killzone haters

  • 111 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for hip-hop-cola
hip-hop-cola

558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#1 hip-hop-cola
Member since 2007 • 558 Posts

there are a lot of u...>_> *looks around in disgust*

but whats with all the hate! because killzone had a CGI...only a brain dead freak would believe that was really..

killzone 1 was bad? so....it was badly made but people who played it will tell u it was good..(me and my mates loved it)

and the difference killzone 2 will have is no bugs or faults, with the new backing they got from Sony.

so whats wrong with people being excited about it!

Avatar image for Dups79
Dups79

2370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#2 Dups79
Member since 2004 • 2370 Posts
The amount of hype Killzone 1 got and the result is the reason people are cautious about Killzone 2.
Avatar image for Ninja-Vox
Ninja-Vox

16314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#3 Ninja-Vox
Member since 2006 • 16314 Posts

Because they lied and said the CGI was real, that's why. So immediately people have no respect for the developers. I also have no respect for the developers after the damn-near two year "halo killer" campaign, only to release a game which scored a 6.9 and was widely regarded as mediocre at best. I also have no respect for the developer because they were so quick to say it was hardware limitations that brought about such a low score, yet TimeSplitters on the PS2 is awesome. Not only that, but they also made Shellshock on the xbox - a much more powerful system - and that got a 5.4 - so what's their excuse with that?

Lying, over-hyping, mediocre developers. 

Avatar image for onewiththegame
onewiththegame

4415

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 onewiththegame
Member since 2004 • 4415 Posts

Because they lied and said the CGI was real, that's why. So immediately people have no respect for the developers. I also have no respect for the developers after the damn-near two year "halo killer" campaign, only to release a game which scored a 6.9 and was widely regarded as mediocre at best. I also have no respect for the developer because they were so quick to say it was hardware limitations that brought about such a low score, yet TimeSplitters on the PS2 is awesome. Not only that, but they also made Shellshock on the xbox - a much more powerful system - and that got a 5.4 - so what's their excuse with that?

Lying, over-hyping, mediocre developers.

Ninja-Vox

I think I love you, i have a tear in my eye that was so beautiful

Avatar image for deactivated-5f956b96dc672
deactivated-5f956b96dc672

2218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 deactivated-5f956b96dc672
Member since 2007 • 2218 Posts
showing CGI and letting people think that it was gameplay was a bad move for sony.
Avatar image for waynehead895
waynehead895

18660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 waynehead895
Member since 2005 • 18660 Posts
I played it and It didn't leave a lasting impression. I was more impressed with Blacks single plyer campaign. Never played MP though beacause I have no Multi tap and no one really wanted to play 1 on 1.
Avatar image for akif22
akif22

16012

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#7 akif22
Member since 2003 • 16012 Posts

killzone was horrible because the cows hyped it up so much

about the CGI .. they lied about the graphics, insulting (some/most) gamers' intelligence

and i'm sorry, i've played killzone and thought it was horrible .. maybe you people who like it need to start playing quality shooters to learn how FPSs should be

i've being playing FPSs for years .. goldeneye, perfect dark, halo, half-life .. those are quality

killzone doesn't come close, and real gamers should know that

Avatar image for omarguy01
omarguy01

8139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 omarguy01
Member since 2004 • 8139 Posts
start hyping the next barbie game while you're at it
Avatar image for ff7isnumbaone
ff7isnumbaone

5352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 ff7isnumbaone
Member since 2005 • 5352 Posts

The amount of hype Killzone 1 got and the result is the reason people are cautious about Killzone 2.Dups79

Its funny I heard killzone got alot of hype but that was after I played it. SO I guess it worked because poeple actually played it. 

Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts

there are a lot of u...>_> *looks around in disgust*

but whats with all the hate! because killzone had a CGI...only a brain dead freak would believe that was really..

killzone 1 was bad? so....it was badly made but people who played it will tell u it was good..(me and my mates loved it)

and the difference killzone 2 will have is no bugs or faults, with the new backing they got from Sony.

so whats wrong with people being excited about it!

hip-hop-cola

  • I guess a lot of cows are brain dead because all of them were talking about how it was real and not CGI when it first came out
  • Killzone 1 was bad? Yeah it was bad so bad that Geist 7.8 > Killzone 6.9 the Geist developers created Mary Kate and Ashley and still managed to get almost an entire point above Killzone 
  • All games have bugs and faults Killzone or any other game for the matter is no different.
Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts

[QUOTE="Dups79"]The amount of hype Killzone 1 got and the result is the reason people are cautious about Killzone 2.ff7isnumbaone

Its funny I heard killzone got alot of hype but that was after I played it. SO I guess it worked because poeple actually played it.

