killzone haters

  • 111 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for hip-hop-cola
hip-hop-cola

558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#51 hip-hop-cola
Member since 2007 • 558 Posts
[QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]

killzone 1 was bad? so....it was badly made but people who played it will tell u it was good

Kestastrophe

Best logic ever: "It was badly made, therefore it was good" 

:roll: no....the gameplay underneth was good. yes, my opinon but whats wrong with that

Avatar image for Ultra-Alue
Ultra-Alue

1111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Ultra-Alue
Member since 2006 • 1111 Posts
...why? are u argueing that i cant be sure? it makes sense more money and devs means less mistakes...and it certanly isnt being rushed

hip-hop-cola

You need a good team to make a good game, not a fraction of a country. 

And the game will have faults and bugs.  Every single game ever made has it's faults.  Sony doesn't exactly make flawless products, hell, no one does.  If you think the game is going to be perfect then you are really setting yourself up for a fall.

Avatar image for Meu2k7
Meu2k7

11809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Meu2k7
Member since 2007 • 11809 Posts
[QUOTE="Kestastrophe"][QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]

killzone 1 was bad? so....it was badly made but people who played it will tell u it was good

hip-hop-cola

Best logic ever: "It was badly made, therefore it was good"

:roll: no....the gameplay underneth was good. yes, my opinon but whats wrong with that

But it wasnt .... hence its rating. 

Avatar image for Kestastrophe
Kestastrophe

4354

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Kestastrophe
Member since 2005 • 4354 Posts
[QUOTE="Kestastrophe"][QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]

killzone 1 was bad? so....it was badly made but people who played it will tell u it was good

hip-hop-cola

Best logic ever: "It was badly made, therefore it was good"

:roll: no....the gameplay underneth was good. yes, my opinon but whats wrong with that

I wasn't commenting on your opinion, only your logic. I also enjoyed the game and I even played it online for awhile, as buggy as it was. Although it is relatively unrelated, I just beat Killzone: Liberation for the PSP last week.  

Avatar image for Grive
Grive

2971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Grive
Member since 2006 • 2971 Posts

...why? are u argueing that i cant be sure? it makes sense more money and devs means less mistakes...and it certanly isnt being rushed

hip-hop-cola

 

Daikatana. Daikatana. Daikatana. People need to learn their history.

 

Why do people hate killzone?

1.- Overbearing hype for a game with no pedigree.

2.- Blatant lying by Sony.

3.- Killzone 1. Seriously, Killzone 1.

4.- Guerrilla is one of the most overrated developers out there... and they're regarded as mediocre-to-acceptable.

5.- Killzone 1. Can't stress this one enough. It had at least as much hype as KZ2, and look where it ended up.

Oh, and don't bring the "somewhere underneath that pile of *** there was nice gameplay". Any true gamer worth his salt should learn to expect at least a competent presentation. Great geometry and effects make bad graphics if they're buggy and choppy. Great gameplay ideas make bad gameplay if they're poorly implemented or even if the controls are horrible.

Killzone was not a particularly bad game, not at all. But it comfortably rested in the nest of mediocrity, all while shouting and claiming excellence.

 

Just for kicks, what's your opinion on the Halo series? 

Avatar image for deactivated-5f6dd6241fdcc
deactivated-5f6dd6241fdcc

6249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 deactivated-5f6dd6241fdcc
Member since 2003 • 6249 Posts

Wow... and cows said sheep over-reacted!

 

Avatar image for Big_T-Mac
Big_T-Mac

6973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#57 Big_T-Mac
Member since 2005 • 6973 Posts
u'd think he'd know better than to severely overhype a game with a shotty at best track record.  whatever, dude. i'll trake the wait and see approach.
Avatar image for Kestastrophe
Kestastrophe

4354

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Kestastrophe
Member since 2005 • 4354 Posts
[QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]

...why? are u argueing that i cant be sure? it makes sense more money and devs means less mistakes...and it certanly isnt being rushed

Grive

 

Daikatana. Daikatana. Daikatana. People need to learn their history.

