It's Official: PS3 Has The Best Library Ever (Says Famitsu)

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for MrGanny
MrGanny

2911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 MrGanny
Member since 2009 • 2911 Posts

Gamecube is 3rd place, nice!

''Former Sony Computer Entertainment head Ken Kutaragi (above) may not be all that happy about how his PlayStation 3 is officially the heaviest game console ever released. But there's another statistic that he'd likely be more delighted to hear: According to a survey of Famitsu magazine's review scores, the PS3 has the highest-quality game library out of any console currently in the marketplace.

According to figures released in the current issue, 77 out of the 171 PS3 games Famitsu has reviewed as of the end of 2009 received a total score of 32/40 or greater, qualifying it for a Gold award. This means that 45.05% of the PS3's library in Japan is "gold" -- according to Famitsu's review staff, anyway.

This puts the PS3 just slightly ahead of the Xbox 360 percentage-wise -- over in Japan, 104 out of 240 360 titles reviewed got gold awards, 43.33% of the library. The good news continues in the portable realm, with 23.2 percent of PSP titles going gold versus 17.14% of Nintendo DS releases.''

And the first top 5:

1. PlayStation 3 (77/171, 45.03%)
2. Xbox 360 (104/240, 43.33%)
3. GameCube (87/240, 36.25%)
4. PSP (90/388, 23.20%)
5. Xbox (40/185, 21.62%)

http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3178474

Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#2 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts

This just in!

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=27235130&tag=topics;title

Ok, it was on page 10, I'll give ya this one. :P

Avatar image for SilentlyMad
SilentlyMad

2093

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 SilentlyMad
Member since 2009 • 2093 Posts

Its official the 360 has better games according to Famitsu 104 quality games to 77. OH SNAP the PS3 still can not win something but enjoy your %

Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#4 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts
So 360 having 27 games more with 32/40 or greater score even though the percentage is lower means PS3 has the best library???!!!! Let alone its based on user game rating on a videogame side ( accurate much )
Avatar image for XanderZane
XanderZane

5174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 XanderZane
Member since 2006 • 5174 Posts
[QUOTE="adamosmaki"]So 360 having 27 games more with 32/40 or greater score even though the percentage is lower means PS3 has the best library???!!!! Let alone its based on user game rating on a videogame side ( accurate much )

I was scratching my head on that one as well. I was shocked that Famitsu actually gave that many Xbox 360 games high scores. Maybe they do like the XBox 360 in Japan. Well, at least they like the games. The 360 still hasn't sold nearly as many units as its competition, but they are improving with each generation.
Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#6 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts

Its official the 360 has better games according to Famitsu 104 quality games to 77. OH SNAP the PS3 still can not win something but enjoy your %

SilentlyMad
Well it won the %, by your own admission, so I guess it can win something.
Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#8 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

Its official: 1 AAA > ! AAA + 1 AA

Avatar image for SilentlyMad
SilentlyMad

2093

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 SilentlyMad
Member since 2009 • 2093 Posts
[QUOTE="SilentlyMad"]

Its official the 360 has better games according to Famitsu 104 quality games to 77. OH SNAP the PS3 still can not win something but enjoy your %

Hahadouken
Well it won the %, by your own admission, so I guess it can win something.

Wow what a victory. So if a game release one really great game over 5 years and was 100% then you would consider it the best ever?
Avatar image for SilentlyMad
SilentlyMad

2093

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 SilentlyMad
Member since 2009 • 2093 Posts

[QUOTE="SilentlyMad"]

Its official the 360 has better games according to Famitsu 104 quality games to 77. OH SNAP the PS3 still can not win something but enjoy your %

Desmonic

So 360 having 27 games more with 32/40 or greater score even though the percentage is lower means PS3 has the best library???!!!! Let alone its based on user game rating on a videogame side ( accurate much )adamosmaki

True, but it has much more games released than the PS3.So even though the Xbox 360 has more 32/40 games, it's quaility/quantity ratio is lower than that of the PS3.

Maybe the ratio is lower BUT the quality and quantity of the 360 are both hight the the PS3 so what is your point that OMG I can brag about the % while 360 owners brag about better and more games?
Avatar image for deactivated-5dd711115e664
deactivated-5dd711115e664

8956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 deactivated-5dd711115e664
Member since 2005 • 8956 Posts

I have the PS3 and I agree...it has awesome games AND its the single heaviest console ever made.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts
pc says hi.
Avatar image for mgkennedy5
mgkennedy5

1501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#13 mgkennedy5
Member since 2005 • 1501 Posts
Nice! But just from one reviewer ;)
Avatar image for CwlHeddwyn
CwlHeddwyn

5314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 CwlHeddwyn
Member since 2005 • 5314 Posts

Japanese game magazine rates Japanese console with extensive library of Japanese video games that cater to Japanese game tastes over an American console that has library that caters more towards American-European game tastes? surprise surprise.

Avatar image for ogvampire
ogvampire

9210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 ogvampire
Member since 2008 • 9210 Posts

[QUOTE="SilentlyMad"][QUOTE="Desmonic"]

True, but it has much more games released than the PS3.So even though the Xbox 360 has more 32/40 games, it's quaility/quantity ratio is lower than that of the PS3.

Desmonic

Maybe the ratio is lower BUT the quality and quantity of the 360 are both hight the the PS3 so what is your point that OMG I can brag about the % while 360 owners brag about better and more games?

My point is: QUANTITY =/= QUALITY. You might have more 32/40 games, but you have much more crappy games released as well.

ALso "better games" is subjective. There is a user here on SW that finds the iPhone games to be better than those on the DS and the PSP.

who cares about crappy games? when you buy a console, you are interested in the 'good games'

therefore, a console with more 'good' games has the better library... in whomever opinion you would like to use. percentages for the most part are just used to twist facts

Avatar image for misterbutt
misterbutt

193

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#17 misterbutt
Member since 2006 • 193 Posts

i must have missed alot of psp games cuz i thought its library sucked. still dont regret selling it, went towards ps3

Avatar image for tagyhag
tagyhag

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 tagyhag
Member since 2007 • 15874 Posts

I'd have to be pretty stupid to base the quality of a console based on percentages and not actual numbers. :P

Avatar image for ballistic3188
ballistic3188

109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 ballistic3188
Member since 2007 • 109 Posts
percentage means nothing. because you don't randomly grab into a game bin to buy your games. you have instead would only buy quality games. by the numbers 104 quality xbox games and 77 quality ps3 games to choose from. from that basis xbox is better.
Avatar image for SammoHH
SammoHH

204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 SammoHH
Member since 2010 • 204 Posts

[QUOTE="ogvampire"]

[QUOTE="Desmonic"]

My point is: QUANTITY =/= QUALITY. You might have more 32/40 games, but you have much more crappy games released as well.

ALso "better games" is subjective. There is a user here on SW that finds the iPhone games to be better than those on the DS and the PSP.

Desmonic

who cares about crappy games? when you buy a console, you are interested in the 'good games'

therefore, a console with more 'good' games has the better library... in whomever opinion you would like to use. percentages for the most part are just used to twist facts

You don't seem to get it. If I release 171 games for a console and out of those 171 games 77 are widely considered "great games" and 94 "average or below average games" it means that I've released a better libraby than someone who released 240 games and has 104 widely considered "great games" and 136 "average and below average games". Why? Because while my librabry is smaller it is also much more consistent and solid than the one of the 2nd person. This is simple math and logic. BUT, as I've said before "better" is very subjective. So to each it's own.

104 AAA games >>>>> 77 AAA games.

Stop trying to spin it. :lol:

Avatar image for marklarmer
marklarmer

3883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#23 marklarmer
Member since 2004 • 3883 Posts

the harder console to develop for has less shovelware, well there's a no-brainer :|

Avatar image for SammoHH
SammoHH

204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 SammoHH
Member since 2010 • 204 Posts

[QUOTE="SammoHH"]

[QUOTE="Desmonic"] You don't seem to get it. If I release 171 games for a console and out of those 171 games 77 are widely considered "great games" and 94 "average or below average games" it means that I've released a better libraby than someone who released 240 games and has 104 widely considered "great games" and 136 "average and below average games". Why? Because while my librabry is smaller it is also much more consistent and solid than the one of the 2nd person. This is simple math and logic. BUT, as I've said before "better" is very subjective. So to each it's own.Desmonic

104 AAA games >>>>> 77 AAA games.

Stop trying to spin it. :lol:

Actually your the one spinning it. 77/171 = 45.03% >>>>>>>>> 104/240=43.33% Also Xbox 360=136 crappy games PS3=94 crappy games.

Oh man. :lol: The irony is too strong with your post. I don't think I can go on here...

104 AAA games >>>>> 77 AAA games.

Spinning it won't change the fact that the 360 has many more AAA games than the PS3 according to Famitsu.

You should realize that the article is a satire. You're just owning yourself.

Avatar image for Superbored
Superbored

1187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Superbored
Member since 2008 • 1187 Posts

[QUOTE="SammoHH"]

[QUOTE="Desmonic"] You don't seem to get it. If I release 171 games for a console and out of those 171 games 77 are widely considered "great games" and 94 "average or below average games" it means that I've released a better libraby than someone who released 240 games and has 104 widely considered "great games" and 136 "average and below average games". Why? Because while my librabry is smaller it is also much more consistent and solid than the one of the 2nd person. This is simple math and logic. BUT, as I've said before "better" is very subjective. So to each it's own.Desmonic

104 AAA games >>>>> 77 AAA games.

Stop trying to spin it. :lol:

Actually your the one spinning it. 77/171 = 45.03% >>>>>>>>> 104/240=43.33% Also Xbox 360=136 crappy games PS3=94 crappy games.

Alright, while you're playing with your percentage points I'm going to go play the 27 more AAA titles on the 360.

Avatar image for ogvampire
ogvampire

9210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 ogvampire
Member since 2008 • 9210 Posts

[QUOTE="SammoHH"]

[QUOTE="Desmonic"] You don't seem to get it. If I release 171 games for a console and out of those 171 games 77 are widely considered "great games" and 94 "average or below average games" it means that I've released a better libraby than someone who released 240 games and has 104 widely considered "great games" and 136 "average and below average games". Why? Because while my librabry is smaller it is also much more consistent and solid than the one of the 2nd person. This is simple math and logic. BUT, as I've said before "better" is very subjective. So to each it's own.Desmonic

104 AAA games >>>>> 77 AAA games.

Stop trying to spin it. :lol:

Actually your the one spinning it. 77/171 = 45.03% >>>>>>>>> 104/240=43.33% Also Xbox 360=136 crappy games PS3=94 crappy games.

with your logic, it also means that the psp has a better library than the ps2, ps1, and SNES... lol!!!

Avatar image for JuarN18
JuarN18

4981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 JuarN18
Member since 2007 • 4981 Posts

Nice self ownage is nice
Good damage control also

Avatar image for ogvampire
ogvampire

9210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 ogvampire
Member since 2008 • 9210 Posts

[QUOTE="ogvampire"]

[QUOTE="Desmonic"] Actually your the one spinning it. 77/171 = 45.03% >>>>>>>>> 104/240=43.33% Also Xbox 360=136 crappy games PS3=94 crappy games. Desmonic

with your logic, it also means that the psp has a better library than the ps2, ps1, and SNES... lol!!!

A more consistent library, yes. Whether or not it has more AAA's that's another story.

so to you, a better library is the consistent one, even though it has much fewer games.... thats fine, but i would take a guess and say that the vast majority of people would rather have more 'good' games then a consistent library

Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts

[QUOTE="ogvampire"]

[QUOTE="Desmonic"] A more consistent library, yes. Whether or not it has more AAA's that's another story.Desmonic

no. you have been saying that this percentage proves that it has a better library, not a more consistent one

kinda changing your argument a little there

Actually what I said was that the if a library is more consistent then it's better. Or wouldn't you agree that if the either the Wii or PS3 or Xbox 360 had say 100 games each and out of those 100, 50 or more games were great it would be better for the consumer? But yes, in my opinion a better library is a more consistent one.

why does more consistent matter? you don't have to play the "bad" games.

Avatar image for farnham
farnham

21147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 farnham
Member since 2003 • 21147 Posts

famitsu is the same publication that gave nintendogs a 40 out of 40..

not saying that it doesnt deserve it.. just throwing it out there

Avatar image for JuarN18
JuarN18

4981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 JuarN18
Member since 2007 • 4981 Posts
[QUOTE="Desmonic"] Actually what I said was that the if a library is more consistent then it's better.

games are like soup now?
Avatar image for red12355
red12355

1251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 red12355
Member since 2007 • 1251 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="Desmonic"] Actually what I said was that the if a library is more consistent then it's better. Or wouldn't you agree that if the either the Wii or PS3 or Xbox 360 had say 100 games each and out of those 100, 50 or more games were great it would be better for the consumer? But yes, in my opinion a better library is a more consistent one. Desmonic

why does more consistent matter? you don't have to play the "bad" games.

