This topic is locked from further discussion.
hmm dynasty warriors, all of them except the first one.. also that new koei game that came out... its fun and you control one guy but you have like a bunch of guys that follow you its really fun.Jaster_DCX
i looked at the ratings for them, and dynasty warriors 5 got a 6.8, dynasty warriors psp got a 6.9, dynasty warriors vol. 2 psp got a 6.1, and a lot of dynasty warrior games got ratings between 6.0 and 7.0. ouch. and that other game u mentioned its bladestorm the hundred years war. i downloaded the demo but i think it kinda sucks cuz all u do is hold down a button and ur guy just slowly swings his sword wenever an enemy comes up. sorta boring to me
try out operation flashpoint....the battles can get massive...especially since you get a very powerfull mision editor....
the Battlefield games also...though those are online only.
Edit* speaking of battlefield, Joint ops can get 150+ (rumered to have gotten all the way to 250 once), but I dont think the community is that big anymore.
oh man i dont care what anyone says Joint ops is way better than BF2, it doesnt have coustomization, or as easy of sqaud commands, but its shere size and number of people was amazingly fun. Also there are still some servers that get up to 100 people on joint ops.try out operation flashpoint....the battles can get massive...especially since you get a very powerfull mision editor....
the Battlefield games also...though those are online only.
Edit* speaking of battlefield, Joint ops can get 150+ (rumered to have gotten all the way to 250 once), but I dont think the community is that big anymore.
cobrax75
[QUOTE="cobrax75"]oh man i dont care what anyone says Joint ops is way better than BF2, it doesnt have coustomization, or as easy of sqaud commands, but its shere size and number of people was amazingly fun. Also there are still some servers that get up to 100 people on joint ops.try out operation flashpoint....the battles can get massive...especially since you get a very powerfull mision editor....
the Battlefield games also...though those are online only.
Edit* speaking of battlefield, Joint ops can get 150+ (rumered to have gotten all the way to 250 once), but I dont think the community is that big anymore.
Sully28
its true, huge games were Joint Ops biggest advantage...however, due to the squad system in BF2, Battles could have the illusion of being a lot biggeer than the actually were in reality...which really was just as good....still though, 80 players in BF3 will be sweet.
[QUOTE="Jaster_DCX"]hmm dynasty warriors, all of them except the first one.. also that new koei game that came out... its fun and you control one guy but you have like a bunch of guys that follow you its really fun.dsan224
i looked at the ratings for them, and dynasty warriors 5 got a 6.8, dynasty warriors psp got a 6.9, dynasty warriors vol. 2 psp got a 6.1, and a lot of dynasty warrior games got ratings between 6.0 and 7.0. ouch. and that other game u mentioned its bladestorm the hundred years war. i downloaded the demo but i think it kinda sucks cuz all u do is hold down a button and ur guy just slowly swings his sword wenever an enemy comes up. sorta boring to me
heavenly sword, god of war 1 & 2, 99 nights.
that was a great game[QUOTE="hello12367890"][QUOTE="Dante2710"]no love for kingdom underfire :( jquest123
agreed
great story, graphics (at the time)and gameplay all good except the controls holy heck they were soooo bad it took me hours to control my squad.
i got used to it, it was a great game, cant wait for the new one :D[QUOTE="jquest123"]that was a great game[QUOTE="hello12367890"][QUOTE="Dante2710"]no love for kingdom underfire :( Dante2710
agreed
great story, graphics (at the time)and gameplay all good except the controls holy heck they were soooo bad it took me hours to control my squad.
i got used to it, it was a great game, cant wait for the new one :Di heard the new one isnt going to be like a hack n slash strategy action game its gonna be like an rpg instead i guess there taking a new turn...too bad the first 2 were like the best hacknslashes ive ever played in my life..for that matter one of the best games ive played ever.
[QUOTE="Dante2710"][QUOTE="jquest123"]that was a great game[QUOTE="hello12367890"][QUOTE="Dante2710"]no love for kingdom underfire :( jquest123
agreed
great story, graphics (at the time)and gameplay all good except the controls holy heck they were soooo bad it took me hours to control my squad.
i got used to it, it was a great game, cant wait for the new one :Di heard the new one isnt going to be like a hack n slash strategy action game its gonna be like an rpg instead i guess there taking a new turn...too bad the first 2 were like the best hacknslashes ive ever played in my life..for that matter one of the best games ive played ever.
yeah, its more of an rpg now, and agreed, the first two were some really fun games....hopefully this one will turn out that way as wellIf you like being hopelessly outnumbered, you might want to try the Serious Sam and Painkiller games.
Oh, and on a random note, Serious Sam is a GOTY winner here on GS. :P
I have been thinking about getting Spartan Total Warrior. It looks pretty good.hoola
it is a good game i dont know why soo many people hate it. It was made by the same guys who made the total war strategy games with those big battles? (ROME TOTAL WAR) well the game is knida short.I suked big time at video games back then so it took me like a week to beat it but now i could probably beat it in 5 hours if i played straight today. Although short it is REALLY FUN AND REALLY REALLY adicting. You collect chess pieces that you can use in ARENA mode were your basically a gladiator andfightagainst and with other people which can add tons of hours into the game. If you need anymore info just PM me.
Battle Engine Aquila, its for ps2. It got an 8.0 from ign. In this game u play a mech in massive battles, im talking like 100's of units on the battlefield at once.
http://ps2.ign.com/articles/383/383894p1.html
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment