LOL PS2 swansong>>>>>>GC swansong/Wii beginning.

I am talking about GoW 2 against LoZ TP. Clearly GoW 2 is the far superior game in terms of gameplay, sound, story, etc. It is one heck of a fighting adventure game with intense and epic battles. TP was a borefest and the combat was way to easy that even a 3 year old could master. Just press B or wave the Wii mote until the enemy is dead. This pales in comparsion to the combo heavy and effective fights seen in GoW.

Here's added refinement to make the sheep angry. I thought Nintendo had the best developers in the world and with the help of the Wiimote, TP should have been the best thing ever. You bash Sony but yet they ae capable of making better games than Nintendo as seen in Ico, Shadow of the Collosus and GoW. Nintendo is fixated on Mario Parties that they forgot how to make killer games. LOL.

The focus of the Zelda series isn't combat.

I am talking about GoW 2 against LoZ TP. Clearly GoW 2 is the far superior game in terms of gameplay, sound, story, etc. It is one heck of a fighting adventure game with intense and epic battles. TP was a borefest and the combat was way to easy that even a 3 year old could master. Just press B or wave the Wii mote until the enemy is dead. This pales in comparsion to the combo heavy and effective fights seen in GoW.

Here's added refinement to make the sheep angry. I thought Nintendo had the best developers in the world and with the help of the Wiimote, TP should have been the best thing ever. You bash Sony but yet they ae capable of making better games than Nintendo as seen in Ico, Shadow of the Collosus and GoW. Nintendo is fixated on Mario Parties that they forgot how to make killer games. LOL.

Ninten007

GoW 2 will clearly outscore TP on Gamespot. Oh yea it already outscored TP on IGN(9.7>9.5). I dont know about you but I stopped playing TP after hitting the Sky Temple, it was just so boring and there was nothing exciting. I cant believe I bought into that GC hype, it was such a massive flop and Nintendo didnt do crap on it, heck Capcom did more for the GC than Nintendo ever did. Not to mention GoW 2 is coming out on time and it is not being delayed. TP was delayed for so long and it ended up not being superior because Nintendo had to go and appeal to casuals by making the game easy. I am sure the orignal GC version would have been on OOT scale level.

Now crap is already spewing out on the Wii with its latest addion being Wii Play which was supposed to showcase Wii mote capablities. So far the FPS sucked and there is nothing you can do to make up for how horrible and cheap this thing is.

Tell me how is the Wiimote saving the industry? The majority of gamers are gonna be playing on analog sticks with games such as GoW 2, Mass Effect, New Star Wars, Assassian's Creed, etc and they dont need motion sensing to make them better or whatnot.

Get out of here sheep, it is time to stop supporting Nintendo because they just dont deliver anymore.

GoW 2 will clearly outscore TP on Gamespot. Oh yea it already outscored TP on IGN(9.7>9.5). I dont know about you but I stopped playing TP after hitting the Sky Temple, it was just so boring and there was nothing exciting. I cant believe I bought into that GC hype, it was such a massive flop and Nintendo didnt do crap on it, heck Capcom did more for the GC than Nintendo ever did. Not to mention GoW 2 is coming out on time and it is not being delayed. TP was delayed for so long and it ended up not being superior because Nintendo had to go and appeal to casuals by making the game easy. I am sure the orignal GC version would have been on OOT scale level.

Now crap is already spewing out on the Wii with its latest addion being Wii Play which was supposed to showcase Wii mote capablities. So far the FPS sucked and there is nothing you can do to make up for how horrible and cheap this thing is.

Tell me how is the Wiimote saving the industry? The majority of gamers are gonna be playing on analog sticks with games such as GoW 2, Mass Effect, New Star Wars, Assassian's Creed, etc and they dont need motion sensing to make them better or whatnot.

Get out of here sheep, it is time to stop supporting Nintendo because they just dont deliver anymore.

Ninten007

You aren't very good at trolling, are you?

I am talking about GoW 2 against LoZ TP. Clearly GoW 2 is the far superior game in terms of gameplay, sound, story, etc. It is one heck of a fighting adventure game with intense and epic battles. TP was a borefest and the combat was way to easy that even a 3 year old could master. Just press B or wave the Wii mote until the enemy is dead. This pales in comparsion to the combo heavy and effective fights seen in GoW.

Here's added refinement to make the sheep angry. I thought Nintendo had the best developers in the world and with the help of the Wiimote, TP should have been the best thing ever. You bash Sony but yet they ae capable of making better games than Nintendo as seen in Ico, Shadow of the Collosus and GoW. Nintendo is fixated on Mario Parties that they forgot how to make killer games. LOL.