And you call sheep blind and casual for buying casual trash :roll: 

Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts
Owned it, played it, hated it. Horrid bugs, level design, and framerate. only good thing I could say about it was the story. Will Killzone 2 be any better? I have my doubts, Why? Look at the guerrilla's history of games; two FPS games that didn't make it past the A rating and a AA PSP game that completley deviated from its originator's formula, which is what helped make it somewhat of a success.
Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts

[QUOTE="Dups79"]The amount of hype Killzone 1 got and the result is the reason people are cautious about Killzone 2.ff7isnumbaone

Its funny I heard killzone got alot of hype but that was after I played it. SO I guess it worked because poeple actually played it.

This made my day. Seriously, it did. 

Avatar image for ff7isnumbaone
ff7isnumbaone

5352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 ff7isnumbaone
Member since 2005 • 5352 Posts
[QUOTE="ff7isnumbaone"]

[QUOTE="Dups79"]The amount of hype Killzone 1 got and the result is the reason people are cautious about Killzone 2.Verge_6

Its funny I heard killzone got alot of hype but that was after I played it. SO I guess it worked because poeple actually played it.

This made my day. Seriously, it did.

thats good that it made ur day its the truth. Coming from some1 who is not a lemming. Whats shooters did ps2 have again? Black, Area 51 and killzone right? Well I played all 3. 

Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts
[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="ff7isnumbaone"]

[QUOTE="Dups79"]The amount of hype Killzone 1 got and the result is the reason people are cautious about Killzone 2.ff7isnumbaone

Its funny I heard killzone got alot of hype but that was after I played it. SO I guess it worked because poeple actually played it.

This made my day. Seriously, it did.

thats good that it made ur day its the truth. Coming from some1 who is not a lemming. Whats shooters did ps2 have again? Black, Area 51 and killzone right? Well I played all 3.

Killzone was hyped to hell and back, lauded as the 'halo killer'. If that isn't hype, I'd like you to tell me what is. And hardly anyone played it, just look at the sales.

By the way, I am not 'some1 who is a lemming'. I have a Dreamcast, the first two Playstations, a Gamecube, an N64, a PSP, a DS Lite, an N64, and a SNES that go along with my XBox and 360. 

Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts
[QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]

there are a lot of u...>_> *looks around in disgust*

but whats with all the hate! because killzone had a CGI...only a brain dead freak would believe that was really..

killzone 1 was bad? so....it was badly made but people who played it will tell u it was good..(me and my mates loved it)

and the difference killzone 2 will have is no bugs or faults, with the new backing they got from Sony.

so whats wrong with people being excited about it!

ff7isnumbaone

  • I guess a lot of cows are brain dead because all of them were talking about how it was real and not CGI when it first came out :lol:
  • Killzone 1 was bad? Yeah it was bad so bad that Geist 7.8 > Killzone 6.9 the Geist developers created Mary Kate and Ashley and still managed to get almost an entire point above Killzone :lol:
  • All games have bugs and faults Killzone or any other game for the matter is no different.

so? Your idiot if u judge every game buy gamespot rating. It think it was a decent game. And every who rated it on gamespot says so to. It got 8.2 from regualr gamers. I trust gamers over some fat reviewer.

I'm an idiot for following system wars law? Yeah okay man whatever you say. You cows always use seem to abandon rules when it favors your situation. Like how GeOW is overrated but Killzone is a dcent game lol. Yeah you trust regular gamers up until they don't go with your opinion. Get outta here you freaking hypocrite. 

Avatar image for istreakforfood
istreakforfood

7781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#18 istreakforfood
Member since 2004 • 7781 Posts

so? Your idiot if u judge every game buy gamespot rating. It think it was a decent game. And every who rated it on gamespot says so to. It got 8.2 from regualr gamers. I trust gamers over some fat reviewer.

ff7isnumbaone

 

So it is ok to use GS ratings when sony games get good ratings but when a sony game gets a bad rating you guys say GS is anti-sony:lol:

 

Killzone was a horriable game. I was able to play it cause one of my friends had it. I have my doubts about KZ2 being good cause of their prequal. I guess all we can do is wait and see. A good shooter game i can think on top of my head that was on PS2 was Socom 1 and 2(i havent tried the other socom games) I loved socom 2.

Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts
[QUOTE="ff7isnumbaone"]

so? Your idiot if u judge every game buy gamespot rating. It think it was a decent game. And every who rated it on gamespot says so to. It got 8.2 from regualr gamers. I trust gamers over some fat reviewer.

istreakforfood

 

So it is ok to use GS ratings when sony games get good ratings but when a sony game gets a bad rating you guys say GS is anti-sony:lol:

 

Killzone was a horriable game. I was able to play it cause one of my friends had it. I have my doubts about KZ2 being good cause of their prequal. I guess all we can do is wait and see. A good shooter game i can think on top of my head that was on PS2 was Socom 1 and 2(i havent tried the other socom games) I loved socom 2.

Such is the way of the mad cows, pathetic indeed. 

Avatar image for hip-hop-cola
hip-hop-cola

558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#20 hip-hop-cola
Member since 2007 • 558 Posts

so the most im getting is u all hate it becouse it was hyped?...thats not much of a reason

another one is the devs who made it..  well they is a whole load more for kz 2 and more money

one of u said that all games have faults... well if u had played kz 1 ud know they were very bad

from what most of u have said it all seems like hate just becouse its on ps3.....

well nobody can say what kz 2 will be like so i cant see where hate is coming from

Avatar image for greg_splicer
greg_splicer

2053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 greg_splicer
Member since 2007 • 2053 Posts

there are a lot of u...>_> *looks around in disgust*

but whats with all the hate! because killzone had a CGI...only a brain dead freak would believe that was really..

killzone 1 was bad? so....it was badly made but people who played it will tell u it was good..(me and my mates loved it)

and the difference killzone 2 will have is no bugs or faults, with the new backing they got from Sony.

so whats wrong with people being excited about it!

hip-hop-cola
Getting hyped for a game over a CGI video, and we have seen NOT ONE real thing about the game, can only lead to frustration after people see the crap graphics killzone 2 will have, why do you think they hold back any pics etc ? PS3 is not that good in graphics as it seems, low res textures etc mean could never make it look even 10 times worst than the CGI trailer, so they hide the game and try to biuld hype around ... NOTHING
Avatar image for hip-hop-cola
hip-hop-cola

558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#22 hip-hop-cola
Member since 2007 • 558 Posts
[QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]

there are a lot of u...>_> *looks around in disgust*

but whats with all the hate! because killzone had a CGI...only a brain dead freak would believe that was really..

Blackbond

  • I guess a lot of cows are brain dead because all of them were talking about how it was real and not CGI when it first came out

well ur right on that one.... some people are dumb

Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts

so the most im getting is u all hate it becouse it was hyped?...thats not much of a reason

another one is the devs who made it.. well they is a whole load more for kz 2 and more money

one of u said that all games have faults... well if u had played kz 1 ud know they were very bad

from what most of u have said it all seems like hate just becouse its on ps3.....

well nobody can say what kz 2 will be like so i cant see where hate is coming from

hip-hop-cola

I already stated my reasons why I hated that game, and it was NOT because it was hyped, nor did I say I was cautious of Killzone 2 because it was being released on the PS3. Read my post better. You can give people with little talent in making games more money, but the result will ALWAYS be the same if talent is not present. Maybe the extra manpower will help, maybe it won't.  

Avatar image for hip-hop-cola
hip-hop-cola

558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#24 hip-hop-cola
Member since 2007 • 558 Posts
[QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]

there are a lot of u...>_> *looks around in disgust*

but whats with all the hate! because killzone had a CGI...only a brain dead freak would believe that was really..

killzone 1 was bad? so....it was badly made but people who played it will tell u it was good..(me and my mates loved it)

and the difference killzone 2 will have is no bugs or faults, with the new backing they got from Sony.

so whats wrong with people being excited about it!

greg_splicer

Getting hyped for a game over a CGI video, and we have seen NOT ONE real thing about the game, can only lead to frustration after people see the crap graphics killzone 2 will have, why do you think they hold back any pics etc ? PS3 is not that good in graphics as it seems, low res textures etc mean could never make it look even 10 times worst than the CGI trailer, so they hide the game and try to biuld hype around ... NOTHING

ur fanboy powers show there......

so they havent shown anything? mabye there making it better? who knows....

