Killzone 3 in High Quality video (awesome)

sorry guys but I think this looks better than crysis 2 in the consoles

link 1 http://www.gamersyde.com/stream_killzone_3_e3_hq_gameplay_1-16070_en.html

2 http://www.gamersyde.com/stream_killzone_3_e3_hq_gameplay_3-16073_en.html

3 http://www.gamersyde.com/stream_killzone_3_e3_killzone_3_gameplay-15872_en.html

I mean look at those graphics, the light , the animations, the detail of the landscape in the distance ,
and the effects on the ocean and the levels much more larger than the previous one.
this game is in pre-halfa and it looks already spectacular , I really think this looks better than crysis 2 on the consoles.

I'm anxious to see the levels in the jungle :D

sorry inferior to Gears 3.

sorry inferior to Gears 3.

ProjectNatalFan

Thats for you.

@ your post: Hmmm....*looks at username*

i see gray and white, and some yellow, and red on some stuff. Looks good, but Gears 3 owns this.

sorry inferior to Gears 3.

ProjectNatalFan

LOL you are a fast guy ,you don't even had the time to see the videos 8)

[QUOTE="ProjectNatalFan"]

sorry inferior to Gears 3.

dalavos

LOL you are a fast guy ,you don't even had the time to see the videos 8)

its because he's one of the hardcore lems in SW

sorry inferior to Gears 3.

ProjectNatalFan

[QUOTE="ProjectNatalFan"]

sorry inferior to Gears 3.

Mestitia

Nice job on the cow post.

Gears 3 and KZ3 are neck and neck. Calm down

[QUOTE="ProjectNatalFan"]

sorry inferior to Gears 3.

Mestitia

maybe I should get my eyes checked, I think Killzone 3 looks like Killzone 2, and Gears 3, well just watch the demo!

I agree but it does not own Crysis 2.If anything its extremely close.This first part of Crysis 2 is definitely the most visually impressive thing at E3 shown,with KZ3 and RAGE up there.

*end of part 2 looks like freaking CGi,best lightning i have ever seen.

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2010-crysis-2/101804?type=flv

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2010-crysis-2/101802?type=flv

[QUOTE="dalavos"]

[QUOTE="ProjectNatalFan"]

sorry inferior to Gears 3.

Modern_Unit

LOL you are a fast guy ,you don't even had the time to see the videos 8)

its because he's one of the hardcore lems in SW

[QUOTE="Modern_Unit"]

[QUOTE="dalavos"]

LOL you are a fast guy ,you don't even had the time to see the videos 8)

Diviniuz

its because he's one of the hardcore lems in SW

You deserve an award for that 8)

[QUOTE="dalavos"]

[QUOTE="ProjectNatalFan"]

sorry inferior to Gears 3.

Modern_Unit

LOL you are a fast guy ,you don't even had the time to see the videos 8)

its because he's one of the hardcore lems in SW

yes the (username) says everything lol

sorry inferior to Gears 3.

ProjectNatalFan

Looks good, but I prefer Crysis 2's visuals.

Killzone 3

3D vs 2D(shots from MagazinerDUDE from NeoGaf).

I love how people say that Killzone 3 looks just like Killzone 2....and think that's a bad thing :lol:

sorry inferior to Gears 3.

ProjectNatalFan

Well I don't know about you guys, but his username sums up the validity of his posts in a nutshell.

[QUOTE="ProjectNatalFan"]

sorry inferior to Gears 3.

Revitaly

Well I don't know about you guys, but his username sums up the validity of his posts in a nutshell.

Lol, welcome to the party.

GeOW3 looks like GeOW2 and KZ3 looks like KZ2. The only conclusion I can draw from this is that KZ3 looks superior.

Looks incredible, especially the water :o

Still i dont think it looks better than Crysis2, Gears3 and probably Rage. They all have completly diferent art styles.

I agree but it does not own Crysis 2.If anything its extremely close.This first part of Crysis 2 is definitely the most visually impressive thing at E3 shown,with KZ3 and RAGE up there.

*end of part 2 looks like freaking CGi,best lightning i have ever seen.

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2010-crysis-2/101804?type=flv

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2010-crysis-2/101802?type=flv

Bus-A-Bus

Crysis 2 on these two videos looks very good but the game is scheduled for this year ,
I do not know what month but I think killzone 3 being in pre-half and being scheduled for february 2011 , I think we will see a great
improvement in the game until he comes out.
But without doubt they are the two most visually stunning FPS on the consoles right now

Looks incredible, especially the water :o

Still i dont think it looks better than Crysis2, Gears3 and probably Rage. They all have completly diferent art styles.

PAL360

I still think it got RAGE beaten,but not by much.It definitely looks better than Gears 3...again,not buy much but it does look better.Crysis 2 though beats it...KZ3 looks a bit bland,you are surrounded by small mountains,white snow,whiteish water,white snowflakes...less post processing,didnt see object motion blur but it looks crisper than KZ2.It looks amazing,but that footage of Crysis 2 beats it by very small amount though...its more about preferences.