 

Why do people hate killzone?

1.- Overbearing hype for a game with no pedigree.

2.- Blatant lying by Sony.

3.- Killzone 1. Seriously, Killzone 1.

4.- Guerrilla is one of the most overrated developers out there... and they're regarded as mediocre-to-acceptable.

5.- Killzone 1. Can't stress this one enough. It had at least as much hype as KZ2, and look where it ended up.

Oh, and don't bring the "somewhere underneath that pile of *** there was nice gameplay". Any true gamer worth his salt should learn to expect at least a competent presentation. Great geometry and effects make bad graphics if they're buggy and choppy. Great gameplay ideas make bad gameplay if they're poorly implemented or even if the controls are horrible.

Killzone was not a particularly bad game, not at all. But it comfortably rested in the nest of mediocrity, all while shouting and claiming excellence.

 

Just for kicks, what's your opinion on the Halo series?

Excellent post. *pats on back* 

Avatar image for djxaquaxblue
djxaquaxblue

2539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#59 djxaquaxblue
Member since 2004 • 2539 Posts

My opinion on the HALO series is that it has some good multiplayer which is pick up and play but the campaign just sucked balls.

 

 

Avatar image for trasherhead
trasherhead

3058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#60 trasherhead
Member since 2005 • 3058 Posts
The amount of hype Killzone 1 got and the result is the reason people are cautious about Killzone 2.Dups79
There is a long jump from Cautious and total hateage!
Avatar image for flintgijoe
flintgijoe

1954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#61 flintgijoe
Member since 2004 • 1954 Posts

[QUOTE="Dups79"]The amount of hype Killzone 1 got and the result is the reason people are cautious about Killzone 2.ff7isnumbaone

Its funny I heard killzone got alot of hype but that was after I played it. SO I guess it worked because poeple actually played it.

 

Hype is Hype.  It can get people to buy a product.  But if the Hyped product sucks, people have good reason to start doubting the talent of the developers.  The Killzone CGI fake gameplay fiasco just adds mass to the trainwreck of a game Killzone will likely be. 

 

 

 

 

Avatar image for hip-hop-cola
hip-hop-cola

558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#62 hip-hop-cola
Member since 2007 • 558 Posts

Just for kicks, whats your opinion on the Halo series? 

Grive

like somebody else said...halo is amazing on the console..but nothing special on a pc. iv played halo 1 on the pc and i thought the campaign was below average and the mulitplayer was good but not special. on cosole i can see it being good....but for splitscreen timesplitters would probably own it completly.      in my veiw best ever fps is farcry.

Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts

[QUOTE="Grive"]

Just for kicks, whats your opinion on the Halo series?

hip-hop-cola

like somebody else said...halo is amazing on the console..but nothing special on a pc. iv played halo 1 on the pc and i thought the campaign was below average and the mulitplayer was good but not special. on cosole i can see it being good....but for splitscreen timesplitters would probably own it completly. in my veiw best ever fps is farcry.

LOL, read my lips. Halo might just be another good shooter on the PC stage but as far as the console FPS go.....It is King. It rules over all other FPS from its throne.

And what do you mean Time Splitters would probably own it completly in splitscreen? Tell me what happened when it actually came out? 

Avatar image for Baller_ps3
Baller_ps3

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 Baller_ps3
Member since 2007 • 47 Posts
killzone 2 will rock ur socks offs!
Avatar image for DaysAirlines
DaysAirlines

9537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 DaysAirlines
Member since 2006 • 9537 Posts
killzone 2 will rock ur socks offs!Baller_ps3
And if it doesn't Killzone 3 will! And if not Killzone 3, Killzone 4 will!
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#67 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Killzone was a fun game. In my opinion is more fun than Halo and Halo 2. It is still an inferior game, it has many crippling bugs and problems with gameplay routing and weapons. The amount of hype Killzone 2 is receiving is disgusting. Even with the massive flop of the first title, cows are still eating up anything Sony throws out... even a pure CGI video claimed as gameplay. It is so sad it is funny.
Avatar image for odin2019
odin2019

4677

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#68 odin2019
Member since 2006 • 4677 Posts

Killzone 2 won't disappoint there is too many people working on the game and too much money being thrown at it for it to fail this time around.  Just wait for E3 lots will be amazed but you still have those few people bashing the game until it is released and then when its released all the people bashing it won't have a good enough reason to really bash the game.  The game may have a few flaws here and there but the game will be well liked by the ps3 fanbase which is all that matters.

Xbox dominated the fps genre last gen but it won't be the same this time around and I'm not saying that the ps3 will dominate in that area but the ps3 will definitely have its fair share of good fps games this time around.

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

I guess if you had never played almost any of the Xbox FPS games Killzone would look pretty good. Same theory applies with PC to Xbox.

Avatar image for odin2019
odin2019

4677

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#70 odin2019
Member since 2006 • 4677 Posts
[QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]

[QUOTE="Grive"]

Just for kicks, whats your opinion on the Halo series?

Blackbond

like somebody else said...halo is amazing on the console..but nothing special on a pc. iv played halo 1 on the pc and i thought the campaign was below average and the mulitplayer was good but not special. on cosole i can see it being good....but for splitscreen timesplitters would probably own it completly. in my veiw best ever fps is farcry.

LOL, read my lips. Halo might just be another good shooter on the PC stage but as far as the console FPS go.....It is King. It rules over all other FPS from its throne.

And what do you mean Time Splitters would probably own it completly in splitscreen? Tell me what happened when it actually came out? 

I still like Timesplitters alot although timesplitters doesn't have a jump button it has bigger environments, and it has a shotgun which I don't think Halo does but I could be wrong about that.  Also, timesplitters has the create a map option, I really wonder why the servers are not loaded with people as they should be, sometimes there is a good amount of players on and then sometimes there isn't but what other online fps game is there for the ps2?

Avatar image for neversummer75
neversummer75

1136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#71 neversummer75
Member since 2006 • 1136 Posts

there are a lot of u...>_> *looks around in disgust*

but whats with all the hate! because killzone had a CGI...only a brain dead freak would believe that was really..

killzone 1 was bad? so....it was badly made but people who played it will tell u it was good..(me and my mates loved it)

and the difference killzone 2 will have is no bugs or faults, with the new backing they got from Sony.

so whats wrong with people being excited about it!

hip-hop-cola

 

Only a brain dead freak would believe it was real? Even after Sony said it was real?

Avatar image for Sgt_Hale
Sgt_Hale

2257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#72 Sgt_Hale
Member since 2007 • 2257 Posts

First of all, the devs never said that the trailer was gameplay... they did however say that it was in-game. And maybe they really believed the in-game graphics would look that good, they still didn't have final dev kits at that point.

All the same, I am pretty cautious on this title. I'm looking forward to seeing the actual gameplay this July but I would hardly hype the game before seeing it... the first one didn't suck, it just wasn't as good as they hyped it to be. Which is why I'm glad they're being more quiet this time too. Killzone on the PSP was awesome... totally different type of game but I hope this one is a high quality product as well.

Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts
[QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]

[QUOTE="Grive"]

Just for kicks, whats your opinion on the Halo series?

odin2019

like somebody else said...halo is amazing on the console..but nothing special on a pc. iv played halo 1 on the pc and i thought the campaign was below average and the mulitplayer was good but not special. on cosole i can see it being good....but for splitscreen timesplitters would probably own it completly. in my veiw best ever fps is farcry.

LOL, read my lips. Halo might just be another good shooter on the PC stage but as far as the console FPS go.....It is King. It rules over all other FPS from its throne.

And what do you mean Time Splitters would probably own it completly in splitscreen? Tell me what happened when it actually came out?

I still like Timesplitters alot although timesplitters doesn't have a jump button it has bigger environments, and it has a shotgun which I don't think Halo does but I could be wrong about that. Also, timesplitters has the create a map option, I really wonder why the servers are not loaded with people as they should be, sometimes there is a good amount of players on and then sometimes there isn't but what other online fps game is there for the ps2?

You obvoiusly haven't played a lot of Halo. All is forgiven though. 

Avatar image for odin2019
odin2019

4677

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#74 odin2019
Member since 2006 • 4677 Posts
[QUOTE="odin2019"][QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]

[QUOTE="Grive"]

Just for kicks, whats your opinion on the Halo series?

Blackbond

like somebody else said...halo is amazing on the console..but nothing special on a pc. iv played halo 1 on the pc and i thought the campaign was below average and the mulitplayer was good but not special. on cosole i can see it being good....but for splitscreen timesplitters would probably own it completly. in my veiw best ever fps is farcry.

LOL, read my lips. Halo might just be another good shooter on the PC stage but as far as the console FPS go.....It is King. It rules over all other FPS from its throne.

And what do you mean Time Splitters would probably own it completly in splitscreen? Tell me what happened when it actually came out?

I still like Timesplitters alot although timesplitters doesn't have a jump button it has bigger environments, and it has a shotgun which I don't think Halo does but I could be wrong about that. Also, timesplitters has the create a map option, I really wonder why the servers are not loaded with people as they should be, sometimes there is a good amount of players on and then sometimes there isn't but what other online fps game is there for the ps2?

You obvoiusly haven't played a lot of Halo. All is forgiven though. 

Nope my cousin has the game and I have played from time to time at his place and I like the game it is without a doubt one of the better xbox games that I did play at his place.

As for everyone doubting Killzone 2's graphics I'm going to say that they have a much better shot at being what they should be like from the trailer than the graphics not being like that because all the stuff you have seen for MGS4 is all in game footage type graphics.  Thats the way its always been with the MGS games is that the cineamatics are the exact same as gameplay footage so its very possible for Killzone 2 to have top notch graphics.

Avatar image for Sgt_Hale
Sgt_Hale

2257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#75 Sgt_Hale
Member since 2007 • 2257 Posts
[QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]

[QUOTE="Grive"]

Just for kicks, whats your opinion on the Halo series?

Blackbond

like somebody else said...halo is amazing on the console..but nothing special on a pc. iv played halo 1 on the pc and i thought the campaign was below average and the mulitplayer was good but not special. on cosole i can see it being good....but for splitscreen timesplitters would probably own it completly. in my veiw best ever fps is farcry.

LOL, read my lips. Halo might just be another good shooter on the PC stage but as far as the console FPS go.....It is King. It rules over all other FPS from its throne.

And what do you mean Time Splitters would probably own it completly in splitscreen? Tell me what happened when it actually came out? 

The first Halo was King. The second one sucked. But Resistance is better than both of them now... so it's up to Halo 3 to try taking the crown back. It may be able to but right now I'm just as catious about Halo 3 as I am about Killzone 2. Haven't seen anything either way to crown either of them yet.

Avatar image for Sgt_Hale
Sgt_Hale

2257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#76 Sgt_Hale
Member since 2007 • 2257 Posts
All fanboyism aside, I might also add that I'm more interested in Clive Barker's Jericho than either Halo 3 OR Killzone 2. Looks like a better FPS so far to me.
Avatar image for RMage
RMage

1176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 RMage
Member since 2006 • 1176 Posts

Resistance doesnt even come near Halo 2, and Halo 2 was pretty bad overall.  Halo 3 will dominate, and if you think Sony even has a chance of competing with it you are very ignorant.

Avatar image for Meu2k7
Meu2k7

11809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 Meu2k7
Member since 2007 • 11809 Posts
[QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]

[QUOTE="Grive"]

Just for kicks, whats your opinion on the Halo series?

Sgt_Hale

like somebody else said...halo is amazing on the console..but nothing special on a pc. iv played halo 1 on the pc and i thought the campaign was below average and the mulitplayer was good but not special. on cosole i can see it being good....but for splitscreen timesplitters would probably own it completly. in my veiw best ever fps is farcry.

