Just wow. Halo Reach vs Resistance 2 Lens of Truth comparison. Reach LOSES lawl

it has much better reviews and sales compared to resistance 2????

who cares if the graphics arent as good. the game is much more enjoyable then resistance 2

I wonder if this article serves the purpose of gaining their reputation back from PS3 owners since the whole Mass Effect nit-picking.

I prefer Resistance 2 over Halo, but let's face it: you can't get more biased than LoT.

Yay, more fighting about 30 fps games on SW!

I prefer Resistance 2 over Halo, but let's face it: you can't get more biased than LoT.

iAtrocious

Resistance 2 didn't have terrible graphics. :|

Lens of Truth are just biased. :P Not really, but Halo Reach looks fine to me!Ravensmash

shouldn't really compare different games...so many other variables at play to be fair

Resistance 2 didn't have terrible graphics. :|

Silverbond

Honestly, I find Reach to be the better looking game.

Yeah, I'm really not surprised. I got Halo over the Christmas break, and the graphics are totally underwhelming. Lots and lots of aliasing that I didn't expect. LOL @ all the bullshots that came out before the game claiming it looked better than Killzone 2, or the people claiming it was the best-looking 360 game (probably Red Dead right now). Still, awesome game.Hahadouken

actually that would be banjo kazooie, nuts n bolts :3

They probably did this because of the recent accusation of teh bias.

Our analysis proves that Resistance 2 out performed Halo: Reach when in similar chaotic firefights. In addition, Resistance 2 seemed to spawn more enemies at any giving time without dropping any frames or a hint of screen tearing. Actually, Resistance 2 seemed to be v-locked at a constant 30fps and absolutely zero screen tearing recorded.

5:10 seperates 360 games from PS3 due to a lot of things moving in one scene.

Samples such as Killzone 2's Visari's Hammer and Pyrrhus Rise; Uncharted 2's Ch 13 & 21; and GOW3's Titans climbing on Olympus.

If I can remember correctly....Halo was never crazy about the graphics. mrmusicman247

5:10 seperates 360 games from PS3 due to a lot of things moving in one scene.

Samples such as Killzone 2's Visari's Hammer and Pyrrhus Rise; Uncharted 2's Ch 13 & 21; and GOW3's Titans climbing on Olympus.

Bazooka_4ME

[QUOTE="Silverbond"]

Resistance 2 didn't have terrible graphics. :|

Bazooka_4ME

All the article talks about are water effects, and frame rate, which resistance wins by like .3 of a frame? No draw distance, very little mention of textures, vistas, jaggies.tehsystemwarior

Insomniac hasn't shown anything yet. ahem. Resistance 3.

[QUOTE="Bazooka_4ME"]

5:10 seperates 360 games from PS3 due to a lot of things moving in one scene.

Samples such as Killzone 2's Visari's Hammer and Pyrrhus Rise; Uncharted 2's Ch 13 & 21; and GOW3's Titans climbing on Olympus.

Hahadouken

[QUOTE="tehsystemwarior"]All the article talks about are water effects, and frame rate, which resistance wins by like .3 of a frame? No draw distance, very little mention of textures, vistas, jaggies.Hahadouken

I much prefer Reachs visuals, but they are right about one thing, Resistance does perform better than Reach, I was suprised with the amount of frame rate drops Halo had.

Resistance 2 might look a bit better, but I like Halo's art style more.

[QUOTE="Hahadouken"][QUOTE="tehsystemwarior"]All the article talks about are water effects, and frame rate, which resistance wins by like .3 of a frame? No draw distance, very little mention of textures, vistas, jaggies.tehsystemwarior

Does this side by side video lend credibility to what I say about how similar the two games are, I think so.

Anyhow, yeah they both look about even to me, and it really boils down to which art style/ gun style suits you more. The FPS and tear difference is negligible. The biggest difference visualy was the water to me, very nicely done in R2. Also the amount of enemies did see higher in R2, but I don't know how much I count that towards graphics rather than game design.

reach looks better and plays light years better. R2 is decent, I own it...but come on lol.

Not sure how you guys did not noticed, but they only did this so they can get the PS3 gamers back after the whole ME2 comparison incident and how most sites bashed LOT's biased comparison.

If teh graphics are bad, it must mean the game is bad too...right?

Huh Halo reach is one of the best looking games out it beats Gears of war 2 in graphics and such but WOW what is this? ah well it doesnt take a rocket scientist to notice reach looks a generation better. (OPINION)

[QUOTE="mrmusicman247"]If I can remember correctly....Halo was never crazy about the graphics. mitu123

Halo Reach is the better game by far but ok.

Good/bad I guess?

[QUOTE="Hahadouken"][QUOTE="Bazooka_4ME"]

5:10 seperates 360 games from PS3 due to a lot of things moving in one scene.

Samples such as Killzone 2's Visari's Hammer and Pyrrhus Rise; Uncharted 2's Ch 13 & 21; and GOW3's Titans climbing on Olympus.

Kickinurass

I played both games and i rate a tie or even giving Reach the advantage. Halo Reach is the best looking Halo game ever made.

:roll: why would they even do a comparison? its not like they are losing hits...all the people making stuff up to make them seem biased will still go to the site every time they do an important comparison to them.

*shakes head*

[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="mrmusicman247"]If I can remember correctly....Halo was never crazy about the graphics. Kane04

yeah, the Halo name gets it a free pass.

that's why Halo Wars was overrated by like 15 points on GS compared to MC....oh wait.