 

Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts
Everyone hates Killzone 1 because um....it F'n sucks. The reason why people probably dislike Killzone 2 is because its recieving hype like its the next Halo when its a game that has never proven to be a good FPS. Then we get all hyped up to find that the Killzone 2 trailer was nothing short of a scam, nothing but smoke and mirrors. I don't hate Killzone 2 but I'm not going to hype it. I'm just going to patiently await its arrival and then pass judgement. But Killzone 1 is crap and that's a fact. How some cows can say Killzone 1 > Halo is beyond me.
Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts
[QUOTE="greg_splicer"][QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]

there are a lot of u...>_> *looks around in disgust*

but whats with all the hate! because killzone had a CGI...only a brain dead freak would believe that was really..

killzone 1 was bad? so....it was badly made but people who played it will tell u it was good..(me and my mates loved it)

and the difference killzone 2 will have is no bugs or faults, with the new backing they got from Sony.

so whats wrong with people being excited about it!

hip-hop-cola

Getting hyped for a game over a CGI video, and we have seen NOT ONE real thing about the game, can only lead to frustration after people see the crap graphics killzone 2 will have, why do you think they hold back any pics etc ? PS3 is not that good in graphics as it seems, low res textures etc mean could never make it look even 10 times worst than the CGI trailer, so they hide the game and try to biuld hype around ... NOTHING

ur fanboy powers show there......

so they havent shown anything? mabye there making it better? who knows....

 

While several of his points ARE wrong, he has a point about them not showing one thing during two years. Wouldn't they want to show their progress instead of hiding it from everyone? :?

Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts
[QUOTE="greg_splicer"][QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]

there are a lot of u...>_> *looks around in disgust*

but whats with all the hate! because killzone had a CGI...only a brain dead freak would believe that was really..

killzone 1 was bad? so....it was badly made but people who played it will tell u it was good..(me and my mates loved it)

and the difference killzone 2 will have is no bugs or faults, with the new backing they got from Sony.

so whats wrong with people being excited about it!

hip-hop-cola

Getting hyped for a game over a CGI video, and we have seen NOT ONE real thing about the game, can only lead to frustration after people see the crap graphics killzone 2 will have, why do you think they hold back any pics etc ? PS3 is not that good in graphics as it seems, low res textures etc mean could never make it look even 10 times worst than the CGI trailer, so they hide the game and try to biuld hype around ... NOTHING

ur fanboy powers show there......

so they havent shown anything? mabye there making it better? who knows....

 

I hope that is the case. 

Avatar image for E_x_i_l_e
E_x_i_l_e

1908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 E_x_i_l_e
Member since 2007 • 1908 Posts

Because they lied and said the CGI was real, that's why. So immediately people have no respect for the developers. I also have no respect for the developers after the damn-near two year "halo killer" campaign, only to release a game which scored a 6.9 and was widely regarded as mediocre at best. I also have no respect for the developer because they were so quick to say it was hardware limitations that brought about such a low score, yet TimeSplitters on the PS2 is awesome. Not only that, but they also made Shellshock on the xbox - a much more powerful system - and that got a 5.4 - so what's their excuse with that?

Lying, over-hyping, mediocre developers.

Ninja-Vox

Umm, that was just Jack Tretton that said it was real. Bad move.

The first Killzone, was only their second console game I believe? Obviously a new developer in the field. Fans decided to deem Killzone a Halo Killer which was rediculous and got a lot of bad rep for the game after it flopped. It was still an average game, yes. It was still fun as well. Then, Killzone Liberation came out, was a great game, did much better than the original Killzone. Now, Guerilla Games is backed by Sony as a first party developer, and last I noticed, Sony makes some pretty damn good first party titles. 

Avatar image for hip-hop-cola
hip-hop-cola

558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#29 hip-hop-cola
Member since 2007 • 558 Posts

ok!! OK!!....so alot of u hated killzone 1....well i liked it and others have 2.

i belive killzone 1 with no faults would be great! and i have never seen what all the fuss was about halo.

my fav fps shooter is farcry so its not that i just have bad taste.

