I've Seen Battlefield 3 On PS3. It's Spectacular.

  • 68 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for -Renegade
-Renegade

8340

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#1 -Renegade
Member since 2007 • 8340 Posts

The last time I saw Kevin O'Leary he had a beard. A tier-one beard. These day's he's wrangling press for Battlefield 3.

Later I went back and played through a multiplayer level of the game on a computer, just to refresh my memory. Initially there isn't a lot of difference to notice.

Things look very similar, but then I start to notice some subtle differences. The lighting is the biggest difference. In the Playstation 3 version the shadows cast across the opening sequence are sharper, there's less subtlety in the way the light is diffused.

When my teammates fire, their barrels don't spew out smoke that quickly dissipates. In the PC version the entire parking lot seems to be clouded with debris, smoke and dust, in the PS3 version the same scene seems clearer, cleaner.

But these are the sort of differences you'd only notice if you were looking for them. At first blush, the Playstation 3 version of Battlefield 3 is every bit as impressive as the computer version.

Source

Nothing about the Xbox 360's version...

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

But these are the sort of differences you'd only notice if you were looking for them. At first blush, the Playstation 3 version of Battlefield 3 is every bit as impressive as the computer version.

-Renegade

PS3 scene seems clearer, cleaner? Lack of detail and cruddy resolution now means it's better! Are they really trying to suggest that the PS3 version can stand with the PC version? :|

I'm done with the hate tonight :P

Avatar image for UCF_Knight
UCF_Knight

6863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 UCF_Knight
Member since 2010 • 6863 Posts
I like how everyone either says it looks awful or it looks amazing. How about what it will actually be, a decent looking game that, like with almost any other game, happens to look/run better on the PC.
Avatar image for edidili
edidili

3449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 edidili
Member since 2004 • 3449 Posts

It can't look clearer, cleaner in a much lower resolution with no AA. That's just ridiculous.

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

I like how everyone either says it looks awful or it looks amazing. How about what it will actually be, a decent looking game that, like with almost any other game, happens to look/run better on the PC.UCF_Knight

Awful by PC standards, amazing by console standards.

We really need some direct footage from the real game. No beta testing or anything. Real footage from the real game.

Avatar image for UCF_Knight
UCF_Knight

6863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 UCF_Knight
Member since 2010 • 6863 Posts

[QUOTE="UCF_Knight"]I like how everyone either says it looks awful or it looks amazing. How about what it will actually be, a decent looking game that, like with almost any other game, happens to look/run better on the PC.ChubbyGuy40

Awful by PC standards, amazing by console standards.

We really need some direct footage from the real game. No beta testing or anything. Real footage from the real game.

Awful? As in it'll be almost unrecognizable and you'll have to tell your kids to look away?
Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

Awful? As in it'll be almost unrecognizable and you'll have to tell your kids to look away?UCF_Knight

Exactly. It's going to murder your children's vision and destroy their souls if they dare to look upon such horror.

Avatar image for Birdy09
Birdy09

4775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Birdy09
Member since 2009 • 4775 Posts

The last time I saw Kevin O'Leary he had a beard. A tier-one beard. These day's he's wrangling press for Battlefield 3.

Later I went back and played through a multiplayer level of the game on a computer, just to refresh my memory. Initially there isn't a lot of difference to notice.

Things look very similar, but then I start to notice some subtle differences. The lighting is the biggest difference. In the Playstation 3 version the shadows cast across the opening sequence are sharper, there's less subtlety in the way the light is diffused.

When my teammates fire, their barrels don't spew out smoke that quickly dissipates. In the PC version the entire parking lot seems to be clouded with debris, smoke and dust, in the PS3 version the same scene seems clearer, cleaner.

But these are the sort of differences you'd only notice if you were looking for them. At first blush, the Playstation 3 version of Battlefield 3 is every bit as impressive as the computer version.

Source

Nothing about the Xbox 360's version...

-Renegade

Lmao, so wait aminute he says "Smoke and Dust and damage is alot more visable in PC version" then states "PS£ version is much clearer" .. you dont get it do you? those effects are demanding, the PS3 version being clearer isnt a good thing.

Avatar image for razgriz_101
razgriz_101

16875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 razgriz_101
Member since 2007 • 16875 Posts

It can't look clearer, cleaner in a much lower resolution with no AA. That's just ridiculous.

edidili

sonds more like he's referencing the lesser amount of particle effects on screen considering he says it looks dusty and debris filled on PC where as on the PS3 it looks cleaner.Sounds more or less like theres little to no particle effects.

