Lair: PLAY Reviews 9/10

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Tnasty11
Tnasty11

4497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Tnasty11
Member since 2005 • 4497 Posts

http://n4g.com/ps3/NewsPending-61654.aspx Runs*

Yes, the review of Lair from PLAY Magazine is in. And what did they give the game? They gave it a 9/10. They also shed some light on how EGM did not review the whole game, read it:

We (Play) received the same review copy that I assume all the other mags did, which had optimized frame rates in the earlier missions, but poor frame rates in the last few missions and several bugs. We contacted Factor 5 and asked for all known issues and Julian himself replied with a detailed list, promising that the later levels were being optimized for frame rates, the bugs were being fixed, and that one aspect of the control would be improved. They said they would have a gold master candidate ready by our ship date, so I wrote the review on the assumptions that their promises would be kept, got the gold master candidate right before we went to press, and played that version for a few hours to confirm that they had addressed the issues. That gold master candidate was dated roughly a month ago, and as far as I know represents the game's final optimization.

I'm not sure what version the OP played-ours were never labeled "Preview Code", but a print mag's Review Code is sometimes a web site's Preview Code. Our last-received version of the game does not run at a rock-solid 30 fps, but I did not consider the frame rate problems to be an issue at all. I don't mind a few frame rate dips into the 20's here and there, if it's for the purpose of making an otherwise amazing looking game. I'm certainly not as sensitive to frame rate issues as the OP, but I don't think the average game enthusiast is either.

Just something to point out to the people who want to hate on Lair here-Sony and Factor 5 went all out to make sure the print mags got review copies as early as possible and frequent updates so that they could have reviews out before the game's release (which was at that point supposed to be August 8th, I think). Companies do NOT do that when they don't have a lot of faith in their games, so clearly both Factor 5 and Sony thought they had a critical hit on their hands, and any suggestion that they're trying to bury it or "send it out to die" is absurd. And having written the 9 review, I (obviously) agree.
Avatar image for htekemerald
htekemerald

7325

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 htekemerald
Member since 2004 • 7325 Posts
Login required?
Avatar image for ZeldaMaster32
ZeldaMaster32

9263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#3 ZeldaMaster32
Member since 2005 • 9263 Posts
User Login? Bah.
Avatar image for _en1gma_
_en1gma_

14617

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 _en1gma_
Member since 2004 • 14617 Posts

"User login"

No thx.

Avatar image for Tom_Brady860
Tom_Brady860

961

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Tom_Brady860
Member since 2007 • 961 Posts
pfft, play.....if they had the word "boy" at the end of their name i wouldve given them more credibility
Avatar image for GundamGuy0
GundamGuy0

10970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 GundamGuy0
Member since 2003 • 10970 Posts

Old...

Play is a joke when it comes to reviews.

Avatar image for ISA_Scum
ISA_Scum

350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 ISA_Scum
Member since 2007 • 350 Posts
You been living in a cave or something? This is like.....last month's news.
Avatar image for ginglejangle
ginglejangle

3171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 ginglejangle
Member since 2007 • 3171 Posts
This is old.
Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts
lol, How desperate do you have to be to use Play as a source.
Avatar image for hamstergeddon
hamstergeddon

7188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 hamstergeddon
Member since 2006 • 7188 Posts
And with another review PLAY's credibility sinks further into nonexistence
Avatar image for rhaigun
rhaigun

3019

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 rhaigun
Member since 2005 • 3019 Posts
Play is terrible.
Avatar image for O_Lineman17
O_Lineman17

1128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 O_Lineman17
Member since 2005 • 1128 Posts
I think a lot of people already posted this...a while ago. At least it seems like I've read that before. I normally don't trust PLAY for reviews, they don't do a terribly great job.
Avatar image for books83
books83

3733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 books83
Member since 2005 • 3733 Posts
For starters they must of had a near finished version of the game considering that the game was originally set to release on the 14th. And second they reviewed it on the basis that they were told that the problems would be fixed. No matter how you cut it they based their reveiw on promises and it really shouldn't be taken that it is the correct score.
Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts
How about from now on we only use Play magazine as a source, it's more efficient. Never again will we have to argue about A or AA, The only two scores to pick from would be AAA or AAAA, talk about a time saver.
Avatar image for DoctorBunny
DoctorBunny

2660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 DoctorBunny
Member since 2005 • 2660 Posts

So from lairs perspective

Sonic>Lair

ouch