Killzone 2 (and 3?) 3D confirmed/announced

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Weird_Jerk
Weird_Jerk

646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 Weird_Jerk
Member since 2010 • 646 Posts
http://thegameraccess.com/news/ps3/killzone-2-going-3d It's been announced that Killzone 2, along with LittleBigPlanet and a few other titles are coming to 3D this summer. I don't think this was posted before or confirmed before. =V By the way...this is NOT an April Fool's joke.
Avatar image for erglesmergle
erglesmergle

1769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 erglesmergle
Member since 2009 • 1769 Posts

The 360 will NEVER do 3D. And if it does, MS will charge 4.99 per game for the 3D feature. Fact.

Avatar image for Juggernaut140
Juggernaut140

36011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 Juggernaut140
Member since 2007 • 36011 Posts

The 360 will NEVER do 3D. And if it does, MS will charge 4.99 per game for the 3D feature. Fact.

erglesmergle
Preach on brotha! [spoiler] no [/spoiler]
Avatar image for robobie
robobie

2172

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#4 robobie
Member since 2007 • 2172 Posts

The 360 will NEVER do 3D. And if it does, MS will charge 4.99 per game for the 3D feature. Fact.

erglesmergle

.

Avatar image for Lto_thaG
Lto_thaG

22611

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Lto_thaG
Member since 2006 • 22611 Posts

I don't see the point.Sony's already in 4D.

Avatar image for mythrol
mythrol

5237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#6 mythrol
Member since 2005 • 5237 Posts

The 360 will NEVER do 3D. And if it does, MS will charge 4.99 per game for the 3D feature. Fact.

erglesmergle
It already has a 3D game. Avatar.
Avatar image for abuabed
abuabed

6606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 abuabed
Member since 2005 • 6606 Posts

I don't see the point.Sony's already in 4D.

Lto_thaG
so true :P :lol:
Avatar image for sayonara89
sayonara89

1985

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 sayonara89
Member since 2009 • 1985 Posts
Nice news :)
Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#9 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts
Those cheap 3D glasses are a joke. If you want to experience true 3D gaming, the only way is with Nvidia.
Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50186

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#10 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50186 Posts

I don't see the point.Sony's already in 4D.

Lto_thaG
Exactly, there's no contest. 3D is so like 10 years ago.
Avatar image for Sandvichman
Sandvichman

4006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Sandvichman
Member since 2010 • 4006 Posts
Those cheap 3D glasses are a joke. If you want to experience true 3D gaming, the only way is with Nvidia.GeneralShowzer
Only costs a arm and a limb to use.
Avatar image for Supabul
Supabul

4266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#12 Supabul
Member since 2004 • 4266 Posts

The 360 will NEVER do 3D. And if it does, MS will charge 4.99 per game for the 3D feature. Fact.

erglesmergle

Yeah and Sony want you to buy a 3D enabled TV for $3000, and how much are the glasses

Avatar image for danish-death
danish-death

5314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#13 danish-death
Member since 2004 • 5314 Posts
[QUOTE="Supabul"]

[QUOTE="erglesmergle"]

The 360 will NEVER do 3D. And if it does, MS will charge 4.99 per game for the 3D feature. Fact.

Yeah and Sony want you to buy a 3D enabled TV for $3000, and how much are the glasses

Wont most of the new Sony 2010 TV be able to do 3D? And wont other companies do the same? And even if they should be that expensive the price will fall next year.
Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#14 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts
[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]Those cheap 3D glasses are a joke. If you want to experience true 3D gaming, the only way is with Nvidia.Sandvichman
Only costs a arm and a limb to use.

You need the 3d glasses and 120hz monitor, that's about 400$. It's expensive for now, but it's not just a cheap gimmick.
Avatar image for Episode_Eve
Episode_Eve

16986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Episode_Eve
Member since 2004 • 16986 Posts
It's nice to have this optional feature whenever I get a 3D HDTV. I'm sure it will enhance the experience depending on game and implementation. KZ3D :D.
Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#16 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts
[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]Those cheap 3D glasses are a joke. If you want to experience true 3D gaming, the only way is with Nvidia.Sandvichman
Only costs a arm and a limb to use.

Still only a fraction of the cost buying a $3000 3d enabled Tv ( all the 3d work is done by the Tv instead of PS3 in this case ) +glasses ( nvidias solution cost around $500-600)
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts
[QUOTE="Sandvichman"][QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]Those cheap 3D glasses are a joke. If you want to experience true 3D gaming, the only way is with Nvidia.GeneralShowzer
Only costs a arm and a limb to use.

You need the 3d glasses and 120hz monitor, that's about 400$. It's expensive for now, but it's not just a cheap gimmick.

no its an expensive gimmick,
Avatar image for ShadowriverUB
ShadowriverUB

5515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 ShadowriverUB
Member since 2009 • 5515 Posts

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]You need the 3d glasses and 120hz monitor, that's about 400$. It's expensive for now, but it's not just a cheap gimmick.WilliamRLBaker
no its an expensive gimmick,

It will get cheaper in time, besides this technology is like stereo audio, so cheaper solutions might pop-up and they will still work

Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#19 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts
[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"][QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"][QUOTE="Sandvichman"] Only costs a arm and a limb to use.

You need the 3d glasses and 120hz monitor, that's about 400$. It's expensive for now, but it's not just a cheap gimmick.

no its an expensive gimmick,

You need to try it to judge . It's nothing like I've seen before.
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"][QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"][QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"] You need the 3d glasses and 120hz monitor, that's about 400$. It's expensive for now, but it's not just a cheap gimmick.

no its an expensive gimmick,

You need to try it to judge . It's nothing like I've seen before.

I've tried it myself, and it's everything like I've seen before (and for comparison, I watched Avatar in 3D IMAX, too). You either have to wear glasses or sacrifice resolution (for the autostereoscopics). Not to mention I lost track of the fact I was actually watching 3D. When you really get into something, you can lose track of the auxiliary stuff.
Avatar image for Dataleak
Dataleak

1737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Dataleak
Member since 2010 • 1737 Posts

I never enjoyed Killzone 2 2D, so I think I'll pass. Killzone 2 will look amazing in 3D though. :shock:

Avatar image for RadecSupreme
RadecSupreme

4824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#22 RadecSupreme
Member since 2009 • 4824 Posts

Damn, I wish I had 3D TV but they are too expensive.

Avatar image for onewiththegame
onewiththegame

4415

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 onewiththegame
Member since 2004 • 4415 Posts

I love kilsone2 but I could care less about any kinda of 3D, I think we should get everyone in HD before we start asking them to go 3D

Avatar image for awssk8er716
awssk8er716

8485

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#24 awssk8er716
Member since 2005 • 8485 Posts

If they make Killzone 2 use the Move, I will actually play the game.

I would love to play Killzone in 3D and with the Move, but I'm not buying a new TV. I might get a Move though.

Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts

The 360 will NEVER do 3D. And if it does, MS will charge 4.99 per game for the 3D feature. Fact.

erglesmergle

Or Xbox Live Gold exclusive.

Avatar image for RogueShodown
RogueShodown

2818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 RogueShodown
Member since 2009 • 2818 Posts

[QUOTE="erglesmergle"]

The 360 will NEVER do 3D. And if it does, MS will charge 4.99 per game for the 3D feature. Fact.

robobie

.

Any console can have games in 3D. Even Sly 3 came with 3D glasses and let you choose whether to play certain parts in 3D.

Avatar image for ghost392
ghost392

1011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 ghost392
Member since 2008 • 1011 Posts

http://thegameraccess.com/news/ps3/killzone-2-going-3d It's been announced that Killzone 2, along with LittleBigPlanet and a few other titles are coming to 3D this summer. I don't think this was posted before or confirmed before. =V By the way...this is NOT an April Fool's joke.Weird_Jerk

Woah Sony copies Nintedo being big story???

Atleast KZ3d will look better than 3DS games so grats to PS3 owners

Avatar image for deactivated-6079d224de716
deactivated-6079d224de716

2567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 deactivated-6079d224de716
Member since 2009 • 2567 Posts

Still cannot get into this 3D thing. And I doubt KZ2/3 really needs this gimmick.

Avatar image for Giancar
Giancar

19160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Giancar
Member since 2006 • 19160 Posts

[QUOTE="Weird_Jerk"]http://thegameraccess.com/news/ps3/killzone-2-going-3d It's been announced that Killzone 2, along with LittleBigPlanet and a few other titles are coming to 3D this summer. I don't think this was posted before or confirmed before. =V By the way...this is NOT an April Fool's joke.ghost392

Woah Sony copies Nintedo being big story???

Atleast KZ3d will look better than 3DS games so grats to PS3 owners

how did Sony copy Nintendo?
Avatar image for nervmeister
nervmeister

15377

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 nervmeister
Member since 2005 • 15377 Posts
[QUOTE="ghost392"]

[QUOTE="Weird_Jerk"]http://thegameraccess.com/news/ps3/killzone-2-going-3d It's been announced that Killzone 2, along with LittleBigPlanet and a few other titles are coming to 3D this summer. I don't think this was posted before or confirmed before. =V By the way...this is NOT an April Fool's joke.Giancar

Woah Sony copies Nintedo being big story???

Atleast KZ3d will look better than 3DS games so grats to PS3 owners

how did Sony copy Nintendo?

Virtual Boy. :P
Avatar image for GreyFoXX4
GreyFoXX4

3612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 GreyFoXX4
Member since 2008 • 3612 Posts

I just don't get why people are talking about this 3d as if it was the red blue glasses kind of 3d. I watched part of Monster vs Aliens at BB the other day in 3d and aswell as seeing Avatar in 3d and this kind of 3d is in a whole different ball park compared to the red blue glasses. I mean you just relax your eyes and bam, glorious HD content in 3d, those red blue glasses was in fact the gimmick, this new tech is the real deal. So please stop posting about games that used the red blue glasses, I've seen 240hz hd lcd's that looked more like 3d than most red blue glasses 3d content looked.

Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#32 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

I'm confused with the whole 3D thing. Would I have to buy a brand new TV for it to work? I've heard that you just need a TV with at least 120Hz. I just bought a new TV like 2 months ago so I won't be buying one for a very long time

Avatar image for gamer-adam1
gamer-adam1

4188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 gamer-adam1
Member since 2008 • 4188 Posts

now just gotta buy the 4000 tv and the 250 glasses

Avatar image for gamer-adam1
gamer-adam1

4188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 gamer-adam1
Member since 2008 • 4188 Posts

I'm confused with the whole 3D thing. Would I have to buy a brand new TV for it to work? I've heard that you just need a TV with at least 120Hz. I just bought a new TV like 2 months ago so I won't be buying one for a very long time

BPoole96
I believe you do, because they want money ^^
Avatar image for Nedemis
Nedemis

10715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#35 Nedemis
Member since 2002 • 10715 Posts

[QUOTE="robobie"]

[QUOTE="erglesmergle"]

The 360 will NEVER do 3D. And if it does, MS will charge 4.99 per game for the 3D feature. Fact.

RogueShodown

.

Any console can have games in 3D. Even Sly 3 came with 3D glasses and let you choose whether to play certain parts in 3D.

Exactly...the SNES and Genesis had a 3D game as well. There's no real special power needed in order to display an image to run in 3D. PGR4 even allows you to take 3D pictures (requires glasses of course) but I think it's been proven that erglesmergle obviously has NO IDEA about what he's talking about.

Avatar image for HavocV3
HavocV3

8068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 HavocV3
Member since 2009 • 8068 Posts

[QUOTE="RogueShodown"]

[QUOTE="robobie"]

.

Nedemis

Any console can have games in 3D. Even Sly 3 came with 3D glasses and let you choose whether to play certain parts in 3D.

Exactly...the SNES and Genesis had a 3D game as well. There's no real special power needed in order to display an image to run in 3D. PGR4 even allows you to take 3D pictures (requires glasses of course) but I think it's been proven that erglesmergle obviously has NO IDEA about what he's talking about.

bu-bu-but that 3d doesn't count:?

anyhow, 3d is worthless until it's:

affordable

doesn't require any sort of glasses.

Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#37 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

[QUOTE="BPoole96"]

I'm confused with the whole 3D thing. Would I have to buy a brand new TV for it to work? I've heard that you just need a TV with at least 120Hz. I just bought a new TV like 2 months ago so I won't be buying one for a very long time

gamer-adam1

I believe you do, because they want money ^^

Ugh, forget that then

Avatar image for deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a

26108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#38 deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
Member since 2008 • 26108 Posts
Can't say I care too much about 3D.
Avatar image for Valiant_Rebel
Valiant_Rebel

4197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Valiant_Rebel
Member since 2009 • 4197 Posts

I didn't like Rico in 2D, so I really don't need him yelling at me in 3D.

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

[QUOTE="Nedemis"]

[QUOTE="RogueShodown"]

Any console can have games in 3D. Even Sly 3 came with 3D glasses and let you choose whether to play certain parts in 3D.

HavocV3

Exactly...the SNES and Genesis had a 3D game as well. There's no real special power needed in order to display an image to run in 3D. PGR4 even allows you to take 3D pictures (requires glasses of course) but I think it's been proven that erglesmergle obviously has NO IDEA about what he's talking about.

bu-bu-but that 3d doesn't count:?

anyhow, 3d is worthless until it's:

affordable

doesn't require any sort of glasses.

And the trouble is that the technology required to perform 3D renders them both mutually exclusive with a third factor: practicality. The only known methods of making a 3D TV without glasses is to chop up the horizontal resolution so that different columns are aiming at different eyes. And that just kills the viewing angle--no good for a home theater setting where people could be watching from different angles. Put it this way: if the technology was already here, we'd already be seeing it in theaters, where cost is less of an issue. The fact they resort to glasses (usually passive polarized glasses) tells me no practical solution exists yet and may not for some time.