It's thanks to Sony that The Elder Scrolls Online is coming to next gen consoles

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for id_mew
id_mew

608

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 id_mew
Member since 2007 • 608 Posts

 I love how Sony puts gamers first.

Link: http://ca.ign.com/articles/2013/09/07/sony-pushed-for-the-elder-scrolls-online-to-come-to-consoles

Avatar image for CanYouDiglt
CanYouDiglt

8500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 CanYouDiglt
Member since 2009 • 8500 Posts
The fact it is on consoles is what turned me off from this game. It is sad how many mmos are going the easy action style for casuals.
Avatar image for Sweenix
Sweenix

5957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

#3 Sweenix
Member since 2013 • 5957 Posts

Thank you sony

Avatar image for campzor
campzor

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 campzor
Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts
I dont think anyone yet alone sony should be thanked for bringing trash to us gamers.
Avatar image for FoxbatAlpha
FoxbatAlpha

10669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 FoxbatAlpha
Member since 2009 • 10669 Posts
Thank you Lord Kaz for your greatness. Lol
Avatar image for treedoor
treedoor

7648

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 treedoor
Member since 2004 • 7648 Posts

The fact it is on consoles is what turned me off from this game. It is sad how many mmos are going the easy action style for casuals.CanYouDiglt

Avatar image for CJ_ofCamelot
CJ_ofCamelot

2072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 CJ_ofCamelot
Member since 2013 • 2072 Posts
I dont think anyone yet alone sony should be thanked for bringing trash to us gamers.campzor
This of it as more of a infrastructure beta test for future games not smitten by bethesda.
Avatar image for Basinboy
Basinboy

14558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#9 Basinboy
Member since 2003 • 14558 Posts

And who is going to buy it and pay the subs?

Avatar image for V3rciS
V3rciS

2241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 V3rciS
Member since 2011 • 2241 Posts

I shed a tear.... thank you Sony!

Avatar image for Consternated
Consternated

848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Consternated
Member since 2013 • 848 Posts
The fact it is on consoles is what turned me off from this game. It is sad how many mmos are going the easy action style for casuals.CanYouDiglt
This. FF14 suffers because of it... Anyway, it's no big loss, TES has been bad for a years.
Avatar image for Nintendo_Man
Nintendo_Man

19733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#12 Nintendo_Man
Member since 2003 • 19733 Posts

$60 ($120 here in Australia) for the game plus $15 a month subscription on consoles, this is going to go free to play very quickly.

Avatar image for Rattlesnake_8
Rattlesnake_8

18452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#13 Rattlesnake_8
Member since 2004 • 18452 Posts
Meh, bring on the next single player Elder Scrolls game!
Avatar image for Lief_Ericson
Lief_Ericson

7082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Lief_Ericson
Member since 2005 • 7082 Posts

[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]The fact it is on consoles is what turned me off from this game. It is sad how many mmos are going the easy action style for casuals.treedoor

Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts

Congrats peasents. I will give you this one. Sony defiantly has your back it seems.

Avatar image for Joedgabe
Joedgabe

5134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#16 Joedgabe
Member since 2006 • 5134 Posts

i'm pretty sure they had to beg for it while they'd LOLOLOLOLOL money!!! $$$$$$

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

sounds like bullshyt and the reason i believe that is why would sony not just adapt everquest over if they wanted an mmo so badly?

this story has a major plot hole.

Avatar image for k2theswiss
k2theswiss

16599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 1

#18 k2theswiss
Member since 2007 • 16599 Posts

And who is going to buy it and pay the subs?

Basinboy
ya i don't buy games + a sub... it's one or the other
Avatar image for gago-gago
gago-gago

12138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 gago-gago
Member since 2009 • 12138 Posts
Isn't this $15 a month now, yeah thanks Sony. :|
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#20 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

first diablo 3, now this....consoles are just raking those high quality RPGs!  /sarcasm

Avatar image for Trail_Mix
Trail_Mix

2579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Trail_Mix
Member since 2011 • 2579 Posts

Eh... thanks, Sony... I guess.

Avatar image for deactivated-5bda06edf37ee
deactivated-5bda06edf37ee

4675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#23 deactivated-5bda06edf37ee
Member since 2010 • 4675 Posts

my body is not ready.

i'd rather have a new singleplayer TES.