Avatar image for Kickinurass
Kickinurass

3357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Kickinurass
Member since 2005 • 3357 Posts

Sounds like the PC version has a more gritty feel due to the particle effects and all. No reason to get defensive in this case guys. Clean and clear here likely mean the actual lack of dust and smoke represented on the battlefield, not resolution and fidelity of graphicss.

Avatar image for Nike_Air
Nike_Air

19737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Nike_Air
Member since 2006 • 19737 Posts

Sounds amazing. I couldn't see anything in Killzone 3 because of all the crap on screen and Resistance 3 looks the same. I want to see what I'm shooting at , thank you. I bet it's the blu-ray cell makiing the graphics clearer. PS3 version for the win.

Avatar image for razgriz_101
razgriz_101

16875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 razgriz_101
Member since 2007 • 16875 Posts

Sounds amazing. I couldn't see anything in Killzone 3 because of all the crap on screen and Resistance 3 looks the same. I want to see what I'm shooting at , thank you. I bet it's the blu-ray cell makiing the graphics clearer. PS3 version for the win.

Nike_Air

or it could just be the lack of particle effects :?

Avatar image for Jane_22
Jane_22

678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#13 Jane_22
Member since 2011 • 678 Posts

[QUOTE="-Renegade"]

But these are the sort of differences you'd only notice if you were looking for them. At first blush, the Playstation 3 version of Battlefield 3 is every bit as impressive as the computer version.

ChubbyGuy40

HHAHHOO HURR DURR

There is no way a ps3 version will be better than the pc

Avatar image for NoodleFighter
NoodleFighter

11896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 NoodleFighter
Member since 2011 • 11896 Posts

Sounds amazing. I couldn't see anything in Killzone 3 because of all the crap on screen and Resistance 3 looks the same. I want to see what I'm shooting at , thank you. I bet it's the blu-ray cell makiing the graphics clearer. PS3 version for the win.

Nike_Air

The power of the cell blurs and blooms the hell out of those games. Can't even see properly in Killzone 2/3 with all the blur and bloom flying around and covering everything.

Avatar image for Nike_Air
Nike_Air

19737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Nike_Air
Member since 2006 • 19737 Posts

[QUOTE="Nike_Air"]

Sounds amazing. I couldn't see anything in Killzone 3 because of all the crap on screen and Resistance 3 looks the same. I want to see what I'm shooting at , thank you. I bet it's the blu-ray cell makiing the graphics clearer. PS3 version for the win.

NoodleFighter

The power of the cell blurs and blooms the hell out of those games. Can't even see properly in Killzone 2/3 with all the blur and bloom flying around and covering everything.

PC engineers need to come up with a better blast processor to keep up with PS3 now and all those beast cores. This is game changer.

Avatar image for Mograine
Mograine

3666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Mograine
Member since 2006 • 3666 Posts

Consolites, defying the laws of physics since System Wars exists :P

Avatar image for kraken2109
kraken2109

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 kraken2109
Member since 2009 • 13271 Posts

People seem to be unable to understand what he means. The PS3 looks 'cleaner' because it's missing effects like smoke and subtle lighting. In other words, it's worse.

Avatar image for harshv82
harshv82

1120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#19 harshv82
Member since 2008 • 1120 Posts

[QUOTE="-Renegade"]

The last time I saw Kevin O'Leary he had a beard. A tier-one beard. These day's he's wrangling press for Battlefield 3.

Later I went back and played through a multiplayer level of the game on a computer, just to refresh my memory. Initially there isn't a lot of difference to notice.

Things look very similar, but then I start to notice some subtle differences. The lighting is the biggest difference. In the Playstation 3 version the shadows cast across the opening sequence are sharper, there's less subtlety in the way the light is diffused.

When my teammates fire, their barrels don't spew out smoke that quickly dissipates. In the PC version the entire parking lot seems to be clouded with debris, smoke and dust, in the PS3 version the same scene seems clearer, cleaner.

But these are the sort of differences you'd only notice if you were looking for them. At first blush, the Playstation 3 version of Battlefield 3 is every bit as impressive as the computer version.

Source

Nothing about the Xbox 360's version...

Birdy09

Lmao, so wait aminute he says "Smoke and Dust and damage is alot more visable in PC version" then states "PS£ version is much clearer" .. you dont get it do you? those effects are demanding, the PS3 version being clearer isnt a good thing.

Notice the keyword clearer? That mean you won't see smoke and dust in PS3 version.

Nah, just kidding. It'll look spectacular ;)

Avatar image for -Tretiak
-Tretiak

2416

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 -Tretiak
Member since 2007 • 2416 Posts

lol. now i remember why i stopped posting here

Avatar image for Harisemo
Harisemo

4133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Harisemo
Member since 2010 • 4133 Posts

It's a lie, PS3 version is 3 gens behind PC version :lol:

Avatar image for NoodleFighter
NoodleFighter

11896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 NoodleFighter
Member since 2011 • 11896 Posts

[QUOTE="NoodleFighter"]

[QUOTE="Nike_Air"]

Sounds amazing. I couldn't see anything in Killzone 3 because of all the crap on screen and Resistance 3 looks the same. I want to see what I'm shooting at , thank you. I bet it's the blu-ray cell makiing the graphics clearer. PS3 version for the win.

Nike_Air

The power of the cell blurs and blooms the hell out of those games. Can't even see properly in Killzone 2/3 with all the blur and bloom flying around and covering everything.

PC engineers need to come up with a better blast processor to keep up with PS3 now and all those beast cores. This is game changer.

OR just remove those smoke effects that clearly make the game less "detailed"

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45531 Posts

Eh, guess they feel the need to try and pump those fans up and hope they bite on the game - I'm guessing the 360 version will be 2nd best right behind PC as usual. :P

Avatar image for razgriz_101
razgriz_101

16875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#24 razgriz_101
Member since 2007 • 16875 Posts

Eh, guess they feel the need to try and pump those fans up and hope they bite on the game - I'm guessing the 360 version will be 2nd best right behind PC as usual. :P

SecretPolice

Thats debatable :P we've not really seen all that much footy of the console versions at all.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45531 Posts

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

Eh, guess they feel the need to try and pump those fans up and hope they bite on the game - I'm guessing the 360 version will be 2nd best right behind PC as usual. :P

razgriz_101

Thats debatable :P we've not really seen all that much footy of the console versions at all.

Sure, sure I agree and I'm just floating some balloons is all - now wasn't it fun shooting them down ? :P

Avatar image for Metal-8654
Metal-8654

73

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Metal-8654
Member since 2011 • 73 Posts

Sounds amazing. I couldn't see anything in Killzone 3 because of all the crap on screen and Resistance 3 looks the same. I want to see what I'm shooting at , thank you. I bet it's the blu-ray cell makiing the graphics clearer. PS3 version for the win.

Nike_Air

or it could just be the lack of particle effects :?

If taking off those effects makes the picture smoother and clearer i'm all for it... team fortress 2 looks better ( not more advanced ) for me than crysis1 because all the motion blur or what ever you call it

Avatar image for Metal-8654
Metal-8654

73

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Metal-8654
Member since 2011 • 73 Posts

People seem to be unable to understand what he means. The PS3 looks 'cleaner' because it's missing effects like smoke and subtle lighting. In other words, it's worse.

kraken2109

Unless you have $250-500 PC then ps3 version is better

Avatar image for Doolz2024
Doolz2024

9623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#28 Doolz2024
Member since 2007 • 9623 Posts

But these are the sort of differences you'd only notice if you were looking for them. At first blush, the Playstation 3 version of Battlefield 3 is every bit as impressive as the computer version.

-Renegade

Initial reaction: :|

Then: :lol:

And stuff like is why I stopped reading Kotaku a while back.

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60812

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60812 Posts
Even the developer says the PC version looks better.
Avatar image for JetB1ackNewYear
JetB1ackNewYear

2931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#30 JetB1ackNewYear
Member since 2007 • 2931 Posts
haha woooow. the second post of the thread just explains it all and seeing who made this topic i wasn't surprised. cleaner..means missing effect haha. does mean its better looking!
Avatar image for brickdoctor
brickdoctor

9746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 156

User Lists: 0

#31 brickdoctor
Member since 2008 • 9746 Posts

It doesn't matter how it looks. Even if it looked just as good as the PC version, there'd still be a ton of people saying that it doesn't. It's pretty obvious that it won't look as good, however I believe that the differences will be overexagerrated.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#32 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="-Renegade"]

But these are the sort of differences you'd only notice if you were looking for them. At first blush, the Playstation 3 version of Battlefield 3 is every bit as impressive as the computer version.

