LA Noire is bad

Ah that's the problem, you went from PC to PS3 and complaining about frame rate.

You got a PS3 for the game but all your pushing is X and Y?

I like the game but it makes me laugh hwo so many reviews gave it such a high score with such crap Framerate.

Its like if its a smaller dev these FPS issues would be MUCH more of a problem and I bet it would ahve gotten lower scores. But since its a big high profile game that Rockstar has a hand in reviewers look over those things.

It is not a bad game by any chance, It is quite good. I agree that there are frame-rate issues, but I don't about the action thing. The focus isn't on action for one. It's on investigation.

But I do agree with the fact that the 'principles' of the reviewers seem to be influenced by the budget and the names behind the game that they are reviewing. It's one of the many depressing things about many of these faux-game-journalism sites.

I like the game but it makes me laugh hwo so many reviews gave it such a high score with such crap Framerate.

Its like if its a smaller dev these FPS issues would be MUCH more of a problem and I bet it would ahve gotten lower scores. But since its a big high profile game that Rockstar has a hand in reviewers look over those things.

kozzy1234

I like the game but it makes me laugh hwo so many reviews gave it such a high score with such crap Framerate.

Its like if its a smaller dev these FPS issues would be MUCH more of a problem and I bet it would ahve gotten lower scores. But since its a big high profile game that Rockstar has a hand in reviewers look over those things.

kozzy1234

Well Mafia 2 ran alot worse and looked alot worse on consoles so for the kind of game it is its pretty solid.

[QUOTE="kozzy1234"]

I like the game but it makes me laugh hwo so many reviews gave it such a high score with such crap Framerate.

Its like if its a smaller dev these FPS issues would be MUCH more of a problem and I bet it would ahve gotten lower scores. But since its a big high profile game that Rockstar has a hand in reviewers look over those things.

Ayrtonsennna

Lense of truth ran an analysis on it it averages 25 to 30fps is that unplayable?

It is not a bad game by any chance, It is quite good. I agree that there are frame-rate issues, but I don't about the action thing. The focus isn't on action for one. It's on investigation.

But I do agree with the fact that the 'principles' of the reviewers seem to be influenced by the budget and the names behind the game that they are reviewing. It's one of the many depressing things about many of these faux-game-journalism sites.

Another-World

You cant accuse someone of lying unless you have evidence. Thats the bottom line. If you didnt investigate enough to find evidence to contradict what they are saying, then dont choose lie. You have to KNOW they are lying. Doubting is just if you think they are holding back.......like there is more to the story. You will know the difference if you do a good investigation. Otherwise, its just like real life, you dont know if you dont investigate. Seems pretty simple to me

[QUOTE="Another-World"]

It is not a bad game by any chance, It is quite good. I agree that there are frame-rate issues, but I don't about the action thing. The focus isn't on action for one. It's on investigation.

But I do agree with the fact that the 'principles' of the reviewers seem to be influenced by the budget and the names behind the game that they are reviewing. It's one of the many depressing things about many of these faux-game-journalism sites.

Ayrtonsennna

[QUOTE="Ayrtonsennna"][QUOTE="Another-World"]

It is not a bad game by any chance, It is quite good. I agree that there are frame-rate issues, but I don't about the action thing. The focus isn't on action for one. It's on investigation.

But I do agree with the fact that the 'principles' of the reviewers seem to be influenced by the budget and the names behind the game that they are reviewing. It's one of the many depressing things about many of these faux-game-journalism sites.

Ravensmash

half the battle with this game is that it is trial and error much like detective work in the 40's and 50's before the dawn of forensic sciences.There was a lot less to go on now we have DNA and various other things.

Homicide cases are relate back to one key point i wont hit at.

Liars tend to be much more erratic than those with doubtful ideas from what i noticed, most of them have more head movement.Doubt usually has eye contact for a few seconds then looks away, the liar tends not to focus on the person interoggating.