LOL, read my lips. Halo might just be another good shooter on the PC stage but as far as the console FPS go.....It is King. It rules over all other FPS from its throne.

And what do you mean Time Splitters would probably own it completly in splitscreen? Tell me what happened when it actually came out?

The first Halo was King. The second one sucked. But Resistance is better than both of them now... so it's up to Halo 3 to try taking the crown back. It may be able to but right now I'm just as catious about Halo 3 as I am about Killzone 2. Haven't seen anything either way to crown either of them yet.

UT3 will steal thier Multiplayer Crown ... or maybe not, A Series Title Hype > Gamplay on system wars 

Avatar image for odin2019
odin2019

4677

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#80 odin2019
Member since 2006 • 4677 Posts
[QUOTE="Sgt_Hale"][QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]

[QUOTE="Grive"]

Just for kicks, whats your opinion on the Halo series?

Meu2k7

like somebody else said...halo is amazing on the console..but nothing special on a pc. iv played halo 1 on the pc and i thought the campaign was below average and the mulitplayer was good but not special. on cosole i can see it being good....but for splitscreen timesplitters would probably own it completly. in my veiw best ever fps is farcry.

LOL, read my lips. Halo might just be another good shooter on the PC stage but as far as the console FPS go.....It is King. It rules over all other FPS from its throne.

And what do you mean Time Splitters would probably own it completly in splitscreen? Tell me what happened when it actually came out?

The first Halo was King. The second one sucked. But Resistance is better than both of them now... so it's up to Halo 3 to try taking the crown back. It may be able to but right now I'm just as catious about Halo 3 as I am about Killzone 2. Haven't seen anything either way to crown either of them yet.

UT3 will steal thier Multiplayer Crown ... or maybe not, A Series Title Hype > Gamplay on system wars 

I think so too but I can't see ps3 owners paying to play online if thats the way it turns out for UT3 but I don't see why it can't be free either for online play.

Avatar image for Meu2k7
Meu2k7

11809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 Meu2k7
Member since 2007 • 11809 Posts
[QUOTE="Meu2k7"][QUOTE="Sgt_Hale"][QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]

[QUOTE="Grive"]

Just for kicks, whats your opinion on the Halo series?

odin2019

like somebody else said...halo is amazing on the console..but nothing special on a pc. iv played halo 1 on the pc and i thought the campaign was below average and the mulitplayer was good but not special. on cosole i can see it being good....but for splitscreen timesplitters would probably own it completly. in my veiw best ever fps is farcry.

LOL, read my lips. Halo might just be another good shooter on the PC stage but as far as the console FPS go.....It is King. It rules over all other FPS from its throne.

And what do you mean Time Splitters would probably own it completly in splitscreen? Tell me what happened when it actually came out?

The first Halo was King. The second one sucked. But Resistance is better than both of them now... so it's up to Halo 3 to try taking the crown back. It may be able to but right now I'm just as catious about Halo 3 as I am about Killzone 2. Haven't seen anything either way to crown either of them yet.

UT3 will steal thier Multiplayer Crown ... or maybe not, A Series Title Hype > Gamplay on system wars

I think so too but I can't see ps3 owners paying to play online if thats the way it turns out for UT3 but I don't see why it can't be free either for online play.

Why would Unreal Tournement 3 charge for online play? except xboxgold :P 

Avatar image for Grive
Grive

2971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 Grive
Member since 2006 • 2971 Posts

Killzone 2 won't disappoint there is too many people working on the game and too much money being thrown at it for it to fail this time around. odin2019

DAIKATANA.  DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA.

Avatar image for odin2019
odin2019

4677

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#83 odin2019
Member since 2006 • 4677 Posts

I don't know I just figured that if Xbox360 people had to pay than maybe ps3 people would have to pay but probably not and you won't have to pay for new maps either.

Avatar image for Meu2k7
Meu2k7

11809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 Meu2k7
Member since 2007 • 11809 Posts

I don't know I just figured that if Xbox360 people had to pay than maybe ps3 people would have to pay but probably not and you won't have to pay for new maps either.

odin2019

Well PS3 doesnt charge for PSN, only in microtransactions so probably maps will be charged for (new ones), while PC's version and PS3s should be free to play from scratch. 

Avatar image for Sgt_Hale
Sgt_Hale

2257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#85 Sgt_Hale
Member since 2007 • 2257 Posts

Resistance doesnt even come near Halo 2, and Halo 2 was pretty bad overall.  Halo 3 will dominate, and if you think Sony even has a chance of competing with it you are very ignorant.

RMage

You're pretty ignorant on the subject if you think Halo 2 was better than Resistance! No one who has played both games could even take you seriously. R:FOM is the best FPS out at the moment but I'm not saying that any of the new titles won't steal its thunder... but at the moment there isn't a better FPS available. Like I said, I think Jericho will be the better FPS whenever it comes out... and UT3 also like another poster said.

But Halo 3 just hasn't shown anything impressive so far... maybe they will after it's tuned up some more. But hyping Halo 3 after the disaster that was Halo 2 is just as silly as hyping Killzone 2 IMO.

Avatar image for NAPK1NS
NAPK1NS

14870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#87 NAPK1NS
Member since 2004 • 14870 Posts
Killzone sucks...
Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts

Killzone was being made for the PC

than sony came and bought the game and the devs cuz they liked it

they made a crappy port to PS2 and the result was Killzone 6.9, great ideas, bad execution

Killzone 2 with a 120 man team and millions of bucks from Sony = good game

R-Dot-Yung

Yeah okay. 

Avatar image for myster_samz
myster_samz

584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#89 myster_samz
Member since 2006 • 584 Posts
I think Killzone's awesome... For ten bucks at least.
Avatar image for hip-hop-cola
hip-hop-cola

558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#90 hip-hop-cola
Member since 2007 • 558 Posts
[QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]

[QUOTE="Grive"]

Just for kicks, whats your opinion on the Halo series?

Blackbond

like somebody else said...halo is amazing on the console..but nothing special on a pc. iv played halo 1 on the pc and i thought the campaign was below average and the mulitplayer was good but not special. on cosole i can see it being good....but for splitscreen timesplitters would probably own it completly. in my veiw best ever fps is farcry.

LOL, read my lips. Halo might just be another good shooter on the PC stage but as far as the console FPS go.....It is King. It rules over all other FPS from its throne.

And what do you mean Time Splitters would probably own it completly in splitscreen? Tell me what happened when it actually came out? 

time-splitters 3...i just cant see anything beating it for fun...halo is to serious for split-screen.

i dont get what u mean..."tell me what happened when it came out"....if ur talking about sales thats just sad...and time splitters has a map maker! which was very awsome

Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts
[QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]

[QUOTE="Grive"]

Just for kicks, whats your opinion on the Halo series?

hip-hop-cola

like somebody else said...halo is amazing on the console..but nothing special on a pc. iv played halo 1 on the pc and i thought the campaign was below average and the mulitplayer was good but not special. on cosole i can see it being good....but for splitscreen timesplitters would probably own it completly. in my veiw best ever fps is farcry.

LOL, read my lips. Halo might just be another good shooter on the PC stage but as far as the console FPS go.....It is King. It rules over all other FPS from its throne.

And what do you mean Time Splitters would probably own it completly in splitscreen? Tell me what happened when it actually came out?

time-splitters 3...i just cant see anything beating it for fun...halo is to serious for split-screen.

i dont get what u mean..."tell me what happened when it came out"....if ur talking about sales thats just sad...and time splitters has a map maker! which was very awsome

Um out score it every where, get more awards, more recognition, crowned champion of console FPS. Time Splitters who? 

Avatar image for hip-hop-cola
hip-hop-cola

558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#92 hip-hop-cola
Member since 2007 • 558 Posts

[QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"][QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]

 

like somebody else said...halo is amazing on the console..but nothing special on a pc. iv played halo 1 on the pc and i thought the campaign was below average and the mulitplayer was good but not special. on cosole i can see it being good....but for splitscreen timesplitters would probably own it completly. in my veiw best ever fps is farcry.

