it's safe to say WII graphics won't look any better than they do now.

let's be honest here, no violence please. WII is graphically a gamecube with a motion sensing under the hood, if you deny that then i feel bad for you cause WII isn't about to sprout any more polygons out of thin air. the GC had already been unlocked-- what you're seeing now (with WII), guys, is the real deal. this is WII pumping it's best graphics. there'll be no "untapping" in now or the future. see how bad mario galaxy looks!

http://image.gamespotcdn.com/gamespot/images/2007/066/915692_20070308_screen002.jpg

http://image.gamespotcdn.com/gamespot/images/2007/066/915692_20070308_screen004.jpg

http://image.gamespotcdn.com/gamespot/images/2006/256/915692_20060914_screen001.jpg

http://image.gamespotcdn.com/gamespot/images/2007/066/915692_20070308_screen001.jpg (mario dying of his own jaggies! :lol: )

Those screens do not do SMG justice and you know it...

And no, the Wii is more powerful than the gamecube...

The Wii is more powerful than Gamecube. If you deny that, you obviously haven't researched the system specs.Overthrow

if it's more powerful shouldn't the nitendo mascot look a tiny bit better? because he is the most important top dog, but right now he is jaggalicious :lol:  !! 

The Wii is more powerful than the cube. Its sad to see the many developers havent properly utilized the console. I mean, half the games on the wii are essentailly ports of PS2 games. Once the PS2 dies, maybe we will actually see some Wii games that dont look horrible.

 Metroid, SMG, Brawl though.. all look fantastic. 

[QUOTE="Overthrow"]The Wii is more powerful than Gamecube. If you deny that, you obviously haven't researched the system specs.MrBlackbeard

if it's more powerful shouldn't the nitendo mascot look a tiny bit better? because he is the most important top dog, but right now he is jaggalicious :lol: !!

Again... watch the video. Super Mario Galaxy looks awesome for a Wii game. Better than a Cube game.

Linked.

http://image.gamespotcdn.com/gamespot/images/2007/066/915692_20070308_screen002.jpg

http://image.gamespotcdn.com/gamespot/images/2007/066/915692_20070308_screen002.jpg

http://image.gamespotcdn.com/gamespot/images/2007/066/915692_20070308_screen002.jpg

http://image.gamespotcdn.com/gamespot/images/2007/066/915692_20070308_screen002.jpg

It's safe to say Wii haters won't come up with any unique arguments anytime soon.Hoffgod

Linked.

http://image.gamespotcdn.com/gamespot/images/2007/066/915692_20070308_screen002.jpg

http://image.gamespotcdn.com/gamespot/images/2007/066/915692_20070308_screen002.jpg

http://image.gamespotcdn.com/gamespot/images/2007/066/915692_20070308_screen002.jpg

http://image.gamespotcdn.com/gamespot/images/2007/066/915692_20070308_screen002.jpg

dmaximum

you linked all four of the same pics :lol:

Just something for people to consider when they talk about the Wii.

Most Development Companies did little to nothing on the Gamecube. The Wii uses enhanced processor and GPU from the Gamecube Family. Its all around about double the potential of the Gamecube.

With the lack of experiance using the flipper family based GPUs etc Most developers are getting their first real look at the components to develop with.

Those who have past experiance you can see it in their work. The ignored nintendo during GC days crowd shows it too by the lack of knowledge.

How can Wii fanboys disagree with this topic!? I bought Zelda for the Wii but didn't like how it played with the Wiimote so I bought it for Gamecube and guess what!!?? It looks the same:shock:4_Horsemen

you barely know anything about the wii. Zelda: TP Wii version is a PORT. It was originally made for GC. Sigh... Stupid fanboys. 

How can Wii fanboys disagree with this topic!? I bought Zelda for the Wii but didn't like how it played with the Wiimote so I bought it for Gamecube and guess what!!?? It looks the same:shock:4_Horsemen

OH MY GOD! A port looks the same. That's it, I'm convinced.

Wii = GC 

[QUOTE="Overthrow"]The Wii is more powerful than Gamecube. If you deny that, you obviously haven't researched the system specs.MrBlackbeard

if it's more powerful shouldn't the nitendo mascot look a tiny bit better? because he is the most important top dog, but right now he is jaggalicious :lol: !!

Funny. You sure picked pictures that completly misrepresented the great graphics of the game... which kind of nullifies your whole topic.

Those who have past experiance you can see it in their work. The ignored nintendo during GC days crowd shows it too by the lack of knowledge.alecsuba

Besides Nintendo themselves, which other developer is showing this? And Ubisoft has worked on Gamecube a lot, it sure doesnt shw on the Wii right now. Now they said they will concentrate more, but I'll wait and see.

bu bu its teh beta!! :|

[QUOTE="alecsuba"] Those who have past experiance you can see it in their work. The ignored nintendo during GC days crowd shows it too by the lack of knowledge.PhoebusFlows

Besides Nintendo themselves, which other developer is showing this? And Ubisoft has worked on Gamecube a lot, it sure doesnt shw on the Wii right now. Now they said they will concentrate more, but I'll wait and see.

Red Steel looked Decent and aside from some rushed areas was good enough for a luanch title graphically. Its hard to judge too many developers yet because  most games are ports and the made from scratch are coming.

Ports will always suffer in areas. if the developers with their ground up games keep sucking then they have issues. EA seems to be having a good time on the Wii. Harry Potter looks good. Boogie has good graphics as well. FF: CC looks great on the Wii as well by SE.

Ubisoftcertainly pushed lots of money to get red steel rushed for launch. In their own words they wanted to be there first no matter what happened

How can Wii fanboys disagree with this topic!? I bought Zelda for the Wii but didn't like how it played with the Wiimote so I bought it for Gamecube and guess what!!?? It looks the same:shock:4_Horsemen

Nobody ever disputed Twilight Princess for the Wii was supposed to look better. It was no secret it was built for the Gamecube so stop trying to find an argument where there is not one.

In fact in an interview the director said that the development team lobbied to up the visuals for the Wii in the extra time they had with the last delay but the request was shot down and focus instead was spent on tweaking the game to perfection.

I agree the Wii visuals have been slightly dissapointing. But for the foreseeable future it just doen't matter, Nintendo's own software lineup this year looks incredibly fun. But hey, wheres the shiny character models and plasticy walls, right? Who cares, Wii owners knew what they were getting into a long time ago. 

This thread is just another fanboy trying feverishly to justify why Nintendo's "inferior" hardware is tearing up the sales charts. Anti-Nintendo people just can't wrap their head around teh success of the Wii.

They may not, but wii games have a general cartonny look to them most of the time and the hardware is more then ennough to do that. I dont like wii but at the end of the day its not really ment to have halo 3 graphics. dudy80