Let's drop the 'that game isn't worth $600' argument.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for fuzzysquash
fuzzysquash

17374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#1 fuzzysquash
Member since 2004 • 17374 Posts

I still see people using that argument. If a good PS3 game is being discussed, someone will invariably jump in and say "good game, but not worth $600."

True.

But here's the thing. No game on the 360 is worth $400. Halo 3 isn't. Gears of War isn't. Mass Effect isn't. Ninja Gaiden 2 isn't. Fable 2 isn't. But those games, combined with the entire library of the 360, are collectively worth $400.

Similarly, MGS4 alone isn't worth $600, nor is FFXIII. But combine those with the likes of FF versus XIII, Heavenly Sword, Uncharted: Drake's Fortune, God of War III, Gran Turismo 5, Eight Days, White Knight Story, Ninja Gaiden Sigma, and future titles by talented developers such as Team Ico, and you have a compelling reason why $600 is worth it.

Hence, the whole argument of "such-and-such game isn't worth $600" is misleading, outdated, and should be retired along with the dinosaurs.

Avatar image for deactivated-61ff675e61178
deactivated-61ff675e61178

12558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 deactivated-61ff675e61178
Member since 2004 • 12558 Posts

Great pic, haha.  Man, i haven't watched JP in so long.

Oh, and i agree. Has anyone ever bought any console for just one game?

Avatar image for Son_of_Some
Son_of_Some

1458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Son_of_Some
Member since 2006 • 1458 Posts
So waiting is the key word?
Avatar image for Game13a13y
Game13a13y

2860

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#4 Game13a13y
Member since 2004 • 2860 Posts

lol, those who claim PS 3 is too expensive is just like saying PC gaming is too expensive.

ya it is more expensive, but you get what you paid for.

 

Avatar image for Ultimas_Blade
Ultimas_Blade

3671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Ultimas_Blade
Member since 2004 • 3671 Posts

Sadly, this is what many fanboys do, validate a $400/$600 purchase with one "must have" title.  To validate a purchase that big, your console "must have" a lot of upcoming games you'd want to play :P

Avatar image for Rhubarb9
Rhubarb9

2352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Rhubarb9
Member since 2006 • 2352 Posts

Great pic, haha. Man, i haven't watched JP in so long.

Oh, and i agree. Has anyone ever bought any console for just one game?

makingmusic476



Everybody who jumped the Xbox wagon to buy Halo
everyone buying a handheld Nintendo console for Pokemon
Avatar image for deactivated-61ff675e61178
deactivated-61ff675e61178

12558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 deactivated-61ff675e61178
Member since 2004 • 12558 Posts
[QUOTE="makingmusic476"]

Great pic, haha. Man, i haven't watched JP in so long.

Oh, and i agree. Has anyone ever bought any console for just one game?

Rhubarb9



Everybody who jumped the Xbox wagon to buy Halo
everyone buying a handheld Nintendo console for Pokemon

They didn't buy them just for that game.  That specific game was the final straw, if you will.  It was the one game, in addition to the rest, that made them finally say, "I'm going to buy one."
Avatar image for daveg1
daveg1

20405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#8 daveg1
Member since 2005 • 20405 Posts
i think your wasting your time with this mate but i agree with you.
Avatar image for Cesar_Barba
Cesar_Barba

3665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Cesar_Barba
Member since 2003 • 3665 Posts

Great pic, haha. Man, i haven't watched JP in so long.

Oh, and i agree. Has anyone ever bought any console for just one game?

makingmusic476
Sega Dreamcast for Sonic Adventure, though it was a much lesser price than when new. Though, after a while I did pick up some games when they went on clearance, brand new for $2.99
Avatar image for SergeantSnitch
SergeantSnitch

3692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 SergeantSnitch
Member since 2007 • 3692 Posts

lol, those who claim PS 3 is too expensive is just like saying PC gaming is too expensive.

ya it is more expensive, but you get what you paid for.

 

Game13a13y


Yea, a Blu-Ray player.  LMAO, just kidding.  I agree Fuzzy.
Avatar image for SolidSnake2020
SolidSnake2020

2180

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 SolidSnake2020
Member since 2006 • 2180 Posts
Well if it is the only game that they want then it is not worth it.
Avatar image for Game13a13y
Game13a13y

2860

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#12 Game13a13y
Member since 2004 • 2860 Posts
[QUOTE="Game13a13y"]

lol, those who claim PS 3 is too expensive is just like saying PC gaming is too expensive.

ya it is more expensive, but you get what you paid for.