Avatar image for E_x_i_l_e
E_x_i_l_e

1908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 E_x_i_l_e
Member since 2007 • 1908 Posts
[QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"][QUOTE="greg_splicer"][QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]

there are a lot of u...>_> *looks around in disgust*

but whats with all the hate! because killzone had a CGI...only a brain dead freak would believe that was really..

killzone 1 was bad? so....it was badly made but people who played it will tell u it was good..(me and my mates loved it)

and the difference killzone 2 will have is no bugs or faults, with the new backing they got from Sony.

so whats wrong with people being excited about it!

Verge_6

Getting hyped for a game over a CGI video, and we have seen NOT ONE real thing about the game, can only lead to frustration after people see the crap graphics killzone 2 will have, why do you think they hold back any pics etc ? PS3 is not that good in graphics as it seems, low res textures etc mean could never make it look even 10 times worst than the CGI trailer, so they hide the game and try to biuld hype around ... NOTHING

ur fanboy powers show there......

so they havent shown anything? mabye there making it better? who knows....

 

While several of his points ARE wrong, he has a point about them not showing one thing during two years. Wouldn't they want to show their progress instead of hiding it from everyone? :?

Hmm, maybe they want it to be as best as they can get it before the reveal anything? Remember the bad pr Silicon Knights and Too Human got with that early showing and how unimpressed people were. 

Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts

ok!! OK!!....so alot of u hated killzone 1....well i liked it and others have 2.

i belive killzone 1 with no faults would be great! and i have never seen what all the fuss was about halo.

my fav fps shooter is farcry so its not that i just have bad taste.

hip-hop-cola

It's fine to have an opinion, just don't accuse others of ignorance for having ones that differentiate from your own. I admit, a bug-less Killzone that had better level designing and a steadier framerate would be great.

Avatar image for redstormrisen
redstormrisen

2015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 redstormrisen
Member since 2007 • 2015 Posts
People hate killzone because it sucked. I imagine helo 2 or gears would be equally hated if they scored 6.9 but was lauded as better than sliced bread.
Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts
[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"][QUOTE="greg_splicer"][QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]

there are a lot of u...>_> *looks around in disgust*

but whats with all the hate! because killzone had a CGI...only a brain dead freak would believe that was really..

killzone 1 was bad? so....it was badly made but people who played it will tell u it was good..(me and my mates loved it)

and the difference killzone 2 will have is no bugs or faults, with the new backing they got from Sony.

so whats wrong with people being excited about it!

E_x_i_l_e

Getting hyped for a game over a CGI video, and we have seen NOT ONE real thing about the game, can only lead to frustration after people see the crap graphics killzone 2 will have, why do you think they hold back any pics etc ? PS3 is not that good in graphics as it seems, low res textures etc mean could never make it look even 10 times worst than the CGI trailer, so they hide the game and try to biuld hype around ... NOTHING

ur fanboy powers show there......

so they havent shown anything? mabye there making it better? who knows....

 

While several of his points ARE wrong, he has a point about them not showing one thing during two years. Wouldn't they want to show their progress instead of hiding it from everyone? :?

Hmm, maybe they want it to be as best as they can get it before the reveal anything? Remember the bad pr Silicon Knights and Too Human got with that early showing and how unimpressed people were.

I'm not asking for real-time videos or anything (which is what brought on the bad press for TH), but are a few screenshots too much to ask for? 

Avatar image for E_x_i_l_e
E_x_i_l_e

1908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 E_x_i_l_e
Member since 2007 • 1908 Posts
[QUOTE="E_x_i_l_e"][QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"][QUOTE="greg_splicer"][QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]

there are a lot of u...>_> *looks around in disgust*

but whats with all the hate! because killzone had a CGI...only a brain dead freak would believe that was really..

killzone 1 was bad? so....it was badly made but people who played it will tell u it was good..(me and my mates loved it)

and the difference killzone 2 will have is no bugs or faults, with the new backing they got from Sony.

so whats wrong with people being excited about it!

Verge_6

Getting hyped for a game over a CGI video, and we have seen NOT ONE real thing about the game, can only lead to frustration after people see the crap graphics killzone 2 will have, why do you think they hold back any pics etc ? PS3 is not that good in graphics as it seems, low res textures etc mean could never make it look even 10 times worst than the CGI trailer, so they hide the game and try to biuld hype around ... NOTHING

ur fanboy powers show there......

so they havent shown anything? mabye there making it better? who knows....

 

While several of his points ARE wrong, he has a point about them not showing one thing during two years. Wouldn't they want to show their progress instead of hiding it from everyone? :?