Blackbond

LOL, read my lips. Halo might just be another good shooter on the PC stage but as far as the console FPS go.....It is King. It rules over all other FPS from its throne.

And what do you mean Time Splitters would probably own it completly in splitscreen? Tell me what happened when it actually came out?

time-splitters 3...i just cant see anything beating it for fun...halo is to serious for split-screen.

i dont get what u mean..."tell me what happened when it came out"....if ur talking about sales thats just sad...and time splitters has a map maker! which was very awsome

Um out score it every where, get more awards, more recognition, crowned champion of console FPS. Time Splitters who? 

have u ever played split screen? becouse then ud know non of the things u menstioned mean anything..the best splitscreen game iv ever played is mashed(ul have to look that one up:P).....and the bit where u said time splitters who is just dumb...    - spell checker broke...

Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts

[QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"][QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]

 

like somebody else said...halo is amazing on the console..but nothing special on a pc. iv played halo 1 on the pc and i thought the campaign was below average and the mulitplayer was good but not special. on cosole i can see it being good....but for splitscreen timesplitters would probably own it completly. in my veiw best ever fps is farcry.

hip-hop-cola

LOL, read my lips. Halo might just be another good shooter on the PC stage but as far as the console FPS go.....It is King. It rules over all other FPS from its throne.

And what do you mean Time Splitters would probably own it completly in splitscreen? Tell me what happened when it actually came out?

time-splitters 3...i just cant see anything beating it for fun...halo is to serious for split-screen.

i dont get what u mean..."tell me what happened when it came out"....if ur talking about sales thats just sad...and time splitters has a map maker! which was very awsome

Um out score it every where, get more awards, more recognition, crowned champion of console FPS. Time Splitters who?

have u ever played split screen? becouse then ud know non of the things u menstioned mean anything..the best splitscreen game iv ever played is mashed(ul have to look that one up:P).....and the bit where u said time splitters who is just dumb... - spell checker broke...

Yes I've played it on split screen. Everyone of my friends in college picks that freaking little monkey because he is so small and fast. The game isn't comparable to Halo by any means. Sure it has tons of weapons and tons of characters to choose from but the levels are uninspiring and there is a severe lack of vehicles. I had Time Splitters 2 for Gamecube. It was really good. I couldn't stand the game not having center aim though. That was its only fault. I own 2 for Gamecube, three people on my floor had Future Perfect on PS2 on my floor in college, but I haven't played the 1st one a lot on PS2. 

I can't decode the last part of your post, but its evident that Halo is just in a whole other league then Time Splitters unless your name is the G-Man from GUFU. He loves that game :P 

Avatar image for DA_B0MB
DA_B0MB

9938

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 DA_B0MB
Member since 2005 • 9938 Posts

there are a lot of u...>_> *looks around in disgust*

but whats with all the hate! because killzone had a CGI...only a brain dead freak would believe that was really..

killzone 1 was bad? so....it was badly made but people who played it will tell u it was good..(me and my mates loved it)

and the difference killzone 2 will have is no bugs or faults, with the new backing they got from Sony.

so whats wrong with people being excited about it!

hip-hop-cola

I enjoyed Killzone 1 as well. I'll be buying Killzone 2 no matter what rating it gets because I loved the first.

Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts
[QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]

there are a lot of u...>_> *looks around in disgust*

but whats with all the hate! because killzone had a CGI...only a brain dead freak would believe that was really..

killzone 1 was bad? so....it was badly made but people who played it will tell u it was good..(me and my mates loved it)

and the difference killzone 2 will have is no bugs or faults, with the new backing they got from Sony.

so whats wrong with people being excited about it!

DA_B0MB

I enjoyed Killzone 1 as well. I'll be buying Killzone 2 no matter what rating it gets because I loved the first.