Ninten007

How about this: GoW 2 against any PS3 game and GoW against any 360 game.  This is a rediculous arguement.  You could argue the same thing for any game on the PS3 or 360 also.

Metriod Prime GC 9.7 And Game of the Year.Marka1700

Oh yea that boring game. It was made my Retro Studios of Texas, which is a 2nd party developer for Nintendo. Kudos to them. I am talking about in-house Nintendo where they develop the games in Japan and lately they have been spewing out trash and calling it innovative. Expect Prime 3 to have a "casual" feeling and it will be so easy a 5 year old can beat it.

[QUOTE="Marka1700"]Metriod Prime GC 9.7 And Game of the Year.Ninten007

Oh yea that boring game. It was made my Retro Studios of Texas, which is a 2nd party developer for Nintendo. Kudos to them. I am talking about in-house Nintendo where they develop the games in Japan and lately they have been spewing out trash and calling it innovative. Expect Prime 3 to have a "casual" feeling and it will be so easy a 5 year old can beat it.

You've played it?  How was it?

[QUOTE="Marka1700"]Metriod Prime GC 9.7 And Game of the Year.Ninten007

Oh yea that boring game. It was made my Retro Studios of Texas, which is a 2nd party developer for Nintendo. Kudos to them. I am talking about in-house Nintendo where they develop the games in Japan and lately they have been spewing out trash and calling it innovative. Expect Prime 3 to have a "casual" feeling and it will be so easy a 5 year old can beat it.

Retro Studios is first party.:|And Prime 3 is going to be amazing.

I've seen better trolling. Try harder please. So many people have already done this....Sonick54

Man, I miss the old fanboys in System Wars.  Now we're stuck with amateurs like the TC.

[QUOTE="Marka1700"]Metriod Prime GC 9.7 And Game of the Year.Ninten007

Oh yea that boring game. It was made my Retro Studios of Texas, which is a 2nd party developer for Nintendo. Kudos to them. I am talking about in-house Nintendo where they develop the games in Japan and lately they have been spewing out trash and calling it innovative. Expect Prime 3 to have a "casual" feeling and it will be so easy a 5 year old can beat it.

[QUOTE="Ninten007"]

[QUOTE="Marka1700"]Metriod Prime GC 9.7 And Game of the Year.Ptolemaueus

Oh yea that boring game. It was made my Retro Studios of Texas, which is a 2nd party developer for Nintendo. Kudos to them. I am talking about in-house Nintendo where they develop the games in Japan and lately they have been spewing out trash and calling it innovative. Expect Prime 3 to have a "casual" feeling and it will be so easy a 5 year old can beat it.

You've played it?  How was it?

Yea once you have played both Primes, you have played them all. The same boring crap of opening up rooms to find a missle upgrade and looking to the morph ball and shooting a few Space Pirates with lock-on.

what did gow2 score at gamespot?CaseyWegner

Since only Gamespot scores count,and not IGN,TC.:|

[QUOTE="Ptolemaueus"][QUOTE="Ninten007"]

[QUOTE="Marka1700"]Metriod Prime GC 9.7 And Game of the Year.Ninten007

Oh yea that boring game. It was made my Retro Studios of Texas, which is a 2nd party developer for Nintendo. Kudos to them. I am talking about in-house Nintendo where they develop the games in Japan and lately they have been spewing out trash and calling it innovative. Expect Prime 3 to have a "casual" feeling and it will be so easy a 5 year old can beat it.

You've played it?  How was it?

Yea once you have played both Primes, you have played them all. The same boring crap of opening up rooms to find a missle upgrade and looking to the morph ball and shooting a few Space Pirates with lock-on.

Nice message misplacement.

You don't even know this for sure.  There's going to be a different controller, and this is just a guess but that might change gameplay a little bit.

what did gow2 score at gamespot?CaseyWegner

Hey look it's Casey!  Been playing some Wow have we?

The focus of the Zelda series isn't combat.

Ptolemaueus

Oh yes, then why do they give you a sword, arrows, sheilds, etc. Those are weapons and weapons are used for combat. Well the puzzles in TP were beyond easy and not thought provoking and atmospheric as OOT, if you think thats the focus. TP has to be the worst in the series because Nintendo decided to get too casual with this hardcore franchise.

[QUOTE="Ninten007"]

[QUOTE="Marka1700"]Metriod Prime GC 9.7 And Game of the Year.kraidiation

Oh yea that boring game. It was made my Retro Studios of Texas, which is a 2nd party developer for Nintendo. Kudos to them. I am talking about in-house Nintendo where they develop the games in Japan and lately they have been spewing out trash and calling it innovative. Expect Prime 3 to have a "casual" feeling and it will be so easy a 5 year old can beat it.