Hmm, maybe they want it to be as best as they can get it before the reveal anything? Remember the bad pr Silicon Knights and Too Human got with that early showing and how unimpressed people were.

I'm not asking for real-time videos or anything (which is what brought on the bad press for TH), but are a few screenshots too much to ask for?

The same still applies there too, maybe they want to optimize the game b4 showing it publically.. PSM3 reported that the private showing of the trailer at GDC looked close to the trailer. I'm expecting big things from this game. It's all just a matter of time until its revealed.

Avatar image for mavven
mavven

560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 50

User Lists: 0

#35 mavven
Member since 2005 • 560 Posts
You found the right place for many, many Kilzone haters!
Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts

ok!! OK!!....so alot of u hated killzone 1....well i liked it and others have 2.

i belive killzone 1 with no faults would be great! and i have never seen what all the fuss was about halo.

my fav fps shooter is farcry so its not that i just have bad taste.

hip-hop-cola

Oh man lol. You shouldn't even attempt to play console FPS if you think don't know what the fuss about Halo is. Halo might just be another FPS when compared to the PC FPS arena but in the console FPS arena aka the JV Team it is the undisputed King. 

Avatar image for redstormrisen
redstormrisen

2015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 redstormrisen
Member since 2007 • 2015 Posts
[QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]

ok!! OK!!....so alot of u hated killzone 1....well i liked it and others have 2.

i belive killzone 1 with no faults would be great! and i have never seen what all the fuss was about halo.

my fav fps shooter is farcry so its not that i just have bad taste.

Blackbond

Oh man lol. You shouldn't even attempt to play console FPS if you think don't know what the fuss about Halo is. Halo might just be another FPS when compared to the PC FPS arena but in the console FPS arena aka the JV Team it is the undisputed King. 

 

Exactly, since killzone and every other console FPS has used the controles from halo and the online matchmaking system from halo 2 is awsome I think thats the big deal.

Avatar image for greenleaf2000
greenleaf2000

1259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 greenleaf2000
Member since 2006 • 1259 Posts
Killzone could be AAA .......u never know
Avatar image for hip-hop-cola
hip-hop-cola

558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#39 hip-hop-cola
Member since 2007 • 558 Posts
[QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]

ok!! OK!!....so alot of u hated killzone 1....well i liked it and others have 2.

i belive killzone 1 with no faults would be great! and i have never seen what all the fuss was about halo.

my fav fps shooter is farcry so its not that i just have bad taste.

Blackbond

Oh man lol. You shouldn't even attempt to play console FPS if you think don't know what the fuss about Halo is. Halo might just be another FPS when compared to the PC FPS arena but in the console FPS arena aka the JV Team it is the undisputed King. 

lol....that makes sense...iv plated halo 1 on pc.

Avatar image for Meu2k7
Meu2k7

11809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Meu2k7
Member since 2007 • 11809 Posts

there are a lot of u...>_> *looks around in disgust*

but whats with all the hate! because killzone had a CGI...only a brain dead freak would believe that was really..

killzone 1 was bad? so....it was badly made but people who played it will tell u it was good..(me and my mates loved it)

and the difference killzone 2 will have is no bugs or faults, with the new backing they got from Sony.

so whats wrong with people being excited about it!

hip-hop-cola

Erm, me and my mates played it when I bought it, the only thing it had going was the graphics, the story was cliche, the story modes gamplay was grind, and the multiplay sucked so badly (Compared with what we use to play TIMESPLITTERS) I played it and threw it in the corner after 2 days never to be used again. 

Avatar image for hip-hop-cola
hip-hop-cola

558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#41 hip-hop-cola
Member since 2007 • 558 Posts
[QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]

ok!! OK!!....so alot of u hated killzone 1....well i liked it and others have 2.

i belive killzone 1 with no faults would be great! and i have never seen what all the fuss was about halo.

my fav fps shooter is farcry so its not that i just have bad taste.

Verge_6

It's fine to have an opinion, just don't accuse others of ignorance for having ones that differentiate from your own. I admit, a bug-less Killzone that had better level designing and a steadier framerate would be great.

u totally dont get what im saying...u just said that a bug free k1 would be great....so why do people hate on k2, if somebody uses k2 in a list of upcoming ps3 games they get hassled by the haters!

Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts
[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]

ok!! OK!!....so alot of u hated killzone 1....well i liked it and others have 2.

i belive killzone 1 with no faults would be great! and i have never seen what all the fuss was about halo.

my fav fps shooter is farcry so its not that i just have bad taste.

hip-hop-cola

It's fine to have an opinion, just don't accuse others of ignorance for having ones that differentiate from your own. I admit, a bug-less Killzone that had better level designing and a steadier framerate would be great.

u totally dont get what im saying...u just said that a bug free k1 would be great....so why do people hate on k2, if somebody uses k2 in a list of upcoming ps3 games they get hassled by the haters!

Because its an unproven game that we know nothing about except for the fact that Sony lied to us about what it was supposed to look like. 

Avatar image for Meu2k7
Meu2k7

11809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Meu2k7
Member since 2007 • 11809 Posts
[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]

ok!! OK!!....so alot of u hated killzone 1....well i liked it and others have 2.

i belive killzone 1 with no faults would be great! and i have never seen what all the fuss was about halo.

my fav fps shooter is farcry so its not that i just have bad taste.

hip-hop-cola

It's fine to have an opinion, just don't accuse others of ignorance for having ones that differentiate from your own. I admit, a bug-less Killzone that had better level designing and a steadier framerate would be great.

u totally dont get what im saying...u just said that a bug free k1 would be great....so why do people hate on k2, if somebody uses k2 in a list of upcoming ps3 games they get hassled by the haters!

Its just fanboyism, Killzone is the Playstations only "Exclusive" shooter, therefore its the consoles' franchise that is intended to compete with Halo.

 I mean its not just Killzone, I take stabs at Halo 3, Xbox/PS3/Wii take stabs at Crysis, Metroid Prime 3 aswell..... 

Avatar image for mlbslugger86
mlbslugger86

12867

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#44 mlbslugger86
Member since 2004 • 12867 Posts

there are a lot of u...>_> *looks around in disgust*

but whats with all the hate! because killzone had a CGI...only a brain dead freak would believe that was really..

killzone 1 was bad? so....it was badly made but people who played it will tell u it was good..(me and my mates loved it)

and the difference killzone 2 will have is no bugs or faults, with the new backing they got from Sony.

so whats wrong with people being excited about it!

hip-hop-cola

i actully played the first one,and honestly it wasn't all that fun,thats why im so skeptical with killzone 2. 

Avatar image for Ultra-Alue
Ultra-Alue

1111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Ultra-Alue
Member since 2006 • 1111 Posts

and the difference killzone 2 will have is no bugs or faults, with the new backing they got from Sony.hip-hop-cola

That part of your post was really really stupid. 

Avatar image for Killfox
Killfox

6666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Killfox
Member since 2004 • 6666 Posts

The devs never said it was a halo killer. I talk to them all the time at their forums. Never once did they mention that it would be a halo killer. It was the media that said it was. Then people went a long with it. So dont blame the devs. Blame the media.

Avatar image for Kestastrophe
Kestastrophe

4354

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Kestastrophe
Member since 2005 • 4354 Posts

killzone 1 was bad? so....it was badly made but people who played it will tell u it was good

hip-hop-cola

Best logic ever: "It was badly made, therefore it was good" 

Avatar image for mlbslugger86
mlbslugger86

12867

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#48 mlbslugger86
Member since 2004 • 12867 Posts

The devs never said it was a halo killer. I talk to them all the time at their forums. Never once did they mention that it would be a halo killer. It was the media that said it was. Then people went a long with it. So dont blame the devs. Blame the media.

Killfox

even if they never said that,the game was buggy beyond belief and didn't fell fun at all,so i do blame the devs. 

Avatar image for hip-hop-cola
hip-hop-cola

558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#49 hip-hop-cola
Member since 2007 • 558 Posts

[QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]and the difference killzone 2 will have is no bugs or faults, with the new backing they got from Sony.Ultra-Alue

That part of your post was really really stupid. 

...why? are u argueing that i cant be sure? it makes sense more money and devs means less mistakes...and it certanly isnt being rushed

Avatar image for Tasman_basic
Tasman_basic

3255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Tasman_basic
Member since 2002 • 3255 Posts

killzone 2 will have is no bugs or faults, with the new backing they got from Sony.

hip-hop-cola
WOW there tiger. No counting before hatching eh? Also they had a tone of sony support before KZ1 aswell.