Jeff Needs to stay way from high-profile releases

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for StarFoxCOM
StarFoxCOM

5605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#1 StarFoxCOM
Member since 2006 • 5605 Posts
Well here are some of Jeff's reviews that got waaay higher scores other places. Crack down, Zelda Tp, Diddy Kong raceing to name a few. All Gamerankings all have those at least .5 whole points higher than Jeff's rating
Avatar image for whoisryanmack
whoisryanmack

7675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 whoisryanmack
Member since 2006 • 7675 Posts
i think its designed for controversy, can't just be a coincidence at this point.
Avatar image for SSJ2_Cloud
SSJ2_Cloud

489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 SSJ2_Cloud
Member since 2006 • 489 Posts
darn that .5 zelda was the only real big dif. crackdown seems about right, no one is giving it that high of a score (It got a 9 somewhere i think, but what game doesnt get a 9 somewhere?)
Avatar image for pins_basic
pins_basic

11521

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 pins_basic
Member since 2003 • 11521 Posts
What's wrong with the score he gave them? His reviews are just fine.
Avatar image for Sir_Graham
Sir_Graham

3983

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#5 Sir_Graham
Member since 2002 • 3983 Posts
Well now Greg is gone he is probably going to be getting the majority of them.
Avatar image for ArisShadows
ArisShadows

22784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 ArisShadows
Member since 2004 • 22784 Posts
What's wrong with the score he gave them? His reviews are just fine.pins_basic
He has a more bitter taste than everyone else.
Avatar image for whoisryanmack
whoisryanmack

7675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 whoisryanmack
Member since 2006 • 7675 Posts
[QUOTE="pins_basic"]What's wrong with the score he gave them? His reviews are just fine.ArisShadows
He has a more bitter taste than everyone else.

i agree, its always "i wish" or "it feels like there should be.." . i'm always thinking, well great, now tell me about the game and how it works instead of how you wished it were another game.
Avatar image for TheCrimsonKoopa
TheCrimsonKoopa

2031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 TheCrimsonKoopa
Member since 2006 • 2031 Posts
I agree completely with all of his reviews?
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#10 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
IGN gave Crackdown 8.0. How can you honestly argue Jeff did a bad job reviewing it.

And Diddy Kong Racing was reviewed 10 years ago!
Avatar image for EditEdit
EditEdit

64

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 EditEdit
Member since 2007 • 64 Posts
Well he did gave THPS3 a 10 now didn't he?

Opinions are everywhere.
Avatar image for tegovoltio
tegovoltio

9280

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 tegovoltio
Member since 2004 • 9280 Posts
[QUOTE="pins_basic"]What's wrong with the score he gave them? His reviews are just fine.ArisShadows
He has a more bitter taste than everyone else.

IGN gave it 8, only .2 less that Jeff..... and many scores are low A's and such, which GS always does, if someone is gonna use other sites scores should at least do it right. Look OXM 7, OXM uk 9??
Avatar image for echelon
echelon

1199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 echelon
Member since 2002 • 1199 Posts
I agree completely with all of his reviews?TheCrimsonKoopa

You do? Seriously? You dont think he was going for shock value with some of them?
Avatar image for whoisryanmack
whoisryanmack

7675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 whoisryanmack
Member since 2006 • 7675 Posts
IGN gave Crackdown 8.0. How can you honestly argue Jeff did a bad job reviewing it.

And Diddy Kong Racing was reviewed 10 years ago!
Danm_999
i would argue that. there's quite a difference in 7.8 and 8.0 to me. 7.8 says to me that its decent, but didnt really accomplish what it set out to do. 8.0 says it works quite well but isnt everything it could be. its a psychological difference, but knocking a game down to a lower number even if by a tenth means something.
Avatar image for Bullet_Holes
Bullet_Holes

1330

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Bullet_Holes
Member since 2006 • 1330 Posts
I'd say this goes against everyone saying gamespot rates xbox games higher.
Avatar image for lantus
lantus

10591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#17 lantus
Member since 2006 • 10591 Posts
Jeff and Gamespot in general review much harder than other sites, that's all.
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#18 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
[QUOTE="Danm_999"]IGN gave Crackdown 8.0. How can you honestly argue Jeff did a bad job reviewing it.

And Diddy Kong Racing was reviewed 10 years ago!
whoisryanmack
i would argue that. there's quite a difference in 7.8 and 8.0 to me. 7.8 says to me that its decent, but didnt really accomplish what it set out to do. 8.0 says it works quite well but isnt everything it could be. its a psychological difference, but knocking a game down to a lower number even if by a tenth means something.

Perhaps, but the broad evaluation of the criteria is similar.
Avatar image for Lazy_Boy88
Lazy_Boy88

7418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Lazy_Boy88
Member since 2003 • 7418 Posts
He's probably the only one who actually rates correctly....... over these past couple years reviews have become so inflated the average score is mid 7s when It's supposed to be 5. I dunno why it happened but prettymuch every game falls between 7 and 10 unless it is utter crap..... when really 5 games should be what 7s are today.
Avatar image for Bleach_is_basic
Bleach_is_basic

3020

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Bleach_is_basic
Member since 2002 • 3020 Posts
Jeff does a great job and I tend to agree with pretty much all his reviews, including the Crackdown review. You need to stay away from the peyote though because Crackdown is no where near a "high-profile" release. Sheesh, they needed to include a beta just to get anyone to notice it.
Avatar image for whoisryanmack
whoisryanmack

7675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 whoisryanmack
Member since 2006 • 7675 Posts
[QUOTE="whoisryanmack"][QUOTE="Danm_999"]IGN gave Crackdown 8.0. How can you honestly argue Jeff did a bad job reviewing it.