 

SergeantSnitch



Yea, a Blu-Ray player.  LMAO, just kidding.  I agree Fuzzy.

well, in that case, a typical Blu-ray player cost around $800... then you get much more than what you paid for.

 

Avatar image for bindip
bindip

2585

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#13 bindip
Member since 2005 • 2585 Posts

i agree with what you say however........

at this moment in time the ps3 is not worth $600 because theres no games out besides RFOM and motor strom worth getting. Where as the 360 has about atleast 30 + titles which are worth getting.

Untill more games come out for the ps3 the ps3 isnt worth is price tag. But in a years time it will be worth it. Just like the xbox 360 wasnt worth getting when it first came out. But its worth getting now.

Avatar image for wavebrid
wavebrid

8204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 wavebrid
Member since 2006 • 8204 Posts

lol, those who claim PS 3 is too expensive is just like saying PC gaming is too expensive.

ya it is more expensive, but you get what you paid for.

 

Game13a13y

a game console should never be over 400 period

or how sony says its a "super computer"

 

Avatar image for BrooklynBomber
BrooklynBomber

1507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 BrooklynBomber
Member since 2007 • 1507 Posts
[QUOTE="Game13a13y"]

lol, those who claim PS 3 is too expensive is just like saying PC gaming is too expensive.

ya it is more expensive, but you get what you paid for.

 

wavebrid

a game console should never be over 400 period

or how sony says its a "super computer" 

A game console should be $300 that's what we are used to and why the wii is selling alot more than the 360 and ps3 but the ps3 is not just a game console is it. The ps3 is what the old xbox was a cheap pc that plays console games. If all you want is games then yea the 360 and ps3 are over priced but if you want more then the 360 and ps3 are very cheap imo.

Avatar image for bindip
bindip

2585

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#16 bindip
Member since 2005 • 2585 Posts
[QUOTE="Game13a13y"]

lol, those who claim PS 3 is too expensive is just like saying PC gaming is too expensive.

ya it is more expensive, but you get what you paid for.

 

wavebrid

a game console should never be over 400 period

or how sony says its a "super computer"

 

but with PCs you dont just pay for a gameing platform you pay for a hell of a lot of other functions as well. PC you can pritty much do any think unlike consoles which are just htere to play games.

 

back to the consoles the ps3 will be worth its price tag once more games come out that warrent the pruchase.

Avatar image for Game13a13y
Game13a13y

2860

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#17 Game13a13y
Member since 2004 • 2860 Posts

come on, in the consumer's point of view (like me), of couse we want things to cost as cheap as possible, but that doesn't mean PS 3 doesn't worth $600. may be not yet, but it eventually will when MGS 4, FF XIII, GT 5, etc came out.

 

 

Avatar image for BrooklynBomber
BrooklynBomber

1507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 BrooklynBomber
Member since 2007 • 1507 Posts

come on, in the consumer's point of view (like me), of couse we want things to cost as cheap as possible, but that doesn't mean PS 3 doesn't worth $600. may be not yet, but it eventually will when MGS 4, FF XIII, GT 5, etc came out.

Game13a13y

The ps3 is worth $600 right now to me just on the blu-ray player and the linux install alone imo. The fact that the ps3 has some good games is like icing on the cake for me. I really don't think gamers get what the ps3 can really do and that is a shame. Sony has made the ps3 to do far more than just play games and now that wifi is working with ydl it just opens the floodgates on what's possible.  

Avatar image for STABW0UND
STABW0UND

2285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 STABW0UND
Member since 2007 • 2285 Posts
[QUOTE="makingmusic476"]

Great pic, haha. Man, i haven't watched JP in so long.

Oh, and i agree. Has anyone ever bought any console for just one game?

Rhubarb9




Everybody who jumped the Xbox wagon to buy Halo
everyone buying a handheld Nintendo console for Pokemon

uhhh yea thats true i bought a gameboy pocket, gamboy color, gameboy advanced, gameboy sp, and nintendo DS just for pokemon. 

Avatar image for proof11102
proof11102

1080

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 proof11102
Member since 2007 • 1080 Posts

 MGS4 alone isn't worth $600...fuzzysquash

Bull...:P lol

To me PS3 is worth 600 just to play MGS4 alone...but luckaly it will have a whole bunch of other great games to play as well so it's even better for me.

Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#21 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts

So waiting is the key word?Son_of_Some

    You don't really need to wait, as there are compelling titles available to the PS3 right now. Whether or not they appeal to you is a different story, and if you aren't interested in the current library, you should wait. But there are good games for the PS3 now, and there will be great games in the future. 

Avatar image for rpg9000owner
rpg9000owner

1859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#22 rpg9000owner
Member since 2006 • 1859 Posts

Great pic, haha. Man, i haven't watched JP in so long.

Oh, and i agree. Has anyone ever bought any console for just one game?

makingmusic476
Many people did just for Halo, unfourtunately I was one of them.
Avatar image for Timesplitter14
Timesplitter14

5934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Timesplitter14
Member since 2006 • 5934 Posts

So waiting is the key word?Son_of_Some

Actually, yes. When cows bought their PS3s, they KNEW there wouldn't be any games (except a few) for it before summer/fall. We bought the PS3 because we think it's the best long-term choice and that's all. YES, WE HAVE TO WAIT.

-

Avatar image for PelekotansDream
PelekotansDream

7602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#24 PelekotansDream
Member since 2005 • 7602 Posts

Remember though that its an opinion. I got a 360 just to play Bioshock. And I am getting a PS3 for MGS4.

I have plenty of cash so I can buy systems for just one game but that does not mean I can't enjoy what else the console can offer me.

To some people "'that game isn't worth $600'" that rings true.

Avatar image for fuzzysquash
fuzzysquash

17374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#25 fuzzysquash
Member since 2004 • 17374 Posts
[QUOTE="Game13a13y"]

lol, those who claim PS 3 is too expensive is just like saying PC gaming is too expensive.

ya it is more expensive, but you get what you paid for.

 

SergeantSnitch



Yea, a Blu-Ray player. LMAO, just kidding. I agree Fuzzy.

lol, that stings :P

Avatar image for fuzzysquash
fuzzysquash

17374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#26 fuzzysquash
Member since 2004 • 17374 Posts

i agree with what you say however........

at this moment in time the ps3 is not worth $600 because theres no games out besides RFOM and motor strom worth getting. Where as the 360 has about atleast 30 + titles which are worth getting.

Untill more games come out for the ps3 the ps3 isnt worth is price tag. But in a years time it will be worth it. Just like the xbox 360 wasnt worth getting when it first came out. But its worth getting now.

bindip

I agree with that. A lower price plus more games would make the purchase more worthwhile. I'm just rebutting the common claim that one game isn't worth $600...which is more of a rhetorical weapon than a substantive argument.

Avatar image for HarryCrackage
HarryCrackage

1426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 HarryCrackage
Member since 2004 • 1426 Posts
All of the pricing arguments are rediculous. Lemmings cry that $600 for one game is not worth it to which the cows respond that the 360 costs more if you add 2+ years of Live service. It is all subjective to the point that if a person can justify the purchase than either console is worth it.
Avatar image for Cuby_Finest
Cuby_Finest

1129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Cuby_Finest
Member since 2005 • 1129 Posts

I still see people using that argument. If a good PS3 game is being discussed, someone will invariably jump in and say "good game, but not worth $600."

True.

But here's the thing. No game on the 360 is worth $400. Halo 3 isn't. Gears of War isn't. Mass Effect isn't. Ninja Gaiden 2 isn't. Fable 2 isn't. But those games, combined with the entire library of the 360, are collectively worth $400.

Similarly, MGS4 alone isn't worth $600, nor is FFXIII. But combine those with the likes of FF versus XIII, Heavenly Sword, Uncharted: Drake's Fortune, God of War III, Gran Turismo 5, Eight Days, White Knight Story, Ninja Gaiden Sigma, and future titles by talented developers such as Team Ico, and you have a compelling reason why $600 is worth it.

Hence, the whole argument of "such-and-such game isn't worth $600" is misleading, outdated, and should be retired along with the dinosaurs.

fuzzysquash

 

yeah...... but whats the point on getting  ps3 on launch!!!!!!!

Avatar image for project343
project343

14106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 project343
Member since 2005 • 14106 Posts
It's more like 'that game isn't worth $660 (+tax)'. :)
Avatar image for superkoolstud
superkoolstud

2800

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#30 superkoolstud
Member since 2004 • 2800 Posts

I still see people using that argument. If a good PS3 game is being discussed, someone will invariably jump in and say "good game, but not worth $600."

True.

But here's the thing. No game on the 360 is worth $400. Halo 3 isn't. Gears of War isn't. Mass Effect isn't. Ninja Gaiden 2 isn't. Fable 2 isn't. But those games, combined with the entire library of the 360, are collectively worth $400.