You cant accuse someone of lying unless you have evidence. Thats the bottom line. If you didnt investigate enough to find evidence to contradict what they are saying, then dont choose lie.navyguy21

If you were paying attention you would notice the first thing anyone accused of lying says is "You got no proof!" You should then go to the evidence page and prove that they are lying if you have the evidence. You can also back out and apologize if you are wrong..lol.

It's very satisfying.

im sorry but this game got average of 9.0 scores all over the place. so i went and get it, " o its a good game it seems" and now i see what they did, They are afraid of giving Rock star a low score. Honestly it feels like a GTA4 DLC, Ayrtonsennna

I must say... if you soley buyign a game because of review scores then there lies the problem. That is a horrible approach to buying games. A little research and you would have definitely seen how the game plays and what it is about.

[QUOTE="Ravensmash"][QUOTE="Ayrtonsennna"] how about the Doubt and lie Options? Honestly this is the part i get mad at lol, U r asking questions but the person u r interrogating is rolling his eyes i, or looking to the sides, then it seems they r hiding something, so im like " ITS A LIE" and nope its a doubt, im mean what? How do u differ those 2 sometimes? then when u choose Doubt the person is actually lying,. So i did my research and it seems 87% of the ps3 community is choosing the wrong option when it comes to Lie or Doubt, Ayrtonsennna

you never ever get your notebook out with your evidence lists when its Doubt.Phelps just says your being economical with the truth and they tend to stop and let more information out.Never ever on doubt have i had the book out.

[QUOTE="Ayrtonsennna"][QUOTE="kozzy1234"]

I like the game but it makes me laugh hwo so many reviews gave it such a high score with such crap Framerate.

Its like if its a smaller dev these FPS issues would be MUCH more of a problem and I bet it would ahve gotten lower scores. But since its a big high profile game that Rockstar has a hand in reviewers look over those things.

TheSterls

Lense of truth ran an analysis on it it averages 25 to 30fps is that unplayable?

Here's an example.

Doubt = "I don't know who did it" or "I didn't hear a thing".

Lie = "I met with him at midnight" or "He was with me the whole time".

I honestly though the game was awesome. They promised us a detective game and that's what they gave us. That 9.0 gamespot gave it was spot on. Just keep in mind that they never promised a GTA.

Also, this game WOULD be boring for anyone with A.D.D.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="Ayrtonsennna"] honestly, i wasn't expecting this horrible Frame rates, even on the cinematic scenes we get low frame rates,, Game should have scored a 6.5 it feels im playing a "Who wants to b a Millionaire" game Ayrtonsennna

Lense of truth ran an analysis on it it averages 25 to 30fps is that unplayable?

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="Ayrtonsennna"] honestly, i wasn't expecting this horrible Frame rates, even on the cinematic scenes we get low frame rates,, Game should have scored a 6.5 it feels im playing a "Who wants to b a Millionaire" game Ayrtonsennna

Lense of truth ran an analysis on it it averages 25 to 30fps is that unplayable?

When you take into account its running a open world larger then GTA4, Mafia 2or RDR thats not bad especially when its being done on a platform with 512 megs of ram.

[QUOTE="Ayrtonsennna"][QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Lense of truth ran an analysis on it it averages 25 to 30fps is that unplayable?

heretrix

only a hermit would rate a game based on its frame-rate. Most console players could care less and wouldn't even notice this issue.

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="Ayrtonsennna"] wow rly? 25 frames for a game that has no Bullets or explosions, Ayrtonsennna

the graphics, character models and facial animations aren't nearly as good

The only time i ever experience low frame rates is when i walk through plants and trees.

I personally think the $60 i dished out was worth it. I'm experiencing something i've never experienced before in a game. Bringing something new to the table. Rockstar never disappoints.

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="Ayrtonsennna"] wow rly? 25 frames for a game that has no Bullets or explosions, Ayrtonsennna

not by much it gets dragged down quickly when it needs to render a lot,noticeable in Algonquin someties at night for some reason.Also LA noire runs steadily never had a problem or even a slight hiccup with it and its buttery smooth for me :S

Also im kinda laughing at the fact you think explosions and bullets magically make a game drop frames its actually more down to engine optimisation,how much is being processed by the machine at one given time and how difficult it is for the cpu/gpu to handle said task.If the texture is bigger then it needs to load more in etc etc and some post processing takes away from overall horsepower aswell.