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#24 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
Thankyou SONY, big time, Elder scrolls is my Fave game series:)
Avatar image for kaealy
kaealy

2179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 kaealy
Member since 2004 • 2179 Posts
So, Sony ruined another MMO? All MMO:s that are both for PC and console is lackluster at best.
Avatar image for AtariKidX
AtariKidX

7166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#26 AtariKidX
Member since 2010 • 7166 Posts
Thanks SONY.......:cool:
Avatar image for tumle
tumle

1274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 tumle
Member since 2004 • 1274 Posts

The fact it is on consoles is what turned me off from this game. It is sad how many mmos are going the easy action style for casuals.CanYouDiglt

Yes us true hardcore gamers are not happy with this kind of mainstreaming and dumming down of things..:P

 

real games should play like this:P

http://youtu.be/0Gy9hJauXns

Avatar image for omho88
omho88

3967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 omho88
Member since 2007 • 3967 Posts

I never liked online RPGs so I don't care.

Avatar image for Raziel831991
Raziel831991

631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Raziel831991
Member since 2013 • 631 Posts

Isn't this $15 a month now, yeah thanks Sony. :|gago-gago

Even though I love Sony I have to agree

Avatar image for pelvist
pelvist

9001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#30 pelvist
Member since 2010 • 9001 Posts

They probably anticipated it would flop on PC and needed more people to buy it, it looks crap and they probably had to beg sony to allow it on their console.

Avatar image for uninspiredcup
uninspiredcup

62649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 2

#31 uninspiredcup
Member since 2013 • 62649 Posts

Thank you for dumbing the game down to work on control pads. Nice work Sony, now children can enjoy it.

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#32 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17911 Posts

Bethesda only planned to launch its upcoming MMO The Elder Scrolls Online on PC and Mac until Sony intervened, reveals SCEA VP Adam Boyes.


SD

Avatar image for darius343
darius343

62

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 darius343
Member since 2013 • 62 Posts

 

 

They probably anticipated it would flop on PC and needed more people to buy it, it looks crap and they probably had to beg sony to allow it on their console.

pelvist

 

The game has 3 million beta testers frothing at the mouth to try out, the game is still a long way off to release. There has been no major marketing on Bethesda, this game will be far from a flop. If a shit game like Guild Wars 2 can sell 3.5 mil than an Elder Scrolls can sure as hell sell more. Especially if its being sold on both consoles and pc. 

Avatar image for deactivated-594be627b82ba
deactivated-594be627b82ba

8405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#34 deactivated-594be627b82ba
Member since 2006 • 8405 Posts
Meh, bring on the next single player Elder Scrolls game!Rattlesnake_8
Avatar image for pelvist
pelvist

9001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#35 pelvist
Member since 2010 • 9001 Posts

 

 

[QUOTE="pelvist"]

They probably anticipated it would flop on PC and needed more people to buy it, it looks crap and they probably had to beg sony to allow it on their console.

darius343

 

The game has 3 million beta testers frothing at the mouth to try out, the game is still a long way off to release. There has been no major marketing on Bethesda, this game will be far from a flop. If a shit game like Guild Wars 2 can sell 3.5 mil than an Elder Scrolls can sure as hell sell more. Especially if its being sold on both consoles and pc. 

 

GW2 didnt need a console sized marketing budget. 3 million beta testers or 3 million frothing at the mouth to try it out? Which one is it?

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

sounds like bullshyt and the reason i believe that is why would sony not just adapt everquest over if they wanted an mmo so badly?

this story has a major plot hole.

Desmonic

EverQuest Next is also coming though....

However more options for a brand new platform =/= bad. If it were say in 3-4 years time, I would agree that Sony should be a bit more selective of what 3rd party games it would/should support, but since the goal right now is to get a decent amount of games and genres into the platform (thus having something for everyone, be it bad or not) I can easily see this story being 100% true.

It falls right in line with what Sony and MS seem to be trying to do in the first year(s) of their consoles.

it still makes very little sense.

one of the everquests could have been ported over and it would have been sony raking in that subscription fee and it would not have had anything to compete with.

eq and eq frontiers was one of my favorite mmos of all time and it was on ps2.

why not recreate that on the ps4?

like i said.

when there is a plot hole this huge it makes me question the original statement.

could sony have been begging for elder scrolls?

sure they could have, but why?

and if they were begging why did they not go for a deal to keep it only on ps4?

this was probably just some throwaway hype generation that they wanted to get out for some reason but took no effort to think through or worry about the questions it  raises.

maybe eq next will be on ps4 and sony wanted there to be a subscription mmo to throw their f2p one into contrast with.

Avatar image for blackace
blackace

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#37 blackace
Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts

 I love how Sony puts gamers first.

Link: http://ca.ign.com/articles/2013/09/07/sony-pushed-for-the-elder-scrolls-online-to-come-to-consoles

id_mew

Yeah, and it will cost $15 a month to play it. LOL!! Thanks Sony. Maybe all your kiss @$$ Cows will be playing it on the PS4. I won't be wasting my money on this unless it goes F2P. I've wasted at least $1000+ on WoW, EQ2, Asherons Call 1 & 2, Planetside and a few other MMO's. Only MMO's I'm playing now is GW2 and Planetside 2 with no fees.

