lol you PS3 owners excited over 60 players online...

How cute lol like acting as if it's something amazing when the PC done it many many years ago and has since gone upto 150 players on a single normal server :)

How cute lol like acting as if it's something amazing when the PC done it many many years ago and has since gone upto 150 players on a single normal server :)

Grantelicious

PC gamers get excited when the player numbers are bumped up for their platform, so whats wrong with PS3 gamers being excited when player numbers are bumped up for their platform?

On a side note more isnt always better.

It's just a bullet point for the back of the box. Games with huge numbers of players usually aren't very fun. FPS is best with 16 or less.Coldplay07

Not really it just depends on if that game was built to have that high amount of players. Planetside had hundreds of people fighting at once in the same area and was a great game, but on the otherside if you had Gears with 16vs16 or higher you would have a pretty horrible and unorganized game. It just depends on the games mechanics and whether they catered to having that high of a player count.

It's just a bullet point for the back of the box. Games with huge numbers of players usually aren't very fun. FPS is best with 16 or less.Coldplay07

I'l take Battlefields over Halo , Console TF2 , CoD4 anyday.

whats the most the 360 can do? maybe 32 to 64?Jack-o-Thompson

The 360 can do as many as the developers wants. It all comes down to how good the net code is written and if they developers are willing to pay to have their own server.

[QUOTE="Jack-o-Thompson"]whats the most the 360 can do? maybe 32 to 64?justforlotr2004

The 360 can do as many as the developers wants. It all comes down to how good the net code is written and if they developers are willing to pay to have their own server.

Meaning the 360 Net Code has to be J Wizz himself.

ps3 is a console

and if 60 player game released on 360 lems will be shouting like end of console war and paying for live is good blah blah ....

[QUOTE="Jack-o-Thompson"]whats the most the 360 can do? maybe 32 to 64?justforlotr2004

The 360 can do as many as the developers wants. It all comes down to how good the net code is written and if they developers are willing to pay to have their own server.

16 I think is the ideal amount for X360. Perfect Dark had 24 but it was lagfest. Mainly because it is built on a peer-peer network.

Whatever, 90% of the games are only made for maximum 16 players anyway.. omgimba

Sorry what? other than Halo ... nothing ....

whats the most the 360 can do? maybe 32 to 64?Jack-o-Thompson

Huxley got announced about the end of 2006 and i think will be out this year.

Huxley for the 360 will have up to 200 players battles online.

ps3 is a console

and if 60 player game released on 360 lems will be shouting like end of console war and paying for live is good blah blah ....

dulgn_ps

exactly the 360 cant do this so lems are gonna hate

[QUOTE="Jack-o-Thompson"]whats the most the 360 can do? maybe 32 to 64?campbell1874

Huxley got announced about the end of 2006 and i think will be out this year.

Huxley for the 360 will have up to 200 players battles online.

lol Thats idiotic.. anyways im not into more than 16 players.. the balance will be lost...

How cute lol like acting as if it's something amazing when the PC done it many many years ago and has since gone upto 150 players on a single normal server :)

Grantelicious

PS3 (hell, ALL CONSOLE) gamers are also excited that they have more to play than just FPS and RTS games.

That right...I went there.

[QUOTE="Grantelicious"]

How cute lol like acting as if it's something amazing when the PC done it many many years ago and has since gone upto 150 players on a single normal server :)

justforlotr2004

PC gamers get excited when the player numbers are bumped up for their platform, so whats wrong with PS3 gamers being excited when player numbers are bumped up for their platform?

On a side note more isnt always better.

um yes it is, given the game type that supports such numbers.

you wont see a tennis game supporting 150 slots...

Its only logical for a bf2 style game to support more and more players, hence BF3 which will support 80slots.

the game he is referring to on PC is Joint Ops which is a bf2-style game with massive maps and vehicles, and it ran perfectly well with 150 and acheived massive battles no other game could render at the time.

[QUOTE="Coldplay07"]It's just a bullet point for the back of the box. Games with huge numbers of players usually aren't very fun. FPS is best with 16 or less.Meu2k7

I'l take Battlefields over Halo , Console TF2 , CoD4 anyday.

When you play battlefield2 for the firts time , the game is insanely boring because your alone with 60 players shooting from everywhere ..

But when you have your squad of 6 players going throught the battlefield together , now that make it awsome .

That squad thing is what Resistance isnt going to do , and its why its gonna suck !

150 isn't even fun, if your the first to die then you have time to do grocery shopping before your next turnFreewayScruff

[QUOTE="Meu2k7"]

[QUOTE="Coldplay07"]It's just a bullet point for the back of the box. Games with huge numbers of players usually aren't very fun. FPS is best with 16 or less.Prid3r

I'l take Battlefields over Halo , Console TF2 , CoD4 anyday.

When you play battlefield2 for the firts time , the game is insanely boring because your alone with 60 players shooting from everywhere ..

But when you have your squad of 6 players going throught the battlefield together , now that make it awsome .

That squad thing is what Resistance isnt going to do , and its why its gonna suck !

you have a point, its fun to have 2 small teams, but this 60 player online thing is huge for consoles. Its great! they are making the maps so youmust use cover so it will not just be run and gun madness. it will be like a small war. plus now if one person does really bad it will not matter, whilst in those 6v6 games one person doing bad really makes a difference, and makes the noob look really silly.

Tell you what, I would hate to be at the bottom of a 60 player scoreboard!!!!

[QUOTE="FreewayScruff"]150 isn't even fun, if your the first to die then you have time to do grocery shopping before your next turnish_gibbor

exactly, the style of game that supports such high numbers are usually instant spawn or fixed-time spawn games. you dont have to wait for the round to end LOL! i guess he's thinking about counterstrike with 150 players

[QUOTE="ish_gibbor"][QUOTE="FreewayScruff"]150 isn't even fun, if your the first to die then you have time to do grocery shopping before your next turnWARxSnake

exactly, the style of game that supports such high numbers are usually instant spawn or fixed-time spawn games. you dont have to wait for the round to end LOL! i guess he's thinking about counterstrike with 150 players

CS w/ 150 players would suck.

For a non BF style game. 32 Max is the magic number.

For a BF style game, huge numbers are fine as long as they space it out and give plenty of mobility/tactical strategies.