Similarly, MGS4 alone isn't worth $600, nor is FFXIII. But combine those with the likes of FF versus XIII, Heavenly Sword, Uncharted: Drake's Fortune, God of War III, Gran Turismo 5, Eight Days, White Knight Story, Ninja Gaiden Sigma, and future titles by talented developers such as Team Ico, and you have a compelling reason why $600 is worth it.

Hence, the whole argument of "such-and-such game isn't worth $600" is misleading, outdated, and should be retired along with the dinosaurs.

fuzzysquash

The games may not be worth $400 or $600 to you, but to others they are. I happily shelled out $250 to play Zelda:TP and I felt the purchase was worth it. I bought my 360 for Halo 3, I ain't gonna lie, sure it has other great games, but Halo 3 is worth $400. I would gladly pay $400 to play MGS4, but not $600.

Its all opinion and preference.

Avatar image for ApocalypseXIVV
ApocalypseXIVV

1988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 ApocalypseXIVV
Member since 2004 • 1988 Posts
[QUOTE="Game13a13y"]

come on, in the consumer's point of view (like me), of couse we want things to cost as cheap as possible, but that doesn't mean PS 3 doesn't worth $600. may be not yet, but it eventually will when MGS 4, FF XIII, GT 5, etc came out.

BrooklynBomber

but thats why i have a laptop...people never said they wanted it to do all that crap...they have computers for a reason...i want a damnvideo game console...not an all in 1 entertainmet thng 

The ps3 is worth $600 right now to me just on the blu-ray player and the linux install alone imo. The fact that the ps3 has some good games is like icing on the cake for me. I really don't think gamers get what the ps3 can really do and that is a shame. Sony has made the ps3 to do far more than just play games and now that wifi is working with ydl it just opens the floodgates on what's possible.

Avatar image for -The-G-Man-
-The-G-Man-

6414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 -The-G-Man-
Member since 2007 • 6414 Posts

The reason I sometimes say "this game isn't worth 600 dollars" is because the PS3 doesn't have, in my opinion, a very good library.  The only game that interests me is Resistance.  And usually when I used (I don't do it much anymore, because talk about Resistance has died down) the phrase, the Sony fans were saying how Resistance alone was amazing and a good enough reason to buy a PS3.  That's just me, though.

Avatar image for -Spock-
-Spock-

7072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 -Spock-
Member since 2006 • 7072 Posts

It's more like 'that game isn't worth $660 (+tax)'. :)project343

I see what you did there. 

 

Avatar image for lordxymor
lordxymor

2438

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 lordxymor
Member since 2004 • 2438 Posts

Buying the ps3 for games now is completely unrealistic, it's too expensive.

Now if you have an HD TV set and is looking for using it's HD playback functionaly as well, than it's the best out of the 3.

As a console, Ps3 is too expensive and doesn't have enough games, as a blu-ray player/console/media center it's the best hardware out there. I'll wait until the games I'm looking foward to are out.  

Avatar image for solidte
solidte

3616

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 solidte
Member since 2005 • 3616 Posts
I agree but not at $999 AU ($822 US)
Avatar image for HeedleGlavin
HeedleGlavin

15373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#36 HeedleGlavin
Member since 2005 • 15373 Posts
So, in other words, we should just continue to.....wait. :| Gotcha.
Avatar image for yoshi_64
yoshi_64

25261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#37 yoshi_64
Member since 2003 • 25261 Posts

Ya know what? I'm hoping Lady Luck will praise me again for the third time in a row and allow me to come across a FREE PS3 like my PS1 and PS2 were. :D

Though I may get one, but I may get it in three years. The reason I say that long is not because I'm trying to wait for a massive drop in price or anything, but it's possible the next two years of my life, I'll be... traveling, I guess is the appropiate word. So, I'll be traveling and you see my consoles will be left home... :(

Avatar image for RedLobsterpwns
RedLobsterpwns

469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 RedLobsterpwns
Member since 2007 • 469 Posts

Great pic, haha. Man, i haven't watched JP in so long.

Oh, and i agree. Has anyone ever bought any console for just one game?

makingmusic476

*raises hand

I got the GC one christmas when it was 100 because it came with a collection disk of four zelda games that i was looking for

Not sure if you consider that one game though

Avatar image for Lazy_Boy88
Lazy_Boy88

7418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Lazy_Boy88
Member since 2003 • 7418 Posts

So waiting is the key word?Son_of_Some

Yeah it is.... but 360 was at least as bad as PS3 up till this point in its life yet tons of people still bought it for Gears and Halo3. By fall PS3 is definitely worth the money...... so with no hardware problems there's really no reason to wait either.