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]what did gow2 score at gamespot?Firelore29

Hey look it's Casey!  Been playing some Wow have we?

yes. why wouldn't i? the expansion came out recently.

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]what did gow2 score at gamespot?VGobbsesser

Since only Gamespot scores count,and not IGN,TC.:|

that's not a number. :?

We all know that Zelda didn't even make a 7 and that GoWII got a perfect 10 here on Gamespot.  Give it a rest already.  You don't have to rub it in.

Scores may say that, however, both games are awesome.. saying one is crap compared to other is just idiotic.Haziqonfire

This is System Wars, my friend.

[QUOTE="Ptolemaueus"]

The focus of the Zelda series isn't combat.

Ninten007

Oh yes, then why do they give you a sword, arrows, sheilds, etc. Those are weapons and weapons are used for combat. Well the puzzles in TP were beyond easy and not thought provoking and atmospheric as OOT, if you think thats the focus. TP has to be the worst in the series because Nintendo decided to get too casual with this hardcore franchise.

The focus of the Zelda series is puzzles.  If you haven't realized this, you probably haven't played a Zelda game.

You seem to have missed my point. I am merely stating that there are other developers out there who are capable of making a game equal or better than of what Nintendo can. You people go crazy and rant on how Nintendo is the best developer ever, but it clearly didnt show with Sunshine, Star Fox, Mario Sports and Parties, Pikmin. If they are so good these games would have at least sold some Cubes. Their franchies have been going downhill and the Wiimote wont revive them.

Sony on the other hand which are bashed by sheep for being a bad developing team with unorignal ideas and casual trash were capable of outdoing Nintendo with the PS2 with games such as ICO, GoW, etc.

You seem to have missed my point. I am merely stating that there are other developers out there who are capable of making a game equal or better than of what Nintendo can. You people go crazy and rant on how Nintendo is the best developer ever, but it clearly didnt show with Sunshine, Star Fox, Mario Sports and Parties, Pikmin. If they are so good these games would have at least sold some Cubes. Their franchies have been going downhill and the Wiimote wont revive them.

Sony on the other hand which are bashed by sheep for being a bad developing team with unorignal ideas and casual trash were capable of outdoing Nintendo with the PS2 with games such as ICO, GoW, etc.

Ninten007

[QUOTE="Ninten007"][QUOTE="Ptolemaueus"]

The focus of the Zelda series isn't combat.

Ptolemaueus

Oh yes, then why do they give you a sword, arrows, sheilds, etc. Those are weapons and weapons are used for combat. Well the puzzles in TP were beyond easy and not thought provoking and atmospheric as OOT, if you think thats the focus. TP has to be the worst in the series because Nintendo decided to get too casual with this hardcore franchise.

The focus of the Zelda series is puzzles.  If you haven't realized this, you probably haven't played a Zelda game.

Did you notice I put the word puzzles in my sentence above and said they were easy? But IMO it is time for the Zelda series to get a revamped combat engine, the puzzles are fine as they way they are.

You seem to have missed my point. I am merely stating that there are other developers out there who are capable of making a game equal or better than of what Nintendo can. You people go crazy and rant on how Nintendo is the best developer ever, but it clearly didnt show with Sunshine, Star Fox, Mario Sports and Parties, Pikmin. If they are so good these games would have at least sold some Cubes. Their franchies have been going downhill and the Wiimote wont revive them.

Sony on the other hand which are bashed by sheep for being a bad developing team with unorignal ideas and casual trash were capable of outdoing Nintendo with the PS2 with games such as ICO, GoW, etc.

Ninten007

Wow.  You're worse at lying than you are at trolling.  I don't think "stating" involves repeatedly bashing the other game.  Oh, and TP scored higher than Shadow of the Colossus and ICO.

[QUOTE="Ptolemaueus"][QUOTE="Ninten007"][QUOTE="Ptolemaueus"]

The focus of the Zelda series isn't combat.

Ninten007

Oh yes, then why do they give you a sword, arrows, sheilds, etc. Those are weapons and weapons are used for combat. Well the puzzles in TP were beyond easy and not thought provoking and atmospheric as OOT, if you think thats the focus. TP has to be the worst in the series because Nintendo decided to get too casual with this hardcore franchise.

The focus of the Zelda series is puzzles.  If you haven't realized this, you probably haven't played a Zelda game.

Did you notice I put the word puzzles in my sentence above and said they were easy? But IMO it is time for the Zelda series to get a revamped combat engine, the puzzles are fine as they way they are.

:roll:  You said the focus of the Zelda series was combat, which isn't true.  I was pointing that out.

[QUOTE="Ninten007"]

You seem to have missed my point. I am merely stating that there are other developers out there who are capable of making a game equal or better than of what Nintendo can. You people go crazy and rant on how Nintendo is the best developer ever, but it clearly didnt show with Sunshine, Star Fox, Mario Sports and Parties, Pikmin. If they are so good these games would have at least sold some Cubes. Their franchies have been going downhill and the Wiimote wont revive them.

Sony on the other hand which are bashed by sheep for being a bad developing team with unorignal ideas and casual trash were capable of outdoing Nintendo with the PS2 with games such as ICO, GoW, etc.

samusarmada

[QUOTE="Ptolemaueus"][QUOTE="Ninten007"][QUOTE="Ptolemaueus"]

The focus of the Zelda series isn't combat.

Ninten007

Oh yes, then why do they give you a sword, arrows, sheilds, etc. Those are weapons and weapons are used for combat. Well the puzzles in TP were beyond easy and not thought provoking and atmospheric as OOT, if you think thats the focus. TP has to be the worst in the series because Nintendo decided to get too casual with this hardcore franchise.

The focus of the Zelda series is puzzles. If you haven't realized this, you probably haven't played a Zelda game.

Did you notice I put the word puzzles in my sentence above and said they were easy? But IMO it is time for the Zelda series to get a revamped combat engine, the puzzles are fine as they way they are.

[QUOTE="Ninten007"][QUOTE="Ptolemaueus"][QUOTE="Ninten007"][QUOTE="Ptolemaueus"]

The focus of the Zelda series isn't combat.

kraidiation

Oh yes, then why do they give you a sword, arrows, sheilds, etc. Those are weapons and weapons are used for combat. Well the puzzles in TP were beyond easy and not thought provoking and atmospheric as OOT, if you think thats the focus. TP has to be the worst in the series because Nintendo decided to get too casual with this hardcore franchise.

The focus of the Zelda series is puzzles. If you haven't realized this, you probably haven't played a Zelda game.

Did you notice I put the word puzzles in my sentence above and said they were easy? But IMO it is time for the Zelda series to get a revamped combat engine, the puzzles are fine as they way they are.

I think it will be even worse. Nintendo is just trying to trick you, the next Zelda game will be just like its 3-D counterparts. If they decide to change the formula, I bet you it will something of a point and click adventure.

[QUOTE="kraidiation"][QUOTE="Ninten007"][QUOTE="Ptolemaueus"][QUOTE="Ninten007"][QUOTE="Ptolemaueus"]

The focus of the Zelda series isn't combat.

Ninten007

Oh yes, then why do they give you a sword, arrows, sheilds, etc. Those are weapons and weapons are used for combat. Well the puzzles in TP were beyond easy and not thought provoking and atmospheric as OOT, if you think thats the focus. TP has to be the worst in the series because Nintendo decided to get too casual with this hardcore franchise.

The focus of the Zelda series is puzzles. If you haven't realized this, you probably haven't played a Zelda game.

Did you notice I put the word puzzles in my sentence above and said they were easy? But IMO it is time for the Zelda series to get a revamped combat engine, the puzzles are fine as they way they are.

I think it will be even worse. Nintendo is just trying to trick you, the next Zelda game will be just like its 3-D counterparts. If they decide to change the formula, I bet you it will something of a point and click adventure.

[QUOTE="Ninten007"][QUOTE="Ptolemaueus"][QUOTE="Ninten007"][QUOTE="Ptolemaueus"]

The focus of the Zelda series isn't combat.

kraidiation

Oh yes, then why do they give you a sword, arrows, sheilds, etc. Those are weapons and weapons are used for combat. Well the puzzles in TP were beyond easy and not thought provoking and atmospheric as OOT, if you think thats the focus. TP has to be the worst in the series because Nintendo decided to get too casual with this hardcore franchise.

The focus of the Zelda series is puzzles. If you haven't realized this, you probably haven't played a Zelda game.

Did you notice I put the word puzzles in my sentence above and said they were easy? But IMO it is time for the Zelda series to get a revamped combat engine, the puzzles are fine as they way they are.

[QUOTE="kraidiation"][QUOTE="Ninten007"][QUOTE="Ptolemaueus"][QUOTE="Ninten007"][QUOTE="Ptolemaueus"]

The focus of the Zelda series isn't combat.

Vampyronight

Oh yes, then why do they give you a sword, arrows, sheilds, etc. Those are weapons and weapons are used for combat. Well the puzzles in TP were beyond easy and not thought provoking and atmospheric as OOT, if you think thats the focus. TP has to be the worst in the series because Nintendo decided to get too casual with this hardcore franchise.

The focus of the Zelda series is puzzles. If you haven't realized this, you probably haven't played a Zelda game.

Did you notice I put the word puzzles in my sentence above and said they were easy? But IMO it is time for the Zelda series to get a revamped combat engine, the puzzles are fine as they way they are.