And Diddy Kong Racing was reviewed 10 years ago!
Danm_999
i would argue that. there's quite a difference in 7.8 and 8.0 to me. 7.8 says to me that its decent, but didnt really accomplish what it set out to do. 8.0 says it works quite well but isnt everything it could be. its a psychological difference, but knocking a game down to a lower number even if by a tenth means something.

Perhaps, but the broad evaluation of the criteria is similar.

thats true. it just seems he made a decision in the end to take it down to the 7 range on purpose. so..i would then conclude that he considered it somewhat of a failure, and i think he's wrong there. it was never meant to be a heavy storyline driven drama, its a superman smash up on an open city, and i think he lost sight of that.
Avatar image for TyrantDragon55
TyrantDragon55

6851

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#22 TyrantDragon55
Member since 2004 • 6851 Posts
Why? Because he's not afriad of giving his honest opinion of a game rather than simply buying in to hype like so many other reviewers? Frankly I think we need more reviewers like him out there.
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#23 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
[QUOTE="Danm_999"][QUOTE="whoisryanmack"][QUOTE="Danm_999"]IGN gave Crackdown 8.0. How can you honestly argue Jeff did a bad job reviewing it.

And Diddy Kong Racing was reviewed 10 years ago!
whoisryanmack
i would argue that. there's quite a difference in 7.8 and 8.0 to me. 7.8 says to me that its decent, but didnt really accomplish what it set out to do. 8.0 says it works quite well but isnt everything it could be. its a psychological difference, but knocking a game down to a lower number even if by a tenth means something.

Perhaps, but the broad evaluation of the criteria is similar.

thats true. it just seems he made a decision in the end to take it down to the 7 range on purpose. so..i would then conclude that he considered it somewhat of a failure, and i think he's wrong there. it was never meant to be a heavy storyline driven drama, its a superman smash up on an open city, and i think he lost sight of that.

The best terms to use would be he say it as a higher rated 'good game', than a lower rated 'great game'.
Avatar image for whoisryanmack
whoisryanmack

7675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 whoisryanmack
Member since 2006 • 7675 Posts
[QUOTE="whoisryanmack"][QUOTE="Danm_999"][QUOTE="whoisryanmack"][QUOTE="Danm_999"]IGN gave Crackdown 8.0. How can you honestly argue Jeff did a bad job reviewing it.

And Diddy Kong Racing was reviewed 10 years ago!
Danm_999
i would argue that. there's quite a difference in 7.8 and 8.0 to me. 7.8 says to me that its decent, but didnt really accomplish what it set out to do. 8.0 says it works quite well but isnt everything it could be. its a psychological difference, but knocking a game down to a lower number even if by a tenth means something.

Perhaps, but the broad evaluation of the criteria is similar.

thats true. it just seems he made a decision in the end to take it down to the 7 range on purpose. so..i would then conclude that he considered it somewhat of a failure, and i think he's wrong there. it was never meant to be a heavy storyline driven drama, its a superman smash up on an open city, and i think he lost sight of that.

The best terms to use would be he say it as a higher rated 'good game', than a lower rated 'great game'.

agreed. i think he leaned the wrong way on this one.
Avatar image for needlesmcgirk
needlesmcgirk

627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 needlesmcgirk
Member since 2006 • 627 Posts
I didn't hear much complaint from anyone with his review of GeoW...
Avatar image for purplemidgets
purplemidgets

3103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#26 purplemidgets
Member since 2002 • 3103 Posts
high-profile releasesThread title


.... Diddy Kong raceing.....StarFoxCOM



whaaaat?
Avatar image for Mr_BillGates
Mr_BillGates

3211

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#27 Mr_BillGates
Member since 2005 • 3211 Posts
You need to stay away from Gamespot.com if you think giving Zelda: Twilight Princess 8.8 for the Wii was a mistake. The game feels aged as lots of people don't notice this already. We call 'em Zelda fans, the franchise many grew up with.
Avatar image for holmesforlife
holmesforlife

902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 holmesforlife
Member since 2006 • 902 Posts
What's wrong with the score he gave them? His reviews are just fine.pins_basic
[QUOTE="EditEdit"]Well he did gave THPS3 a 10 now didn't he?

Opinions are everywhere.
SystemWarsMan
LOL this guy gave THPS3 a 10. Please, the guy cant be trusted.

I have to agree...
Avatar image for Laserwolf65
Laserwolf65

6701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 Laserwolf65
Member since 2003 • 6701 Posts
I'm so tired of these "Jeff is teh biased" threads.
Avatar image for poopinloop32
poopinloop32

4949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 poopinloop32
Member since 2006 • 4949 Posts
I dont think hes a bad reviewer but I think he is trying to get more original and controversial in his reveiws so that more people sign up on gamespot