This topic is locked from further discussion.
What's wrong with the score he gave them? His reviews are just fine.pins_basicHe has a more bitter taste than everyone else.
[QUOTE="pins_basic"]What's wrong with the score he gave them? His reviews are just fine.ArisShadowsHe has a more bitter taste than everyone else. i agree, its always "i wish" or "it feels like there should be.." . i'm always thinking, well great, now tell me about the game and how it works instead of how you wished it were another game.
[QUOTE="pins_basic"]What's wrong with the score he gave them? His reviews are just fine.ArisShadowsHe has a more bitter taste than everyone else. IGN gave it 8, only .2 less that Jeff..... and many scores are low A's and such, which GS always does, if someone is gonna use other sites scores should at least do it right. Look OXM 7, OXM uk 9??
IGN gave Crackdown 8.0. How can you honestly argue Jeff did a bad job reviewing it.i would argue that. there's quite a difference in 7.8 and 8.0 to me. 7.8 says to me that its decent, but didnt really accomplish what it set out to do. 8.0 says it works quite well but isnt everything it could be. its a psychological difference, but knocking a game down to a lower number even if by a tenth means something.
And Diddy Kong Racing was reviewed 10 years ago!
Danm_999
[QUOTE="Danm_999"]IGN gave Crackdown 8.0. How can you honestly argue Jeff did a bad job reviewing it.i would argue that. there's quite a difference in 7.8 and 8.0 to me. 7.8 says to me that its decent, but didnt really accomplish what it set out to do. 8.0 says it works quite well but isnt everything it could be. its a psychological difference, but knocking a game down to a lower number even if by a tenth means something. Perhaps, but the broad evaluation of the criteria is similar.
And Diddy Kong Racing was reviewed 10 years ago!
whoisryanmack
[QUOTE="whoisryanmack"][QUOTE="Danm_999"]IGN gave Crackdown 8.0. How can you honestly argue Jeff did a bad job reviewing it.i would argue that. there's quite a difference in 7.8 and 8.0 to me. 7.8 says to me that its decent, but didnt really accomplish what it set out to do. 8.0 says it works quite well but isnt everything it could be. its a psychological difference, but knocking a game down to a lower number even if by a tenth means something. Perhaps, but the broad evaluation of the criteria is similar. thats true. it just seems he made a decision in the end to take it down to the 7 range on purpose. so..i would then conclude that he considered it somewhat of a failure, and i think he's wrong there. it was never meant to be a heavy storyline driven drama, its a superman smash up on an open city, and i think he lost sight of that.
And Diddy Kong Racing was reviewed 10 years ago!
Danm_999
[QUOTE="Danm_999"][QUOTE="whoisryanmack"][QUOTE="Danm_999"]IGN gave Crackdown 8.0. How can you honestly argue Jeff did a bad job reviewing it.i would argue that. there's quite a difference in 7.8 and 8.0 to me. 7.8 says to me that its decent, but didnt really accomplish what it set out to do. 8.0 says it works quite well but isnt everything it could be. its a psychological difference, but knocking a game down to a lower number even if by a tenth means something. Perhaps, but the broad evaluation of the criteria is similar. thats true. it just seems he made a decision in the end to take it down to the 7 range on purpose. so..i would then conclude that he considered it somewhat of a failure, and i think he's wrong there. it was never meant to be a heavy storyline driven drama, its a superman smash up on an open city, and i think he lost sight of that. The best terms to use would be he say it as a higher rated 'good game', than a lower rated 'great game'.
And Diddy Kong Racing was reviewed 10 years ago!
whoisryanmack
[QUOTE="whoisryanmack"][QUOTE="Danm_999"][QUOTE="whoisryanmack"][QUOTE="Danm_999"]IGN gave Crackdown 8.0. How can you honestly argue Jeff did a bad job reviewing it.i would argue that. there's quite a difference in 7.8 and 8.0 to me. 7.8 says to me that its decent, but didnt really accomplish what it set out to do. 8.0 says it works quite well but isnt everything it could be. its a psychological difference, but knocking a game down to a lower number even if by a tenth means something. Perhaps, but the broad evaluation of the criteria is similar. thats true. it just seems he made a decision in the end to take it down to the 7 range on purpose. so..i would then conclude that he considered it somewhat of a failure, and i think he's wrong there. it was never meant to be a heavy storyline driven drama, its a superman smash up on an open city, and i think he lost sight of that. The best terms to use would be he say it as a higher rated 'good game', than a lower rated 'great game'. agreed. i think he leaned the wrong way on this one.
And Diddy Kong Racing was reviewed 10 years ago!
Danm_999
What's wrong with the score he gave them? His reviews are just fine.pins_basic
[QUOTE="EditEdit"]Well he did gave THPS3 a 10 now didn't he?LOL this guy gave THPS3 a 10. Please, the guy cant be trusted. I have to agree...
Opinions are everywhere.
SystemWarsMan
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment