~-~Well, they're both same old FPSs I've been playing for so long. But KZ looks so good I'm going to buy the game just to encourage those kind of graphics. As games they're both not too big, so all we have to go on is how it looks. And guess who kicks who's rainbow colored ass in that department.~-~
Right now, from what I have seen so far, I think Killzone 2 would score 8 - 8.5. All the developers seem to show (and the fanboys seem to hype) is the game's graphics and character animation. From what I've seen of the gameplay, it looks generic.
I think you people are hyping this game way too soo. Wait for more information.
I bet if killzone didnt have such dark and gloomy graphics it would be practically the same as halo 3 graphics.keith500
~-~I doubt it, the thing I like most is the lighting. Halo has that look where everything is a reflective surface. Looks like someone buffed the world like the hood of a car. I hate that and KZ doesn't do it. And there's something else to it, I think it's the motion blur, but whatever it is it just looks good.~-~ ~-~Added: ^^^^ And how is that different from Halo? Except looking much better cuz Halo doesn't do that.~-~
Whats the point in having colour TV's if we can't display the colour? Yeah, Killzone 2 is made up of every single shade of grey known the human eye. To me, Halo 3 looks far better than KZ2 because it utilises the next gen technology known as 'colour'.
Log in to comment