True. but it means that there is a better quality control on the games released and you don't end up like the WIi.. loads of shovelware and a couple of good title only..

1. Using Famitsu scores only does not make it "official"-- different reviewers have different tastes.

2. The XBox 360 is only 1.7% less consistant. Are you saying that that 1.7% is better than 27 extra good games?

3. The only "quality control" that Microsoft/Sony (and Nintendo) do is on first/2nd party games. The to force "quality control" on the majority of the games (3rd) party would only waste time and money. The only reason that the Wii has all the shovelware is because the cost to produce the games is relitively low compared to the x360 and ps3.

Avatar image for lafiro93
lafiro93

2076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 lafiro93
Member since 2010 • 2076 Posts

While you guys suck on your 1.7% we will play our 27 great games. :D that was fun

Avatar image for toxicmog
toxicmog

6355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 toxicmog
Member since 2006 • 6355 Posts
lol wtf, PS1 or PS2 had better titles than what we have now, more decent exclusives.
Avatar image for SammoHH
SammoHH

204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 SammoHH
Member since 2010 • 204 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="Desmonic"] Actually what I said was that the if a library is more consistent then it's better. Or wouldn't you agree that if the either the Wii or PS3 or Xbox 360 had say 100 games each and out of those 100, 50 or more games were great it would be better for the consumer? But yes, in my opinion a better library is a more consistent one. Desmonic

why does more consistent matter? you don't have to play the "bad" games.

True. but it means that there is a better quality control on the games released and you don't end up like the WIi.. loads of shovelware and a couple of good title only..

So what? You're not forced to play the bad games.

You've been proven wrong so many times. Just let it go while you still can.

Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="Desmonic"] Actually what I said was that the if a library is more consistent then it's better. Or wouldn't you agree that if the either the Wii or PS3 or Xbox 360 had say 100 games each and out of those 100, 50 or more games were great it would be better for the consumer? But yes, in my opinion a better library is a more consistent one. Desmonic

why does more consistent matter? you don't have to play the "bad" games.

True. but it means that there is a better quality control on the games released and you don't end up like the WIi.. loads of shovelware and a couple of good title only..

you're not making sense. would you rather have a system with more or fewer good games? your whole "consistency" thing is irrelevant.

Avatar image for ogvampire
ogvampire

9210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 ogvampire
Member since 2008 • 9210 Posts

[QUOTE="red12355"]

[QUOTE="Desmonic"] True. but it means that there is a better quality control on the games released and you don't end up like the WIi.. loads of shovelware and a couple of good title only..Desmonic

1. Using Famitsu scores only does not make it "official"-- different reviewers have different tastes.

2. The XBox 360 is only 1.7% less consistant. Are you saying that that 1.7% is better than 27 extra good games?

3. The only "quality control" that Microsoft/Sony (and Nintendo) do is on first/2nd party games. The to force "quality control" on the majority of the games (3rd) party would only waste time and money. The only reason that the Wii has all the shovelware is because the cost to produce the games is relitively low compared to the x360 and ps3.

1- Never did I say that it was official.

2- For me, yes. Is there a problem?

3- But they should. The Wii has way to much shovelware and the PS3 and Xbox 360 are starting to suffer a bit from that as well, since the production cost are now lower then 3/4 years ago. Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft should aprove wheter or not those shovelware games are released to their consoles. IMO it would only benefit the overall quality of the games, and the costumer as well.

i have a feeling that youre sticking with point #2 only for the purpose of this argument.... not willing to admit faulty logic

Avatar image for Mario1331
Mario1331

8929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#46 Mario1331
Member since 2005 • 8929 Posts

why isnt the ps2 in this?and this doesnt make sense at all doesnt the ps3 have a lower percentile of games rated 32/40 and higer then the 360

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts

I have the PS3 and I agree...it has awesome games AND its the single heaviest console ever made.

ZIMdoom
really? i thought the original xbox weighed more.
Avatar image for Miroku32
Miroku32

8666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#48 Miroku32
Member since 2006 • 8666 Posts
Old news, this was posted before.
Avatar image for ogvampire
ogvampire

9210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 ogvampire
Member since 2008 • 9210 Posts

why isnt the ps2 in this?and this doesnt make sense at all doesnt the ps3 have a lower percentile of games rated 32/40 and higer then the 360

Mario1331

it is, but its lower on the list than even the PSP... which proves that this way of figuring which library is best is insta-fail