ChubbyGuy40

PS3 scene seems clearer, cleaner? Lack of detail and cruddy resolution now means it's better! Are they really trying to suggest that the PS3 version can stand with the PS3 version? :|

I'm done with the hate tonight :P

Actually clearer and cleaner aren't necessarily an improvement. BF3 is going for natural light with soft shadows and more SSAO. The days of hard shadows are gone. It's definitely a downgrade from the PC version but it is worth noting how good it looks.

DICE has said time and time again by pushing the PC version they have been able to squeeze far more into the consoles than they ever thought possible. It apparently is showing.

Avatar image for ironcreed
ironcreed

14195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 46

User Lists: 0

#33 ironcreed
Member since 2005 • 14195 Posts

I am sure it will be fine on the PS3 and I look forward to playing it. That said, my hype is kind of drying up for this game because I am finding it increasingly difficult to get super excited for yet another modern military shooter. I am much more excited for Rage and Resistance 3, as far as shooters go.

Avatar image for finalstar2007
finalstar2007

27952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#34 finalstar2007
Member since 2008 • 27952 Posts

Spectacular or not i wont waste my money on such a game that i know i wont spend over 3 hours playing it, the real addicting multiplayer shooter game coming November 8th 8)

Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#35 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts
PC version looks better, you don't even need a direct comparison. Even DICE said, did people really expect consoles to match the PC version?
Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#36 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts

Spectacular or not i wont waste my money on such a game that i know i wont spend over 3 hours playing it, the real addicting multiplayer shooter game coming November 8th 8)

finalstar2007

Why do people post in threads about games they have no interest in :?

Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#37 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts

[QUOTE="finalstar2007"]

Spectacular or not i wont waste my money on such a game that i know i wont spend over 3 hours playing it, the real addicting multiplayer shooter game coming November 8th 8)

millerlight89

Why do people post in threads about games they have no interest in :?

I know he came here to tell us this, which he always posts in a BF3 thread. Hey man, we get it already. You like COD and you're not ashamed.
Avatar image for eboyishere
eboyishere

12681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 eboyishere
Member since 2011 • 12681 Posts

either it looks horrible to people or awesome...so somebody is overdoing it

[QUOTE="finalstar2007"]

Spectacular or not i wont waste my money on such a game that i know i wont spend over 3 hours playing it, the real addicting multiplayer shooter game coming November 8th 8)

millerlight89

Why do people post in threads about games they have no interest in :?

miller...are you....jell.... :o

:P

Avatar image for lazerface216
lazerface216

7564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 lazerface216
Member since 2008 • 7564 Posts

[QUOTE="finalstar2007"]

Spectacular or not i wont waste my money on such a game that i know i wont spend over 3 hours playing it, the real addicting multiplayer shooter game coming November 8th 8)

millerlight89

Why do people post in threads about games they have no interest in :?

happens here all the time, i'm sure you've been guilty of it at some point and time...

Avatar image for TheAcountantMan
TheAcountantMan

1281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 TheAcountantMan
Member since 2011 • 1281 Posts
Disappointed you said the awful ps3 version even compares to the flat out greater PC version. But ppointed that you believe in the illuminati :)!.
Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#41 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts

[QUOTE="millerlight89"]

[QUOTE="finalstar2007"]

Spectacular or not i wont waste my money on such a game that i know i wont spend over 3 hours playing it, the real addicting multiplayer shooter game coming November 8th 8)

lazerface216

Why do people post in threads about games they have no interest in :?

happens here all the time, i'm sure you've been guilty of it at some point and time...

Not that I recall. It happens all the time with this guy, every BF3 thread he has to say how he won't like it and has no interest in it since the almighty CoD will keep him entertained.
Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#42 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts

[QUOTE="-Renegade"]

The last time I saw Kevin O'Leary he had a beard. A tier-one beard. These day's he's wrangling press for Battlefield 3.

Later I went back and played through a multiplayer level of the game on a computer, just to refresh my memory. Initially there isn't a lot of difference to notice.

Things look very similar, but then I start to notice some subtle differences. The lighting is the biggest difference. In the Playstation 3 version the shadows cast across the opening sequence are sharper, there's less subtlety in the way the light is diffused.

When my teammates fire, their barrels don't spew out smoke that quickly dissipates. In the PC version the entire parking lot seems to be clouded with debris, smoke and dust, in the PS3 version the same scene seems clearer, cleaner.

But these are the sort of differences you'd only notice if you were looking for them. At first blush, the Playstation 3 version of Battlefield 3 is every bit as impressive as the computer version.