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="Ayrtonsennna"] wow rly? 25 frames for a game that has no Bullets or explosions, Ayrtonsennna

More action: Yes.
Bigger map: No.
More characters: No. L.A. Noire has over 400 actors credited in the game.
More of everything: In terms of side missions and random stuff to do? Sure, but so does Red Dead Redemption. And the key difference between those games and L.A. Noire is that they're free roaming, open world games. L.A. Noire is a linear narrative SET in an open world, not unlike Mafia 2.
Better framerates: On PC, obviously GTAIV will have a better framerate. As far as the PS3 version of L.A. Noire vs. the PS3 version of GTAIV goes though, I can confidently say that L.A. Noire has the more stable and smoother framerate.

Basically, to use the analogy for all the people (myself included) that say L.A. Noire is like a mashup of GTA or Mafia and Heavy Rain, if you're not going into the game looking forward to the interrogations and adventure game side, you're gonna be disappointed.

If you're trying to play L.A. Noire like GTA, you're doing it wrong.

i'm renting the game at redbox in a couple weeks. How many days did it take you guys to beat it? I figure I probably will beat it in 3 days. 6 bucks should be a pretty good price to play to beat this game.

only a hermit would rate a game based on its frame-rate. Most console players could care less and wouldn't even notice this issue.

GojiMaster

i'm renting the game at redbox in a couple weeks. How many days did it take you guys to beat it? I figure I probably will beat it in 3 days. 6 bucks should be a pretty good price to play to beat this game.

GojiMaster

i think it is great 8)

When you use Lie you always have found the proper evidence wether it's in your notebook or not. Anyways I think peoples most major complaints is they walked into the game expecting a GTA experience and this game is far from it. It's Rockstars stigma they have created with making nothing but free roaming "do what you want" games. Team Bondi on the other hand made a restricted game in a open world, while I applaud them on having the massive open, I can see why some people get frustrated not being able to go on murder sprees "even though your a cop..."Jynxzor

I personally love the gameplay and how its so caleld SLOWER, I really like this take on these kinds of games. The poor FPS is really my only issue I have with the game.

But I agree, I can see why people would not like this game if they are expecting GTA IV part 2 or Saints Row type of game, its a little slower pace (which I persoanlly like), just wish the FPS was better.

For my taste I like it more then GTA IV, just wish FPS could be better.

Looks like the TC didn't

*puts on the glasses*

investigate the game enough

YYEEEEAAAHHHHHH

(sorry )

another aprt, is i dont e get why people that has nothing to do with the murders, have o lie to my questions, Why would u lie if u haven't done anything? lol Ayrtonsennna

people are intimidated by police and interrogation along with being scared of repercussions of them saying something.Happens all the time in real life.

[QUOTE="Jynxzor"]When you use Lie you always have found the proper evidence wether it's in your notebook or not. Anyways I think peoples most major complaints is they walked into the game expecting a GTA experience and this game is far from it. It's Rockstars stigma they have created with making nothing but free roaming "do what you want" games. Team Bondi on the other hand made a restricted game in a open world, while I applaud them on having the massive open, I can see why some people get frustrated not being able to go on murder sprees "even though your a cop..."kozzy1234

I personally love the gameplay and how its so caleld SLOWER, I really like this take on these kinds of games. The poor FPS is really my only issue I have with the game.

But I agree, I can see why people would not like this game if they are expecting GTA IV part 2 or Saints Row type of game, its a little slower pace (which I persoanlly like), just wish the FPS was better.

For my taste I like it more then GTA IV, just wish FPS could be better.

another aprt, is i dont e get why people that has nothing to do with the murders, have o lie to my questions, Why would u lie if u haven't done anything? lol Ayrtonsennna