x360 first?

both wii and x360 r forcing devs to create previous gen graphics for current consoles, but enjoy the 1st party ps3 games like KZ2 and others, they will look great.

ps3 can output twice the polygons than x360.

But PS3 you will win this console war.

Don't ask for a link, I am smart.

MetalContra

ps3 can output twice the polygons than x360.

Chetnik07

Nope

http://www.xploder.net/xbox-360/news/2284/PS3-Half-Polygon-Performance-Of-360-.htm

Oh yeah. Totally. Polygons are really what makes a game fun. I never play a game with too few polygons. Because it wouldn't be fun. Because polygons are fun. Not gameplay, not character, not story - none of that crap. Anyone who says that those are fun is probably a fanboy. Or a communist. Or both. No, polygons are great. Probably better than Jesus.

That, ladies and gents, is sarcasm.

PS3 Half Polygon Performance Of 360 ???

From that link, rofl.

[QUOTE="Chetnik07"]

ps3 can output twice the polygons than x360.

KillaHalo2o9

Nope

http://www.xploder.net/xbox-360/news/2284/PS3-Half-Polygon-Performance-Of-360-.htm

:| June 2006? Is this supposed to be a joke.

if ps3 game had high polygons counts then there wouldn't be need for anti aliasing, and looking at ps3 games thats not the case

[QUOTE="KillaHalo2o9"][QUOTE="Chetnik07"]

ps3 can output twice the polygons than x360.

Adrian_Cloud

Fill rate is one of the primary ways to measure graphics performance - in essence, it's a number describing how many pixel operations you can perform. The fill rate on the PS3 is significantly slower than on the 360

Nope

http://www.xploder.net/xbox-360/news/2284/PS3-Half-Polygon-Performance-Of-360-.htm

:| June 2006? Is this supposed to be a joke.

[QUOTE="KillaHalo2o9"][QUOTE="Chetnik07"]

ps3 can output twice the polygons than x360.

Adrian_Cloud

http://www.xbox.com/en-AU/support/xbox360/manuals/xbox360specs.htm

http://www.gamepro.com/community/profile.cfm?login_name=numonex&blog_id=9481

The RSX about the same hast two 6800s Ult.

Weres your proof?

Nope

http://www.xploder.net/xbox-360/news/2284/PS3-Half-Polygon-Performance-Of-360-.htm

:| June 2006? Is this supposed to be a joke.

[QUOTE="KillaHalo2o9"][QUOTE="Chetnik07"]

ps3 can output twice the polygons than x360.

Adrian_Cloud

Nope

http://www.xploder.net/xbox-360/news/2284/PS3-Half-Polygon-Performance-Of-360-.htm

:| June 2006? Is this supposed to be a joke.

Fill rate is one of the primary ways to measure graphics performance - in essence, it's a number describing how many pixel operations you can perform. The fill rate on the PS3 is significantly slower than on the 360

[QUOTE="KillaHalo2o9"][QUOTE="Chetnik07"]

ps3 can output twice the polygons than x360.

Adrian_Cloud

Nope

http://www.xploder.net/xbox-360/news/2284/PS3-Half-Polygon-Performance-Of-360-.htm

:| June 2006? Is this supposed to be a joke.

http://www.xbox.com/en-AU/support/xbox360/manuals/xbox360specs.htm

http://www.gamepro.com/community/profile.cfm?login_name=numonex&blog_id=9481

The RSXis about the same hast two 6800s Ult.

Weres your proof?

is that why halo3 cant runin 720p and Lair on ps3 can run in 1080p?

When devs use the Cell the way its designed to and unlike with todays multiplat games that r nothing but ps2 and xbox games in higher def the PS3 just destroys xbox360 in the graphics department.

too bad graphics arent the only thing that matters. Maybe then I would listen. Since this is all I heard

is that why halo3 cant runin 720p and Lair on ps3 can run in 1080p?

When devs use the Cell the way its designed to and unlike with todays multiplat games that r nothing but ps2 and xbox games in higher def the PS3 just destroys xbox360 in the graphics department.

Chetnik07

Weres your proof?

Xbox360: 500 million Tris per Sec.

PS3: 275/333 million Tris per sec.

KillaHalo2o9

The PS3 can push more than that.

[QUOTE="KillaHalo2o9"]

Xbox360: 500 million Tris per Sec.

PS3: 275/333 million Tris per sec.

Wasdie

The PS3 can push more than that.

Not what I have read, but if you have a link that would be nice.

lol get your facts straight cow:shock:

this tread fails for lack of evidence :D

where is my proof?

u didnt hear that Halo3 is not in HD?

Lair is 1080p with all that stuff on the screen and yet halo3 cant even manage few enemies on screen at 720p

[QUOTE="Chetnik07"]

ps3 can output twice the polygons than x360.

KillaHalo2o9

Nope

http://www.xploder.net/xbox-360/news/2284/PS3-Half-Polygon-Performance-Of-360-.htm

Extremely outdated and debunked information provided in that link....

esp the 16MB/s thing....I think that was broken by a site called "The Inquirer" and it has been proven false.