I'm only mocking you because you're a Yankee Fan. Like Killzone a large Budget doesn't directly correlate to a good game. Just ask the Yankees lol. I mean look at all the money they are spending and they still suck haha. I also hate the Red Sox too.

Avatar image for Grive
Grive

2971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 Grive
Member since 2006 • 2971 Posts

First of all, the devs never said that the trailer was gameplay... they did however say that it was in-game. And maybe they really believed the in-game graphics would look that good, they still didn't have final dev kits at that point.

Sgt_Hale

Tretton did say "it's real gameplay". It's been proven CGI.

And even if you were right and they thought that target render would be the final product... why lie about the render calling it gameplay? Why not call it a target render?

 

Killzone was being made for the PC

than sony came and bought the game and the devs cuz they liked it

they made a crappy port to PS2 and the result was Killzone 6.9, great ideas, bad execution

R-Dot-Yung

 

 Yet that's the best FPS Guerrilla has come up with. Still, they had all the sony support they could've asked for... and it still sucked. 

Quite simply, Guerrilla simply isn't a particularly good developer. They bluffed their way into a purchase by Sony, and that's pretty much it about them. 

 

Killzone 2 with a 120 man team and millions of bucks from Sony = good game

R-Dot-Yung

I can do this all day long: DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA. DAIKATANA.

Avatar image for DA_B0MB
DA_B0MB

9938

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 DA_B0MB
Member since 2005 • 9938 Posts
[QUOTE="DA_B0MB"][QUOTE="hip-hop-cola"]

there are a lot of u...>_> *looks around in disgust*

but whats with all the hate! because killzone had a CGI...only a brain dead freak would believe that was really..

killzone 1 was bad? so....it was badly made but people who played it will tell u it was good..(me and my mates loved it)

and the difference killzone 2 will have is no bugs or faults, with the new backing they got from Sony.

so whats wrong with people being excited about it!

Blackbond

I enjoyed Killzone 1 as well. I'll be buying Killzone 2 no matter what rating it gets because I loved the first.

I'm only mocking you because you're a Yankee Fan. Like Killzone a large Budget doesn't directly correlate to a good game. Just ask the Yankees lol. I mean look at all the money they are spending and they still suck haha. I also hate the Red Sox too.

It's a marathon not a sprint in the MLB ;). Ya know, I honestly get attacked daily for being a Yankees fan. People look at me like I'm a lesser human. But I guess I'm used to it by now. Oh and btw my friend, don't make the comparison between killzone and the yankees because the yankees are the greatest sports franchise in the history of any sport ever. Steriods, payroll (I specifically like this excuse because people act like the other teams don't get paid anything), cheating etc. I love all the excuses, all the hate, all the jelousy that I get as being a yankee fan. Why? Because it let's us know that they're only hated cause they're the best! :D

 Oh and quote me, by the end of the season the yankee will have a better record than the Red Sox. I gaurentee it. ;)

Avatar image for -The-G-Man-
-The-G-Man-

6414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 -The-G-Man-
Member since 2007 • 6414 Posts

What does Killzone 2 have for people to hype it?  A good first game?  No, sorry.  Killzone was bad in my opinion, which by the way counts just as much as anybody else's, thank you very much.

Avatar image for steve_89
steve_89

790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 steve_89
Member since 2006 • 790 Posts
you guys have to remember that it was not the developers who hyped the game so dont bash them for underdelevering.
Avatar image for istreakforfood
istreakforfood

7781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#100 istreakforfood
Member since 2004 • 7781 Posts

Um out score it every where, get more awards, more recognition, crowned champion of console FPS. Time Splitters who?

Blackbond

 

Timesplitter was a great fps game that came out on the ps2. came out sometime around 2001. Concept was cool and orginal.You get to play diff time periods for each mission and it was fun playing single or split-screen. Controls were really good for a fps game on the ps2.

 

 

To SGT_Hale: Resistance is a good game, but i dont see it being innovating. Maybe its cause i played a lot of FPS games in the past but to me it felt like another FPS just with better graphics. Even the multiplayer was meh. Nothing new. Its cool you like resistance.Â