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

I still see people using that argument. If a good PS3 game is being discussed, someone will invariably jump in and say "good game, but not worth $600."

True.

But here's the thing. No game on the 360 is worth $400. Halo 3 isn't. Gears of War isn't. Mass Effect isn't. Ninja Gaiden 2 isn't. Fable 2 isn't. But those games, combined with the entire library of the 360, are collectively worth $400.

Similarly, MGS4 alone isn't worth $600, nor is FFXIII. But combine those with the likes of FF versus XIII, Heavenly Sword, Uncharted: Drake's Fortune, God of War III, Gran Turismo 5, Eight Days, White Knight Story, Ninja Gaiden Sigma, and future titles by talented developers such as Team Ico, and you have a compelling reason why $600 is worth it.

Hence, the whole argument of "such-and-such game isn't worth $600" is misleading, outdated, and should be retired along with the dinosaurs.

fuzzysquash

lol, ouch, this is defending the PS3? You got a list of games coming out in 2008(excluding HS and NGS). Do the PS3 a favor and stop "helping" it.

I totally agree though the "not worth $600" arguement is a pretty lame one, just not the worst one on SW by far.

Avatar image for The_Game21x
The_Game21x

26440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#41 The_Game21x
Member since 2005 • 26440 Posts
That's an excellent point Fuzzy and one I'm surprised hasn't been brought up before.
Avatar image for shungokustasu
shungokustasu

7190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#42 shungokustasu
Member since 2004 • 7190 Posts

That's an excellent point Fuzzy and one I'm surprised hasn't been brought up before.The_Game21x

It has many, many times by me and other PS3 fans. 

Avatar image for Nugtoka
Nugtoka

1812

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Nugtoka
Member since 2003 • 1812 Posts

Ok how about this joke of a console isn't worth $600.

Happy now?

Avatar image for The_Game21x
The_Game21x

26440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#44 The_Game21x
Member since 2005 • 26440 Posts

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]That's an excellent point Fuzzy and one I'm surprised hasn't been brought up before.shungokustasu

It has many, many times by me and other PS3 fans. 

This is the first time I've seen someone make a thread about it.

Avatar image for Hot_Potato
Hot_Potato

3422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#45 Hot_Potato
Member since 2004 • 3422 Posts
[QUOTE="Rhubarb9"][QUOTE="makingmusic476"]

Great pic, haha. Man, i haven't watched JP in so long.

Oh, and i agree. Has anyone ever bought any console for just one game?

makingmusic476




Everybody who jumped the Xbox wagon to buy Halo
everyone buying a handheld Nintendo console for Pokemon

They didn't buy them just for that game. That specific game was the final straw, if you will. It was the one game, in addition to the rest, that made them finally say, "I'm going to buy one."

How would you know what THEY did. As a matter of fact I got my 360 at launch for the main reason of playing Halo 3. I'm still gonna get Mass Effect and a few other games that looks good, but when I bought my 360, the main reason was Halo 3. On the other hand, the games coming out on PS3 look slightly more appealing and broad to me. Games like MGS (stealth), Gran Turismo (racing sim), God of War (action adventure), Uncharted (adventure) and Ratchet and Clank (platformer) were all main reasons for me buying a PS3. All thought it's a bad argument, most of the 360s games are shooters and they get boring after awhile. The other 360 games just don't appeal to me.

Avatar image for SA--X
SA--X

340

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 SA--X
Member since 2007 • 340 Posts
If we start dropping agruments for the PS3, can we do so for the Wii; I've got some gripes with a few of those.
Avatar image for Adrian_Cloud
Adrian_Cloud

7169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Adrian_Cloud
Member since 2006 • 7169 Posts

wowI don't know MEtal Gear SOlid 4: Guns of the PAtriots may actually be worth the purchase of a PS3.

Its amazing.  

 

Avatar image for fuzzysquash
fuzzysquash

17374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#48 fuzzysquash
Member since 2004 • 17374 Posts

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]That's an excellent point Fuzzy and one I'm surprised hasn't been brought up before.shungokustasu

It has many, many times by me and other PS3 fans.

True, but did you use dinosaurs to help you make the point? :wink: