I played it and it didn't impress me. Hasen't anyone ever realized that graphics arn't everything?
I refuse to call it AAA, and i implore anyone who has played it to do the same.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I played it and it didn't impress me. Hasen't anyone ever realized that graphics arn't everything?
I refuse to call it AAA, and i implore anyone who has played it to do the same.
Come on, it's a 9. Would you prefer if I'd call the game 8.9? I disagree, I think the score is good (which is just a number anyway)....I refuse to call it AAA, and i implore anyone who has played it to do the same.
Acemaster27
I agree.
Technically its a marvel.But I've got to wonder what GG were doing for almost 5 years?!!
The single player is far too short and cliche,with nothing close to what you'd call a memorable story or characters.And yes innovation isn't every thing,but would it have hurt GG to have spent some of the reported $60 million budget deveoping some new gameplay ideas? Seriously :?
Its saved from medicocrity by the MP quite frankly.
A poor opinion that pretty much goes against all the reviews. Not to mention KZ2 isn't just about great graphics. That's just icing on the cakeYou have an own opinion! That's great.
TheAnnihilation
There are new gameplay ideas. First person cover? New multiplayer mode, that will become the standard in all FPS games? Or do those not count?I agree.
Technically its a marvel.But I've got to wonder what GG were doing for almost 5 years?!!
The single player is far too short and cliche,with nothing close to what you'd call a memorable story or characters.And yes innovation isn't every thing,but would it have hurt GG to have spent some of the reported $60 million budget deveoping some new gameplay ideas? Seriously :?
Its saved from medicocrity by the MP quite frankly.
stvee101
Nice Acemaster. That's pretty poor. I hate when people try to fudge reviews. That's really not coolYou gave Mario & Sonic: Olymipic games a 9.0
AC 360 version: 9.0
AC ps3 version:1.0
MGS4 1.0I can see the whole picture, but I'm simply too busy right now to continue
Giancar
Its not an opinion its the truth. I played it and its the truth. AA at best but thats doubtableAcemaster27
No, it's still an opinion.
Graphics aren't everything but they help... a lot. Great physics and AI help too. I think the idea for the game is cool but the writing is just awful, even worse than Gears. Even with KZ2's crappy writing and lack of originality, its still a 9 easily.
[QUOTE="Giancar"]
You gave Mario & Sonic: Olymipic games a 9.0
AC 360 version: 9.0
AC ps3 version:1.0
MGS4 1.0I can see the whole picture, but I'm simply too busy right now to continue
zarshack
megafanboy confirmed?
for giving Ninjabreadman a perfect score...lolyou can have some conclusions
what you should of call this topic is "i think killzone 2 isn't that good" and even then you'd still be wrongI played it and it didn't impress me. Hasen't anyone ever realized that graphics arn't everything?
I refuse to call it AAA, and i implore anyone who has played it to do the same.
Acemaster27
it is an opinion, and many people disagree with you. i personally find it amazing, and the graphics are just the icing on the cake. definate AAA IMO.
You gave Mario & Sonic: Olymipic games a 9.0
AC 360 version: 9.0
AC ps3 version:1.0
MGS4 1.0I can see the whole picture, but I'm simply too busy right now to continue
Giancar
:|
I guess congrats on having your own opinion TC even if, looking at your history with ratings, is slightly biased or just slightly... out there (NinjaBread Man a 10???).
[QUOTE="stvee101"]There are new gameplay ideas. First person cover? New multiplayer mode, that will become the standard in all FPS games? Or do those not count?I agree.
Technically its a marvel.But I've got to wonder what GG were doing for almost 5 years?!!
The single player is far too short and cliche,with nothing close to what you'd call a memorable story or characters.And yes innovation isn't every thing,but would it have hurt GG to have spent some of the reported $60 million budget deveoping some new gameplay ideas? Seriously :?
Its saved from medicocrity by the MP quite frankly.
EmperorSupreme
The cover system thing is debateble.There have been cover sytems in FPS's in the past,although,I suppose,not like KZ2's.
And about the MP,well as far as I can see GG cherry-picked all the best stuff from COD4 and TF2 and added a few ideas of their own.Very little genuine innovation there imo.
Cows give this game too easy a ride imo.Like HL2,this game should have moved the genre forward ,given the recouses that were thrown at it.