Avatar image for blackace
blackace

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#39 blackace
Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts

And who is going to buy it and pay the subs?

Basinboy

Cows. :lol: Since they are the only ones thanking Sony for this crap.

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

[QUOTE="Desmonic"] EverQuest Next is also coming though....

However more options for a brand new platform =/= bad. If it were say in 3-4 years time, I would agree that Sony should be a bit more selective of what 3rd party games it would/should support, but since the goal right now is to get a decent amount of games and genres into the platform (thus having something for everyone, be it bad or not) I can easily see this story being 100% true.

It falls right in line with what Sony and MS seem to be trying to do in the first year(s) of their consoles.

Desmonic

it still makes very little sense.

one of the everquests could have been ported over and it would have been sony raking in that subscription fee and it would not have had anything to compete with.

eq and eq frontiers was one of my favorite mmos of all time and it was on ps2.

why not recreate that on the ps4?

like i said.

when there is a plot hole this huge it makes me question the original statement.

could sony have been begging for elder scrolls?

sure they could have, but why?

and if they were begging why did they not go for a deal to keep it only on ps4?

this was probably just some throwaway hype generation that they wanted to get out for some reason but took no effort to think through or worry about the questions it  raises.

maybe eq next will be on ps4 and sony wanted there to be a subscription mmo to throw their f2p one into contrast with.

What would be the point in porting a PS2 MMO when the EQ team is already working on the sequel (which has an 80% chance of ending up on the PS4 given Sony's behaviour lately)? It would be just wasted time and money. With EQ Next looming I doubt a port of an older EQ would do much. This way they get a 3rd party MMO, from another very big franchise as well, without spending nearly the same amount of time and money they would have to otherwise. (addind to other MMO-ish games like Planetside 2, Warframe, etc)

 

Now obviously I don't think Sony made the game "possible" on next-gen consoles, the interest from Bethesda had to be there from the start. Perhaps them (Sony) pushing for it and making it easy and simple to make a decent port was the final "push" Bethesda needed to approach consoles with this game. 

lol, i'm not talking about doing eq frontiers or anything that thing would make you want to claw your eyes out.

i just think the ps4 would run a mean version of whatever the latest eq is and sony could have had that subscription money and no competition.

anyway i had forgotten about eq next so maybe that is what will go to the ps4.

since sony has such a hardon for f2p right now that would make sense to me.

then they would have elder scrolls and elder scrolls would make the f2p eq more appealing.

Avatar image for ShaineTheNerd
ShaineTheNerd

1578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 ShaineTheNerd
Member since 2012 • 1578 Posts
The fact it is on consoles is what turned me off from this game. It is sad how many mmos are going the easy action style for casuals.CanYouDiglt
Avatar image for blackace
blackace

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#42 blackace
Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts

[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]The fact it is on consoles is what turned me off from this game. It is sad how many mmos are going the easy action style for casuals.ShaineTheNerd

I don't care that it's on consoles at all. I care that they want to charge you $15 a month to play it. No Thanks.

Now if the PS4 gets EQ Next I'll be all over that. I'd might go the PC route though as it would probably get the patches and DLC faster.

I refuse to pay fees for an MMO anymore. I'd gladly pay for extra DLC every 2-3 months. I honestly have no problems buying the game as long as I'm not paying crazy fees every money.

Avatar image for k2theswiss
k2theswiss

16599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 1

#43 k2theswiss
Member since 2007 • 16599 Posts
Isn't this $15 a month now, yeah thanks Sony. :|gago-gago
lol. it's a mmo. SUB was going be there either way lol
Avatar image for Miroku32
Miroku32

8666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#44 Miroku32
Member since 2006 • 8666 Posts
Poor cows, $15 per month + the fee for play online on PS4 (unless of course, they decide to give up playing online the other games). And they still thanks Sony :lol:
Avatar image for k2theswiss
k2theswiss

16599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 1

#45 k2theswiss
Member since 2007 • 16599 Posts
Poor cows, $15 per month + the fee for play online on PS4 (unless of course, they decide to give up playing online the other games). And they still thanks Sony :lol:Miroku32
At least Sony is removing that psn+ for f2p/p2p games... MS won't even do that
Avatar image for AHUGECAT
AHUGECAT

8967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 AHUGECAT
Member since 2006 • 8967 Posts

Thanks Sony, now I can play this on my Xbox One.

Lol, Sony had the perfect opportunity for a console exclusive and blew it...

Avatar image for Master_ShakeXXX
Master_ShakeXXX

13361

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 142

User Lists: 0

#47 Master_ShakeXXX
Member since 2008 • 13361 Posts

$14.99 a month subscription fee? Are they off their f*cking rocker? I was actually interested in ESO until I read that bit. They're nuts.