Source

Nothing about the Xbox 360's version...

Birdy09

Lmao, so wait aminute he says "Smoke and Dust and damage is alot more visable in PC version" then states "PS£ version is much clearer" .. you dont get it do you? those effects are demanding, the PS3 version being clearer isnt a good thing.

He never said it was, just a noticeable thing to see that the PC version has more smoke and particle effects and the PS3 version has such a pathetic tiny amount of RAM that they can barely do anything with the damn console [ In hopes that Sony reads this so they give the PS4 way more RAM ].

Avatar image for majoras_wrath
majoras_wrath

6062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 majoras_wrath
Member since 2005 • 6062 Posts
Or, you know, he was actually saying it wasn't as good as the PC, but it still looked really good. :?
Avatar image for finalstar2007
finalstar2007

27952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#44 finalstar2007
Member since 2008 • 27952 Posts

[QUOTE="millerlight89"]

[QUOTE="finalstar2007"]

Spectacular or not i wont waste my money on such a game that i know i wont spend over 3 hours playing it, the real addicting multiplayer shooter game coming November 8th 8)

SaltyMeatballs

Why do people post in threads about games they have no interest in :?

I know he came here to tell us this, which he always posts in a BF3 thread. Hey man, we get it already. You like COD and you're not ashamed.

I guess im interested to see what BF3 fans say :P, and ashamed? :o? why would anyone be ashamed in playing THE king of FPS? 8).. yea its maybe a copy and paste from MW2 lol ( and is why i keep saying MW3 deserve only a 7/10 or below ) but gameplay and enjoyment above graphics

Avatar image for finalstar2007
finalstar2007

27952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#45 finalstar2007
Member since 2008 • 27952 Posts

[QUOTE="lazerface216"]

[QUOTE="millerlight89"] Why do people post in threads about games they have no interest in :?

millerlight89

happens here all the time, i'm sure you've been guilty of it at some point and time...

Not that I recall. It happens all the time with this guy, every BF3 thread he has to say how he won't like it and has no interest in it since the almighty CoD will keep him entertained.

People do that on every single JRPG thread i make, if i can handle the hate toward JRPGs then im sure you can handle this towards BF3 :) :oops:

Avatar image for eboyishere
eboyishere

12681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 eboyishere
Member since 2011 • 12681 Posts

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"][QUOTE="millerlight89"] Why do people post in threads about games they have no interest in :?

finalstar2007

I know he came here to tell us this, which he always posts in a BF3 thread. Hey man, we get it already. You like COD and you're not ashamed.

I guess im interested to see what BF3 fans say :P, and ashamed? :o? why would anyone be ashamed in playing THE king of FPS? 8).. yea its maybe a copy and paste from MW2 lol ( and is why i keep saying MW3 deserve only a 7/10 or below ) but gameplay and enjoyment above graphics

i will say this

at least your secure in what you want, i know people saying they will skip mw3 but will be the first one in line at midnight

most likely due to my friends and the bro gamers.....i will be getting it....

Avatar image for Remmib
Remmib

2250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Remmib
Member since 2010 • 2250 Posts

I am sure it will be fine on the PS3 and I look forward to playing it. That said, my hype is kind of drying up for this game because I am finding it increasingly difficult to get super excited for yet another modern military shooter. I am much more excited for Rage and Resistance 3, as far as shooters go.

ironcreed

You're more excited for Resistance 3 than BF3? I am not sure if I can take you seriously.

Avatar image for VanDammFan
VanDammFan

4783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#48 VanDammFan
Member since 2009 • 4783 Posts

im sure BF3 does look good on PS3. Most games do..

Avatar image for Remmib
Remmib

2250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Remmib
Member since 2010 • 2250 Posts

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"][QUOTE="millerlight89"] Why do people post in threads about games they have no interest in :?

finalstar2007

I know he came here to tell us this, which he always posts in a BF3 thread. Hey man, we get it already. You like COD and you're not ashamed.

I guess im interested to see what BF3 fans say :P, and ashamed? :o? why would anyone be ashamed in playing THE king of FPS? 8).. yea its maybe a copy and paste from MW2 lol ( and is why i keep saying MW3 deserve only a 7/10 or below ) but gameplay and enjoyment above graphics

CoD is not the king of FPS and never has been. Besides I played MW3 when it came out in 2007.

Hell, BF1942 which came out in 2002 ****s all over any CoD game.

The above statements are facts. Whether you cannot see this things for yourself is not my problem.