I agree but it does not own Crysis 2.If anything its extremely close.This first part of Crysis 2 is definitely the most visually impressive thing at E3 shown,with KZ3 and RAGE up there.

*end of part 2 looks like freaking CGi,best lightning i have ever seen.

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2010-crysis-2/101804?type=flv

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2010-crysis-2/101802?type=flv

Bus-A-Bus

Graphics look great, but the gameplay looks very "meh". Run, shoot, run, shoot. :roll: Generic as can be. Crysis 2 will own it in everyway. :)WhenCicadasCry

So....a gane genre that is called "First-Person Shooter" doing mostly shooting is a bad thing...? Let's forget that Killzone basically started the FPS cover system, and it's improved upon itself with the sequel. Also, I think you missed the memo on jetpacks. Killzone is adding some platforming to the mix.

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

Looks incredible, especially the water :o

Still i dont think it looks better than Crysis2, Gears3 and probably Rage. They all have completly diferent art styles.

Bus-A-Bus

I still think it got RAGE beaten,but not by much.It definitely looks better than Gears 3...again,not buy much but it does look better.Crysis 2 though beats it...KZ3 looks a bit bland,you are surrounded by small mountains,white snow,whiteish water,white snowflakes...less post processing,didnt see object motion blur but it looks crisper than KZ2.It looks amazing,but that footage of Crysis 2 beats it by very small amount though...its more about preferences.

Yes, Crysis2 had the most impressive gameplay presentation out of those but we have yet to confirm if that gameplay is from consoles or PC. On the other hand Rage was the least impressive to me. It had incredible NPC animations but for some reason the combat didnt impress me as much. Gears3 looked very impressive especially considering it was being played in 4 player coop.

Again, all of those + KZ3 looked fantastic to me but it´s not an easy job to find out which one is technically better since they look completly diferent!

Looks excellent, but don't let that pre-alpha talk fool you. The game isn't going to magically look 10x better at release. At the most some of the textures will be higher res and the rough edges will be gone, possibly a rock solid framerate.

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]Graphics look great, but the gameplay looks very "meh". Run, shoot, run, shoot. :roll: Generic as can be. Crysis 2 will own it in everyway. :)xYamatox

So....a gane genre that is called "First-Person Shooter" doing mostly shooting is a bad thing...? Let's forget that Killzone basically started the FPS cover system, and it's improved upon itself with the sequel. Also, I think you missed the memo on jetpacks. Killzone is adding some platforming to the mix.

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

Looks incredible, especially the water :o

Still i dont think it looks better than Crysis2, Gears3 and probably Rage. They all have completly diferent art styles.

PAL360

I still think it got RAGE beaten,but not by much.It definitely looks better than Gears 3...again,not buy much but it does look better.Crysis 2 though beats it...KZ3 looks a bit bland,you are surrounded by small mountains,white snow,whiteish water,white snowflakes...less post processing,didnt see object motion blur but it looks crisper than KZ2.It looks amazing,but that footage of Crysis 2 beats it by very small amount though...its more about preferences.

Yes, Crysis2 had the most impressive gameplay presentation out of those but we have yet to confirm if that gameplay is from consoles or PC. On the other hand Rage was the least impressive to me. It had incredible NPC animations but for some reason the combat didnt impress me as much. Gears3 looked very impressive especially considering it was being played in 4 player coop.

Again, all of those + KZ3 looked fantastic to me but it´s not an easy job to find out which one is technically better since they look completly diferent!

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

Looks incredible, especially the water :o

Still i dont think it looks better than Crysis2, Gears3 and probably Rage. They all have completly diferent art styles.

PAL360

I still think it got RAGE beaten,but not by much.It definitely looks better than Gears 3...again,not buy much but it does look better.Crysis 2 though beats it...KZ3 looks a bit bland,you are surrounded by small mountains,white snow,whiteish water,white snowflakes...less post processing,didnt see object motion blur but it looks crisper than KZ2.It looks amazing,but that footage of Crysis 2 beats it by very small amount though...its more about preferences.

Yes, Crysis2 had the most impressive gameplay presentation out of those but we have yet to confirm if that gameplay is from consoles or PC. On the other hand Rage was the least impressive to me. It had incredible NPC animations but for some reason the combat didnt impress me as much. Gears3 looked very impressive especially considering it was being played in 4 player coop.

Again, all of those + KZ3 looked fantastic to me but it´s not an easy job to find out which one is technically better since they look completly diferent!

Crysis 2 was played on PC but with 360 settings,that was confirmed yesterday by their developer on crymod.com.They still need to polish some things up,like particles and maybe add per object motion blur.

He also stated that mindblowing trailer was real time.Gears 3 looked very impressive and just the fact that people admit it speaks alot cus there is alot of hate on Gears.KZ3 was just amazing and it also ran butter smooth.

[QUOTE="xYamatox"]

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"]Graphics look great, but the gameplay looks very "meh". Run, shoot, run, shoot. :roll: Generic as can be. Crysis 2 will own it in everyway. :)WhenCicadasCry

So....a gane genre that is called "First-Person Shooter" doing mostly shooting is a bad thing...? Let's forget that Killzone basically started the FPS cover system, and it's improved upon itself with the sequel. Also, I think you missed the memo on jetpacks. Killzone is adding some platforming to the mix.

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

I agree but it does not own Crysis 2.If anything its extremely close.This first part of Crysis 2 is definitely the most visually impressive thing at E3 shown,with KZ3 and RAGE up there.

*end of part 2 looks like freaking CGi,best lightning i have ever seen.

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2010-crysis-2/101804?type=flv

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2010-crysis-2/101802?type=flv

Delsage

I definitely agree,thats why i said its close call.KZ3 has probably best animation in business and that goes solely for developers knowledge and dedication,no game has better animations than KZ3.I also like KZ3 cus it looks bit more cripser,but i like Crysis 2 because of its better lighting,better destruction and all around chaos like skyscrapers in fire...rockets all around you and such.Its definitely close :)

I noticed 2 bad things. Rico is alive, and that motion valve/bomb turning is still here.

Other then that.... it was AMAZING.

[QUOTE="Delsage"][QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

I agree but it does not own Crysis 2.If anything its extremely close.This first part of Crysis 2 is definitely the most visually impressive thing at E3 shown,with KZ3 and RAGE up there.

*end of part 2 looks like freaking CGi,best lightning i have ever seen.

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2010-crysis-2/101804?type=flv

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2010-crysis-2/101802?type=flv

Bus-A-Bus

I definitely agree,thats why i said its close call.KZ3 has probably best animation in business and that goes solely for developers knowledge and dedication,no game has better animations than KZ3.I also like KZ3 cus it looks bit more cripser,but i like Crysis 2 because of its better lighting,better destruction and all around chaos like skyscrapers in fire...rockets all around you and such.Its definitely close :)

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

I still think it got RAGE beaten,but not by much.It definitely looks better than Gears 3...again,not buy much but it does look better.Crysis 2 though beats it...KZ3 looks a bit bland,you are surrounded by small mountains,white snow,whiteish water,white snowflakes...less post processing,didnt see object motion blur but it looks crisper than KZ2.It looks amazing,but that footage of Crysis 2 beats it by very small amount though...its more about preferences.

Bus-A-Bus

Yes, Crysis2 had the most impressive gameplay presentation out of those but we have yet to confirm if that gameplay is from consoles or PC. On the other hand Rage was the least impressive to me. It had incredible NPC animations but for some reason the combat didnt impress me as much. Gears3 looked very impressive especially considering it was being played in 4 player coop.

Again, all of those + KZ3 looked fantastic to me but it´s not an easy job to find out which one is technically better since they look completly diferent!

Crysis 2 was played on PC but with 360 settings,that was confirmed yesterday by their developer on crymod.com.They still need to polish some things up,like particles and maybe add per object motion blur.

He also stated that mindblowing trailer was real time.Gears 3 looked very impressive and just the fact that people admit it speaks alot cus there is alot of hate on Gears.KZ3 was just amazing and it also ran butter smooth.

So Crysis2 will look on 360 like in their vids you posted? :o

Dude, you made my day!!! :D

[QUOTE="Androvinus"] i can see you have never played killzone 2 or you are just trying to make jokesWhenCicadasCry

Weighted controls, realistic recoil in the guns, original weapons (lighting gun, bolt gun), Squad-based multiplayer, superior character animations that react depending on where the character was hit, and obviously as mentioned, the FPS cover system.

That's not even everything that Killzone does different from Call of Duty...

Rage, Crysis2 and Gears3 are graphicallysuperior in my honest opinion.

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"][QUOTE="Androvinus"] i can see you have never played killzone 2 or you are just trying to make jokesxYamatox

Weighted controls, realistic recoil in the guns, original weapons (lighting gun, bolt gun), Squad-based multiplayer, superior character animations that react depending on where the character was hit, and obviously as mentioned, the FPS cover system.

That's not even everything that Killzone does different from Call of Duty...

[QUOTE="xYamatox"]

[QUOTE="WhenCicadasCry"] I have? Tell me one thing apart from a FPS cover system which Call Of Juraz - Bound In Blood had, that Killzone 2 does differently from Call Of Duty. WhenCicadasCry

Weighted controls, realistic recoil in the guns, original weapons (lighting gun, bolt gun), Squad-based multiplayer, superior character animations that react depending on where the character was hit, and obviously as mentioned, the FPS cover system.

That's not even everything that Killzone does different from Call of Duty...

"They were broken".

The devs intended it to be played like that, so they arent "broken". And many people seem to like it too. And what do you mean by "gameplay mechanics" then???