I don't think it's triple A either. I own it. The campaign is exciting, but nothing special. 8.5/10 there. The online is exciting, but gets old VERY quickly, as you'll realize that the deadzone on the controller is just terrible after playing for a few days and then trying CoD again. 8.0/10 there. I'd give an 8.6 or 8.7, but it's really nothing too amazing.
The more I play it, the more I tend to think that yes, it is mostly about graphics. The visual fidelity is top tier, but the gameplay mechanics and level design aren't better than what's available in other shooters.
Overall, still and excellent game and a must-have for any PS3 owner that likes shooters. But only time will tell if Killzone 2 has the legs to stand the test of time.
[QUOTE="Giancar"]
You gave Mario & Sonic: Olymipic games a 9.0
AC 360 version: 9.0
AC ps3 version:1.0
MGS4 1.0I can see the whole picture, but I'm simply too busy right now to continue
Zassimick
:|
I guess congrats on having your own opinion TC even if, looking at your history with ratings, is slightly biased or just slightly... out there (NinjaBread Man a 10???).
:lol:
did he think no one was gonna look at that? *shake head*
People have every right to not like KZ but somehow I have a feeling that he didn't play it or played about 20 seconds at a friends house.
[QUOTE="Zassimick"]
[QUOTE="Giancar"]
You gave Mario & Sonic: Olymipic games a 9.0
AC 360 version: 9.0
AC ps3 version:1.0
MGS4 1.0I can see the whole picture, but I'm simply too busy right now to continue
FragTycoon
:|
I guess congrats on having your own opinion TC even if, looking at your history with ratings, is slightly biased or just slightly... out there (NinjaBread Man a 10???).
:lol:
did he think no one was gonna look at that? *shake head*
People have every right to not like KZ but somehow I have a feeling that he didn't play it or played about 20 seconds at a friends house.
to rate MGS4 a 1.0 you must have no idea what you are on about. I think this thread is an extention of this.
I thought it was really good.
The level design is good with interesting battles. The story has a twist with the enemies for once not being aliens, but mostly human, and for once, your the big invading force. Which almost makes you the evil invaders???
I love it, I love the online. I can easily call it AAA.
Its ok not to like the game, but its hard to make a real, discussion out of this thread because youve given no reason for why you dont like it. Which makes me wonder if this is just a poor attempt at flamebait...
anyone who claims killzone2 has better graphics than gears of war has no idea what they are talking about. http://image.gamespotcdn.com/gamespot/images/2008/196/928377_20080715_screen001.jpg See that killzone2 shot? look at the wall texture behind the dude 90% of all killzone2 textures are flat like that. there's a few good but most like that. killzone2 isnt even in same league texturing wise as gears of war.dfgfdgfdgdfgfg
You obviously havent even played Killzone 2, posting screenshots.... The graphics in the game are more than just textures. Its the whole effect it creates. There is so much going on. Dust in the air blowing in the wind. Amazing lighting. Particle effects.
Gears has its share of bad textures too.
I played it and it didn't impress me. Hasen't anyone ever realized that graphics arn't everything?
I refuse to call it AAA, and i implore anyone who has played it to do the same.
Acemaster27
I know right, even though I have dark skin and have black parents, I refuse to acknowledge I'm a black person. :roll:
[QUOTE="angry_fork"]
Yet another System Wars topic filled with:
Ek-Andy
I can't see pictures until I qoute anymore :(. This sucks, I thought your post meant nothing, and when I checked the picture popped up.
You just see a blank space or something? Check out your settings in whatever browser your using, or the preferences on gamespot itself., if you can see it when you quote then you should be able to see it on the forum too, atleast i'd imagine so.[QUOTE="Ek-Andy"][QUOTE="angry_fork"]
Yet another System Wars topic filled with:
angry_fork
I can't see pictures until I qoute anymore :(. This sucks, I thought your post meant nothing, and when I checked the picture popped up.
You just see a blank space or something? Check out your settings in whatever browser your using, or the preferences on gamespot itself., if you can see it when you quote then you should be able to see it on the forum too, atleast i'd imagine so.It's been like this for a while, not too sure how to fix it. I don't see peoples avatars either, or alot of sigs for that matter. It's not my browser though, it's this account.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment