LOL at Resident Evil 4 Wii score

So Gamecube is better than PS2 and Wii (Re4 on GC got 9.6)?
RE4 is for kiddies?

I don't see why the score is bad, thats good for a 2 year old game..

*checks watch*

PS3_FTW is about 18 hours late on this on, ain't he?

The Wii graphics only got a 9 because there are higher standards because the system is more powerful. Everyone knows that the Gamecube version looked a lot better than the PS2 version. The Wii version runs on the Gamecube engine, except in 480p and 16x9. This is incredibly weak.

Graphics: Wii: 9
PS2: 10

Gears of war also had 10 in graphics.

Which means RE4 on the PS2 looks as good as gears of war.

OK????

the graphics are ''dated''-wii60-

No, the PS2 version got 10 out of 10 for graphics. Wii got 9 out of 10. So the Wii has worse graphics than the PS2PS3_FTW

Just get off of suspension did we? PS3_FTW is back in full effect.

It's like you're trying your best to be wrong. :|

Wii version got 9.1 so the PS2 version is the best, even though it scored lower than the GCN version? Fassive Mailure.

[QUOTE="-wii60-"]the graphics are ''dated''PS3_FTW

Because the game is a port?

No, the PS2 version got 10 out of 10 for graphics. Wii got 9 out of 10. So the Wii has worse graphics than the PS2PS3_FTW

Well if gamespot says so, then it automatically makes the graphics worse regardless.

This is the definitive version of a modern classic and a must-play, even if you've already experienced the unique thrill of Resident Evil 4 on another platform.VGobbsesser

/end thread

Poor ps3_ftw, I wonder if he ever gets tired of getting owned?

This is the definitive version of a modern classic and a must-play, even if you've already experienced the unique thrill of Resident Evil 4 on another platform.VGobbsesser

People are saying that alot about Wii games now aren't they? Guess I am going to go and pick this up.

I don't think I've seen PS3_FTW for a couple months, it's nice to know he's back.Saturos3091

yay to the return of PS3_FTW!!!! system wars isn't the same without all the moronic fanboys!

[QUOTE="-wii60-"]the graphics are ''dated''PS3_FTW

The Wii version looks exactly like the GC version,which looked better than the PS2 version,therefore,the Wii version looks better.VGobbsesser

[QUOTE="-wii60-"]the graphics are ''dated''PS3_FTW

I really do wonder why sheep are praising RE4 on Wii. It got a 9.1, thats garbage, when the PS2 version got 9.3. So the PS2 version is better. The Wii version is the WORST version of the game. Lets look at some scores:

Graphics: Wii: 9
PS2: 10

So if the Wii is so much more powerful than the PS2, why do the games look worse? This game is like 10 years old now, why can't the Wii keep up? Its because its not even as powerful as PS2, because Nintendo can't afford good graphics.

One thing you might say is better about the Wii version is the controlls. WRONG. " The controls soften the difficulty". This is a game that should be challenging. The Wii makes it easier for the kiddies that will be playing on the Wii.

So really the PS2 version is the best, its got the best graphics, its a more challenging game, you get to play with a proper controller, and you can get the PS2 version for like 20 bucks now. So you're getting more for less. Wii can't even beat PS2 games, its a joke.PS3_FTW

Lolz, your logic is terribly flawed. The game got a lower score than the other versions because it was old. Graphics were taken from the Gamecube version of the game, and ported directly to the Wii, so they're the same as the GC and therefore better than the PS2. The rating was purely subjective.

Better controls = better game. Despite the easier controls, that doesn't mean that the PS2 controls are better because of difficuly. I'd much rather aim with Wiimote movements than wiggle an analog stick around to aim. You can't claim PS2 is better solely because the task of aiming is harder to accomplish.

It's still only $30 for better control, beter graphics than the PS2 (because the GC version of RE4 was superior and graphics are taken from that version), and still all the extra content from the PS2 version. The only reason the score was lower was because the game is 2 years old. The PS2 version would have scored less had it been reviewed at the same time as the Wii version.

I really do wonder why sheep are praising RE4 on Wii. It got a 9.1, thats garbage, when the PS2 version got 9.3. So the PS2 version is better. The Wii version is the WORST version of the game. Lets look at some scores:

Graphics: Wii: 9
PS2: 10

So if the Wii is so much more powerful than the PS2, why do the games look worse? This game is like 10 years old now, why can't the Wii keep up? Its because its not even as powerful as PS2, because Nintendo can't afford good graphics.

One thing you might say is better about the Wii version is the controlls. WRONG. " The controls soften the difficulty". This is a game that should be challenging. The Wii makes it easier for the kiddies that will be playing on the Wii.

So really the PS2 version is the best, its got the best graphics, its a more challenging game, you get to play with a proper controller, and you can get the PS2 version for like 20 bucks now. So you're getting more for less. Wii can't even beat PS2 games, its a joke.PS3_FTW

Nice try dude. By your logic, Resistance: Fall of Man's graphics aren't any better than either version. So what does that say about your logic? Besides, if we're going strictly by scores, how many PS3 games have gotten a 9.1 yet? Oh that's right, only a port of Elder Scrolls! Yeah, PS3 for the win, definitely.

Edit: And who said the PS2 version looks better than the Wii version? Everyone agrees the Wii and GC ones are better, because, you know, they're more powerful than the PS2. The PS2 couldn't even handle in-game cutscenes. Better luck next time.

[QUOTE="VGobbsesser"]The Wii version looks exactly like the GC version,which looked better than the PS2 version,therefore,the Wii version looks better.PS3_FTW

It doesn't.It looks like the GC version,which looked better than the PS2 version.

[QUOTE="VGobbsesser"]The Wii version looks exactly like the GC version,which looked better than the PS2 version,therefore,the Wii version looks better.PS3_FTW

Well, I think you mean GC, and the reason is because it's a port. They could port this game to PS3 and do nothing. Does that make PS3 any less powerful?

[QUOTE="VGobbsesser"]The Wii version looks exactly like the GC version,which looked better than the PS2 version,therefore,the Wii version looks better.PS3_FTW

I can't believe I'm even posting in this thread.

The Wii version has better graphics than the PS2 version ok. The review score is affected by the capabilities of the system. A DS game with 10/10 in graphics does not look as good as Gears of War. An Xbox 360game with 6/10 for graphics looks better than a PS2 game with 8/10.

I don't think I've seen PS3_FTW for a couple months, it's nice to know he's back.Saturos3091

yeah, it's always great reading material, what he posts and what the people actually taking him seriously post.

[QUOTE="PS3_FTW"]I really do wonder why sheep are praising RE4 on Wii. It got a 9.1, thats garbage, when the PS2 version got 9.3. So the PS2 version is better. The Wii version is the WORST version of the game. Lets look at some scores:

Graphics: Wii: 9
PS2: 10

So if the Wii is so much more powerful than the PS2, why do the games look worse? This game is like 10 years old now, why can't the Wii keep up? Its because its not even as powerful as PS2, because Nintendo can't afford good graphics.

One thing you might say is better about the Wii version is the controlls. WRONG. " The controls soften the difficulty". This is a game that should be challenging. The Wii makes it easier for the kiddies that will be playing on the Wii.

So really the PS2 version is the best, its got the best graphics, its a more challenging game, you get to play with a proper controller, and you can get the PS2 version for like 20 bucks now. So you're getting more for less. Wii can't even beat PS2 games, its a joke.SeanBond

Nice try dude. By your logic, Resistance: Fall of Man's graphics aren't any better than either version. So what does that say about your logic? Besides, if we're going strictly by scores, how many PS3 games have gotten a 9.1 yet? Oh that's right, only a port of Elder Scrolls! Yeah, PS3 for the win, definitely.

Owned.

No, the PS2 version got 10 out of 10 for graphics. Wii got 9 out of 10. So the Wii has worse graphics than the PS2PS3_FTW

IMO the fact that a 3 year old game got AAA, that means it's pretty good. Although I won't be buying it, it's nice for people that only have a Wii.

The reason it got a lower score was not because its 'the worse' version, its because the game is 2 years old. If it came out the same time as the other versions, it would've got probably a 9.5+.

All the stuff from it now is DATED besides the controls, but i think you have your head to far up your butt to understand that.

[QUOTE="SeanBond"]

[QUOTE="PS3_FTW"]I really do wonder why sheep are praising RE4 on Wii. It got a 9.1, thats garbage, when the PS2 version got 9.3. So the PS2 version is better. The Wii version is the WORST version of the game. Lets look at some scores:

Graphics: Wii: 9
PS2: 10

So if the Wii is so much more powerful than the PS2, why do the games look worse? This game is like 10 years old now, why can't the Wii keep up? Its because its not even as powerful as PS2, because Nintendo can't afford good graphics.

One thing you might say is better about the Wii version is the controlls. WRONG. " The controls soften the difficulty". This is a game that should be challenging. The Wii makes it easier for the kiddies that will be playing on the Wii.

So really the PS2 version is the best, its got the best graphics, its a more challenging game, you get to play with a proper controller, and you can get the PS2 version for like 20 bucks now. So you're getting more for less. Wii can't even beat PS2 games, its a joke.Homesrfan

Nice try dude. By your logic, Resistance: Fall of Man's graphics aren't any better than either version. So what does that say about your logic? Besides, if we're going strictly by scores, how many PS3 games have gotten a 9.1 yet? Oh that's right, only a port of Elder Scrolls! Yeah, PS3 for the win, definitely.

Owned.

PS3_FTW - reported yesterday's news today.Michael85

PS3_FTW - reporting yesterday's news today.Michael85

Except without any logic and plenty of brainless fanboy trolling.

I'll bet if they ported it to the PS3 it would get 10/10
Graphics 10
Sound 10
Tilt 10
PS3_FTW

so, you think it would get 10 in graphics because they ported it over.. with the same graphics already?:?