Killzone 3 looks better than Halo Reach

I haven't played neither game but I think Killzone 3 looks better than Halo Reach and I also think it has the better gameplay. Halo Reach is just another Halo while Killzone 3 brings actual progress in comparison to the predecessors. However, both are overhyped action shooters.

and the sky is blue

I haven't played neither game but I think Killzone 3 looks better than Halo Reach and I also think it has the better gameplay. Halo Reach is just another Halo while Killzone 3 brings actual progress in comparison to the predecessors. However, both are overhyped action shooters.

nameless12345

It would be nice to make a thread about something you actually have a legit opinion about.

this made me lol .

[QUOTE="nameless12345"]

I haven't played neither game but I think Killzone 3 looks better than Halo Reach and I also think it has the better gameplay. Halo Reach is just another Halo while Killzone 3 brings actual progress in comparison to the predecessors. However, both are overhyped action shooters.

heretrix

It would be nice to make a thread about something you actually have a legit opinion about.

Wait, we are in SW, aren't we?

Killzone 2 looks better then reach, so what's the point of this thread?

Killzone 3 looks better, but Reach is better.

I haven't played neither game but I think Killzone 3 looks better than Halo Reach and I also think it has the better gameplay. Halo Reach is just another Halo while Killzone 3 brings actual progress in comparison to the predecessors. However, both are overhyped action shooters.

nameless12345

KZ3 looks better than Reach, what an acomplishment :roll:

The Halo games looks awful, and play awful, they would have to be the worst shooters ever made, i honestly have no clue on how people can like something so bad. Killzone 3 does look better than Halo and not only does it look better, its more fun to play.TheAcountantMan

Halo > Killzone > CoD.

I haven't played neither game but I think Killzone 3 looks better than Halo Reach and I also think it has the better gameplay. Halo Reach is just another Halo while Killzone 3 brings actual progress in comparison to the predecessors. However, both are overhyped action shooters.

nameless12345

Halo Reach is just another Halo, that is why it has a million times better gameplay than KZ3 that is an indifferent, one in the billion linear shooters

And Reach looks a lot better than KZ3 ad has variety too, than brown and grey

I haven't played neither game but I think Killzone 3 looks better than Halo Reach and I also think it has the better gameplay. Halo Reach is just another Halo while Killzone 3 brings actual progress in comparison to the predecessors. However, both are overhyped action shooters.

nameless12345

Do tell ol' chap.

Technically. Artistically I think Reach looked a lot better.UCF_Knight

And Killzone 1 looks better than Crysis :o :P

The Halo games looks awful, and play awful, they would have to be the worst shooters ever made, i honestly have no clue on how people can like something so bad. Killzone 3 does look better than Halo and not only does it look better, its more fun to play.TheAcountantMan

You can not seriously think it's one of the worst shooters ever made.:lol:

You haven't played many shooters.

They quite clearly don't look awful and they certainly don't play awful. They're popular for a reason and no, it's not because there's millions of ignorant people out there.

Unfortunately you could say that about the CoD series. The people who play those games are mostly oblivious to the fact that other video games actually exist.

If you haven't played either game, then how can you have an opinion on them?

9.5>8.5 KZ3 looks better, obviouslyocstew

Halo Reach have Hockey , your argument is irrelevent

Nope, not by mah eyes - I love the visuals in Reach and do believe it gets short changed for it great visuals all because it has that 4 letter word attached to it... HALO. :?

Anyhoo, HALO > KZ and ya really should try playing them, well, at least Halo is more fun playing thenjust looking at. :P

Yes it does (graphically) But artistically ? Halo kills that generic, bland looking world.

To bad KZ sell, scores, and plays worse. :wink:

Thankyou Cpt. Obvious. :roll:

I played both games and they both have their pros and cons, IMO I prefer Halo's colourfulness and it's non-COD like gameplay.

Yes it does (graphically) But artistically ? Halo kills that generic, bland looking world.

To bad KZ sell, scores, and plays worse. :wink:

Sp4rtan_3

:lol: oh wow... system wars delivers again...

yep... so bland and generic... art styl3 sucks big time :roll:

[QUOTE="nameless12345"]

I haven't played neither game but I think Killzone 3 looks better than Halo Reach and I also think it has the better gameplay. Halo Reach is just another Halo while Killzone 3 brings actual progress in comparison to the predecessors. However, both are overhyped action shooters.

heretrix

It would be nice to make a thread about something you actually have a legit opinion about.

[QUOTE="campzor"] yep... so bland and generic... art styl3 sucks big time :roll:

sts106mat

you have just basically proved his point for him by posting those shots.

the warehouses could exist anywhere on earth today, a bunch of old crates an old building devoid of colour with a statue and a bizarre bunch of rocks and branches, what are you seeing when you look at those pictures. anyone who claims that that game beats halo reach artistically is simply lying to themselves.

[QUOTE="campzor"] yep... so bland and generic... art styl3 sucks big time :roll:

sts106mat

you have just basically proved his point for him by posting those shots.

the warehouses could exist anywhere on earth today, a bunch of old crates an old building devoid of colour with a statue and a bizarre bunch of rocks and branches, what are you seeing when you look at those pictures. anyone who claims that that game beats halo reach artistically is simply lying to themselves.

oh look.. its an outdoor setting near a cliff in the mountains with some mist/fog in the background..where on earth would i ever find something like that.. surely on another planet cause earth sure as hell doesnt have anything like that.

i cant see how from an artistic point of view those kz3 look horrible in the slightest. I dont see what a common setting has anything to do with its ARTSTYLE.. infact it doesnt have anything to do with an artstyle.

Obviously. Halo games have last generation level graphics. Drakan11

Reach looks great.

i cant see how from an artistic point of view those kz3 look horrible in the slightest. I dont see what a common setting has anything to do with its ARTSTYLE.. infact it doesnt have anything to do with an artstyle.

campzor

I don't think KZ has a horrible art-style at all, it's better than competent but that's it.

Halo's artstyle is unique, no matter what Halo-haters say.

It's distinctive. It may not be to your taste but I'd bet the people that genuinely prefer KZ's style to Reach's would be quite small in number.

As a previous poster said, look at the needler. It is BEAUTIFUL.:P

Halo Reach have Hockey , your argument is irrelevent

devilsoultaker2

Halo Reach also chess andskeeball, your argument is irrelevent

Why do people bag on Reach? Because it's cool? the Reach engine is pretty impressive.